FAC1121-Handkerchief Dance

likes this

Continuing on from FAC1120 Rick and Rollo… Anounceofsaltperday joins Ab the Fakeologist and Farcevalue to continue reasoning with boogieman. Linda Curtis and Just A Gal join to soothe the savage breast. Stupid and Critical Syncer speak up later.

0;Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean people aren’t out to get you!”

No tags for this post.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

24 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
1 day ago

i have no idea why anyone who calls themselves a fakeologist after all these years think people died ,i dont think boogieman believes it either

fakeologist.com/forums2/viewto…

your country is run built and raped by masons, batcoins all round

Last edited 1 day ago by napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
1 day ago

they shown exactly what they wanted on 911 no mistakes ,no fuckups , i must be doing a good job ,clocked judy from oz ,ozma,oz-wald,fuck me ruby too,even shown ya a spaceship at ground zero,and now were in lockstep for green cities and injecting kids and what replace the fall-con a syringe ,and they,re trying throw doubt on the millenium fall-con, this fingertrap boogieman set just proves people are not clear on what they believe ,and that dont know what 911 was ,in a masonic country like murica ,theres rules to telling the truth , but we knew that didnt… Read more »

Last edited 1 day ago by napoleon wilson
antipodean
antipodean
1 day ago

My understanding of Boogieman is that he believe’s the footage of UA175 impacting the South Tower was filmed in real time, and that the plane was inserted using CGI. He also believe’s that the close up footage of the Towers collapsing etc. is also real (although this footage was not shown live in real time) I’m going to argue on behalf of Boogieman, since he is not very good at arguing his point. If all the footage of UA175 impacting the WTC was all pre recorded in a studio, why wasn’t the error of the ‘nose out’ noticed prior to… Read more »

Last edited 1 day ago by antipodean
napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
1 day ago
Reply to  antipodean

how do you know it was an error ,

antipodean
antipodean
1 day ago

I think it was an error, because of CNN subsequently covering it up with their logo and the fade to black.

Last edited 1 day ago by antipodean
napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
1 day ago
Reply to  antipodean

so a fake plane cant penetrate and come through a fake tower, or is the tower real? see what a fake plane does ,

napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
1 day ago

lets keep this going ,because all the “mistakes” are purposeful

antipodean
antipodean
1 day ago

It depends on where you think the footage was first broadcast from.

napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
1 day ago
Reply to  antipodean

we see magicians cut sexy assisstants in half ,we have rubber knives and guns in movies ,fake wounds on the injured , why would no one apply this logic to 911 ,and instead fall into judy woods rabbit hole ,or keep saying cgi ,when theres hd images and 360 degree videos of the collapse ,its plain to see the collapse was hollywood industrial light and magic apt name x

youtu.be/dEarbsUSzww

Last edited 1 day ago by napoleon wilson
antipodean
antipodean
1 day ago

A plane in real life can’t go through any building constructed of reinforced concrete and steel.
So the footage can only be seen as fake.

napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
1 day ago
Reply to  antipodean

fully agree ,so what did the “mistake” do ,it confused obviously as you say A plane in real life can’t go through any building constructed of reinforced concrete and steel.

but you are assuming the building is reinforced concrete and steel ,

antipodean
antipodean
1 day ago

I don’t think we need to argue about what the Towers were constructed of. A jumbo jet simply can’t fly into the WTC Tower and have it’s nose cone pop out the other side unscathed.

IMHO the mistake was a mistake. It wasn’t picked up prior to going to air.

Others say the mistake was deliberate,to give the impression of the plane being a CGI inserted in real time, once the footage was scrutinised
Or it could have been deliberate to confuse.

napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
1 day ago
Reply to  antipodean

i dont care what others say building 7 mistake ? the one they said collapsed before it did ,the one where we heard the countdown ,and we still have dogshit truthers pointing and shouting building 7 wont go away ,well it came back in both movies didnt it!!,was that a mistake ,nope it was part of the narrative oh i,d love an argument but unfortunately i solved this turky years ago building 7!!!!!! the buildning that came back from the dead the solo-man building returned for the finale just like hna solo (solohan)the millenium fall-con did in that childrens film… Read more »

antipodean
antipodean
1 day ago

Are you referring to Jane Standley.
With WTC7 still seen standing in the back ground.

napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
1 day ago
Reply to  antipodean

fakeologist.com/forums2/viewto… obviously im referring to building 7 the one that was counted down live on air mirroring its hhermetic counterpart from the millenium fall-con. A video from the archives shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head. How did the BBC know that it was going to collapse? And why did they report the collapse when… Read more »

Last edited 1 day ago by napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
1 day ago
Reply to  antipodean

instead of saying fake ,say not accurate to what is proposed ,so then you have to identify what you saw,and find its place in realty ,including what they told us we saw ,with what tools we have ,and what we know about recreating this ,after you have done this you will see that blaming a terra-ism fiction for something that could only be acheived by a group of special effects people is not what you think it is and not as inaccurate either. ,special effects team who i might add made a childs movie with the same narrative and images… Read more »

Last edited 1 day ago by napoleon wilson
boogieman
boogieman
1 day ago
Reply to  antipodean

not sure if it was filmed in real time but simon shack does a good job with his 17 sec delay theory. so i think how he explained it was possible.

Dawn
Dawn
1 day ago

Boogieman made himself clear and Not sure why the rest of the panel kept asking him questions he already answered. IMO.

anounceofsaltperday
anounceofsaltperday
1 day ago
Reply to  Dawn

So what is the practical difference between what Boogieman thinks about the films and what I think about the films?

anounceofsaltperday
anounceofsaltperday
2 days ago

Me: I have come here for an argument
Boogieman: No you haven’t, you have come here for an argument!

napoleon wilson
napoleon wilson
2 days ago

classic

www.dailymotion.com/video/x2q1…

my fav sketch

Last edited 2 days ago by napoleon wilson
boogieman
boogieman
2 days ago

you lost the argument by a large margin. nice try though.

Last edited 2 days ago by boogieman
anounceofsaltperday
anounceofsaltperday
2 days ago
Reply to  boogieman

What is the argument? I don’t even have the slightest idea of what your cinematic claims are and in what way they are different to mine. Perhaps you would care to enlighten me?