FAK363-Unreal on the Southcentric infinite plane

like this

all unreal | South is Center – North is infinite and unknown
Antarctic Treaty System – Wikipedia(6) Journey to the Center of Flat Earth – Fakeologist Forums

all unreal | South is Center – North is infinite and unknown

planar-globe-surfacearea.gif (1000×457)

Journey to the Center of Flat Earth – Fakeologist Forums

Holy Water Scandal : When Argentina drugged Brazilian players to snatch a World Cup win

Antarctic Treaty System – Wikipedia

Sias University 2008 Peter Weiss / Shawn Chen Interviews – YouTube

 

 

No tags for this post.

86 thoughts on “FAK363-Unreal on the Southcentric infinite plane

  1. Unreal

    ” Unreal wants you to believe in his deception, when you can just walk outside on a Starry night and see he is wrong with your own eyes […] Planetariums makes a mockery of Unreal’s thesis, and it is time to call this nonsense out for the obvious nonsense that it is. It is bad enough people believing in the ball nonsense, but to expect people to believe that the North Star is not in the Sky where your own eyes can clear see it is, is misinformation ” -RadicalEgg

    We have Polar stars both in the South and in the North – these stars change over time as they move slowly around the sky and Earths hypothetical rotational axis. A polar star is not True North or True South, just a visual aid to find geographical North or South.

    The current pole star in the North is Alpha Ursae Minoris (Polaris) which is very bright and very close to true North. The pole star in the South is Sigma Octantis (Polaris Australis) which is much dimmer than the North Pole star and thus for visual aid in navigation sailors use brighter stars than the South Pole star to determine True South.

    Not only do we have a Pole Star in the North (Polaris) a Pole Star in the South (Polaris Australis), these stars change over time as they both move across the sky and heavens. Without the Earth’s axis as a constant geographical point, a flat model of Earth is entirely determined by the orbit of the Sun.

    And at the center of the Sun’s orbit the Flat Earth has the equivalent of one (1) of todays two (2) Poles – the Axis Mundi (also called the Cosmic Axis, World Axis, World Pillar, World Tree, Agartha, Paradesha, Hyperborea, Avalon, Shambhala… )

    The UN and every other contrived Flat Earth movement all try to convince us the center of Earth is the North Pole and that there is but one Pole star in the Sky,,, This is just not true – South is Center…

    Southern Pole Star
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma_Oc…
    Earth’s Pole stars
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pole_sta…

    [ hereunder the Southern Pole star Sigma Octantis aka Polaris Australis ]

    Reply
    1. Unreal

      ” True North, aka the sky map, this is impossible to fake, unless you’re on some kind of drugs and start seeing weird spots in front of your eyes or other pretty fairies and pixies […] This is why for navigating True North (not magnetic) you can navigate by the stars and pole star & constellations very easily. The sky above is permanent, and does not appear to have changed ever ” -RadicalEgg

      First off, True North is NOT the “Star Map” or the brightest star closest to Earth’s Northern axis of rotation called Alpha Ursae Minoris aka Polaris. Many stars that are closer to the North Pole axis than Polaris, but none are as visible to the naked eye.

      True north is the geographic North Pole – the Earths northern rotational axis. True north can be called the geodetic north or geographic north, but True North is not the Northern Star of the moment Alpha Ursae Minoris aka Polaris. Polaris is about 0.74° from the North pole axis and rotates around it which can be seen in star-trail pictures taken with a telephoto lens.

      Modern maps include a declination diagram with three directions clearly indicated:
      • True Geographic North (TN)
      • Magnetic North (MN)
      • Grid North (GN – vertical grid line system)

      Of course when we discard the Globe model and there is no rotational axis, we no longer have two geographical Poles that represent True North and True South. In a flat layout of Earth we do not have two poles – just one geographic centre.

      When we substitute two (2) geographic Poles with one (1) geographic Center, there are many aspects of our current maps that change drastically. In a map with two poles the surface area outside and inside the Sun’s orbit of FE is the same.

      With one center inside the Sun’s orbit (Equator) the surface area on flat Earth is just half (50%) of maps based on the Globe model…

      The surface area outside the Suns orbit (Equator) on a flat model of Earth will be at least twice as big (200%) as on current Globe maps…

      [ hereunder we see the surface area of the Globe model compared to actual size of a Flat Earth layout ]

      Reply
      1. RadicalEgg

        No, just no.

        You are conflating “their” model with what is seen in the sky.

        “Their” model has True north point to some imaginary just slightly off somewhere for no other reason than they make up shit all the time. Supports their dumb precession or some such nonsense (which is wrong too, nothing of the kind occurs), the constellations move above, but precession is a nonsense.

        True north is the pole stars etc., whether you want to establish this as your reality or not matters not, but if you want to believe “their” model you are beyond helping, and are just cherry picking bits and bobs from “their” model because you are either deluded, or believe it makes you clever.

        And for the love of god, stop posting shitty Standard Model links as proof, “their” model is wrong, and trying to fit “their” model into actual reality is just going to get you mocked by real flat earthers, the Flat earth society does this all the time – do you also believe the Earth “spirals upwards” in some weird corkscrew as per the flat earth society no doubt. You appear to believe a mix of Standard model nonsense sometimes so whoever knows.

        Reply
      2. Unreal

        In order to explain some of the basic concepts discussed, it can help to understand the background and explantions from the current model – hence the links to the general information on Wikipedia.

        Rather than looking at the heavens to find the brightest star closest to geographical North or South on Earth, i prefer to determine where the real Geographical Centre of Earth is on the actual terrain. The centre of Earth is not on the Moon, it is not in the Heavens – its right here to verify for ourselves on maps and locations we are familiar with and to some extent can visit or verify.

        We both know the “Star Map” has Pole stars both South and North and that a flat layout of Earth would not have two (2) poles but one (1) geographical centre*. Your very imprecise and inverted Moon Plasma map has the Northern Hemisphere and North Pole at its centre. This is just what every fake FE movement and the UN try make us believe. If anyone uses “their model” it is you Radical Egg.

        South is Center
        allunreal.com/blog/south-is-ce…

        * in a flat layout it is the Sun’s orbit that determines what is centre and constitutes what we refer to on a Globe model as a Pole

        Reply
    2. RadicalEgg

      Prove that the pole stars move about.
      It is a myth, to support the warping about and twisting of the wandering Earth throughout their fantasy cosmos.
      Please, get with the programming, everything is made up with the ball earth is fiction, so why you cherry picky the bits you want to use as evidence is besides the point, but on this, you are (again) wrong. Nothing moves about as you claim and never had; it is a snow globe, naff all shifts about like this, and no evidence that it does.

      Reply
    3. Unreal

      Hereunder you can see the movement of Polaris (Alpha Ursae Minoris) in a star-trail picture – there are many other stars closer to the celestial North Pole (Earth’s axis & geographical “true” North) and you can see their movement inside Polaris orbit closer to the center/axis.

      Its not me that have taken the discussion of the layout of Earth onto the stars and the Moon – it is you (RadicalEgg) and your claim that Polaris disproves South as center just does not hold up. There is a Soth Pole star (Sigma Octantis) on the Southern Axis just as there is a Pole star on the Northern axis. And there is only one center to the Sun’s orbit over Flat Earth.

      Reply
      1. RadicalEgg

        The only reason Polaris moves about, every so slightly, and I cannot believe, literally, cannot believe this has to be explained.,…….
        Is because you are not standing DIRECTLY under it.

        If you want to flip the pole stars – and this is something you literally have not even considered till I got here, then you have the ENTIRE sky map flipped and in the wrong parts of where everyone sees them. You believed that you could flip the poles, probably the magnetic ones, and everything magically would work out for you. But flipping the poles – and by this fact the entire sky map also – – would bring a different set of stars & constellations into every part of the sky above, us and everybody else, which self evidently doesn’t occur.

        Sorry fella, your wrong, and nothing you can say or do or cry about is going to make flipping this shit make any sense.
        Go outside, and just marvel at the snow globe, it is what it is. I don’t even know if you realize we’re not really physically here, but then again, given your misconception in the 3D nature of the realm (sky map is FIXED and no evidence disproves this), it is a simple reality, not complicated, and flipping stuff randomly just coz you have a “light bulb” idea doesn’t work out sometimes, not sure what else a rational person can say.

        Like Shacks weird “thesis” that he agrees with Not A Space Agency that the Sun is 92 occult million miles away from Earth. You need 2 parts of triangulation to calculate the missing distance, stunning he wants to agree with the standard model, just stunning, and i’ve only come across this entity in FAK’s.
        If nobody has been higher than 80 miles or so, this claim is actually nuttier and more insane than anything you wrote Unreal, so have some solace in that at least.
        This dude camw up with Sep clues? I think not, just like Ab’s Eric Clapton observation the other day, Clapton’s “best” work was by other agencies, and by this nature, Shak’s “best” work was obviously done by other agencies, and when you’re best handlers abandon you, trying to mimic the best is clearly seen by what is delivered recently, nonsense that is just pimping the standard model wrapped up in a different bow tie.

        Reply
      2. Unreal

        ” If you want to flip the pole stars – and this is something you literally have not even considered till I got here, then you have the ENTIRE sky map flipped and in the wrong parts of where everyone sees them. You believed that you could flip the poles, probably the magnetic ones, and everything magically would work out for you ” -RadicalEgg

        Nothing is “flipped” anywhere in my model. And on a flat Earth there are no poles to flip anyway. The definition of a pole is the extremity of an axis of a sphere. Earth is a plane, not a sphere or oblate spheroid.

        Speaking of the Earth’s plane, it is impossible to know its size which does not mean it is infinite like IPS and others claim – and what might have been understood from the FAK363 interview. I’m not in favour of using “infinite” to describe the size of Flat Earth that to my knowledge it is unknown, not infinite (∞). Infinite means there are no boundaries or limits which is unreasonable to conclude with. Earth could well be a finite entity, thus right now the expanse of the surface of Earth is just unknown, not never ending.

        The current sky map of the North pole centred FE is not correct as to the South Pole star and Southern hemisphere star map. If anything is flipped here it is FE logic overall when compared to Ball Earth science. Making the South centered model “worse” than current FE models compared to the flawed Globe model is therefore unreasonable.

        Tyche Brahe’s nose was made of brass
        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tycho_Br…

        Regarding Simon Shack’s research i do not at all support his Tycho model – there are no rocks floating around in any multiverse vaccum of space. The hero of Shack’s newfound astronomy fixation is a fantasy character with a brass* nose. A clown in other words – just as Shack likes to call his detractors “clowns”. Tyge O. Brahe was supposedly a super-rich danish nobleman who lived on a private island in a Castle with a drunken Elk and psychic dwarf… Sure,,,

        Reply
        1. RadicalEgg

          We’re going to have to leave it there Mr Unreal,
          You’re starting to make less sense the more your flipping/infinite nonsense is destroyed, some people have a mental illness which makes them unable to see any errors in the batshit theory they produce, not saying you are one of these. but maybe you should get a job with NASA, your bullshit is just as stupid as theirs, and why you are agreeing with me on Shaks typhoid sorry tacos model is very odd, you and him both appear to believe in Precession as you both have recently cited this as a reference. You are both wrong, there is no such thing as procession, it is made up and we’re getting really tired of correcting your shit as you pull random nonsense from NASA and the Disney joke that is the ball globe and all the rubbish that goes along with it.

          You couldn’t even destroy the plasma model, so here, I’ll do it for you – the reason the plasma model is wrong is because the moon is not a physical object. There, i did it for you, and no, we didn’t believe in the model in the first place, we just thought we’d offer you an easy win and you couldn’t even find the most obvious way to destroy it.

          Too many errors on this blog to continue fighting the constant log outs, errors and formatting issues with reply and finding where the literal fook we posted last, and right here, when I try and reply to a previous comments, yours, the text pasted right above this box I am literally typing in, is not the message I clicked to reply to (which was yours), but when i finish typing this and submit, other errors can appear.

          Fakotube doesn’t work on Linux browsers either, can’t be bothered to report report that to Ab either, it appears to use a builtin billy boy gates codec that non jizzed systems do not have.

          Take care in the coming hell on earth, a lot of us are not going to be around in the coming chaos, going to be too busy fighting other battles.
          (PS – and not to be contentious, but if the world doesn’t end next year, the Veda cosmology model is more up your street, and if you’d used that as a base, at least you’d have something that wasn’t polluted by the current controllers bullshit). it is a proper batshit crazy model, and is very likely to more reflect this artifical reality.

          Peace out.

          Reply
          1. marin2

            You’re starting to make less sense the more your flipping/infinite nonsense is destroyed, some people have a mental illness which makes them unable to see any errors in the batshit theory they produce, not saying you are one of these. but maybe you should get a job with NASA, your bullshit is just as stupid as theirs, and why you are agreeing with me on Shaks typhoid sorry tacos model is very odd, you and him both appear to believe in Precession as you both have recently cited this as a reference. You are both wrong, there is no such thing as procession, it is made up and we’re getting really tired of correcting your shit as you pull random nonsense from NASA and the Disney joke that is the ball globe and all the rubbish that goes along with it.

            He “Unreal” does NOT agree with Shack’s model.
            You better read the material more correctly. You are in such a hurry for destroying somebody who don’t agree with you. It is the hate and the kick you get which drives you forward when somebody is not of the same openion as you.
            Mentally you are a very low level. Here you can learn something from Unreal.

            Reply
            1. RadicalEgg

              Bless, here comes the cheerleaders again.
              Don’t you have something else to do rather than defend someone who is objectively wrong.
              I have learnt something here, you do not know the blind difference between Intelligence and Wisdom.
              Good luck figuring out the difference.

              Reply
              1. marin2

                Thank you so much my darling for your very kind, nice and carefully chosen words.
                I am very sure that every pilot or a mate working on board ship will get a very big smile on his or her face when you ask him or her if your chart is correct.
                You make me smile and I am very sure this will make you very happy. At last you did do something very positive.

                Reply
        2. Unreal

          My argument against Polaris not being at the center of the Celestial Pole or movement does not require any Precession – any star-trail photo of the North celestial pole will show that Alpha Ursae Minoris (Polaris) moves and does not sit in the exact center of the North celestial pole axis. Much like the case with Sigma Octantis (Polaris Australis) that equally sits off the South celestial pole.

          Now you suddenly “destroy” the Plasma Moon model you (RadicalEgg) presented here in the FAK363 discussion yourself ?

          The Plasma Moon Map by “Vibes of Cosmos” was presented by you (RadicalEgg) as the actual map of the greater flat Earth. The contention behind the impossible and imprecise Plasma Moon map is that the moon is made of focused plasma in the ionosphere that represents a mirrored hologram of flat Earth – 2000 years ago…

          Whether the Moon is made of plasma, just an image or a hologram, what is certain is that the surface we observe on the Moon does not in any way represent a correct map of Earth : not 2000 years ago and not today.

          [ hereunder the plasma moon map overlaid a mirrored moon image – the features do not even match, not to mention the imaginary landmasses needed to make the map “work”,,, ]

          Reply
          1. RadicalEgg

            Changing “labels” on any map, North to South, changes nothing, your theory isn’t even a theory, you just want to re-label stuff.

            Congratulations, you are a genius, you’ve figured out their insidious evil flaw whilst all the other scholars have completely overlooked. They swapped the axis lol lol

            You started to quote wickedpedia articles of north/south with no disclaimers, meaning you completely agreed with them, again, you had no disclaimers, and to be frank, once someone starts linking there, it is game over for you, and you will never be taken seriously on this subject ever again.

            Good luck, peace out and god speed.

            Reply
          2. Unreal

            ” Changing “labels” on any map, North to South, changes nothing […] you’ve figured out their insidious evil flaw whilst all the other scholars have completely overlooked “

            Very curious that the only FE center proposed by anyone in the Flat Earth movement – ever – is the North…

            And when you speak of FE Scolars,,, Beware these “experts” are 99% paid gatekeepers working for State and Military intelligence. The only way to get nowhere with a meaningful model of Flat Earth – for centuries – is to lead the alternative Flat Earth “Truth” movement yourself.

            Of course when it comes to gatekeeping, it is equally curious that you (RadicalEgg) drop in here on Fakeologist out of nowhere ever so quick and purpusefully – all good and ready with yet another flawed map of Flat Earth.

            And again – you propose yet another map with the North Pole at its center…

            Reply
            1. marin2

              I am starting to get convinced that you must have hit a raw nerve as “he” (“they”) started to attack you. Remember the first post: you are a shill and must be removed from this forum.
              There are indeed very strange things going on.
              Do think you are on the right track.

              Reply
              1. RadicalEgg

                Dearest pom pom’s,

                Changing the labels on poles on a map – just the poles – places all the other stars in the wrong place, this can be verified, call the pole stars what you want, but it can be verified by everyone on any part of the plane, look upwards. Call the North Pole “Unreal’s North Asshole”, and move it South and call it “Unreal’s South Asshole”, and the dumb thing you do not realize is that all the other fixed stars stay where they originally were – you have effectively just done nothing useful, apart from move 2 stars which are always in opposition, and left all the other stars where they are.

                The alternative is that the other stars move with the poles and are flipped – something which Unreal claims he is not proposing – as this would just be akin to turning a map “upside down”. This is what we originally thought he was proposing, which was stupid enough, but what he ACTUALLY wants you to believe is that pole stars are reversed, but all the other stars stay where they are, it’s hysterical.

                This is called logic and reasoning, if you’d put your pom pom’s down for a few minutes, we are certain you could entertain this logic also.

                Reply
            2. RadicalEgg

              Good god dude, you’re like a dog in heat who latches onto someone’s leg and humps away with the blood lust of an insane person.

              Good luck, peace out and god fooking speed.

              Reply
  2. Anonymous

    ” the Moon image was created pre-flood times, it is a very old image, static, and is an historical record, and does not exactly reflect what is down here 2 thousand years later “ -R.Egg

    As a premise for creating a black box scenario where everything is possible, inventing an exact pre-flood plan of the Earth on the Moon is nothing short of literal lunacy.

    What RadicalEgg seriously wants us to believe is how he (and his “we” group) have mastered the Rorschach test of uncovering an unknown World map on the Moon, made at an unknown period when unknown effects of flooding happened…

    In order for the moon plasma map to be correct, we would need to imagine gigantic, unknown tectonic activity to take place, and surely volcanic activity of level unheard of for continents to appear, disappear and new landmass created…

    The worst part clearly is that even the pixelated “maps” produced from moon imagery is hardly even correct according to existing moon imagery and the Moon Plasma Map is in itself merely a redrawn, photoshop’ed wish-wash made according to fit the UN North Pole centered map with some fantasy continents featuring as filler – the list of lost lands offers a wide choise to chose from.
    –Lost

    [ hereunder the vertically mirrored image of the moon and the extrapolations made to produce an impossible, interpretative map of world as according to the UN flag arranged around the geographic North Pole – with lost lands added as needed ]

    Reply
      1. RadicalEgg

        It’s ok fella/Unreal, we could tell it was you 🙂

        This blog is almost broken, far too many shittly plugins and whatnot, it doesn’t work properly in some browsers far too much goiung on.

        Reply
    1. Unreal

      Herunder is North and South America on the “Plasma Moon Map” compared to the Americas on the UN style Flat Earth map as shown in Vibes of Cosmos video collages.

      Both “maps” develop around the (geographic) North Pole as their center, and then you’d need need a fair share of imagination, tectonic plate shifts, volcanic activity, submerged lands reappearing or even floods to even begin recognize North and South America on the (plasma) Moon.

      Reply
  3. napoleon wilson

    can we prove the compass points to the light in the sky

    can we measure strengths of compasses , if north is south and vice versa does make any difference

    does the sky affect the shape of the ground

    can i get a rewind

    Reply
    1. napoleon wilson

      fun stuff, if theres no pull and only push and we consider south the default opposite of north,then southdoes end up being north ,or can we have two magnetic poles on a sphere ,dont think i can , any way you should domore audios about this the pair of you its really interesting,

      also isnt the mud flood just remnants of an ash cloud for eighteen months after an eruption in scandanavia 250 years ago that makes sense to me , water attaches to dust particles et voila

      Reply
    2. RadicalEgg

      Which North do you mean? –

      Magnetic North – it is possible to “fake” magnetic north with a stronger induction field, quite easily, but have to be closest proximity to the source of your compass.

      True North, aka the sky map, this is impossible to fake, unless you’re on some kind of drugs and start seeing weird spots in front of your eyes or other pretty fairies and pixies 🙂

      This is why for navigating True North (not magnetic) you can navigate by the stars and pole star & constellations very easily. The sky above is permanent, and does not appear to have changed ever.

      (Precession is a theory and appears to only support the ball earth nonsense).

      Reply
      1. napoleon wilson

        cheers for the answer ,by any chance were born on a moutian top ,and are you irrepressible

        heres some fun ,get a globe tilt it with the 23,4 degrees then travel east 3250km or so stop when you hit the equator at approximatley 3250 km and you end up on the equator ,start anywhere and you end up on the equator,not sure what that declinationis called but east from you viewing from space not from terra firma .

        you might be able to reproduce, it i dont have that option on software i have

        precession is bollocks ,psidereal day has something to do with the measurements ,i also suspect when mapping the sky they use an obscure egyptian calendar as a time scale similar to the one adopted by nasa,

        911 was the prestige to lucas,s turn the pledge was made by kubrick

        Reply
  4. RadicalEgg

    Unreal wants you to believe in his deception, when you can just walk outside on a Starry night and see he is wrong with your own eyes.

    The Sky Map above us, the Planetarium, is navigable without compasses or maps. You can do this with your own eyes. Just go outside and do it for yourself, North has nothing to do with maps, it is called that due to the Pole star called Polaris. Everything else in the sky can be measured w.r.t. this star, and the others form their own, static map, which everyone can see in the sky, and if you mess with the Pole star, because you believe it is 180deg rotated , your entire sky map collapses around with it. Unreal appears to not know this.

    Here’s a link to such a planetarium, use a different one, but they all match up, they’re based on static models of the Sky Map. And quickly show how North has nothing to do with the ground you walk on, maps are independent of North, the Pole Star Polaris, they are part of the Sky Map we can all see about us.

    Planetariums makes a mockery of Unreal’s thesis, and it is time to call this nonsense out for the obvious nonsense that it is. It is bad enough people believing in the ball nonsense, but to expect people to believe that the North Start is not in the Sky where your own eyes can clear see it is, is misinformation.

    theskylive.com/planetarium

    PS – I’ve tried to explain to Unreal dozens of times that the Moon image was created pre-flood times, it is a very old image, static, and is an historical record, and does not exactly reflect what is down here 2 thousand years later.
    Unreal doesn’t even have a model of where the Sky Map is on this thesis, because a sky map overlayed would fail completely.
    Unreal has also called me a “new ager” via email, which is funny, I fully believe a lot of the bible is historical fact.

    Reply
    1. marin2

      I fully believe a lot of the bible is historical fact.

      Nope, Bible is not a historical fact. See for this: www.dillum.ch/html/inhalt.html See the site and read the essay’s.

      Flood as described in the Bible never did happen. Read a professionel commentary as the BK (=Biblischer Komentar), eye-opener,etc.

      Reply
      1. RadicalEgg

        Bless you really went out of your way to post twice on one day, take it easy, you may have something intelligent to say one day.

        Not that you’ll make it through the entire video linked below, this is more for caual drive by’s than for those peddling factual errors. There was a reset in the 1800’s you’ve never heard of, because you know, you were fast asleep. And there’s plenty of evidence there was a massive flood, you just don’t want to see it, which is fair enough, that’s why we’re hoping you don’t qualify through the coming reset. Which nobody can deny is coming, you just want to disagree it’s not happened before (but if has & several times).

        Mud Flood Advanced Archive – Mud Flood and Timeline – Martin Liedke Rosette Delacroix

        As per unreal this board messes up images & URLs, not sure why it takes 3 or 4 edits for a utube vid to be properly recognised as linked.

        Reply
        1. marin2

          Are you on an all-time high? You with your bloody nonsense. Boy, oh boy, you are so impressed from yourself.

          Reply
          1. marin2

            @Radical Egg

            You wanted to say: Martin Liedtke? You don’t even know how to write a name properly, or was you in an all time hurry? I have followed the man a while. The man is a shill and not a small one..
            Told you sooooooooooo, you better start using your own brain.

            Reply
            1. RadicalEgg

              Is that you Unreal, under a different handle?
              Are you that butthurt that your attempt to delude those here that North is not where they believe it here, you can’t come back and defend your little pet project anymore? You probably didn’t plan on someone knowing the Sky Map/Planetarium, the only map the parasites can’t tamper with.

              Nothing was misspelled, I didn’t type out any name, it is correct and only included in the the channel title, you are seeing things, delusional.

              Like we said, the vid was never posted for your consumption, you are suffering from the same delusion as those who believe in invisible pixxie viruses.

              We’re not religious, we’d burn down religions tomorrow, they’ve assisted in a lot of how we got here. You helped too, by not know what is coming.

              But that doesn’t meant the old books are wrong, on the contrary, but that’s where the similarity between you and religious zealots resides, you are rabid in your view that there can be only 1 type of person who reads the old books (we’re more into the Veda’s than corrupted and man made Catholics cult).

              The link is again just for a drive by reader. We know Canada is going into vaxports shortly, and that’s the only reason I’m here, to watch what happens, and to post what some of the destruction is going to be, not too similar to that of the 1800’s.

              UAP Channel | Lost and Founded Cities

              PS – yes the Biden will pass away shortly, you ess aye didn’t have 2 presidents for nothing duking it out, and so will bizzie lizzie in the you kay suddently pass also. if a red heifer is then approved, it is truly game on.

              Reply
              1. marin2

                Is that you Unreal, under a different handle?

                Nope, Marin2 is not Unreal. Unreal is much more cleverer as Marin2.

                Pull yourself together man, with your bloody nonsense.
                Everybody here knows what is going on and will coming down on us.

                Goodbeye to you

                Reply
              2. marin2

                Like we said, the vid was never posted for your consumption, you are suffering from the same delusion as those who believe in invisible pixxie viruses.

                I read the article more carefully, as it raises a lot of questions.
                Who is “we” ? You’re words, not mine.

                Reply
                1. RadicalEgg

                  The only questions it raises for us is, ie Unreal’s lies about North is swapped, is how can you fall for deception that the stars in the sky are wrong, if you believe Unreal’s pet little thesis holds water. This is no different to why ISS/hoax space never shows stars, trivial to back engineer eq/az location, via the never changing skyp map.

                  I never posted a video to Martin’s channel, this is your programming kicking in, what I actually posted was to a Russian fella you’ve never heard of until the last 24 hours.

                  FE never went away, big blip of obvious disinfo aka Mark the Sarg and ball busters etc., was more recent, and lots of obvious disinfo spread curtesy of this very little clique here. This site amplified the disinfo signal well enough to have switched most off to it, someone somewhere is very happy on mission accomplished.

                  Either way, just dropped by to support Ab, financially, unlike most of you fake supporters, I don’t agree with everything here, but some of the things said are balls on accurate, if you excuse the crude pun.

                  Reply
        2. Anonymous



          leidke? …you’r not being serious are you?

          Reply
            1. RadicalEgg

              I never posted a video to Martin’s channel, this is your programming kicking in, what I actually posted was to a Russian fella you’ve never heard of until the last 24 hours.

              Just posting this again to this thread of the comments as it is obvious you literal morons do not know where Martin got his “original” info from.
              I just posted above where Martin got his info from.

              Philipp Druzhinin.

              Geez you fakologists couldn’t work out how to unravel a shoe lace, maybe it’s the effects of pretending everything is a lie that makes you so goddam dumb. If you don’t have to think if something is true or false, you don’t have to actually think anymore.

              Oh and there was a point in the amplifying the FE broadcast circa 2010 or so. This was to get people off the the old forums, GeoCities, angelfire, UseNet, other BBS’s which most no longer exist now (but a lot did even too recently, some as recent as a couple years ago). And group you all together and mush your brains with the same nonsense they’ve been doing for the past decade.

              & you fell for it, you fell for the operation that made you believe the FE movement was suddenly being renewed!

              But it wasn’t true, it had already existed particularly still on UseNet since the 70’s. Just because this site says it was renewed in the last decade, is actually a lie, was never true.

              PS and before some dumb fook says Philip is also a shill, the answer is complicated, he works in marketing and has no military known connections, but his recent guests over the last 4 or 5 years are VERY connected, which either means it is an operation, or he is being infiltrated, just like fakologist was several years ago with Mark Sarg et al. Paul Stern, ooops, nobody ever saw that back in the day. Markus was also at the forefront of a new resurgence too, and a lady has several times on a call tried to call him out on it, but be drown out by the usual fako cheerleaders, french i believe she was.

              Reply
                1. RadicalEgg

                  Hey Ab, sorry no discord for us.
                  How found site – Allison Morrow (mild mil connections) interviewed Adam Curry (extreme cia shitster) on utube.

                  Listened to a few yes-we-are-shills-agenda episodes, my god, you promote these shills?……anyway, one of the episodes mentioned fakologist site/you donated.

                  Found this via a search and realized you all must be insane if it took you all a decade to realize 9.11 was staged, and you’re still talking about the same projection on the wall another decade later.

                  pro-tip – if they show on the cave wall (tv) a “live” falling down of building 7, and on a different channel, another “live” image of the same building still standing at-the-same-time, ya probably looking at pre-recorded re-replayed footage, this was the “tell”, the so-called monkey staring tat he black monolith in 2001 Kubrick propaganda. Or Platos’ cave – look that up, given the guest comments on trivium were hilarious.

                  Oh and some of your guests recently know nothing about the trivium/quadrivium, it was nothing to do with “scientific method”, it is a preSocrates philosophy and training guide for discerning truth in reality (metaphysics), the controllers just rewrote it was a medieval invention and as we all know the medi-evil era was inserted into history and never occurred.

                  Anyway, as per Rachel on the weekend show, she is spot on, 9/11 was the sacrifice of the two witnesses, meaning the Tulpa/Krisha/Jesus aka Kali Avatar was born somewhere in the middle east the same year maybe even the exact same day (as per the stars over behlehem, you have to bring in the literal god with a bang you know). And given what’s currently going on there, we’re getting closer to the big kick off.

                  But let’s assume scripture, prophecies, Islam, indian, the vedas and many other texts are wrong, and let’s face it, if half the world takes a bio mechanical “implant” within the next 5 years, ie 2016 is their goal to either start or complete mission doomsday, nothing good will come if the mob free will accepts the branding.

                  We’re more extreme than Rachel on our view on this, and sadly this site is not for us, but good luck, and see you on the other side (literally).

                  PS – Unreal is someone we’d rather have standing at our side than the zombies, he may be wrong but damn he’s stuck to his guns, someone like this is worth countless npc’s.

                  Reply
                  1. napoleon wilson

                    Found this via a search and realized you all must be insane if it took you all a decade to realize 9.11 was staged, and you’re still talking about the same projection on the wall another decade later.

                    you seem bright

                    what you fail to notice is that this bad boy has pointed who filmed it (kerner optics) star wars camera company and who built the models you saw collapse industrial light and magic star wars miniature effects company , now would a shill or professional cave dweller still get work after pointing this out ? the answer is no obviously ,
                    but dont take it out on ab that bad boy hasnt seen star wars or no-lens movies

                    Reply
                    1. RadicalEgg

                      Fair comment & point taken.

                      but when you’re a teenager (Moir) and we realize that the Falkland’s footage was no better than toy model ships being blown about a bathtub under the power of waves being propelled by the farts they were selling everyone, and everyone believed it, it kinda ruins your life for 30 years till you realize by the time you find some normies, the normies are so divided that’s its almost impossible to communicate even though we/them believe everything is the monolith, and we’re just standing being the monkeys watching them in horror as they’re full on believing in the projected puppet show.

                      PS – although i’m not sure anymore how they create planetaroum/sky map models, the ones we’ve used since the last 80’s have been balls on accurate when setting up telescopes on mountains/back years, ie they produce exactly what is see in the real world. this doesn’t mean a lot, but it can be tested by doubters even with a simple pair of binoculars or own eye balls.

                    2. RadicalEgg

                      #1
                      Regime change in Argentina, yea this old chestnut is an oldie but as usual the goodie.
                      The old dictator installed by the cia/mi6 wasn’t playing ball anymore, pandering far too much to the argentinian people, and must be stopped! so a new cia/mi6 dictator needed pronto toot sweet.
                      (They actualy paraded a lot of junta “operations” or stunts as you see in these places, you know, fake actors being shot by fake bullets and the locals believe the junta are killing the locals), but more importantly, the West believes this.
                      “democracy” was restored around ’83’84 or whenever the faux nonsense finished.
                      Prince nonce Andrew was there gallantly prancing about in a helicopter, or more likely, having a holiday on Anglesey just like William.

                      #2
                      Thatcher was on her way out, to say she was hated is akin to Justin Castro willingly walking down a street without two dozen guards.
                      She’d have lost the next election guaranteed, but won it with a Herr Borris scale Brexit landslide.

                      Some minor stuff which doesn’t appear to be the main thrust,
                      Showed that women prime ministers could be just as insane as men, albeit it was sold as “iron lady of course”.
                      side note never done an egi on thatcher, but the horror of a man being that ugly does explain a lot.
                      Thankfully no sheep were harmed or otherwise spooked in the making of this “smooth” regime change, but there was a lot of docs extolling the virtues of how morally just and democratic the reasons for travelling to a tiny island that had more sheep on it than the hu-man population of new Zealand (unverified claim).

                      At least, the above makes some more sense that a benelovent leader cared about a bunch of sheep diddlers living on a remote island.

                    1. RadicalEgg

                      Prove it.

                      This should be good, retard anon makes a claim which cannot be proven, and voilla, retard anonymous is still a retard.

                      Congratrulations, you added about -10 IQ points to the conversation. If this was your contribution to a wall of text, then you should ask mommy and daddy to change your nappies, looks like you are well out of your depth.

                      Go away troll.

  5. Unreal

    ” Unreal incorrectly believes that Vibes of Cosmos uses imagery of the Moon that Unreal interprets according to the same North Centric model of his own incorrect but flipped thesis -R.Egg”

    Radical Egg herover is very sure of himself, his knowledge and the absolute truth that lie in Vibes of Cosmos music video image research.

    Attack is of course the first defence, and after failing to convince us with their new age “As Above so Below” Moon Map of Earth, it is easy to understand how-come they now need to try discredit me as researcher and the objective findings of my research on flat earth.

    The major flaw of the incredibly sketchy and interpretative images taken from the moon is of course that the “Vibes of Cosmos” group start their fantasy map by placing all the landmass in the Globes northern hemisphere in the centre…

    Lol – now how can adding a couple of unknown, unverifiable continents and new fancy names ever change that the Moon Plasma Map is nothing but a pimped up version version of the contrived FE movements North Pole Azimuthal projection map – aka the UN flag ?

    When if comes having maps projections with coordinates, the Plasma Moon map is nothing of the sort. The Moon Map from Vibes of Cosmos merely interpret pixels and tweaks it into being a very far away from any exact type of map.

    Their excuse for producing such a far fetched, inexact map is that… Drums… The moon is a static image of Earth from the distant Past ! Lol.

    So now we have watch the new age music videos of this group to get into their NLP trance and actually imagine the Earth evolve change just like geologists and scientists claim, let continents drift and whatnot… Lol

    The Plasma Moon Map is so inexact it hurts the eye and all the hype this group is trying to create is built on pure fantasy – maybe they should draw some giant trees on their image extrapolations too, just to sell some more banners, CDs and T-shirts.

    Flat Sea’er
    allunreal.com/blog/flat-seaer

    South is Center
    allunreal.com/blog/south-is-ce…

    [ hereunder how bad Africa matches up on the “Moon Plasma Map” – overall the map is a pure North Centric map with some unknown continents added and some known landmasses missing ]

    Reply
    1. Unreal

      [ can not see the attachment – nor am i able to edit my post – herunder the image comparison of real proportions Africa with the sketchy, pixel ridden moon image map “from the past”… ]

      Reply
  6. RadicalEgg

    In summary, Unreal incorrectly believes that Vibes of Cosmos uses imagery of the Moon that Unreal interprets according to the same North Centric model of his own incorrect but flipped thesis. Mercator maps which Unreal uses himself have been known for a long time as their own psyop and implanted/created into the narative to confuse naive researchers like Unreal.

    Anybody can use their own eyes and clearly see that Vibes actually shows where the extra land is, what it is, and places features and place names on the extra land also. This is something Unreal does not show himself, does not say where or how large his extra land is. This is because his theory is intentionally incomplete because it cannot be mapped to anything we can verify ourselves.

    Unreal appears to be a gatekeeping operation playing on new age esotericism, and merely takes the common FE model of Mercator maps, long since disproven as fakes and created to add confusion, in order to get nowhere closer to a correct map of Earth.

    Unreal has no maps, has no projections, no co-oridnates, and very importantly does not realise that by moving polar North, the equivalent magentic direction also needs to be corrected, but whoever came up with this charade, the entity that is Unreal, may just understand that by even mentioning magnetic directions, it destroys this theory completely.

    Reply
    1. marin2

      As a former sailor I dare say your model is not correct. How the Earth looks like I don’t know to.

      Reply
      1. RadicalEgg

        Do you fly sex objects for SpaceSex also?

        Credentials are worthless, and your claim is meant to prove that you are a trust worthy person.
        Please, remember where you are.

        Reply
  7. RadicalEgg

    Unsure why the vid in the other post is blocked/here’s the edited URL.

    & edited – is fakologist blocked from certain youtube servers?……it appears so.

    Astronomical Clock Analysis

    Reply
  8. RadicalEgg

    The 600 years old astronomical geocentric clock of Prague, presentation. Basics things for easy clock reading.
    A big proof of our geocentric motionless world.

    PS – Unreal does a lot of complaining about others using the UN map as an anchor point for reference, which is not strictly true, and then goes and uses the Mercator maps – which is known to distort the shape and relative size of continents, particularly near the poles. Quite ironic.

    Reply
  9. Pingback: all unreal | FAK 363 - Fakeologist Radio 22 August 2021

  10. RadicalEgg



    Had a lovely dialogue with Mr Unreal, nice fella.

    However, and no offense meant or inferred, he is mistaken in both fact and substance regarding we live on an infinite plane.

    The moon was scared some time in the past with a static multi layer EM plasma image – just like xrays – of the map of our “greater” earth and double imaged with the structure of the overhead dome columns. It even shows the extended and missing continents.

    The Moon is the reflected map of the greater flat earth crater – by Vibes of cosmos.

    ^The Moon is the fabled “As above so below”

    PS – why the obvious shill Gaia is not perma banned is beyond obvious. You may just attract new faces if the obvious shills and crack/smack heads were banned too.

    Reply
    1. Unreal

      ” The moon was scared some time in the past with a static multi layer EM plasma image – just like xrays – of the map of our “greater” earth and double imaged with the structure of the overhead dome columns. It even shows the extended and missing continents “

      The “moon map” as you (RadicalEgg) refer to is not correct in any shape way or form. The worst part of “Vibes of Cosmos” tentative aproximations is the fact he uses the UN flag concept of the North Pole as the center of FE in order to interpret moon imagery…

      In other words, all the problems with the current FE model all exists in the Plasma Moon World Map*. The additional interpretation of unverifiable continents such as Atlantis and Lemuria further adds confusion and even more subjective interpretation.

      As demonstrated in the “South is Center” article and on the FAK363 podcast, more evidence points to the South being the center of Earth – not the North Pole.

      * although i cannot find a high resolution image online of the plasma moon map, Vibes of Cosmos does sell his North Pole centered map online here

      Reply
  11. Unreal

    Thanks to Anonymous, Dirtybenny, Marin2, Napoleon Wilson and Ricky for their positive feed back – glad my research is of interest. Hopefully Ab might consider following up on the South centric FE research as my next article on the subject is published.

    Regarding Gaia* and his arguments in favor of a spherical model of Earth, that particular “debate” might not longer be needed at FAK – debating curvature is like debating vaccines, either you believe doctors/scientists or not. Geologists are no better than scientists from my perspective.

    Asking dumb questions is sometimes required, and especially important i’d say for breaching the wall of conventionnal wisdom and shame that we try to profer on the rather few that dare think and express themselves freely. Bongo Bill looks to ridicule my research no doubt with his comment* and he actually illustrates exactly how gatekeepers try pressure opinion in the “right” direction using shame & riducule.

    Thank you Marin2 for the link to “Fisher Private” website* – as the site is in german with multiple subjects it would help if you might specify what articles/subjects you find of particular interest in regards to the research on the “South Cenric Infinite Plane” as Ab well coined it@nbsp;?

    Very much agree on the importance of inversion in popular culture and propaganda as brought up by Napoleon Wilson. Unfortunately i’m not really good with movies and popular culture references, but understand the Elite and Masons use every media available in their quest to dumb down, misinform and mismanage the general population.

    Regarding magnitism i have not looked at this in detail, your insuation (napoleon wilson) there are different models of the compass for the Southern Hemisphere is new to me. There are so many questions unanswered of course once you work on a new model that have to battle 500 years of top priority deception. Most problems of the Globe model have been planned ahead for, so a mechanical difference in design of compasses might be significant.

    * gaia posted here
    * bongo bill posted here
    * Fisher Private website here

    Reply
    1. marin2

      The man discovered that we are dealing with a complete ” lay-out ” from the top to the bottom.The landscape and mountains are for the greater part man-made and the lay out is man- made.
      Best you start with:
      left: click on : Geologisches -> Felstore, Gussform etc.
      Palaentologisches etc. The rest will follow suit

      right: Schraege und andere Architektur click on it and the rest will follow

      Here you have your starting point.
      Th rest is worth looking after too.

      Reply
  12. napoleon wilson

    no shit hahaha,
    thats a line from a movie called the thing set in braintarctica , ive listened to that audio loads , , unreal is one of the giants i got a leg up from , gonna use your audio doing the prestige tenets next time i do a video ,

    incidentally the turn on 911 had already been played out for 24 years prior ,the prestige was having alchemically placed carachters around the world to blame for the events

    most psi ops however have a pledge ,titanic had a a novel The Wreck of the Titan and was unsinkable ,remeber the towers were built to withstand a plane hit,jfk had evil soviets after him

    ill tell you what though anyone new have a listen as recomended by ricky



    Reply
  13. napoleon wilson

    nice to hear unreal
    heres some imagery i picked up a while back ,they like templates as it gives them a basis for inverting , during your research have you come across any information to do with needing another type of compass in the southern hemisphere ie australia ,or have you thrown that idea out , im a fan of magnetism

    Reply
  14. Bongo bill

    Unreal is not afraid to ask questions. Are men women? Is the south the north? Are bears actually gays in costume? If so are toucans cgi shills? If you’re not asking the right question you’re not going to get the right answer.
    We have been lied to but the truth is plane.

    Reply
    1. dirtybenny

      Unreal has consistently been one of the most brave and courageous researchers to question the underpinnings of the realm in which we exist. Despite being pilloried for his observations and research, he just pushes on like an icebreaker through ice-filled waters, referencing his research and observations. He has significantly added to my personal understanding of the nature and place in which we exist. He has encouraged me to always question the veracity of my “grammar” and for that I am eternally grateful.

      I am fascinated by his southcentric planar model. The climate and biome gradations are insightful observations that are truth in plain sight. Kudos to Ab for staying so open-minded to Unreal’s research including EGI, southcentric planar earth model, and TCC.

      In one of the recent audiochats, Alto mentioned the sun as a local phenomenon. This is my observation as well and critical to my working model. I look forward to hearing Alto expand his thoughts on this.

      It is ironic that Unreal referenced pizza multiple times in his model in the chat. TCC insiders Chris Kendall and John Adams (Tim Kelly regulars along with Jay Dyer) repeatedly derisively mocked and scorned those observing a planar earth with the pizza epithet.

      The chickens have come home to roost.

      Reply
  15. ricky

    Great show, and I’ll repeat, ep 112 is essential listening for anyone new to “fakeology.” I’ll be sure to listen anytime unreal shows up. a side note, marin2- “Is he married with Kham???” I got a good laugh there!

    Reply
  16. gaia

    Listening to this chat, my first in a LONG time.

    1st – thank you Unreal for shouting out Fakeopedia, for the listeners, misom and me have done our best in converting the Excel sheet into this Main list of psyops, and added quite some to it:

    fakeologist.com/fakeopedia/ind…

    2nd – according to conventional history (which I think very few here including myself subscribe to) the sphericity of Earth was proven by Eratosthenes in the 2nd century BC (btw I loved Ab’s designation of pre-Rona as BC), and then Ptolemy came up with the geocentric view.

    When I reviewed Simon Shack’s work on the TYCHOS model (in which Earth is also spherical, not flat!), I documented the many models that were followed by many different astronomers.
    This showed that the watered down basic version of history of cosmology is very different from what conventional history documents; many different models with many different viewpoints, not the classical Copernican-Galilean-Keplerian view vs. a geocentric view.

    You can consult this list here:

    fakeologist.com/fakeopedia/ind…

    3rd – the claim that we cannot visit Antarctica is ludicrous. Not only are there many tourist trips from Ushuaia going to the Antarctic Peninsula and flyovers from New Zealand on their side of the Antarctic continent, I have a former colleague who did geologic fieldwork in Antarctica and produced maps of it:

    doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA…

    I lost Unreal (and Ab in his understanding) because I was only listening, downloaded the video to be able to understand, at this “50% more land, or 50% less land” point. What do you mean? And of course the landmasses are not equally distributed on Earth; we have more land in the northern hemisphere than in the southern. Today, in the geologic past that was very different.

    Point remains is that the Earth cannot have any other shape than a convex sphere (“globe” if you will). This we can observe with our very own eyes, without the need to rely on NASA or any other so-called authority organization.

    The fact that we have 2 celestial poles means that the only shape possible is a convex sphere. I saw it with my own eyes in the constellation Orion and call it the Orion test.

    Orion, as defined in the northern hemisphere, comes up “straight”, meaning shoulders first, then the belt and then the knees.
    Here near the equator, and that is what I saw, Orion comes up sideways, on its “back”.
    In the southern hemisphere (Australians can confirm this), Orion comes up “upside down”; so first the knees, then the belt and then the shoulders.

    These observations can only happen if the Earth is a convex sphere. No other shape can cause this to happen. This proves the Earth is a globe.

    Ab made an excellent point; before 2015 ‘nobody’ thought the Earth was flat. Especially not those who have traveled and seen the skies in different latitudes.

    So ALLLL the pilots, sailors, cartographers and others who look at Earth on a daily basis, they didn’t see that “they were misled”, until some clowns like Dubay, Sargeant, Skiba and the likes came with this rehashed Rowbothamian idea.

    That makes no sense whatsoever. If the shape of the Earth were different than what the main model claimed, then it would be THOSE people who rely on the sphericity of Earth that would come up en masse to call out this supposed misleading. They didn’t, and many pilots and sailors have come out to speak out against the Flat Earth nonsense.

    Reply
    1. marin2

      Calm water will always level itsself. As a former sailor I am convinced that Unreal is on the right track.

      So you are telling me that a 200.000 ton tanker which is “down yunder” let’s say SA is pushed back into the water by the the so-called gravity force. You make me smile.

      Name me one situation where calm water won’t level itsself.

      Reply
        1. gaia

          Just like you, fighting misguided ideas.

          The tragedy is however, that we can establish the shape of the Earth with our own observations. That in contrast with JFK, or 9/11, or even “viruses” and “vaccines”; those things we can at most come to speculative conclusions.

          Reply
      1. gaia

        Of course water finds its level, and at 0 elevation that is sea level, which is curved; it follows the curvature of Earth.

        As a former sailor, did you come up with the idea the Earth were flat, or did some internet carnies placed that idea in your head? In case of the former, I am very interested, as you should have unique arguments for a Flat Earth that predated the psyop that started in 2014/15….

        So you are telling me that a 200.000 ton tanker which is “down yunder” let’s say SA is pushed back into the water by the the so-called gravity force. You make me smile.

        I have no idea what you mean here, but I haven’t been “telling” anything about tankers.

        I stick to observable truths. Like that even if you believe in a Flat Earth you must admit that both the Sun and Moon must be spheres, because only a sphere can look like a circle when observed from different viewpoints. No other shape can cause that effect.

        These are natural laws, Gaia’s laws; geometry ; measuring Gaia. They are objectively true, do not depend on so-called authorities, they are undebatable; truisms.

        Reply
        1. marin2

          As a former sailor, did you come up with the idea the Earth were flat, or did some internet carnies placed that idea in your head? In case of the former, I am very interested, as you should have unique arguments for a Flat Earth that predated the psyop that started in 2014/15….

          When one is on the bridge , one is confronted with an enormous straight horizon, when the water is calm. NO curve to see.

          Reply
        2. marin2

          Of course water finds its level, and at 0 elevation that is sea level, which is curved; it follows the curvature of Earth.

          As the Earth is not curved, the water won’t follow its curvature.

          Reply
        3. REM



          Flat Earth was still a commonly held belief as late as 1900s.
          This thread has collected a few articles from the newspapers of the time.
          stolenhistory.net/threads/proo…

          However, the sudden explosion of the “Flat Earthers” a few years ago could have a psy op, a preemptive strike in light of new cameras that allow to capture images of objects that should’ve been hidden by the “curvature”.

          Reply
  17. Anonymous



    I loved this, fantastic to hear from Unreal again. I’d love to hear a chat with him and IPS as well…in fact Unreal, Ab and IPS would make for great listening too.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

wp-puzzle.com logo

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.