Via https://t.me/DarksidePapersChat/136240
Darkside Papers:
okay friends, we’ve already exposed Kary Mullis for the fraud that he is, but since it’s come up again, let’s have a review.
As we all know, Mullis is largely credited as having “invented PCR” … but that’s not really true. Have a read.
https://wgntv.com/news/coronavirus/pcr-testing-inventor-speaks-to-wgn-amid-covid-19-pandemic/
As we quickly learn, Mullis didn’t “invent” anything.
PCR was just an alleged “idea” that Mullis had … the actual in-lab work was conducted by a team of technicians that did not include Mullis.
That team of technicians was led by Dr. Henry Erlich.
Since the early 1980s, Henry A. Erlich has been well-known in the forensic and medical communities for helping to pioneer the research and development of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR ) technique that ultimately lead to a number of important forensic and clinical applications. As a result of the pioneering efforts of Erlich and his team of scientists, the first commercial PCR typing kit was developed specifically for forensic use. Currently, Erlich is the director of the Department of Human Genetics and vice-president of Discovery Research, both for Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; and the co-director (and co-founder) of the HLA Laboratory at the Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute—all three located in the San Francisco Bay Area of California.
Source
Next, read what Mullis wrote:
https://www.karymullis.com/pcr.shtml
He essentially took credit for the invention, even though he had no part in it whatsoever, except for “allegedly” coming up with the idea. But he didn’t do any of the work at all.
Now go ahead and read his little story and ask yourselves if you think it’s believable in any way.
it’s dramatic, for sure. But is it true?
Darkside Papers:
Next, see if you can find any photos of Mullis in a lab, doing actual work.
And by photos, I mean real photos of him in a Lab, not photoshoots like this one.
That’s not a real lab, it’s a studio.
Is Mullis even a real scientist? Or is he just an actor?
Here is the “drawing” that Mullis came up with when he “had the idea” of PCR, which is on display at the Smithsonian Institute.
Description (Brief)
Kary Mullis drew this diagram of the polymerase chain reaction process during an interview for a video history conducted on May 15, 1992, by former National Museum of American History curator Ray Kondratas. The video history is available at the Smithsonian Archives under record number SIA RU009577. Mullis invented the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 1983 as a method to copy specific portions of DNA. He won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his invention.
The drawing’s purple and red horizontal lines represent strands of DNA being copied. The letters “dNTPs” at the top of the page refer to deoxyribonucleotides, the individual units of DNA that are assembled into the longer continuous chain. A supply of dNTPs (which come in four types: dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP) are necessary for PCR to occur.
correction, he drew it later, during an interview
https://www.si.edu/object/drawing-pcr-kary-mullis%3Anmah_333204
So, what was the point of Mullis, anyways? Well, if we read his interviews, we can start to understand what his role was.
“The guys who were hanging out in the bathhouses of San Francisco had every parasite you could imagine,” he says. “It was a whole way of life that killed a certain percentage of the people who lived it.”
…
“I don’t actually think it’s a disease.” He says, “There isn’t an epidemic that you can verify.” He says, “It’s not transmitted by sex.” He says, “I don’t really respect the people who call themselves AIDS scientists.”
Now ask yourself, does that make any sense at all?
On the one hand Mullis says that AIDS is spread by homosexuals infected with parasites
And then he says it’s not a disease or an epidemic and not transmitted by sex.
WHAT?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1998/11/03/nobel-chemist-kary-mullis-making-waves-as-a-mind-surfer/
Read this Washington Post article and you’ll learn some interesting things.
among them
We learn that Mullis profited his entire adult life working for biotech pharmecuetical/vaccine manufacturers.
and then won othe Nobel Prize Award for a job well done. Well you and I both know they don’t just give the Nobel Prize award to anyone. They give it TO THEIR OWN.
The article discusses his time at spook University of Berkeley and subsequent hiring at Cetus despite a reputation as a frequent psychadelic drug user and apparently not knowing much about molecular biology.
So a guy who doesn’t know much about molecular biology somehow “boomed” the production of the lab work at Cetus and ended up winning the Nobel Prize for Chemistry for his “invention” of PCR? C’mon now.
Darkside Papers:
“Despite knowing little about molecular biology, Mullis was hired to work in the company’s DNA synthesis lab where he was tasked with streamlining the production of oligonucleotides, little molecules used to isolate sections of natural DNA for study. Thanks to his ingenuity, oligonucleotide production boomed. When White was promoted to director of molecular and biological research, he made Mullis head of the DNA synthesis lab.”
What? Why would they do that?
Why would they hire a guy who doesn’t know anything about molecular biology to work in the DNA synthesis lab AND THEN PROMOTE HIM TO DIRECTOR?
and what did he do there? Just think and come up with ideas? What is he credited for there?
He wasn’t qualified for that job, so why did they hire him? Makes no sense at all.
“He really didn’t know much of anything about molecular biology. And so when he tried to tell all the molecular biologists that this was a good idea, most of them were very skeptical.”
(but we promoted him to Director anyways)
Now, here’s the million dollar question, friends.
If Mullis indeed was making such a difference “working in the lab” – then why was he not part of the team that actually CREATED the PCR process in-lab, and why is there no evidence of his work there?
https://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/winter-2019/intolerable-genius-berkeleys-most-controversial-nobel-laureate
He fought with his bosses. He fought with his coworkers. He fought with Cetus security guards and receptionists. Though married, he dated his labmates—and fought with them, too. Behind Mullis’s bellicosity seemed to be an abiding certainty that he was brilliant and everyone else was a fool, hell-bent on undermining his work. Cetus management was left wondering: What do we do with this guy?
Well, normally you fire a guy like that. Not promote him.
Now – see if you can find specific scientific papers detailing Mullis’ research. You might find his name on a paper or 3, but I’m talking about something substantial.
The following links are either more accounts of his drug fueled discovery of the PCR process “in his mind,” or basicly nothing more than a few paragraph explanations of how the PCR process works in general terms all of which are nearly identical and only detail about how it came to be developed in lab accredited to multiple individuals with no evidence of Mullis’ direct contribution whatsoever. So, where was he?
Usually, in genuine scientific articles, there are normally many pages of detailed, step-by-step analysis of the process leading to the results of the experimentation and development.
Not the case with Mullis, instead we just get ridiculous tall tales about his various exploits and eccentricism.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.199412091
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-unusual-origin-of-the-polymeras
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2288446
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0076687987550236
https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.79.19.5966
Read through them. You’ll find a few paragraphs of fluff, but no real meat and potatoes.
Next, you can read this nonsense:
“With PCR 30 years later,” continues Doyle, “you could actually manipulate this DNA. The chain reaction itself then causes a chain reaction. You get the whole ‘Boom!’ effect. Four molecular biologists and a computer can start a company. You get massive shifts in drug design and Big Pharma—all because you can directly extract genetic information and manipulate it, which is ordinarily the job of evolution through organisms.”
mmm hmmmm. sure you can.
But we already understand that the PCR process is not amplifying or detecting anything at all and there is simply no satisfactory, detailed explanation of exactly how these theoretical “DNA particles” are seen, separated, combined or cloned beyond scientifically artistic explainaitions of totally unverified biological processes between totally theoretical particles.
in layman’s terms – they’re bullshitters.
It is more likely that Mullis was an actor, rather than a real scientist.
There is no evidence of him actually as a “lab technician”
More likely he was hired as an actor paid to play the colorful, eccentric, strangely relatable “genius” fall guy for the completely fraudulent PCR process which was planned from the beginning to be used as it has in the current global attack upon our health, sanity, freedom and intelligence and whose role also includes a novel distraction who becomes the voice of opposition by criticizing the industry to which he sold his soul in nonsensical false binary rants of imaginary nonsense.
The official story is too bizarre to be true as told both about the PCR process and the man who allegedly “discovered” it.
It’s smoke and mirrors.
Need more evidence?
Watch this 18 minute interview with Mullis.
you see Mullis wants to take the soft approach that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS
rather than admit the TRUTH – which is there is NO SUCH THING AS HIV
If you watch this video closely and with your skeptics goggles on, you may come to the inevitable conclusion that this man is a controlled opposition agent of deception.
Part of his job was to create the false narrative and the fake opposition
the “limit” of the opposition voice. the manufactured “boundary” so to speak. Which is the BLASPHEMOUS SUGGESTION that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS. And then that position could be ridiculed and painted as a cartoon. Meaning that any suggestion that HIV doesn’t exist at all would be considered even FAR MORE extreme than this and dismissed alltogether.
and what better way to smear that position than by giving the false opposition an eccentric character like Mullis?
Remember that despite his fake anti-establishment rhetoric, his entire career was spent serving the medical industry and fully participating in the development of concepts and technologies that profoundly enhanced the power of the disease industry over the health and well being of the human community.
Mullis ain’t no rebel. He’s a SOLDIER FOR BIG PHARMA.
Mullis starts the interview off by explaining that nobody has proven HIV causes AIDS.
Well of course nobody has proven that, because HIV (as defined) doesn’t exist, so there’s no way a thing that doesn’t exist could cause a disease. But Mullis conveniently leaves that important piece out of the narrative (because he’s paid to do so).
“Ten years have past and we’ve been waiting for someone to distinguish himself (by proving that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS) and get a life long grant from Tony Fauci but he hasn’t shown up.”
mmm hmmmm
as you can see, Mullis is engaging in DECEPTION here.
He’s doing the same thing that the current covid con men did. Creating a fictional bad guy in Fauci
He then goes into the concept of surrogate markers and the CD4 cell explaining that no one knows exactly what they do or if we need more or less of them and that some diseases make them go up and some make them go down or even if a cell is or is not a CD4 cell.
“We don’t know what they do the immune system is incredibly complicated. An immunologists brain isn’t complicated enough to deal with it. We have these theories but no competent immunologist would tell you that CD4 levels were a sufficient surrogate marker for anything until we know more about it. But that’s what the FDA is using saying yeah you don’t have to show that it helps them or a single life saved, all you have to do is show that some little clinical indicator has changed in a way that somebody is hoping it’s gonna make you better.”
He’s throwing up false arguments but only in the context of supporting Germ Theory.
At the 5:50 mark, you can find the betrayal clearly.
“The chances of you getting a human virus are a hell of a lot higher than they were say 10,000 years ago. There are an infinite number of retro viruses in the world because they are changing so fast you can’t even count them. As there are more and more people in your life, you get more and more chances of getting retro viruses’
The chances are good that they are harmless because they are barely alive but if you hang out with a thousand people here that allow you to get some or most of their retro viruses and then hang out with a thousand people a year and they hang out with a thousand people a year, you’re hanging out with 1/4th of the human race. You’re getting all the retro viruses from all over the planet. Now it might be that none of those things by themselves is gonna hurt you. But we know that some of them do grow in your immune cells.”
what a Clown
if he was REALLY any threat to the powers that be, then why would they give him the Nobel Prize?
Answer – They wouldn’t.
They gave him the nobel prize because he WORKS FOR THEM.
Then he pretends to go back into opposition mode, at 8:40
Where he admits no one actually has proven that an infection is going on.
at 9:50 he says:
“Cell biology is a bunch of magic half the time…people that say they’re doing quantitative estimations of HIV from cultures are fooling themselves”.
Alexander Rimmer:
I would suggest (as always) something was discovered somewhere and the people who did the discovering don’t want to give away their secrets (this is standard for business) . So instead they come up with the ‘apple fell on my head while sleeping’ , ‘saw it in a dream’ , ‘mushrooms showed me’ story, which every person on the inside knows is code for I’m not telling you anything about my discovery or how it really works.
Then you throw in a flawed genius character as the front man and hope he doesn’t lose his shit too badly and have to be moved on. Promoting your discovery and what it can do (mixed with a lot of exaggeration or BS) while revealing as little as possible about its actual workings.
For some reason ordinary people expect every scientific discovery to be provided for the entire world, with a full explanation of its workings and how it was discovered. People with power are not like that. If they were they wouldn’t have the power.
Darkside Papers:
When asked if he thinks HIV is an epidemic, his response:
“The number of cases went up epidemically, exponentially, because the number of tests that were done went up exponentially. How many doctors knew about HIV in 1983? 2. How many know about it in 1985? 500. How many knew in 1986? 40,000.
So that’s where the curve (surge) came from. How much money did we make off of HIV this year? They could’ve plotted that and (the curve) would look the same. We’re making more and more money off it every year. If it’s just caused by needles or it’s just caused by homosexual activity you’re not gonna get a long sustained public outcry and nobody’s gonna wanna spend 6 billion dollars a year.
So the CDC says we’ve got to say it’s heterosexually transmitted. There’s no proof that it’s transmitted at all so why not say it’s heterosexually transmitted too? That made it a plague and the CDC needed one. The CDC hadn’t had a good pl gue since polio. Their funding was probably gonna be cut back if they didn’t come up with one.
Those guys have got an agenda which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health. The scientists are considered the final arbiters of what is good or bad for the planet, and they haven’t got the slightest idea. Instead of wearing white robes they wear white lab coats. Instead of bringing you the word of God they bring you the word of the EPA or whatever and they don’t have to understand what they are making you do in fact and people fall into this because there is a need in humanity in fact for something like a religion.
Something that makes you feel part of some larger group. When beliefs get tangled up with matters of fact, facts become matters of religion. When somebody gets mad at you for asking them a question at a scientific meeting, when someone says “we’re never gonna have Kary Mullis at the European Union meeting of whatever because he came in here and had the audacity to say AIDS might not be something you get from sex”. I don’t see any evidence for it is all I said. I don’t see any evidence for it.”
Alexander Rimmer:
If you get lucky with your discovery the really big boys tap you on the shoulder and use it for a big project (and you move over).
Darkside Papers:
NOTICE how he swings back and forth – a true, tell-tale sign of a controlled opposition disinfo agent of deception.
His entire career is a fraud, and so is he.
Alexander Rimmer:
Every single promoted person is promoted for a reason. There is no exception.
Darkside Papers Chat:
100%
Alexander Rimmer:
And true scientists generally hate the media show.
Ian Randell:
Kinda like pasteur then ..and his similar name to ‘pastor’ ???
Darkside Papers:
Now let’s think about the bottom line for a moment. What did Kary Mullis achieve?
Mullis revealed nothing that runs counter to the official narrative.
His greatest achievement is winning a Nobel prize for inventing a fraudulent PCR process of “amplifying particles” that don’t exist.
That PCR process was eventually used to engulf the entire planet in a paranoid psychotic episode of insanity as part of the COVID Con.
that’s what we have to thank Mullis for.
To put it another way, COVID could have never happened without the help of Mullis.
From his WikiPedia page, we learn a few more interesting things about this fraudulent character, Kary Mullis.
He founded Altermune LLC in 2011 to pursue new ideas on the immune system.
Mullis described the company’s novel technology in a presentation:
It is a method using specific synthetic chemical linkers to divert an immune response from its nominal target to something completely different which you would right now like to be temporarily immune to. Let’s say you just got exposed to a new strain of the flu. You’re already immune to alpha-1,3-galactosyl-galactose bonds. All humans are. Why not divert a fraction of those antibodies to the influenza strain you just picked up? A chemical linker synthesized with an alpha-1,3-gal-gal bond on one end and a DNA aptamer devised to bind specifically to the strain of influenza you have on the other end will link anti-alpha-Gal antibodies to the influenza virus and presto!–you have fooled your immune system into attacking the new virus.
In a TED Talk, Mullis describes how the US Government paid $500,000 for Mullis to use this new technology against Anthrax, which worked. The treatment was 100% effective, compared to the previous Anthrax treatment which was 40% effective.
Another proof-of-principle of this technology, re-targeting pre-existing antibodies to the surface of a pathogenic strep bacteria using an alpha-gal modified aptamer (“alphamer”), was published in 2015 in collaboration with scientists at the University of California, San Diego.
Mullis was inspired to fight this particular strep bacteria because it had killed his friend.
what a bunch of horse shit.
Susan Grace:
Mullis says retroviruses are “barely alive”? ?. either they are alive or they aren’t. There is no barely. What a clown. So why Mullis? Who was he? Was he connected to “the families” like many of these jerk offs are?
DPL (@dpl.):
Sitting back watching everything you cannot help but laugh. These chaps plan decades in advance and we sit here thinking sht just happened because of chance.
HEidi:
But why do they need to fake it when it’s real? Three family members and 12 other people that I know are dead.
Darkside Papers:
It is a trite point that every patentable invention needs an inventor as claimant, just as every inventor needs an invention to claim possession of. However, it does not follow that objectively identifying them and then linking them together are necessarily straightforward tasks; especially in new fields like biotechnology where the creativity of nature itself provides a helping hand and inherent complexity and unpredictability may obfuscate matters further. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which enables small pieces of DNA to be amplified exponentially, is one of the foundational techniques in molecular biology and a vital research tool. Its (alleged) inventor, Kary Mullis, won a Nobel prize for it and was named as an inventor on the two main patents. Yet, his association with the invention was subject to continued dispute and a controversial court case, which, in the view of some highly qualified critics, resolved nothing. Using PCR as an example, this seminar offers some new interdisciplinary perspectives on the contested nature of attribution and credit in the life sciences, both within and outside patent law.
https://www.qmul.ac.uk/law/events/podcasts/ipdutfield/
The effects of business practices, licensing, and intellectual property on development and dissemination of the polymerase chain reaction: case study
The initial discovery of the polymerase chain reaction technique is attributed to Kary Mullis, a chemist who won the Nobel Prize in 1993 for his work on PCR. Mullis found himself at Cetus in 1979 after studying chemistry at Georgia Institute of Technology, biochemistry at UC Berkeley, and doing post-doctoral work in pharmaceutical chemistry at UC San Francisco. His work at Cetus focused on synthesizing oligonucleotides, short segments of DNA usually less than 20 nucleotide bases in length, for use by other researchers within the company. He became head of the DNA synthesis lab in 1981, and automated the production of oligonucleotides, making the process of DNA synthesis much less laborious. With productivity on the rise, Mullis remembers, “we nucleotide chemists found ourselves successfully underemployed. Laboratory machines, which we loaded and watched, were making almost more oligonucleotides than we had room for in the freezer…in my laboratory at Cetus, there was a fair amount of time available to think and to putter
PCR has earned huge sums of money in royalties for the various rights-holders while also becoming one of the most important research tools in molecular biology. In addition to Kary Mullis’ $10,000 bonus and the $300 million earned by Cetus in selling the PCR patents, it is estimated that Roche has earned upwards of $2 billion in royalties from licensing the technology
Roche represented an interesting partner for Cetus. The Swiss pharmaceutical giant owned the patent rights to recombinant forms of interleukin 2 (IL-2), the production of which was one of Cetus’s largest revenue sources [17]. Cetus officials were intrigued at the possibility of swapping rights to PCR technology for rights to manufacture and sell IL-2 without worrying about patent infringement suits. After lengthy negotiations, Cetus announced on January 19, 1989 that the two companies had settled on terms of the agreement: Roche would supply $30 million, paid over five years, to fund diagnostic research. Additionally, Roche would pay a significant royalty on the sale of diagnostic products and services that were developed through the partnership. Roche also agreed to purchase one million shares of Cetus stock. Most importantly, Roche granted Cetus the rights to use the IL-2 patents for commercial purposes without fear of lawsuit
Source
Interesting that WikiPedia mentions NOTHING about the lawsuit
Defendants argue that Applera breached its duty of candor before the PTO in addressing inventorship and prior art affecting the patentability of the ‘675 and ‘493 patents. First, defendants claim that Applera knowingly made false statements and failed to disclose material information to the PTO concerning the inventorship of the ‘675 and ‘493 patents in order to deceive the PTO into believing that Dr. Kary Mullis was the sole inventor of the asserted claims of the ‘675 and ‘493 patents, in order to remove from consideration Dr. Mullis’ prior art PCR process patents, when in fact Dr. Mullis was not an inventor of any of the asserted claims in the ‘675 and ‘493 patents. In particular, defendants argue that Applera did not consult with the originally named inventors during the prosecution of the ‘493 patent, who would have informed Applera that Dr. Mullis had no direct involvement in the development of thermal cyclers, and that Applera failed to inform the PTO that Dr. Mullis never programmed a computer to cycle temperatures. Source
Mullis is and was a Liar
Let this be a friendly reminder that all of your favorite opposition voices are 100% AGENTS OF DECEPTION!
III. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
A. Sole Inventorship of Dr. Mullis
The jury found that defendants failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Dr. Kary B. Mullis was not the sole inventor of claims 17, 33 and 45 of the ‘675 patent and claim 16 of the ‘493 patent. Dr. Mullis invented the polymerase chain reaction process (“PCR”) and related processes that are the subject of U.S. Patent No. 4,683,202 and several other patents. While Dr. Mullis originally was not named as an inventor in the prosecution of the ‘493 and ‘675 patents, (U.S. patent applications serial numbers 833,368 (“‘368 application”) and 899,061 (“‘061 application”)), filed by Cetus in February and August 1986, he was added an inventor in 1990. At that time, during the prosecution of the ‘675 patent, the other co-inventors submitted declarations to the PTO stating:
The error in not joining Kary Mullis as an inventor arose at the time of filing the parent of the subject application on February 25, 1986. At the time of the filing of the patent of this application, it was thought that a general purpose programmable temperature cycler was new. Accordingly, this is what was originally claimed. The original claims did not recite any subject matter regarding the PCR protocol, and it was not deemed necessary to join Kary Mullis as a joint inventor. The subject matter of the PCR protocol and much of the specification from the Mullis patent U.S. 4,683,202 was included in the subject application for completeness in the description of how to use the invention.
It was discovered on or about December of 1989, that general purpose programmable temperature cyclers were already in the prior art. Soon thereafter, between December, 1989 and February, 1990, Cetus decided to narrow the original broad claims in light of this prior art. Accordingly, the claims were amended in March 1990 to recite the details of the PCR protocol. It then became clear that Kary Mullis had to be joined as a joint inventor since the recitations in the claims regarding the PCR protocol were his conception. Accordingly, the error in not naming Kary Mullis as a joint inventor arose inadvertently and without deceptive intent.
mmm hmmmm
Declaration by Richard Leath in Support of a Petition to Add a Joint Inventor, April 2, 1990 [PTX 24]; see also Declaration of Larry Johnson in Support of Petition to Add a New Joint Inventor, April 2, 1990 [PTX 23] (concurring with statement by Richard Leath and stating that he “obtained the details of the PCR protocol indirectly from Kary Mullis by conversations with John Sninsky and Randy Saiki, both employees of Cetus.”); Declaration of Larry Johnson in Support of Petition to Add a New Joint Inventor, August 23, 1990 [PTX 14] (stating “I believe the error arose because Kary Mullis had no direct connection with the [instrument design] project and was simply forgotten when inventorship was being considered when we wrote the original invention disclosure describing the subject invention to the Cetus legal department.”); Declaration of Kary B. Mullis in Support of Petition to Change Inventorship, April 2, 1990 (concurring with statement by Richard Leath and stating that he “communicated information regarding the PCR protocol indirectly to Larry Johnson and Richard Leath through my communications with Norman Arnheim. This information included the reaction mixture, cycle times and temperatures, the reagents needed, and what a machine to automate the process would have been able to do. This information eventually got to Larry Johnson and Richard Leath, probably through John Sninsky and Randy Saiki who got it from Arnheim.”).
Applera also submitted to the PTO the declaration of John Atwood, who stated that given the criteria Dr. Mullis set forth, “an average instrument engineer, using only his ordinary skills and routine approach, could have put together a system to automate various PCR protocols.” See Declaration of John Atwood, June 3, 1991 [PTX 34].
Based on the evidence on which the jury found that defendants failed to prove that Dr. Mullis was not the sole inventor of the asserted claims of the ‘675 and ‘493 patents, the Court concludes that defendants have not proved the existence of any misrepresentations regarding inventorship. The declarations presented to the PTO acknowledge the initial failure to name Dr. Mullis as an inventor, explain the reasons for this omission, and explain why Dr. Mullis was believed to be the sole inventor of the asserted claims. The Patent Office thus had before it the relevant information necessary to decide the patentability of the asserted claims of the ‘675 and ‘493 patents, including facts that defendants here use to cast suspicion on Applera’s actions (for example, that Dr. Mullis was not included on the original invention disclosure forms and that Dr. Mullis did not speak directly with the engineers earlier named as inventors). Applera, moreover, acknowledged in its 1995 Amendment to the ‘493 patent application that it understood that one of the originally named inventors on the invention disclosure regarding the “Son of Cycle” machine independently conceived of using a Peltier device in a PCR instrument.
Defendants have also failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Applera intended to deceive the PTO. At best, defendants’ references to deposition testimony of the engineers would indicate that it may have been prudent for Applera to return to the engineers in 1995 to determine whether they would verify Dr. Mullis’ 1995 declaration, which explained in detail for the first time his conception of automation using a metal block and a Peltier device. Such evidence is plainly insufficient to meet defendants’ burden. See, e.g. Specialty Composites, 845 F.2d at 992 (evidence of negligence does not satisfy the intent element). First, Dr. Mullis’ declaration need not be viewed as inconsistent with the omission of his name from the “Son of Cycle” invention disclosure form, because one of the named Cetus inventors may have conceived of using a Peltier device independently from Dr. Mullis and at a later time. Applera made this argument to the PTO during the prosecution of the ‘493 argument, and it is possible to infer that the PTO agreed that there was no inconsistency, as the ‘493 patent issued. While intent can be inferred from indirect evidence, here the record is devoid of evidence that Applera knew of information inconsistent with Dr. Mullis’ claim of inventorship, and intended to deceive the PTO by intentionally failing to disclose this information.
I highly encourage you to read the entire thing ?
and then ask yourself a few basic questions.
1) Had you EVER heard of this controversy (which includes multiple lawsuits) around Mullis being the true inventor of PCR before?
2) If not, why not?
3) Why haven’t ANY of your favorite cartoon truthers talked about this?
I can only offer my opinion for the answer to number 3, of course.
It’s because 99% of the Truth Community is full of either:
a) controlled opposition gatekeepers
b) rookie, amateaur truthers who don’t know how to research
they’re too busy sucking on each other, planning summits, collecting money – caught in the vaccine/virus debate and fucking the flat earth
and they don’t have what it takes.
they don’t have THE STONES
how hard is it? start at his wikipedia page
grow an OUNCE OF FUCKING INTUITION
that’s all you need in the end, really. your own intuition.
Nobel Prize should be all you need to discard Mullis. No research needed.
Mullis invented PCR just like Robert Malone invented mRNA
When Malone first came onto the scene as the alleged “inventor of mRNA” I knew right away that was likely a big fat lie.
How? How could I have known?
BECAUSE OF MULLIS
Same Script. Same screenplay. Recycled from one decade to the next
their stupid psyops often overlap with each other.
so if you understand one psyop, you are steps ahead on the next one.
For example – I was able to dismiss that stupid clown Denis Rancourt right out of the gate. I’ve literally never read anything he’s written or listened to a single thing he’s said about COVID. I knew what he was because of his 9/11 idiocy.
Don’t waste your time with these clowns. Even the ones who you think are on your side. UNLESS you are doing it for the sole purpose and understanding that you’re going to learn a few things and then be ready to discard them.
Like Mullis.
Most Truthers think Mullis is a friend. A “hero” for fighting the establishment.
He’s not anti-establishment, he SERVES the establishment.
which is why they gave him the Nobel Prize, of course.
After receiving his doctorate, Mullis briefly left science to write fiction before accepting the University of Kansas fellowship
mmm hmmm. they tell you RIGHT THERE ON HIS WIKIPEDIA PAGE
He was a fictional writer.
A STORYTELLER
During his postdoctoral work, he managed a bakery for two years.
Really?
perhaps that’s where he “cooked up” his bullshit little story, huh?
Despite little experience in molecular biology, Mullis worked as a DNA chemist at Cetus for seven years, ultimately serving as head of the DNA synthesis lab under White, then the firm’s director of molecular and biological research; it was there, in 1983, that Mullis invented the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure.
mmm hmmm, sure he did.
A guy who wrote stories and worked in a bakery suddenly began working as a DNA Chemist? Who fucking writes this crap? Oh, Mullis does, that’s who.
In 1992, Mullis founded a business to sell pieces of jewelry containing the amplified DNA of deceased famous people such as Elvis Presley and Marilyn Monroe.
So Mullis is not only a fraud and a liar, he’s also A GRIFTER
Selling trinkets to gullible apes.
stupid truthers who can’t learn to think for themselves.
Mullis was a member of the USA Science and Engineering Festival’s Advisory Board.[25] In 2014, he was named a distinguished researcher at the Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute in Oakland, California.
None of these organizations would allow Mullis to step foot in their buildings if he was really anti-establishment or a threat to their industries.
He founded Altermune LLC in 2011 to pursue new ideas on the immune system
yes, yes, the immune system
just another Germ Theory Zealot, spreading lies and fabrications.
A concept similar to that of PCR had been described before Mullis’s work. Nobel laureate H. Gobind Khorana and Kjell Kleppe, a Norwegian scientist, authored a paper 17 years earlier describing a process they termed “repair replication” in the Journal of Molecular Biology.[34] Using repair replication, Kleppe duplicated and then quadrupled a small synthetic molecule with the help of two primers and DNA polymerase. The method developed by Mullis used repeated thermal cycling, which allowed the rapid and exponential amplification of large quantities of any desired DNA sequence from an extremely complex template. Later a heat-stable DNA polymerase was incorporated into the process.
well, we know that’s a LIE because PCR doesn’t directly amplify ANYTHING!
Despite having no background or experience in scientifically studying the supernatural whatsoever, Mullis publicly recounted his belief in various paranormal activities and his direct participation in some of them. For example, he asserted that he had witnessed the ghost of his grandfather and had attempted to mutually consume alcoholic drinks with the spirit. He specifically used the term “non-substantial form” to describe his understanding of the ocurrance.
Mullis was a surfer[41][55] and played the guitar. He married four times[14] and had three children by two of his wives.
how hard is the picture to paint?
Eccentric drug user, womanizer, rock-star, AIDS and climate change denialist
a PERFECT agent of controlled opposition.
eccentric enough for the stupid truthers to latch onto and the normies to dismiss easily.
Abu-Sumayah:
Facts.
Ian Randell:
And baker!…maybe that’s how the yeast was influenced
Susan Grace:
I completely understand
