Oil is the 2nd-most prevalent liquid on earth after water – not a ‘fossil fuel’, a term coined by J D Rockerfeller to create the idea of scarcity. Oil & gas will not run out. Carbon dioxide cannot warm the climate, but is in long-term decline, a true risk. All parts of a UN hoax.
If true, this is quite the trick to circumvent the constitution.
Use of the Zip is voluntary. See Domestic Regulations. Section 122.32 as amended. You should also know that the Postal service cannot discriminate against the non-use of the Zip Code. See “Postal Reorganization Act “, Section 403, (Public Law, 91-375). The federal government
utilizes the ZIP code to prove that you reside in a “federal district of the District of Columbia”.
The most intelligent explanation I’ve seen so far as to how/why Texas went dark. Reading the headlines will not explain it. Reading all the paragraphs will – which most people won’t do in a tiktok world.
The story from some media sources is that frozen wind turbines are responsible for the power shortfalls in Texas. Other media sources emphasize that fossil fuel resources should shoulder the blame because they have large cold induced outages as well and also some natural gas plants could not obtain fuel.
Is Walmart part of a state sponsored oligopoly to dictate social behaviour? Seems so.
Does corporate welfare count as socialism?
“The study estimated the cost to Wisconsin’s taxpayers of Walmart’s low wages and benefits, which often force workers to rely on various public assistance programs,” reads the report, available in full here.
“It found that a single Walmart Supercenter cost taxpayers between $904,542 and $1.75 million per year, or between $3,015 and $5,815 on average for each of 300 workers.”
Centralized servers, search and DNS, go against the spirit of the web.
Could the unnecessary SSL push be used to setup a two tier internet?
Will fakeologist go to the second, unsearchable tier?
SSL and Lets Encrypt – a Trojan horse for internet censorship?
Since this is on the wall right now (good call to clean up the chatbox) I just want to voice my concerns regarding SSL (Secure Sockets Layers) technology and its implications.
First of all, SSL is a great thing. What it does is to encrypt a connection between two parties and ensure the identity of these by the use of asymmetric encryption and a certificate chain. This is very useful when we do bank transactions or purchase things on the internet since it’s harder for an internet eavesdropper to get hold of for example card information. SSL has been in use for many years by banks and e-commerce.
However what’s happened the last years is that the idea has taken foothold that a website is somehow inherently insecure if it does not implement SSL. And to help every website implement SSL, a free certification entity – Lets Encrypt has emerged and Google has started punishing websites that do not use SSL, regardless if they have any functions that actually justify the technology. Why would for example a web forum be safer because of SSL? It makes no sense.
What does makes sense however is the usual problem, reaction, solution dialectic. Despite Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and an enormous disinformation machinery, the free web is still causing problems and needs to be controlled. And with a certificate chain in the hands of the Nutwork and web clients that does not accept communication from servers outside this chain, there is a swift way to shut down unwanted sites. I think this is the actual reason for all the care and effort being spent right now on having SSL universally implemented. Its a Trojan horse for internet censorship. In the future we might read in New York Times about how Russian cyber criminals have staged attacks from certain websites but that our valiant protective agencies have eliminated the threat by revoking their SSL certificates…