Category Archives: Science hoaxes

Is Simon’s tychos model getting attention?

Be the 1st to vote.

When the Miles Mathis operation takes note of Mercury’s retrograde, and it explains it with charges and Solar Minimum/Maximum theory (bunk?), then perhaps tychos.info has reached high enough to attract misdirection.

Maybe things are going to get more interesting with our nearly stationary earth.

Looking forward  to Simon’s response.

tychos.info

cluesforum.info

Apparently it’s a hot topic because Mercury’s retrograde is being blamed, among other ridiculous misdirection, for Fecesbook’s outage. Link

No tags for this post.

UFO hoax psyop

Napoleonlikes this

Episode 55: The Collins Brothers on Invoking the Beyond and the ET Myth

2021-06-02 by Timothy Kelly

Web player: podcastaddict.com/episode/1239…
Episode: tkelly6785757.podomatic.com/en…

H/t Exoterick

Paul and Phillip Collins return to Our Interesting Time to discuss their research regarding the UFO phenomenon and ET myth – subjects extensively covered in their new book – Invoking the Beyond: The Kantian Rift, Mythologized Menaces, and the Quest for the New Man. Their research connects Gnosticism, Darwinism and intelligence agencies in a centuries long scheme to deceive humanity.

No tags for this post.

Why do Spacex Starlink Satellites only work near the US border?

Be the 1st to vote.

How can satellites so far up be only tuned to one country or very close to it?

Obviously because there are no satellites. We’re still dealing with long wave rf, likely from very high mast towers.

The Starlink satellite constellation now has 800 satellites in orbit and the company has now rolled out public beta testing accross the US and Canada. The “Better Than Nothing” public testing phase has now begun and Canadian users are starting to see beta testing invites. Users in the US now have the Starlink terminals, sold for US$499 (C$649), and a monthly fee of US$99 (C$129) per month. Total start up costs for a typical Canadian user are about C$800.

www.canadasatellite.ca/StarLin…

Why lie about the satellites? It’s because providing service to a low density area is expensive, and only something from outer space can justify an outer space price.

Here’s a similar service that had just one big mast that couldn’t penetrate Canada’s biggest city market 20 years ago.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Look_Com…

The signals were then broadcast over the air from one of several transmission towers or base stations to a receiving antenna at subscribers’ homes or businesses

Update:

Here’s the likely technology used.

Fixed wireless.

No tags for this post.

Where does the H go?

Be the 1st to vote.

If the Earth is mostly covered in water and water evaporates, where does all the hydrogen in the water molecule go? We are told that the air is 20% oxygen- so where does the double hydrogen go? Also interesting is that CO2 only makes up .033% of the air, and we are told there are just trace amounts of hydrogen.

The whole concept of air being composed of different gases may just be a tool for deception. It’s a concept worth exploring.

Is this story just to hide the entire concept of aether?

inspectapedia.com/indoor_air_q…

No tags for this post.

Show me some DNA, genes, or even a chromosome

Be the 1st to vote.

D.N.A. is the basis from which we are supposed to accept that it is the genesis from which all so-called ‘life-forms’ have developed and continue to do so. Thus the notion of entities called ‘genes’ was developed from the notion. These ‘entities’ (genes) are supposed to establish our ‘make-up’ from our direct progenitors and those before us.

General World Affairs • Re: THE DNA/RNA DECEIT www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic….

No tags for this post.

The Molecular Path to Shamanism | Watson, Crick and the Double-Helix Delusion

Psyopticonlikes this

GENETICIST JAMES WATSON AND FRANCIS CRICK, a molecular biologist, biophysicist, and neuroscientist by trade, conducted no DNA experiments of their own, according to the U.S. National Library of Medicine. And yet in 1953, in the final few years leading up to the space race, they discovered the DNA molecule known as the Double Helix by “drawing upon the experimental results of others” and relying on “brilliant intuition, persistence, and luck.” But there is a missing ingredient here. As the story goes, Francis Crick burst through the front door of his Cambridge home spouting barely-legible gibberish to his wife about “two spirals twisting in opposite directions from one another.” Being herself somewhat of an artist, she put vision to paper. And like Walt Disney with Mickey Mouse, the coiling double helix was promptly born. To celebrate, the couple met up with research partner James Watson, and the trio drunk themselves silly at a local pub. It should be noted that Crick was a devoted fan of author Aldous Huxley. He famously threw nude parties throughout the 1950’s and 60’s. But most importantly of all, Crick was a devoted connoisseur of LSD.

theunexpectedcosmology.com/the…

No tags for this post.

The DNA double helix hoax

XileffilexMarin2Psyopticonlike this

Crick was an LSD popping, Aldous Huxley loving theorist who didn’t do one experiment to “discover” DNA.

His wife painted his hallucination.

He’s simply another scientistism character used to sell a myth.

H/t Jan Erik

No tags for this post.

POP101: A primer on the future of planet Earth – Overpopulation is a myth

Be the 1st to vote.

Great website.

Perhaps the eugenicists should review it before they prick the population into a precipitous decline.

overpopulationisamyth.com/

No tags for this post.

The DNA deceit

Be the 1st to vote.

From Sharpstuff:

Thesis:
If you remove any substance from a ‘living’ organism it may be part of that original but immediately must become something else.

We cannot, then, therefore make any reference to it as a ‘part’ of the original (since the original is now also a part of the original and deplete of its ‘wholeness’ and the removed ‘part’ is now a separate entity). Any results of ‘experiments’ or studies upon the removed part can (in simple) only be a form of conjecture as to its part in the original .

If, for example, let us make an analogy, say, making a fruit cake. We may work from a known recipe or create one from any several parts, which we call ingredients. We take those ingredients and mix them into a bowl. Now we have a ‘dough’ comprised of the ingredients all mashed up, therefore not recognised as separate entities. We then place this into a cooking vessel (e.g. a cooking oven, or even an ice-box) and after a given period of time we are presented with a structure (comprised of the individual ingredients but now not recognisable as such) which we might say is a complete object we will call it a ‘cake’.

No tags for this post.

Dig into Peter & Pete 

Be the 1st to vote.

SMJ and Ricky recommend this site. I’ll start watching – you can too and report back.

Since April 2015 and realising the Earth is not a globe, the channel has gone through significant changes and after researching numerous areas of science (especially chemistry) we’ve arrived at the conclusion that mainstream’s understanding of the natural world is fabricated; it’s literally made up with a plethora of information and contrived demonstrations that only attempt to convince people the understanding is true. So, through the education we receive to the food we eat, to the medicines we take, to th

Source: Peter & Pete – YouTube

No tags for this post.