3 thoughts on “Markus Allen-from drill to live hoax · Fakeotube – by Anon

  1. Gabriel

    I do not think of Pitbull or Tony Robbins as men of renown that we should trust or follow. These guys are agents of the system. They flipped on their message at the direction of those that control them. Markus uses them because they confirm these are exercises or operations that go from drill to live exercise. Just as newsman Peter Power says London 7/7 started as a drill and then turned into a live exercise.

    @Markus, if you ever want to extend that video consider adding our own Secretary of State Pompeo telling us Covid is a Live Exercise, fort-russ.com/2020/03/mike-pom…. Then President Trump says “you should have let us know”. I saw this live on the news and it was very odd to hear that and think of what the intention was.

    All of this is mind games. Its as if they were goading us by having Pompeo say that. They do not let these things out on accident. I am sure there is a big team with psychologists analyzing us for reaction and planning their next manipulation. It is unreal that we live in a world where so much effort goes into controlling people and the negative ramifications of that. I know those that read this blog are aware of all of this but it is fascinating that we are here and that all of this is happening. Absolutely nothing would surprise me.

  2. YouCanCallMeAl

    Great video – but the volume is a bi up and down..

    On Tony Robbins – I have heard that he’s a pretty senior Mason. Even if that’s incorrect, is the biggest self-help guru someone we can trust? All these other public figures (politicians, billionaires, actors, etc) are stooges of one sort or another, but Tony Robbins is for real? I think not.

    So, what does it say that Robbins is stating some (pretty self-evident) truth here, by stating that flu has disappeared in direct proportion to the increase in covid? He’s not really saying much!

    Is this about setting a new Overton window of what is acceptable discourse? If so, it could that he’s indicating its ok to talk about the provided statistics but its ok to challenge the stats, the existence of viruses, the intent of those providing those stats, etc. Perhaps that’s it..

    1. YouCanCallMeAl

      Gah typos! I meant:

      Is this about setting a new Overton window of what is acceptable discourse? If so, it could be that he’s indicating its ok to talk about the provided statistics but its NOT ok to challenge the stats, the existence of viruses, the intent of those providing those stats, etc. Perhaps that’s it..

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.