Audiochat-Ab, Uninstall Media

Be the 1st to vote.

Good chat with Uninstall – let’s get the audiochat going again!

We talk about Making of a Murderer, Squatting, and Slender Man


No tags for this post.

1 thought on “Audiochat-Ab, Uninstall Media

  1. arthur king

    “Inertia is the resistance of any physical object to any change in its state of motion (this includes changes to its speed, direction or state of rest). It is the tendency of objects to keep moving in a straight line at constant velocity. The principle of inertia is one of the fundamental principles of classical physics that are used to describe the motion of objects and how they are affected by applied forces. Inertia comes from the Latin word, iners, meaning idle, sluggish. Inertia is one of the primary manifestations of mass, which is a quantitative property of physical systems. Isaac Newton defined inertia as his first law in his Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, which states:[1]

    The vis insita, or innate force of matter, is a power of resisting by which every body, as much as in it lies, endeavours to preserve its present state, whether it be of rest or of moving uniformly forward in a straight line.

    In common usage, the term “inertia” may refer to an object’s “amount of resistance to change in velocity” (which is quantified by its mass), or sometimes to its momentum, depending on the context. The term “inertia” is more properly understood as shorthand for “the principle of inertia” as described by Newton in his First Law of Motion: that an object not subject to any net external force moves at a constant velocity. Thus, an object will continue moving at its current velocity until some force causes its speed or direction to change.

    On the surface of the Earth, inertia is often masked by the effects of friction and air resistance, both of which tend to decrease the speed of moving objects (commonly to the point of rest), and gravity. This misled the philosopher Aristotle, to believe that objects would move only as long as force was applied to them:[2][3]

    …it [body] stops when the force which is pushing the travelling object has no longer power to push it along…”

    Newton’s concept of Orbital Mechanics is flawed. Gravity is an accelerated phenomena and inertia is supposed to be set at a constant velocity. By Newton’s own reasoning, the imagined cannonball must eventually strike the Earth. Gravity’s pull continues to increase but the inertia is set at a constant velocity so it cannot “keep up” with gravity.

    The Foucault Pendulum and Coriolis Effects are problematic as by Newton’s reasoning, we should expect these experiments to result in no detection of rotation. In other words, inertia means these experiments prove nothing at all, they should result in no motion detected and any motion that is supposedly detected has to be caused by some other factor or factors. The pendulum still posses inertia and this is something the mainstream conveniently ignores. The other issue with the Foucault Pendulum experiment is that the supposition is the pendulum is imagined above the North Pole and the Earth is imagined to rotate beneath it. If we ignore inertia, we still have a problem as the experiments are usually not conducted at either pole.At any other point on an imagined rotating sphere we can expect no such rotation beneath the freely suspended pendulum. The pendulum would be dragged along with the rotating Earth.

    The mainstream conception of gravity and orbital mechanics relies on the notion that the center of mass of a falling body is somewhere near the center of the Earth’s mass. Gravity acts like a string and the imagined “inertia” is the what causes the globe to spin and all bodies to spin with it “as one”, in this model. If it were not for gravity, all bodies would fly off in what would otherwise be a straight line.

    FYI: Video Games and CGI technology originate with the Military Industrial Complex.…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.