Found in a basement phony story

Be the 1st to vote.

Like the unpublished and “newly discovered” (read: just created) music of “dead” musicians, we have this latest round of fotoslop 9/11 “ground zero” “latest” (read: just created) imagery.

Incredible never-before-seen images of the Ground Zero clean-up operation discovered in a worker’s photo archive nearly two decades after 9/11 provide a haunting glimpse of the immediate aftermath of the terror attack that killed 3,000 people

Source: Incredible never-before-seen images of the Ground Zero clean-up operation | Daily Mail Online

Just in case you thought you’d get to know the sim source:

Discovered on a series of damaged CD’s, the some 2,400 images were captured on a Canon Powershot G1 by a currently unidentified member of the World Trade Center clean-up crew who has since died from complications related to his work on the site.

None of the fake photos that I found are worth reposting .

No tags for this post.

12 thoughts on “Found in a basement phony story

  1. tokarski

    This is just booster shot propaganda … there are offices full of people whose job it is to make sure the hoaxes are reinforced on a regular basis. (They just did a masterful workup of Columbine.) But what I saw was men calmly going about their jobs, operating the machinery, no emotions, just a job to do. There are no fire engines, no firemen around, no bodies to be found. And of course the office scenes where they have equipment like ovens and coffee pots are staged. But don’t kid yourself … sloppy as it is, it works. People beleive in the hoaxes. They get angry if you take their massacres away!

    1. napoleon wilsonnapoleon wilson

      it would be obvious if there were tiny coffins and funerals for the tiny people in the models, sloppy is for the shills to wax lyrical about,

      watch the collapsing models without laughing at how they fooled the gullible apes.
      glad im mancunian, id hate to be a yank and have to explain this shit to dumbasses.

      mancunians are just slightly better.

  2. xileffilex

    “nearly positive…”
    Weeeeell, if there were no demolition cleanup, , that would imply the twin towers never existed in the first place.

    These photos have been available for some time – not sure why the UK press has just discovered them. The whole cache with exif data is available on Flickr.
    www.flickr.com/photos/textfile…

    I’m not sure what’s fake about them, though the story of their “discovery” is fishy.
    This one surfaced a long time ago, I haven’t checked to see if it’s in the “newly discovered” cache [no body parts to be seen]
    www.flickr.com/photos/viewmake…
    Viewmaker Follow
    Raising A Truck: Early Stages of Clean Up at Ground Zero
    This picture was taken by a friend at Ground Zero the day after. A comment on another photo prompted me to post several more of these 9/11 images here, not as art, but as something not to be forgotten.

    PS if you scroll to the right , you’ll find a few more
    www.flickr.com/photos/viewmake…
    www.flickr.com/photos/viewmake…

    www.flickr.com/photos/viewmake…

    www.flickr.com/photos/viewmake…
    all uploaded in 2006

      1. xileffilex

        What’s the point of faking cleanup photos ** [I don't buy that] which show nothing, other than diggers and rubble from empty buildings when you could invite a controlled photographer in October 2001 – yes a month later – to select images which show nothing other than rubble from emptied buildings and diggers?
        ** This sounds suspiciously like CF-groupthink.

        1. ab Post author

          I’m sure some are real and some are Photoslop. Don’t ask what’s the point. It’s called maximum effect. Most of my best family photos are staged., especially the action shots.

          1. xileffilex

            Sure, pretty well every photo in the MSM is staged, just as are my own family pictures. But they’re not photoshopped or CGI. I think this >CF thread is as misleading and misdirecting, as the “Vicsim report”.
            This gem from Hoi Polloi, sums up the nonsense
            Personally, not a single image connected to 9/11 has been convincing to me as representative of reality. Care to propose one that is?
            and this …

            The fake photos are as invented as the broadcast imagery to control the dialogue and the visual narrative. More opportunities for subliminal messages, more opportunities to make the photos and videos seem to come from less controlled and managed sources by the simple act of crediting more people, crediting sims and pseudonyms and people in your employ/control, and more opportunities to continue their simulation with people dressed up as fire fighters and hometown Amerukins, or digitally inserted, posing with print-outs of their never-existing “loved ones” etc. etc. ad nauseum.

            Perhaps this fake rubble imagery nonsense is put out to obfuscate add weight to the “Vicsim report”?

            Well, there are 2400 images now to analyse and keep the above CF thread running until the next appearance of Halley’s comet.

  3. watermanchris

    None of the fake photos that I found are worth reposting

    Read more: http://fakeologist.com/blog/2019/06/28/found-in-a-basement-phony-story/#ixzz5s8mvn2bL

    What about the fake, cheesy “kitchen” that was left “intact” or the one showing ridiculously large pieces of cardboard with handwritten labels for the contents of shelves. Both of those seemed extremely phony to me.

    That being said, I’m nearly positive that there was a demolition in downtown New York York 9/11/2001 so there was some kind of cleanup. I do recall not being allowed near the site when I visited New York in November 2001 because it was cordoned off by the NYPD.

Leave a Reply