9/11 Vicsim Report: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| colspan=2 align=center | '''Information''' | | colspan=2 align=center | '''Information''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Cluesform.info|Cluesforum]] || align=center | <ref name=CluesforumVicsimReport group="CF">[http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1393 Cluesforum | | [[Cluesform.info|Cluesforum]] || align=center | <ref name=CluesforumVicsimReport group="CF">[http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1393]Cluesforum Vicsim Report</ref> | ||
|- | |||
| [[Fakeologist.com|Fakeologist]] || align=center | <ref name=fakeologist.com|Fakeologist group="Ab">[http://fakeologist.com/september-clues-tour-guide]September Clues Tour Guide</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| <small>Other</small> || align=center | <small></small> | | <small>Other</small> || align=center | <small></small> | ||
Line 73: | Line 75: | ||
=== Cluesforum === | === Cluesforum === | ||
<references group="CF"/> | <references group="CF"/> | ||
=== Fakeologist === | |||
<references group="Ab"/> | |||
=== Other === | === Other === |
Revision as of 16:33, 17 December 2017
Vicsim Report 9/11 | |
Type 1 | War Preparation |
Type 2 | Simulated Terror Attack |
Category | Technology |
Year | 2009 |
Authors | Hoi Polloi, Clues Forum and Simon Shack |
Topics | |
• 9/11 | • vicsims |
Information | |
Cluesforum | [CF 1] |
Fakeologist | [Ab 1] |
Other |
The Vicsim Report is an in depth research about the vicsims of 9/11 compiled by Hoi Polloi. Simon Shack, producer of September Clues describes it as follows: "The 80-page Vicsim Report was put together by Hoi Polloi (assisted by yours truly) during Hoi's six-month-long stay in my home back in 2009. It represents the seminal groundwork for what has developed over the years into an extensive collective investigation - enriched and refined by the fine efforts of all our dedicated forum members. Throughout these last three years of unrelenting 'vicsim' research, we have collected a vast body of converging findings which, taken together, strongly suggest that our tentative, initial postulation - i.e. that no one perished on 9/11 - was correct. To this day, we have not encountered any substantial, compelling or - much less - official refutation of our working thesis - nor have we ever been formally confronted by any verifiably legit family member of the alleged "3000" 9/11 victims."