Coronavirus is a worldwide Event 201 HRDPAR

Be the 1st to vote.

If so, then what of all these 0;cases” and “confirmed tests”?

This is all propaganda. It’s a global(ist) test to see the worldwide reaction and enact REAL laws and regulations to control the population.

Here’s what (hopefully) is a real person’s account just BEGGING for a test that likely doesn’t exist. Since I think viri are fake – another massive deception – then there would be no test that can 0;see” this thing.

I live in Seattle, I have all symptoms of COVID-19 and have a history of chronic bronchitis. Since I work in a physical therapy clinic with many 65+ patients and those with chronic illnesses, I decided to be responsible and go to get tested. This is how that went.


Reply to @into_the_brush
into_the_brush's avatar

I called the Corona hotline, was on hold for 40 minutes and gave up. So I looked at the CDC and Washington public health websites. They told me to see a primary care doctor, but there’s no information about testing.

into_the_brush's avatar

I called 2 primary care doctors. One told me they don’t know where to get testing, and that I should not to seek out testing. The other one told me to go to an urgent care or ER. I called the Urgent Care, they also had no idea where tests are, but told me to call the hospital.

into_the_brush's avatar

I called the hospital. They do not have tests, but transferred me to the COVID-19 hotline to 0;answer my questions”. Since I was transferred on a medical provider line, I actually got through. Progress!

into_the_brush's avatar

The lady with the hotline was very kind and professional and understood my concern about my own health and those at my clinic. (Which is currently being sanitized). However, I was told I do not qualify for testing. And I was not given a timeline or info on current resources.


into_the_brush's avatar

So. Who does qualify? Those who have been out of the country in the last 14 days, and those who have had contact with one of the few people who have been tested and come up positive. That’s it.

into_the_brush's avatar

The only way I can get treated is if my symptoms get so bad I develop pneumonia or bronchitis, which is very likely in my case. Then I’ll be in the ER and quarantined for several days while waiting for a test and for the results to come back.

into_the_brush's avatar

This is all incredibly frustrating because I am trying to do everything right in a system that punishes moments of 0;weakness” like taking days off. It’s also scary to know that I won’t be able to get help until I need life support.

into_the_brush's avatar

To sum up: this is not contained. No one knows what the fuck is happening. I can’t work. WASH YOUR FUCKING HANDS.

into_the_brush's avatar

Ah fuck! Didn’t realize there was a hashtag just for lil ol’ me! Check out above thread ?? #CoronaVirusSeattle


into_the_brush's avatar

Since this is getting attention. COVID-19 HOTLINE: 1-800-525-0127 DON’T CALL unless you are experiencing all symptoms or have been exposed to a case. Leave the lines open to people who need it most. Any other questions can be answered on the CDC, WHO, or WA public health sites.

20 thoughts on “Coronavirus is a worldwide Event 201 HRDPAR

  1. xileffilex

    March 3 – great prescience.
    August 5 2020 – and still little evidence of anyone isolating any “virus”.
    Are you infectious if you have a positive PCR test result for COVID-19?

    we noticed how few studies had attempted or reported culturing live SARS-CoV-2 virus from human samples…..This surprised us, as viral culture is regarded as a gold standard or reference test against which any diagnostic index test for viruses must be measured and calibrated, to understand the predictive properties of that test……We identified fourteen studies that succeeded in culturing or observing tissue invasion by SARS-CoV from various samples from patients diagnosed with Covid-19. The quality of these studies was moderate with a lack of protocols, standardised methods and reporting.

    Data are sparse on how the PCR results relate to viral culture results. There is some evidence of a relationship between the time from collection of a specimen to test, symptom severity and the chances that someone is infectious……

    just fancy that – all those millions of people testing positive, all those hundreds of thousands of people dropping dead “with covid” and nobody is isolating this “killer virus”, and only `14 suspicious papers to report.

    These studies provided limited data of variable quality that PCR results per se are unlikely to predict viral culture from human samples. Insufficient attention may have been paid how PCR results relate to disease. The relation with infectiousness is unclear and more data are needed on this.

    If this is not understood, PCR results may lead to restrictions for large groups of people who do not present an infection risk.

    The results indicate that viral RNA load cut-offs **** should be used: to understand who is infectious, the extent of any outbreak and for controlling transmission

    **** The cycle threshold (referred to as the Ct value) is the number of amplification cycles required for the fluorescent signal to cross a certain threshold. This allows>very small samples of RNA to be amplified and detected. </strong

    i.e. d-i-y case pandemic. Strange how no other scientists in the “brotherhood” and “sisterhood” are noticing this absence of evidence for the culturing of “the virus”.

  2. ricky

    What can we reasonably verify about the “events” of 911? There were several buildings that were there one day and gone the next, the “story” of what occurred was supplied by the govt., the media and other such official sources. All proven pathological liars. The “official” story given to us has been sanctified and is being taught in schools as reality, to live on forever as an important turning point in “history.” If this has taught us one thing, it’s to doubt everything said and “taught” to us over the course of our lifetimes and not be afraid to go against the overwhelming majority of our friends, family, experts, scholars and especially the average tv watcher and be suspicious of any story we’ve collectively “learned.” These proven liars have also “taught” us the story of the universe, the “big bang” LOL!, going to the moon, light years, uranus smells bad, the list goes on and on. They show us tv shows from the “space station” that are so lame, they’re hard to watch, they also “educate” us about satellites. What can we reasonably verify about the sky above us, there are lights in the sky that show up consistently every day and night, everything else has been provided by the same proven liars, of course it’s all been sanctified as “official history” just like the story of 911. I think most of what passes for “official narratives” have all been fabricated to manipulate human psychology. It used to make me angry, now I just accept it as the way humans are managed, go to Walmart, it probably makes sense as herd management. As an aside AB, smj suggested a youtube channel, Peter and Pete, it’s really good and funny at times. Check out “Do rockets work in space”? part two.It’s two years old and they film their experiments, they make some compelling points, somehow corresponding with common sense, go figure!

  3. smj

    I stumbled across the Italian von braun on the interwebs the other day. I had forgotten all about him. The Italians were the third nation to launch a satellite. They did so from an oil rig off of the coast of Kenya per the narrative. The Italian von Braun’s name was Luigi broglio of course. Broglio, get it?…

    …and let’s not forget that joe kennedy sold his interest in rko to Floyd odlum and his atlas corp. they made the fantastical atlas balloon rockets. Odlum would sell his interest in rko to Howard Hughes. Hughes aircraft would build the first communications satellite in clarke orbit. Sometimes I think the rko/spaceship connection is mere coincidence but then I remember that the first administrator of nasa was a movie studio executive and that jack parsons died per the narrative working on a movie prop and that werner von braun got his start with oberth working on special effects for the promotion of fritz Lang’s frau im mond of course.

    Bytheway viruses serve a very important cosmological purpose. They are lifeless codes and therefore the perfect narrative device for the transhumanism(Russian cosmism)movement. The mechanism for inheritance was reportedly discovered using viruses, isotopes, and a feckin kitchen blender of course. They are also the lifeless code that brought an explosion of life to this rock in the minds of certain psience minded folks……

  4. barbm124

    it’s a world wide show, ab. The news always go like this: 1. the masks don’t help with viruses. 2. you can buy the masks at your hardware store. 3. the masks at hardware stores are running out. What people then read is : I need to hurry to buy a mask or I may die. It’s never a complete lie and that’s why people can’t see through it. Actually it is a complete lie, if you understand that there are no pathogens. Everything in nature has a purpose. Everything is a part of nature and has a useful meaning in it. Except viruses. Their only purpose seems to be destruction. That does not make sense. Why should nature ever create such thing? And why do viruses never win?

    They invent new viruses every winter. Only in winter, never in summer. It is because only then people start to get cold, start to sneeze and cough, some even get fever. Then they tell us it’s a new virus, a Corona virus this year, it was a bird or swine flu virus in the past. The good old simple flu virus doesn’t scare anymore. Next year they’ll invent something else. People get scared, run to doctors, do stupid things, like they wear dust masks or rub in alcohol based fluids they call disinfectants. Why is alcohol supposed o kill viruses? They never isolated any virus, they never infected anybody on purpose like they tell us viruses do. They say, it is because it would by unethical to do such thing. But the don’t have such scruples giving their untested poison they call medicine to people in need in medical studies for a thousand bucks per week where some of the participants occasionally get really sick, like a friend of mine did a couple of years ago. He died later due to heart troubles caused by participating on such study.

    1. barbm124

      one more thought, in my office many colleagues went “sick” recently for a few days due to the Corona panic. It gets excused of course. People even get encouraged to stay home when they feel so. And many do. It creates a good image of the health care system where you get paid even when you don’t work just because you’re officially on a sick leave. Of course it is from the money you paid in already. Or from other peoples money.
      When they introduced the deadly smallpox vaccine in 1874, Otto von Bismarck made it an opportunity for poor people to get rid of some of their children they couldn’t feed. Many children died that way until they had to stop it 1885. The person responsible was some Emil von Behring, who after he removed some of the deadly adjuvants became famous as the children savior.

    2. barbm124

      as for the tests, they only look for what they call antibodies. They say, there are proteins they call immunoglobulins which react with specific proteins which belong to the virus. They claim if the virus was already in the body, it created this specific antibodies. Since they never ever isolated any virus, how do they know what to look for? The binding between this two kinds of proteins depends from the chemical ph value of the environment (blood) not from your health conditions. For the test they first clean the blood from all cells and bigger proteins in a centrifuge. What’s left then is some blood-water they call serum. Then they mix this serum with a secret fluid, which is more secret than coca cola and if there is an reaction they call the test positive. The laboratory always needs to know what they have to look for and which sensitivities (test-parameters) they have to use. This is why there always is first the news about a flu outbreak, then the institutes (CDC) define the sensitivities for the coming blood tests, then the laboratories use this sensitivities for tests and get the expected results. It never works 100% because some peoples serum never reacts and some peoples serum always reacts with this secret substance no matter if there are antibodies are not. The amount of the antibodies in your blood probe depends on your condition at the time not on your health condition. If you just came from the gym or recover from a hangover you may get tested positive not ever getting sick. The problem with Corona is, that they didn’t define the sensitivities yet, because it’s a test not only for the limits of stupidity in people but also for the dutifulness of all involved parties. With the spring break it will be over anyway. IMO.

        1. barbm124

          never mind ab.
          I told you how to photograph the tv-satellites. All you need is a dark place and a tripod. Take a series of long exposure pictures of the area where the geostationary orbit is supposed to be in your place, so that the stars will appear as lines on it but the sky will stay dark. Then process the pictures in Gimp using the startrail plugin, which works great. Repeat this at least one time more with slightly moved camera (two series of pictures) to see, that you’ll get the same dots the second time. What you’ll get is something like this (look at the dots):
          It looks not very spectacular but you’ll get the same dots every time. That’s the satellites.
          That plugin is great. I discovered it just recently, couldn’t use it myself yet. It’s always raining here.

          1. ab Post author

            You can’t see something the size of a car 200 or 17,000 or even 10 miles away. End of argument.

            1. barbm124

              I told you what you can see, not what you cannot see. I don’t know about the size or distance, all I know is, it can be seen. Or to be more precise, it can be photographed. I did that and many others too. You actually don’t see the satellites. The satellites reflect the very strong sunlight, which then has to pass through the undisturbed vacuum except for the last 100km or so, where the atmosphere disturbs the reflection slightly. That’s my explanation, why it can be seen. I see the lights from airplanes landing in Frankfurt Airport coming from the other side from more then 100km distance. All the light going through the thick atmosphere at 2-4 km altitude.

                1. barbm124

                  what am I seeing then and how do you know if you never used a dish yourself and never observed what I observe?
                  Just don’t get me any balloons and ufos.

                  1. ab Post author

                    Then of course there’s the problem of what’s illuminating the flying object the size of a VW when the sun is blocked by the earth’s (pen)umbras.

                    The umbra of the shadow which extends about 138,900 km.
                    The penumbra of the shadow in which the sunlight is partially excluded.

                  2. tokarski

                    Some years ago we were in Nepal hiking part of the Annapurna Circuit. We got to our lodge late and we sat and looked about, seeing stars everywhere. The next morning we saw what was real – we were surrounded by high mountains, the only available sky straight up. What we had been looking at the night before was incandescent bulbs, house lights, one per residence. Some were more than two miles away. In pitch darkness, a little light goes a long way. It is not hard for me to comprehend that satellites are visible at night if they are reflecting sunlight. An intrepid viewer can distinguish between stars and satellites by movement, just as our ancestors noted that some stars were “wanderers,” moving as everything else was still, our planets.

                    1. smj

                      Apparently some folks around here don’t believe the inverse square apples in space. Lights bulbs and so forth make their own light. Satellites reflect, off of materials that have their own refractive index, light that has traveled millions of miles(per the narrative) from the sun and that light must then travel back towards our eyes thru the atmosphere(atmospheric extinction) of course. But anywhoo, it seems I’m in commentary purgatory over at your site mark. But since it’s on topic I’ll post it here.

                      Mark Tokarski:

                      Elon Musk is a puppet on strings … not saying he doesn’t matter. He does. Whatever they have in store for us, they place him in the store window. Space X is fake, Tesla’s are unnecessary DeLoreans. But they want it to appear that a real person is at the forefront of technology, even as the technology is garbage. So watch the fake muhfuh closely. He is to technology as Al Gore is to climate change, the squirrel running in the cage.


                      Seeing as spacex is fake as feck. What are we to make of all its supposed missions resupplying the iss and putting supposed satellites into supposed orbits for the last eight years?
                      …And speaking of trannies and satellites ever heard of the creature from satellite beach?
                      …it was Gerard O’Neil’s protègè.

                      Mark Tokarski:

                      I find it easy to beleive that they can place equipment in space, placing it at a certain speed with a degrading orbit that will eventually end its life. Much of my research into climate change involved satellites in polar orbits that daily measure earth temperatures, evidence that the planet is heating at an an almost imperceptible rate that can only be measured due to the instrumentation now available. At a certain point they had to redo the math and make adjustments to past readings due to degrading orbits of the satellites. Don’t suggest to me this is all fake. There is no reason for faking it. It runs against the current Climate Change psyop.
                      Can they put humans in orbit? Probably possible but way too expensive and dangerous, as when something goes wrong, they are cooked. The incremental benefit of having humans up is small compared to the enormous cost and risk. Equipment yes, humans no. All of this space is fake stuff to me is wildly speculative and often counter the evidence.

                      Me(comment purgatory for now apparently):

                      I don’t know if space is fake. There are a lot of psilly stories about it that makes me speculate it may be. Especially when I consider that jfk was the face of the space race, and that his father started rko, and his father sold his interest in rko to a spaceship maker, and that that spaceship maker sold his interest in rko to another spaceship maker that controlled a lot of the spaceship business, and that the first administrator of nasa was a movie studio executive, and that jack parsons died working on a movie prop per the narrative, and that werner von braun got his start in the spaceship business with oberth doing movie promotions for fritz Lang’s frau im mond, and that fritz Lang would fund the German spaceship hustle, and that the third nation to launch a satellite(Italy) had its own von braun named Luigi broglio(broglio is fraud in Italian of course), and that Intelsat is 100% government controlled, and that the first private satellite company was controlled by the tranny creature from satellite beach(it had a genome business too of course), and that the spanish American war was about laying cable across the pacific. That’s just some of the nonsense that I find absurd about the spaceship narrative.

                      The folks over at the fog got pissed at me when I asked them how they could reconcile their admission that the explorer one footage was obviously fake and their admission that spacex launches are obviously faked with their continued belief in spaceships. I asked you the same. You countered well spaceships gotta be real because spaceship climate change data goes against the narrative. I have no idea where the climate change narrative is supposed to take us but I do know every decent narrative is never completely one sided. That would be boring. Plus how hot can the powers that be tell us it is down here because well we are down here and some of us still have our senses about us?

                      The official proof of agw is isotopes bytheway. But that’s another fake subject of course. Here’s an official army video about our first satellite, explorer one. It is an absurdly obvious fake of course…


                      …so I gotta ask since you concede spacex is fake and since you will concede that the explorer one footage is fake; how is it do you think they get your climate change satellites up there? I’m flummoxed. How can ‘murica’s first satellite launch be an obvious fake and her latest launches be obvious fakes yet we are supposed to believe we have satellites flying about us in the last magician’s miraculous orbits wherein a constant acceleration is defeated by a constant velocity?

                      p.s. mark, it’s more fun when you let my comments thru first and then delete them.

                    2. ab Post author

                      We will never delete SMJ’s comments here.
                      That said, SMJ I sent you a Gmail asking if you could summarize the nuke hoax into a reader’s digest page I could present to the masses? Please help as no one else has a grasp on the nuke science hoax as well as you do.

                    3. smj

                      My bad. I never check my email.

                      That’s a big subject. It’d prolly be better if I narrowed my focus to the cavendish and the manhattan project with some berkeley fecks sprinkled in here and there.

                      I’ll go thru my notes next week and see what I can come up with.

                    4. ab Post author

                      Thank you. We need to educate the youtube generation with something quick and dirty, but not radioactive.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. logo

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.