9/11 1976 TWA 355 Hoax

like this

@Notsofreemason investigates an old hoax.

 

Can you believe this narrative of a 9/11, 1976  hijacking with it’s fake bombs, absurd love stories, CIA connections, and unbelievable 0;coincidences”? 25 years before the far more infamous hijacking??? I don’t think that I can.  MAINSTREAM NARRATIVETWA Flight 355 was a domestic Trans World Airlines flight which was hijacked on September 10-12, in 1976 by five 0;Fighters for Free Croatia”, a group seeking Croatian independence from Yugoslavia.The Boeing 727, TWA 355 took off from New York’s LaGuardia Airport and was headed to O’Hare International Airportin Chicago. The hijackers were Slobodan Vlaši?, Zvonko Buši?, his wife Julienne Buši?,[2] Petar Matani?, and Frane Pešut. The hijackers claimed to have a bomb as they seized control of the plane in the 95th minute of its flight; the alleged bomb on board was actually a pressure cooker.

Source: The Four Horses Asses of the Apocalypse: 9/11 1976 TWA 355 Hijacking, Fake Bombs, and Terrorist Love Triangle

No tags for this post.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ricky
ricky(@ricky)
4 years ago

Good post Ab. Have a fun Christmas and thanks for the gift of the “skeleton key” that’s unlocked the medias’ “ice wall” of misinformation, confusion and outright lies going back probably since “history” has been recorded.

gaia
gaia(@gaia)
4 years ago
Reply to  Fakeologist

I’ll skin the Turkey when he’s trying to invade…

But you’re right, personal names should not be used.

xileffilex
xileffilex(@xileffilex)
4 years ago

“Hallo. What seems to the problem?” “Doctor, I think i’m suffering from Conspiracy Fatigue” “In what way?” “Mobility problems, I’m finding it very difficult to move on from bus crashes, suicide bombings and collapsing and burning buildings, Doctor” “Are you suffering from pain at the base of your conspiracy pyramid?” “Yes Doctor” “And you can’t seem to be able to move higher up the hoax pyramid?” Yes, Doctor” “Hmmm, I don’t think a course of satellites will do the trick. Or giving yourself some space. Have you tried bigger hoaxes, dinosaurs, history itself?” “No Doctor” “Well, we have cleared up… Read more »

gaia
gaia(@gaia)
4 years ago
Reply to  xileffilex

Great man. Had a good laugh.

Unreal
Unreal(@unreal)
4 years ago

Researching older minor hoaxes can of course be valuable and help some hesitant truthers better understand how reality has been manufactured since a long way back. – However, there is a danger in looking back too much. The same entities that planned and carried out yesterdays frauds are still active today and they clearly hope for inquisitive minds to engage in endless debate on matters that don’t really help us research further and understand what is to come. A convenient place to lay inquisitive minds to rest in a million details that no longer matter. The ‘Real Deal’ proposition. –… Read more »

gaia
gaia(@gaia)
4 years ago
Reply to  Unreal

But Unreal, how can it be “harmful” or “biased” just by looking into “new” old interesting staged events and not into the same things everybody talks about (Sandy Hoax, Boston, 9/11 and the likes)? Isn’t it just more advantageous to look into other hoaxes, especially with the idea of being able to “predict” the future ones (like we could ever do that?).

Analyzing the various modus operandi I think is very useful to learn the tricks up the sleeves of the magician card players.

To paraphrase James Hutton: “The past is the key to the present”

Unreal
Unreal(@unreal)
4 years ago
Reply to  Unreal

The manner in which spending too much time past minor hoaxes is damaging is in providing a false sensation of knowledge and allocating time disproportionally on topics and memes that in their own right no longer are part of what is presently perpetuated and foremost now is planned for the future. – As reference points older hoaxes are indeed useful when we can relate them to more recent events – but on their own we already know they are preprogrammed time traps as many major hoaxes of the past prove like JFK and 9/11 that goes on forever with new… Read more »

Unreal
Unreal(@unreal)
4 years ago
Reply to  Fakeologist

Thanks – appreciated.

Just for information, the term “Sir” actually can be quite deceptive as it phonetically corresponds to the french word “Soeur” which means ‘sister’. An EGI pun in my opinion and deceptively used i’d suppose by those in the know.

As such nomenclature seems to have originated from religion* – i’m pretty doubtful this double entendre is by any means happenstance.

*article – Sisters are mostly Brothers

Unreal
Unreal(@unreal)
4 years ago
Reply to  Unreal

I don’t want you to protest. I don’t want you to riot … All I know is that first you’ve got to get mad. You’ve got to say: ‘I’m a human being, god-dammit! My life has value!’

No worries – i’m not that mad !

xileffilex
xileffilex(@xileffilex)
4 years ago
Reply to  Unreal

So let me summarise – we have no idea how in-your-face daily hoaxes, usually involved death, disease or injury for maximum media impact, are organised, who is doing them, how they are co-ordinated, how people stay silent, how fake deaths are planned, how the vicsims are recruited, or where the vicsims go to. Yet we must “move on” to future hoaxes, the substance of which is unclear or unknown [not sure how we go about that] despite 99.99 per cent of the population still swallowing all the fake blood, fake grief, silly stories and staged photos of the in-your face… Read more »

Unreal
Unreal(@unreal)
4 years ago
Reply to  Unreal

My point was more @xileffilex that we are encouraged to move back to the past to dwell on conspiracy candy & known memes and thus not see the deception that is on the way – like the transgender agenda that many comment on but few to none actually study. – Too many alternative researchers are stuck in what i’d call arrested development (or Conspiracy Fatigue) where they have found their confort-zone and work hard to stay within – refusing to even do basic research on any topic that challenge their conspiracy-confort-zone. – I’m not sure how you see the 99%… Read more »

notsofreemason
notsofreemason(@notsofreemason)
4 years ago
Reply to  Unreal

Unreal:”Too much detail can actually blur vision” You are a funny guy, unreal! I’ll try pure speculation next time, I know that’s how you like it.

Unreal:”I’m not sure how you see the 99% of the population will take interest in the CIA in the 1960s, the Punk Rock conspiracy or a 1976 plane hijacking, but i’m not convinced it has the potential to spark their interest in any new way.”

Your only half-decent example of this advanced process of egi is a Bond “girl” from the 70’s. Real current there!

notsofreemason
notsofreemason(@notsofreemason)
4 years ago
Reply to  Unreal

Unreal, you said, “The very inaptitude of most alternative truthers to even engage in new topics is in itself alarming and a clear sign of how efficient the “conspiracy fatigue” gatekeeper technique of brassing ever evernew evidence on older insignificant hoaxes actually prove to be.” I’m sorry Andreas, we can’t all be on the cutting edge like yourself. I need to coin a term with a snappy acronym to describe some irrelevant delusion in order to be a non-“conspiracy fatigue gatekeeper”, such as yourself. Am I mistaken, are TWA-355 and the Grand Central Station 9/11 Bomb not “new topics”? I’ve… Read more »

Unreal
Unreal(@unreal)
4 years ago
Reply to  notsofreemason

Just to be clear with @notsofreemason – we have never been on first name basis and i actually do not know you as a researcher that well except for the fact you to my knowledge have chosen to go by two pseudonyms both incorporating the word “mason” (Masonic Youth & notsofreemason). – As you full well know, nomenclature can be misleading and while i’m not opposed to anyone using my real name – i have chosen to appear under my pen-name Unreal while i engage in controversial topics, and those who insist on using my first name to imply unwarranted… Read more »

notsofreemason
notsofreemason(@notsofreemason)
4 years ago
Reply to  Unreal

@Unreal, I explained to you months ago, when you were making negative statements towards the validity of my work that, “I don’t like to argue in text”, mainly because it is likely a futile exchange, and also because I don’t appreciate your point of view nor do I respect what you call research. I tried to avoid interacting with you, and was successful until later in the day when I read your comment that stopped discussing the current TWA topic and brought up “punk rock”. It was at this point that it was clear to me that you were taking… Read more »

gaia
gaia(@gaia)
4 years ago
Reply to  Unreal

You miss the fact that people are all individuals and all have different interests. You went down the rabbit trail into an empty hole; EGI, that is your passion, some may even call it an obsession. Other people have other interests. Where do you think you pulled the “right” from to define for other people “what is important”…? Right, you cannot. I see this whole EGI stuff as a stupid trail based on photos and videos released just by those people we have exposed as faking photos and videos… Don’t you recognize the irony in that? If you don’t, I… Read more »

Unreal
Unreal(@unreal)
4 years ago
Reply to  gaia

My argument @gaia is not about EGI here – yet many seem all to eager to pigenhole me as a sort of one trick pony. Fortunately, i’ve participated on Fakeologist long enough to justify my wide interest in Fakeology – for starters your Fakeopedia is not a “new” subject, nor is the PsyOps List that existed as a spreadsheet before. – The endless hamster-wheel of conspiracy is not happenstance and neither is the constant focus on minute detail on past events that i qualify as an indirect means to gatekeep curious minds. – When you qualify secretly transgendered Elite individuals… Read more »

xileffilex
xileffilex(@xileffilex)
4 years ago

Good work. I call total Bulšit on that Croatian 355 escapade. Interesting that there was an alleged mid air collision between a BA flight with allegedly just 54 passengers on board and an obscure Cologne bound Croatian flight, with 108 more easily assimilated passengers the same day. What are the chances? That’s another obvious candidate for a faked disaster mid 1970s style. I can’t find any complete list of vicsims from the BA flight. [the old “late for work” ruse contributed to the “crash near Vrobec] No. 7 in a list of best Yuglslav air “crashes” in this list www.telegram.hr/zivot/istrazil…… Read more »