“Science says” only reproducible .5% of the time

Be the 1st to vote.

More proof that science is just science fiction today.

The reproducibility crisis in science, which is the fact that most peer-reviewed studies published in the most-reputable science journals cannot be replicated, is being significantly exacerbated by the fact that the nonreplicable studies are cited far more often than the replicable ones:

Scientistry exacerbates bad scientody voxday.blogspot.com/2021/05/sc…

No tags for this post.

1 thought on ““Science says” only reproducible .5% of the time

  1. YouCanCallMeAl

    Yes, and that’s not even the worst issue with science studies, IMO.

    The even more fundamental problem is the issue of funding. If funds go in only one direction, say funding research in favour of climate change, you will soon have reams of data in support of whatever you are proposing. One sided funding will give the illusion of having objectively addressed a problem. People do not realise they are only seeing one side of the coin.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.