Silkwood and the nuke power hoax

likes this

Miles does more to blow holes in the nuke power hoax, which was always just there to promote the nuclear bomb hoax.

I didn’t know they always preheated the water to the boiling point conventionally before letting the nuclear rods do the rest of the magical heating? Question is why would they need to boil water past the boiling point to turn turbines? Once it’s a gas there’s nothing left to do!

Look closely at that. It isn’t what you thought, is it? The towers are open at the bottom. So what’s inside? Absolutely nothing, for the most part. It’s just an empty shell, with some steam generators at the bottom, so they can boil some water and make you think something magnificent is going on there.
You see steam coming out and you think nuclear power is being generated. Except for one thing:
nuclear fission doesn’t create steam. Boiling water creates steam, and if you look it up, they admit that is what is going on there. They will try to convince you heat from fission is heating the water, but there is no evidence of that. In fact, they admit the water is already preheated to a high temperature, above the boiling point, before it ever comes in contact with anything nuclear. The nuclear component only adds a few more degrees, allegedly. So, once again, suspicious in the extreme. But I will hit that in more detail later.

The was also used to create government sanctioned nuclear waste, which is simply oil and gas waste that they could then legally dump without any accountability and government sanction.

Also remember what I just reminded you about Kerr-McGee: they were already illegally dumping huge amounts of toxic waste long before 1965. But if they could convince the government, government regulators, and the public that this was nuclear waste, it might be forgiven as part of the Cold War and “defense”. So they were basically hiding behind the military and its budget, which was shielded from questions about waste. While nuclear waste was given a bye due to “national security”, waste from oil refining or other mining wouldn’t be. So, upside down to expectation, Kerr-McGee was probably labeling non-nuclear waste as nuclear, to avoid being found criminally liable for it. Besides, disposal of nuclear waste was a government project, not just a private enterprise like non-nuclear waste. So by working with the government on the nuclear fake, Kerr-McGee was shielding itself from responsibility, or trying to. I imagine that in exchange for Kerr-McGee pretending to be working on nuclear fuel rods, the government agreed to instruct EPA to look the other way for another decade on Kerr-McGee’s toxic dumping, guaranteeing billions more in profits before the final reckoning.

No tags for this post.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
guest logo

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
7 days ago

DO these plants use natural gas to this “preheating”?
When Put-in cuts out natural gas delivery to europe –> we are out of electricity? What is going on here then? Does anybody know?

Is this preheating actually way those plants produce power? If so that explain why shortage of natural gas is shutting down these “nuclear” power plants.