Shots In The Dark

Be the 1st to vote.

Media culture change agent (actor) Robert Deniro has been in the news leading the charge to investigate what’s in the vaccines.  The vaccines that are so good for us that we are being bribed,  threatened or at least shunned if we don’t make our children take them.

His unreleased movie, like this one, could easily be controlled opposition.

This movie implies that vaccines are good and have improved our health, coinciding with the period of time that hygiene, nutrition, sanitation, and pesticide awareness became common.

Did vaccines have any role at all in our improved health? Is there any proof? Is there a movie that questions this? Is there a movie that questions whether the science of virology is based on identifiable viri or are they all artist’s impressions?

You don’t have to worry about the answers if you get everybody asking the wrong questions.

No tags for this post.
0 0 votes
Article Rating

This is a demo advert, you can use simple text, HTML image or any Ad Service JavaScript code. If you're inserting HTML or JS code make sure editor is switched to 'Text' mode.

Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Barbara Mueler(@barbm124)
5 years ago

I stick to what Stefan Lanka so clearly wrote about all those things. Virus is a myth based on fraud and wrong assumptions with roots in ideas from the middle age. Virus means poison. Back then people believed, sickness is caused by poison and can be healed by anti-poison also you can prepare yourself against sickness by taking small amounts of respective poison. People like Rudolf Virchow made this ideas popular again in the 19-th century and it started an entire new branch of pseudo-science: molecular biology. It’s a trillion dollar business now and that’s why it is so heavily… Read more »