Tag Archives: Oklahoma city bombing

9/11 in training – OKC bombing

Be the 1st to vote.

Our old liar for hire Matt when he had hair starts this off.

Instructional to watch this footage – what exactly are we watching? Pre-recorded “unedited” “live” footage?

No doubt this “Terror in the Heartland” media event was used as a template/training ground for the biggest hoax of all, 9/11.

This event started, of course, at 9.

1200 lb car bomb rips through 9 story building”

“there was no-one to save”

“right in the middle of hell”

“genie out of the bottle after ’93 WTC bombing”

The whole child care center killing of children meme was a particularly despicable act of fakery.

? Oklahoma City Bombing News Reports – YouTube.

7 and building destruction

Be the 1st to vote.

Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building - Controlled Demolition, Inc. 2014-03-06 13-28-35

It appears that CDI is a private and mysterious company.  Interesting use of 7 in taking down the Oklahoma City bombing building. Probably just a coincidence.

At 7:00 am on Wednesday, May 24, 1995, the remains of the building that was the target of America’s deadliest domestic terrorist attack crumbled neatly in seven (7) seconds. The results of the implosion surpassed expectations. The Murrah Building fell as planned, leaving the adjacent parking structure intact.

The implosion proved to be a catharsis for the American People who had watched the tragedy unfold since the bombing of April 19th. It was now a time to begin the healing process and start a new chapter for Oklahoma City.

via Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building | Controlled Demolition, Inc..

Update 3/7/14

Here’s that other building 7 story: seems like it was ultimately determined to have collapsed on the sevens.Numerology is so important to the Nutwork to encode and confound and communicate that it really can’t be ignored as a signature. It’s like a Z for Zorro or cow-brand, or like a cat spraying its territory to let you know it’s been there and you’re on its territory.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_… (the wikedpedia article is chock-a-block of numbers that add up to 7 I won’t bother to highlight them — discover for yourselves)

7 World Trade Center   Wikipedia  the free encyclopedia

On September 11, 2001, 7 WTC was damaged by debris when the nearby North Tower of the World Trade Center collapsed. The debris also ignited fires, which continued to burn throughout the afternoon on lower floors of the building. The building’s internal fire suppression system lacked water pressure to fight the fires, and the building collapsed completely at 5:21:10 pm, according to FEMA,[5] while the 2008 NIST study placed the final collapse time at 5:20:52 pm

Fruity nukes at the Oklahoma City Murrah building

Be the 1st to vote.

No doubt in my mind that Oklahoma was a mini 9/11. The parallels are endless and I’m glad to see OBF and Pshea make mention of it in the thread below that I commented on.

My favorite part of this fantasy theory is the pineapple nuke. If this miniaturization of the nuclear bomb hoax was true, then we need to immediately surround Costa Rica and start inspecting their biggest export, one by one. I am sure Dole will he happy to dole out the dough. Heck, if it can double their profits, why not? What’s next? Banana nukes? Obf and Pshea have it right. This was another military media hoax for fear and money like 9/11.

via The Real Deal with Jim Fetzer podcast: Harmon Taylor.

On reflection, I did enjoy this broadcast. It’s quite clear that the whole Oklahoma City Bombing was a psyOp done in the same full-of-holes way as 9/11. The bomb in the fertilizer truck made no sense from an explosive point of view, the illegal moving of the trial from the state was not legal. The building itself was a state building rented to the feds.

As usual, the only thing Fetzer leaves out and glosses over is the possibility that no-one died, and the holes in the story can be simply attributed to the fact that it was a manufactured event. No truck was required, since the scene was a controlled demolition scene and they only had to say there was a truck, and back it up with fake witnesses and imagery. The parallels with the 9/11 planes and the impossible damage they did to real buildings are striking.

Getting back to the methodology of the destruction: how are nukes or direct energy weapons that we have no proof of their existence seem more likely and explainable than media fakery that we do have proof exists? Why do these two educated people insist of believing in magic instead of reality?

All their arguments become unhinged on this simple reality: their theories are magical where mine are based on today’s (and yesterday’s) very simple and cheap media manipulation.