Difference between revisions of "1912 - Voynich manuscript"

From Fakeopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(External links)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan=2 align=center | [[File:Voynich-partof_f78r.jpg|300px]]
 
| colspan=2 align=center | [[File:Voynich-partof_f78r.jpg|300px]]
|-
 
| <small>[[Psyop#Types|Type 1]]</small> || [[:Category:HIstory|HIstory]]
 
|-
 
| <small>[[Psyop#Types|Type 2]]</small> || [[:Category:Forgery psyops|forgery]]<br>[[:Category:Money scam psyops|money scam]]
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| <small>Year</small> || align=center | [[:Category:1912 psyops|1912]]
 
| <small>Year</small> || align=center | [[:Category:1912 psyops|1912]]
 
|-
 
|-
| <small>Places</small> || [[Jesuit]] Library, [[:Category:Psyops in Italy|Italy]]<br>Castle in [[:Category:Psyops in Austria|Austria]]<br>[[:Category:Psyops in New York City|New York City]]
+
| <small>Places</small> || Jesuit Library, [[:Category:Psyops in Italy|Italy]]<br>Castle in [[:Category:Psyops in Austria|Austria]]<br>[[:Category:Psyops in New York City|New York City]]
|-
 
| <small>[[Perp]] || [[Wilfrid Voynich]]
 
|-
 
| colspan=2 align=center | '''Linked to'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| <small>[[Stonehenge]] (??)</small> || • <small>[[Vinland map]] (1965)</small>
+
| <small>[[Perp]] || Wilfrid Voynich
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan=2 align=center | '''Information'''
 
| colspan=2 align=center | '''Information'''
Line 26: Line 18:
 
|}
 
|}
  
The '''Voynich manuscript''' is one of the most [[mystery|mysterious]] books of all time. According to the official story, it was discovered in [[:Category:1912 psyops|1912]] by [[Wilfrid Voynich]],<ref name=WikiWilfridVoynich group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilfrid_Voynich Wikipedia - Wilfrid Voynich]</ref> married to Ethel Boole,<ref name=WikiEthelBoole group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethel_Voynich Wikipedia - Ethel Boole]</ref> the daughter of George Boole of the Boolean algebra,<ref name=WikiGeorgeBoole group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Boole Wikipedia - George Boole]</ref> in a [[Jesuit]] library near Rome in Italy, but also a castle in [[:Category:Psyops in Austria|Austria]] has been said. The vellum (calf skin "paper") of the manuscript has been [[carbon dating|carbon dated]] to the period of 1404 to 1438. Until today, despite numerous attempts, the manuscript, housed by the [[Yale University]] library has not been deciphered.
+
The '''Voynich manuscript''' is one of the most mysterious books of all time. According to the official story, it was discovered in [[:Category:1912 psyops|1912]] by Wilfrid Voynich,<ref name=WikiWilfridVoynich group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilfrid_Voynich Wikipedia - Wilfrid Voynich]</ref> married to Ethel Boole,<ref name=WikiEthelBoole group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethel_Voynich Wikipedia - Ethel Boole]</ref> the daughter of George Boole of the Boolean algebra,<ref name=WikiGeorgeBoole group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Boole Wikipedia - George Boole]</ref> in a Jesuit library near Rome in Italy, but also a castle in [[:Category:Psyops in Austria|Austria]] has been said. The vellum (calf skin "paper") of the manuscript has been carbon dated to the period of 1404 to 1438. Until today, despite numerous attempts, the manuscript, housed by the Yale University library has not been deciphered.
  
 
== Analysis ==
 
== Analysis ==
There are many mysteries surrounding this manuscript.<ref name=VoynichNinja>[https://www.voynich.ninja/thread-742-post-5936.html#pid5936 The Voynich Manuscript - a forgery?] - [[User:Gaia|Gaia]]</ref>
+
There are many mysteries surrounding this manuscript.<ref name=VoynichNinja>[https://www.voynich.ninja/thread-742-post-5936.html#pid5936 The Voynich Manuscript - a forgery?] </ref>
 
# the manuscript has never been documented or referenced directly before 1912, the year of discovery
 
# the manuscript has never been documented or referenced directly before 1912, the year of discovery
 
# even in the official history of the manuscript, there is a large gap in the history of it<ref name=WikiTimelineVoynich group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Timeline_of_Voynich_manuscript_ownership Wikipedia - Timeline of Voynich manuscript ownership]</ref>
 
# even in the official history of the manuscript, there is a large gap in the history of it<ref name=WikiTimelineVoynich group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Timeline_of_Voynich_manuscript_ownership Wikipedia - Timeline of Voynich manuscript ownership]</ref>
 
# the text has not been deciphered<ref name=WikiVoynich group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voynich_manuscript Wikipedia - Voynich manuscript]</ref>
 
# the text has not been deciphered<ref name=WikiVoynich group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voynich_manuscript Wikipedia - Voynich manuscript]</ref>
# there are many spooky names suggested around of this manuscript; alchemist [[John Dee]],<ref name=WikiJohnDee group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dee Wikipedia - John Dee]</ref> German Jesuit scholar Athanasius Kircher,<ref name=WikiAthanasiusKircher group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athanasius_Kircher Wikipedia - Athanasius Kircher]</ref>, his student Jan Marek Marci,<ref name=WikiJanMarekMarci group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Marek_Marci Wikipedia - Jan Marek Marci]</ref> Jesuit Jacobus Sinapius,<ref name=WikiJacobusSinapius group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobus_Sinapius Wikipedia - Jacobus Sinapius]</ref> alchemist Georg Baresch,<ref name=WikiGeorgBaresch group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Baresch Wikipedia - Georg Baresch]</ref> and the Holy Roman Emperor of Bohemia, Rudolf II<ref name=WikiRudolfII group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_II%2C_Holy_Roman_Emperor Wikipedia - Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor]</ref>
+
# there are many spooky names suggested around of this manuscript; alchemist John Dee,<ref name=WikiJohnDee group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dee Wikipedia - John Dee]</ref> German Jesuit scholar Athanasius Kircher,<ref name=WikiAthanasiusKircher group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athanasius_Kircher Wikipedia - Athanasius Kircher]</ref>, his student Jan Marek Marci,<ref name=WikiJanMarekMarci group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Marek_Marci Wikipedia - Jan Marek Marci]</ref> Jesuit Jacobus Sinapius,<ref name=WikiJacobusSinapius group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobus_Sinapius Wikipedia - Jacobus Sinapius]</ref> alchemist Georg Baresch,<ref name=WikiGeorgBaresch group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Baresch Wikipedia - Georg Baresch]</ref> and the Holy Roman Emperor of Bohemia, Rudolf II<ref name=WikiRudolfII group="MSM">[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_II%2C_Holy_Roman_Emperor Wikipedia - Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor]</ref>
 
# there is the Jesuit link<ref name=VoynichRugg>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpzLhmH0UYs Voynich manuscript - a meaningless hoax? - Gordon Rugg]</ref>
 
# there is the Jesuit link<ref name=VoynichRugg>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpzLhmH0UYs Voynich manuscript - a meaningless hoax? - Gordon Rugg]</ref>
 
# Voynich probably was a Polish jew, and then ending up at Yale, so spook markers all around
 
# Voynich probably was a Polish jew, and then ending up at Yale, so spook markers all around
 
# Even the results of the C14 dating are not facts. It is a measurement (or a set of them) which we have to believe (or not). We have to take the authority of the laboratory seriously to believe those ages are correct. From the start on I had my doubts about that and reading through SantaColoma's views that skepsis only increased. We were not there when that dating was done. We don't know the reliability of the methods used. We don't know the credibility of the people involved, etc. etc. etc.<ref name=VoynichNinja/>
 
# Even the results of the C14 dating are not facts. It is a measurement (or a set of them) which we have to believe (or not). We have to take the authority of the laboratory seriously to believe those ages are correct. From the start on I had my doubts about that and reading through SantaColoma's views that skepsis only increased. We were not there when that dating was done. We don't know the reliability of the methods used. We don't know the credibility of the people involved, etc. etc. etc.<ref name=VoynichNinja/>
 
# the involvement of many spooks and interested characters in it (like Terence McKenna, see in the external links)
 
# the involvement of many spooks and interested characters in it (like Terence McKenna, see in the external links)
# other researchers, such as Richard SantaColoma have suggested it is a modern [[forgery]]<ref name=SantaColoma>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=qDTVEz6rXMQ Is The Voynich Manuscript a Modern Forgery?  (and why it matters) '''great video''', by Richard SantaColoma]</ref><ref name=VoynichSantaColoma>[https://proto57.wordpress.com/ The 1910 Voynich Theory by Richard SantaColoma]</ref><ref name=VoynichSantaColomaModern>[https://proto57.wordpress.com/2016/03/23/the-modern-forgery-hypothesis/ The Modern Forgery Hypothesis by Richard SantaColoma]</ref><ref name=VoynichSantaColoma1665Marci>[https://proto57.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/the-1665-marci-letter-a-forgery/ The 1665 Marci Letter: A Forgery? by Richard SantaColoma]</ref>
+
# other researchers, such as Richard SantaColoma have suggested it is a modern forgery<ref name=SantaColoma>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=qDTVEz6rXMQ Is The Voynich Manuscript a Modern Forgery?  (and why it matters) '''great video''', by Richard SantaColoma]</ref><ref name=VoynichSantaColoma>[https://proto57.wordpress.com/ The 1910 Voynich Theory by Richard SantaColoma]</ref><ref name=VoynichSantaColomaModern>[https://proto57.wordpress.com/2016/03/23/the-modern-forgery-hypothesis/ The Modern Forgery Hypothesis by Richard SantaColoma]</ref><ref name=VoynichSantaColoma1665Marci>[https://proto57.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/the-1665-marci-letter-a-forgery/ The 1665 Marci Letter: A Forgery? by Richard SantaColoma]</ref>
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
Line 52: Line 44:
 
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RED1DSqPIkk The book that cannot be read] - [[National Geographic]]
 
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RED1DSqPIkk The book that cannot be read] - [[National Geographic]]
 
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPAYZsDVyGc Video Version of Voynich 100 Conference Talk by Richard SantaColoma]
 
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPAYZsDVyGc Video Version of Voynich 100 Conference Talk by Richard SantaColoma]
 +
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZEHBkBlalc The Histocrat - The Voynich manuscript (2019)]
  
 +
[[Category:Historical narratives]]
 +
[[Category:Prenaissance psyops]]
 +
[[Category:1400-1500 psyops]]
 +
[[Category:1900-2000 psyops]]
 
[[Category:1912 psyops]]
 
[[Category:1912 psyops]]
[[Category:Mystery psyops]]
+
[[Category:1920s psyops]]
 
[[Category:Forgery psyops]]
 
[[Category:Forgery psyops]]
[[Category:Money scam psyops]]
+
[[Category:Myth creation psyops]]
[[Category:HIstory]]
 
 
[[Category:Psyops in New York City]]
 
[[Category:Psyops in New York City]]
 
[[Category:Psyops in Austria]]
 
[[Category:Psyops in Austria]]
 
[[Category:Psyops in Italy]]
 
[[Category:Psyops in Italy]]
[[Category:Puzzles]]
 

Latest revision as of 15:56, 20 November 2019

Voynich manuscript
Voynich-partof f78r.jpg
Year 1912
Places Jesuit Library, Italy
Castle in Austria
New York City
Perp Wilfrid Voynich
Information
Mainstream [MSM 1]

The Voynich manuscript is one of the most mysterious books of all time. According to the official story, it was discovered in 1912 by Wilfrid Voynich,[MSM 2] married to Ethel Boole,[MSM 3] the daughter of George Boole of the Boolean algebra,[MSM 4] in a Jesuit library near Rome in Italy, but also a castle in Austria has been said. The vellum (calf skin "paper") of the manuscript has been carbon dated to the period of 1404 to 1438. Until today, despite numerous attempts, the manuscript, housed by the Yale University library has not been deciphered.

Analysis

There are many mysteries surrounding this manuscript.[1]

  1. the manuscript has never been documented or referenced directly before 1912, the year of discovery
  2. even in the official history of the manuscript, there is a large gap in the history of it[MSM 5]
  3. the text has not been deciphered[MSM 1]
  4. there are many spooky names suggested around of this manuscript; alchemist John Dee,[MSM 6] German Jesuit scholar Athanasius Kircher,[MSM 7], his student Jan Marek Marci,[MSM 8] Jesuit Jacobus Sinapius,[MSM 9] alchemist Georg Baresch,[MSM 10] and the Holy Roman Emperor of Bohemia, Rudolf II[MSM 11]
  5. there is the Jesuit link[2]
  6. Voynich probably was a Polish jew, and then ending up at Yale, so spook markers all around
  7. Even the results of the C14 dating are not facts. It is a measurement (or a set of them) which we have to believe (or not). We have to take the authority of the laboratory seriously to believe those ages are correct. From the start on I had my doubts about that and reading through SantaColoma's views that skepsis only increased. We were not there when that dating was done. We don't know the reliability of the methods used. We don't know the credibility of the people involved, etc. etc. etc.[1]
  8. the involvement of many spooks and interested characters in it (like Terence McKenna, see in the external links)
  9. other researchers, such as Richard SantaColoma have suggested it is a modern forgery[3][4][5][6]

References

Other

Mainstream

External links