Difference between revisions of "Prescriptive programming"

From Fakeopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 8: Line 8:
[[Mike Wood]] makes the case that [https://conspiracypsychology.com/2013/08/21/5-reasons-why-predictive-programming-is-psychologically-implausible/ predictive programming is not at all about prediction:]
[[Mike Wood]] makes the case that [https://conspiracypsychology.com/2013/08/21/5-reasons-why-predictive-programming-is-psychologically-implausible/ predictive programming is not at all about prediction:]


<blockquote>"''So that's the theory of predictive programming. At its heart, it's a psychological claim. So is it psychologically plausible?  
<blockquote>"''So that's the theory of predictive programming. At its heart, it's a psychological claim. So is it psychologically plausible?''


I argue that the answer is no.  
''I argue that the answer is no.''


First, social learning theory shows that context is important when presenting something that’s meant to be a model for future behaviour. Second, the supposed outcomes of predicting programming seem to have nothing to do with the methods used. Third, the mechanisms by which predictive programming are supposed to work don’t make nearly as much sense as they seem to. Fourth, neurolinguistic programming, the most commonly cited psychological justification for why predictive programming could be expected to work, has been thoroughly discredited by research. Finally, predictive programming is not very good at actual predictions.''"</blockquote>
''First, social learning theory shows that context is important when presenting something that’s meant to be a model for future behaviour. Second, the supposed outcomes of predicting programming seem to have nothing to do with the methods used. Third, the mechanisms by which predictive programming are supposed to work don’t make nearly as much sense as they seem to. Fourth, neurolinguistic programming, the most commonly cited psychological justification for why predictive programming could be expected to work, has been thoroughly discredited by research. Finally, predictive programming is not very good at actual predictions.''"</blockquote>


== Examples of ''predictive'' or <br>''prescriptive'' programming ==
== Examples of ''predictive'' or <br>''prescriptive'' programming ==

Latest revision as of 17:09, 26 August 2019

Prescriptive programming is a term introduced by Kham in a discussion about 9/11.[ab 1] She stated that the term predictive programming is not accurately describing the movies, series episodes and other artistic productions prior to 9/11, which aim to subliminally prepare the public perception for the upcoming event. These productions do not predict the event, they do actually display essential parts of the script of the event. Kham concludes therefore that these productions prior to the event pre-scribe the narrative, that will be propagandized by the media as the "truth" about the event - namely the script of the psyop.

Discussion

As mentioned above the introduction of the new term prescriptive programming is based on the older term predictive programming. Predictive programming is an invention of Alan Watt who describes it as follows:

Predictive programming is a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented by our leaders. If and when these changes are put through, the public will already be familiarized with them and will accept them as natural progressions, thus lessening possible public resistance and commotion.

Mike Wood makes the case that predictive programming is not at all about prediction:

"So that's the theory of predictive programming. At its heart, it's a psychological claim. So is it psychologically plausible?

I argue that the answer is no.

First, social learning theory shows that context is important when presenting something that’s meant to be a model for future behaviour. Second, the supposed outcomes of predicting programming seem to have nothing to do with the methods used. Third, the mechanisms by which predictive programming are supposed to work don’t make nearly as much sense as they seem to. Fourth, neurolinguistic programming, the most commonly cited psychological justification for why predictive programming could be expected to work, has been thoroughly discredited by research. Finally, predictive programming is not very good at actual predictions."

Examples of predictive or
prescriptive programming

psyops
Year Title Referencing event Notes
1990 The Simpsons 3-eyed fish nuclear power plant, nuclear scare [1]
1993 The Simpsons Tiger attack Las Vegas (2003) [1][2]
1994 The Simpsons Average Joe Astronot (2010), Oliver Knight (2013) [1]
1995 The Simpsons Ebola medical scare (2014) [1][3]
1997 The Simpsons 9/11 (2001) [2]
1998 The Simpsons God particle (2012) [3][2]
1998 The Simpsons Disney owns FOX (2017) [2]
1999 The Simpsons Nuclear power plant, Nuclear scare, Fukushima tsunami (2011) [1]
2000
03/19
The Simpsons
Bart To The Future
Presidency of Donald Trump (2016), Plan Patagonia (2030?) [4][5][6][2]
2005 Family Guy Kevin Spacey scandal (2017) [7]
2005 American Dad Area 51, alien myth [8]
2007 The Simpsons NSA spying, Edward Snowden release through WikiLeaks (2013) [1][3]
2008 The Simpsons Rigged voting machines Obama vs. McCain (2012) [2]
2009 Knowing Deepwater Horizon oil spill (2010)
2010 The Simpsons Nobel Prize winner Economics (2016) [2]
2012 Family Guy Death of Robin Williams (2014) [7]
2012 Family Guy Bruce Jenner (2015) [7]
2012 The Simpsons Debt default Greece (2015) [3][2]
2012 The Simpsons Lady Gaga Performance (2017) [2]
2013 Family Guy Boston Bombings (2013) [7]
2013 Family Guy Death of Paul Walker (2013), 6 days later [7]
2014 The Simpsons FIFA scandal (2015) [1][3][2]
2017 Rick and Morty World government [9][10]

See also

References

Fakeologist

Other

External links