The NASA science recruiting group create lies to get children into science and maths – with a goal that is fantasy and imagination.
That seems like a worthy goal – but it’s a lie based on Disney’s space imagination.
Is it worthwhile? Does it do more good than harm?
They think so – it’s called a noble lie.
No tags for this post.
Long before NASA was even a seed.
No tags for this post.The Great Moon Hoax of 1835 was the most spectacular global news event of the year, despite it being a complete fabrication. Was it satire gone wrong, or a cynical ploy to sell newspapers?
Very few are paying attention to NASA and its pathetic fakery.
For those that do, here’s another slip up.
Dear all, it would appear that ‘zero gravity’ acts in – uh – opposed directions – depending on which side of the Earth the ISS is traveling…
Source: Fakery in Orbit: THE I$$ – Page 105 – Cluesforum—Exposing Mass Deception
No tags for this post.
likes thisWorks for every country and every religion, and I’m sure they’ll customize it for the Covidian religion.
Great work by IPS.
No tags for this post.How can satellites so far up be only tuned to one country or very close to it?
Obviously because there are no satellites. We’re still dealing with long wave rf, likely from very high mast towers.
The Starlink satellite constellation now has 800 satellites in orbit and the company has now rolled out public beta testing accross the US and Canada. The “Better Than Nothing” public testing phase has now begun and Canadian users are starting to see beta testing invites. Users in the US now have the Starlink terminals, sold for US$499 (C$649), and a monthly fee of US$99 (C$129) per month. Total start up costs for a typical Canadian user are about C$800.
www.canadasatellite.ca/StarLin…
Why lie about the satellites? It’s because providing service to a low density area is expensive, and only something from outer space can justify an outer space price.
Here’s a similar service that had just one big mast that couldn’t penetrate Canada’s biggest city market 20 years ago.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Look_Com…
The signals were then broadcast over the air from one of several transmission towers or base stations to a receiving antenna at subscribers’ homes or businesses
Update:
Here’s the likely technology used.
No tags for this post.
likes thisAllan knows NASA and SpaceX are bs, but he sees something unexplained in the sky.
Spacex and NASA are there to misdirect us from… whatever is really going on. Based on March 3rd and 4th, plus other images from other nights, plus years of research, I suspect there has been a secret space program since just after World War Two.
A Flying Circus blog.banditobooks.com/a-flying…
No tags for this post.
like thisEnjoyed this post.
No tags for this post.Well I’m pretty sure that going into space is exactly as impossible today as it was 100 years ago. This would be supported by the fact that contemporary imagery of ‘space missions’ looks fake, imagery of 10 years ago looks fake, 20 years ago still fake, i.e. all of it looks fake. The US Air Force ran the X-plane program and as soon as it started looking like they’d hit a ceiling of maximum flight altitude, they dropped space like a hot rock and NASA was formed to carry things on. If it were possible to travel to orbit, the US Air Force would by now at least have taken something heavy up there and dropped it to see what kind of mess it would make. But they haven’t.
Now, to address your above-mentioned issues of attitude control, would you like to speculate (I know, neither you or I are rocket scientists – but give it a try!) as to exactly how this would be achieved for this “GAIA satellite” hat-shaped contraption? Can you see any which is depicted (with its fancy fold-out solar panels) on ESA’s official website as follows
Apollo, and more space hoaxes • Re: Satellites : general discussion and musings www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic….
No tags for this post.