What’s up with the 2983 (1111) 9/11 vicsims Youtruthers?

Be the 1st to vote.

9-11-9 the Vicsim Report

Yes, Simon, why are so many Youtruthers ready to accept with vicsims for all these relatively minor hoaxes, but still bow down to the crux of the 0;Great American hoax”? The logic is indefensible, especially since not one of them even mentions the penultimate work of – the .

It’s time to ask these people directly if their familiar with one of the most important documents of our era, and in doing so make others aware of the kryptonite they can use when facing America’s #1 enemy, the military media.

Well, all I can say is: good luck with that, dear Intothevoid. Almost fifteen years and counting – yet not ONE alleged 9/11 victim (out of the supposed 2983 casualties) has been proven to be a real person.Just saying (so as to make this clear for everyone): the Great American has become the laughing stock of this planet.These pathetic, “minor follow-up terror attacks” are all designed to make us all argue with each other – and ultimately ‘forget’ the Great 9/11 Hoax.It is quite astonishing to me that so many people are now aware of the fakeness of these shooting “events” (and have no problems accepting that NO ONE dies in these staged operations) yet STILL believe that 2983 people were killed in Manhattan on September 11, 2001. What’s up with that?

Source: View topic – Pulse Gay Bar Orlando shooting, 12 June 2016 • Cluesforum.info

No tags for this post.

10 thoughts on “What’s up with the 2983 (1111) 9/11 vicsims Youtruthers?

  1. antipodean

    Robert Eaton’s Dad being interviewed after the annual memorial soccer match in memory of Robert.
    (forward to 5minutes & 20 seconds)

  2. xileffilex

    “not ONE alleged 9/11 victim (out of the supposed 2983 casualties) has been proven to be a real person”

    There’s ample evidence that Robert Eaton existed, just to pick a name out of the hat. Where’s the proof that he’s a fake entity?

    1. Tom Dalpra

      Obviously there were some ‘real’ people whose deaths were faked on 9/11.

      Funny, Simon makes a good point earlier –

      It is quite astonishing to me that so many people are now aware of the fakeness of these shooting “events” (and have no problems accepting that NO ONE dies in these staged operations) yet STILL believe that 2983 people were killed in Manhattan on September 11, 2001. What’s up with that?”

      And then follows it with –

      “not ONE alleged 9/11 victim (out of the supposed 2983 casualties) has been proven to be a real person”

      It seems clear that there were some real people whose deaths were faked among the victim total on 9/11. Simon and Cluesforum awakened me to the idea of the bulk of the victims being ‘made up’ but I never bought that idea with the notion they ALL were. haha!

      Seems like sloppy wording from Simon.

      1. xileffilex

        I haven’t had time to listen to all the JLB audio with Rollo – he makes a good point that real deaths would cause real upset to relatives, but listen just afterwards at 4.38
        www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9Nls2…
        I don’t think [the Vicsim Report] “goes through all the simulated victims] , Rollo.
        Certainly there’s no mention of Mr Eaton, and he’s just one who has been investigated in some depth.
        He’s #3343 in the Vicsim list
        OK so, the linked photo is a candle
        edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/…
        and the memorial image, probably cropped out of a group photo, has a silly woolly hat
        mi-cache.legacy.com/legacy/ima…
        Is that the proof he didn’t exist?

      2. Hoi Polloi

        I agree, it’s sloppy wording.

        But not totally inaccurate. It would be a very small hat we’re drawing from, containing luminaries that people have already forgotten like “David Angell” and a hockey player (well, okay, hockey fans should probably dig into that one).

        Simon should have posted something that read something like: not one person is proven to have died and not one supposed death with evidence for their pre-9/11 existence is shown to have been a thoroughly honest individual that wasn’t capable of disappearing for cash/prestige or otherwise.

        It should also be very clearly noted that ALL the images are photoshopped to resemble one another and create The Vicsim wall. That means the photos and videos of real people like the “Barbara Olson” person (I say this in case it is not her real name) are processed by the same people that processed the fakes. This same “touch” was used on all pics to deliberately blur the lines, as mono- and di-glycerides are added to shitty ice cream in order to force incompatible ingredients to bond together in the food (and subsequently in your body).

        “Fake” and “real” become a polluted mixture that makes the whole thing toxic. I would say this particular psy-op, the 9/11 scam, may have only had anything from a half dozen to several dozen pseudo-real versions of real people, “scanned into” the sim and their profiles borrowed to create vicsims. Some of the vicsims are based on people who didn’t disappear, but who are disguised or remixed enough in the sim that people don’t notice, like Ron Paul, Alex Jones, Donald Rumsfeld and George W. Bush.

        Simon should have made it more clear that profiles of real people were turned into a whole media-supported celebrity style “death story”, but in truth we ALL need to make this more clear. It’s just a lot for people to process, like the concept the media is wholly owned and controlled by some kind of military force. Takes time to understand if you are coming at it fresh.

      3. simon shack

        Dear Tom & Felix,

        So I stand accused of sloppiness. Alright guys, I apologize for my sloppy wording. Now, to (hopefully) make up for this terrible mistake, here’s what I wish to have written :

        – “not ONE alleged 9/11 victim (out of the supposed 2983 casualties) has been proven to be a real 9/11 casualty” [instead of “person“].

        Would anyone here have any objection as to the correctness of the above statement?

        1. ab Post author

          We can find fault with anybody, especially those with great bodies of work. Is your intent evil? Of course not. This is what should be highlighted and I try to do that here.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.