Brian Staveley’s second amazing 911 show

like this

Brian is reposting all his old shows and I’ll admit I’ve missed most of them. This second 911 show that he did is absolutely outstanding and is as clear an audio on the subject as I’ve ever heard. Listen to all of it and enjoy.

I wonder if I heard this show before I started broadcasting if I would have bothered to broadcast myself. Brian pretty much has the whole thing figured out.

No tags for this post.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

wp-puzzle.com logo

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

20 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dante
dante
3 years ago

i really enjoy this style of broadcasting where it’s just one individual, not distracted or interrupted by one or more parties, doing a deep dive into various aspects of one topic, especially one where its clear there is strong command over the subject matter. no hyperbole or excessive rhetoric. just calm and collective narration, point by sub-point, occasionally mixing in multimedia collateral. excellent! *circa 2010, I spent some time with the We are Change crew. Even had a few interactions with Manny Badillo. if he is / was a lifelong paid actor by the people who put on the show… Read more »

dante
dante
3 years ago
Reply to  dante

*in my personal life. (not mystery)

John le Bon
3 years ago

Thanks for posting this, Ab. This was a terrific show. Miles ahead of its time. Better than 99.x% of what is being churned out by ‘alt’ and ‘independent’ media today. How many years ago did Brian produce this piece? Just goes to show that the so-called ‘truth movement’ is and always has been a joke. It is not simply a matter of ‘show them and they’ll see’. It is a matter of the blind leading the blind. The permablind. In five years, where will most ‘awake’ people be? Where they are now. Still talking about thermite and space beams and… Read more »

ricky
ricky
3 years ago

I’ve been plowing through a lot of Brians’ old vids as well as Dave J’s old stuff. Their discoveries way back when are still a no-sell to this day for most people/dumb-shits to this day. My sister in law last week told me she was sorry for me when I told her we didn’t go to the moon! LOL!! Glad you’re saving this stuff Ab, it’s only a matter of time until he’s booted again, also “Fakeologist” will probably get canceled from Itunes, seems inevitable. Whats with all the thumbs down for “tokarski?” An innocuous statement followed by a question.… Read more »

xileffilex
xileffilex
3 years ago
Reply to  ricky

Whats with all the thumbs down for “tokarski?” An innocuous statement followed by a question</blockquote
A lot of traffic from the extreme Mathisian tendency which still keeps an eye on us, methinks.

xileffilex
xileffilex
3 years ago

Early on, Brian mentions the ABS, American Bureau of Shipping [one of whose alleged employees on the 91st floor was UK born George Sleigh, a perennial on the 9/11 lecture circuit. If all the building were hollow, certainly on the upper floors, the hoax goes back to 1991 at least when the ABS allegedly rented and put 140 employees onto the 106th floor of the South Tower [WTC2] with 140 employees – books.google.co.uk/books?id=hM… ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagl… [this 1999 reference still cites the 106th floor of WTC2, which may well just be a serviced mail box for the purposes of the fraud] stevenwarranresearch.blogspot….… Read more »

misom
misom
3 years ago
Reply to  xileffilex

I think that we should start treating the information about the whole involved parties in the WTC demolition the same way as we treat all other information about the 9/11 psyop: as part of the design. Even the information out of the official registry of 1991 can be faked. The company may not exist as such. But: The official narrative is in its own contradictory by design and we can, i think, reconstruct these contradictions and deviances and show that they do not comply to the main plot. We know for sure that the whole WTC complex was a highly… Read more »

xileffilex
xileffilex
3 years ago
Reply to  misom

Indeed, the ABS has the 106th floor address listed on their 1999 website but it’s only one alleged office in one of three large divisions, ABS Marine Services, around the world. So it may just be a mailbox. [the divisions were Integrated Services and Quality Evaluations] web.archive.org/web/1999021918… They also had a London office, allegedly. I can’t find any mention in archived websites for the WTC1 91st floor “office” in which George Sleigh was allegedly beavering away in. Now, This guy, Mark Gilbert from Portland says he was on the 105th [not 106th] floor of the WTC working for ABS from… Read more »

misom
misom
3 years ago
Reply to  xileffilex

Agree that it makes sense to use the controlled environment of the WTC for various frauds e.g. firm mailboxes, but in this case the firms involved would not be part of the psyop design. If that is correct, it makes it appear rather improbable that ABS had in fact something real to do as an enterprise with the WTC complex (including a real mailbox which still is a real postal adress). Wikpedia lists ABS as a tenant of the 91st floor of WTC1 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_… Have to look into Mark Gilbert yet but the period 1996-1999 is definitely part of the… Read more »

tokarski
tokarski
3 years ago
Reply to  misom

My ex-brother-in-law works or worked for Morgan Stanley at that time, so naturally I called my ex to check on his well-being. She told me he was late for work that day and was alive and well. I’ll gladly pass along his name to anyone doing research, as I suspect he reported to a different address.

misom
misom
3 years ago
Reply to  tokarski

You did not research the info about your ex-brother-in-law yourself ? Why?

tokarski
tokarski
3 years ago
Reply to  misom

It was 2001. I bought in, believed the pageant. And, he is my “ex” b-i-l. We do not speak. I have not seen him since the early 1980s.

You’ve never been through a divorce? Get real. Of course you have. You are, after all, annoying.

misom
misom
3 years ago
Reply to  tokarski

Sorry Mark, didn’t mean to hurt your feelings 🙂 This is not about marriage, only about memory. I’ll gladly pass along his name to anyone doing research, as I suspect he reported to a different address. You are offering to any interested researcher the name of your ex-brother-in-law who worked for Morgan Stanley “at the time” although you are yourself a researcher and could at least remember in which branch of www.morganstanley.com/about-us… he worked… ?! Even if you bought into the story at the time, now you dont. So why do you reproduce an “information” which you can not verify… Read more »

xileffilex
xileffilex
3 years ago
Reply to  misom

Check oiut this trio who say they worked for ABS in the late 90s in the WTC
www.linkedin.com/in/kerry-higg…

www.linkedin.com/in/karen-bour…

www.linkedin.com/in/joseph-vui…

How many people write the floor number they worked on in their linkedin pages? It’s as if they are trying to reinforce the story. Either there were fitted out floors there, or there weren’t.

tokarski
tokarski
3 years ago

Thanks for this, AB – if only I had known about this when I stumbled on Judy Wood, I could have avoided that embarrassing chapter of my life. There’s a lot of stuff in this presentation that is new to me. I have long since quit reading and thinking about 911, but this re-triggered my interest. By the way, if we are going to do an interview, do I need to buy a new microphone? I use a Logitech thing that I paid maybe $30 for. It seems to work for everything but did not work on Disqus when I… Read more »

Vespadouglas
Vespadouglas
3 years ago
Reply to  tokarski

i smell shite

tokarski
tokarski
3 years ago
Reply to  Fakeologist

Again, bad timing, as we are on a short trip. Let me call you when we return and arrange a date and time. We are guaranteed at least 8 listeners, as I see by the dislikes above! By the way, you surely notice, that the company that had perhaps a third of the victims on 911, according to Snaveley, occupied floors 92 through 101, two elevens. It never fails! (We are working on Jonestown, 909 victims, 33 survivors.) OK dislikers, have at me! I like what Jerry Seinfeld said about people who review is act, “I have left town and… Read more »

tokarski
tokarski
3 years ago
Reply to  tokarski

Staveley

TRUTHTHE
TRUTHTHE
8 months ago
Reply to  tokarski

BRIAN S Stavaley is an idiot. Was debunked for lack of research back in 2008 and then again in 2010. He is a flat earther ( yes he’s an idiot) and has made up many BS story telling made up cartoon level information such as Mandela effect (not his work) and has conned his way from pressuring people to support him with money and crypto since he doesn’t want to work a job. He has no college, no higher levels of knowledge. Currently he is an anti masker and covid19 denial. Go figure. The time didn’t age well for Brian… Read more »