[Gwynned]

Very interesting post. I had not really considered Joan for replacement, and I’m not an expert in face comparisons nor am I willing to take the time, so I will just say were I to bet money at this point, I would bet she had been replaced. If I were to guess why I would suggest they wanted a more sanitized, easily manipulated version, but that’s just a guess and remembering just a slight disappointment in her as she got older.

But the point about LOVE is what really got me. People are used to being taken for their money by politicians and bankers and so an event like 9-11, while extraordinary, is not devastating to the psyche. But these same people will recoil at the mere possibility of the Beatles betraying them. That is sacred ground.

I found my way to the general world of hoaxed through what I think is fair to call an obsession with the Michael Jackson death hoax. Since you brought his name up, I have to ask your opinion about something that I have yet to resolve completely despite the nearly thousands of hours of research on the matter. If the original Michael Jackson was replaced, WHY would they continuously replace him with someone that had people scratching their heads in disbelief. And then there’s the two white children of his. I don’t think it’s sufficient to suggest ‘they’ are throwing it in our faces.

In the movie V for Vendetta, V creates a fake prison in which Evey lives until she finally overcomes her fear of death. When she realizes how deeply she has been tricked she is furious. But he says to her that, since she believed the lie, she learned something about herself and overcame the fear of death that had imprisoned her for so long.

So my second question to you is this. Are all lies evil? And the corrolary, are all the ‘liars’ on the same side? If the truth is that we are despoiling the earth to our peril, would a giant false flag that finally wakes the population up be an evil act?

And, if there are opposing sides, what are their opposing stories?

As for the divine gift, perhaps the meaning of selling one’s soul to the devil has less to do with one’s immortal soul and more to do with what happens to talent when big money is involved. But what if big money is not involved? Or rather, what if it’s not really about the money, but the art.

Just some thoughts in response to your very thought provoking commentary.

[Gwynned]

I like the Jungle Surfer and like some of us here, have been a bit taken aback by his recent obsession with transgenders. Marilyn Monroe a MAN and Sly Stalone a WOMAN!!!

For the moment, I am withholding judgment and have continued to watch many of his videos. I guess I’ve had too many people look at me like I’m nuts to not, at least for the moment, extend him the courtesy of maintaining an open mind. Besides, a couple of times I was surprised to seem some supporting evidence, albeit circumstantial. I found the idea of Nicole Kidman being transgender ridiculous but did a quick search only to discover that she was slated to play the first fully transgendered person in a movie scheduled for release in 2007. Gwenyth Paltrow was to be her ‘wife.’ Coincidence?

[Gwynned]

Wasn’t sure it was a hoax until I found out that Koko the Gorilla (in keeping with the ‘monkey’ theme) weighed in with her feelings on the ‘tragic death’.

“More phone calls about the news came in, and Koko overheard one from a former colleague,” Dr. Penny Patterson, her mentor and surrogate mother, noted on Koko.org on Monday. “About a half an hour later, Koko signed to Penny: ‘CRY LIP.'” Koko then “became very somber, with her head bowed and her lip quivering.” (Koko is able to understand more than 1,000 signs in American Sign Language.)

Read more: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/koko-the-gorilla-reacts-to-robin-williams-death-in-emotional-moment-2014138#ixzz3AKTPGxw0

I guess Koko likes to eavesdrop on people’s phone conversations!

[Gwynned]

So who is Alex working for? Is he a bad guy or a good guy? I tend to agree with Peter Sheehan and would apply the same logic to Alex as he applied to another famous conspiracy theorist whose name escapes me at the moment. All of these people are playing a role and as such, their scripts are limited. They can reveal parts of the truth but are also tasked with keeping a lid on how far things will be taken. If you think about it, it only makes sense. If this script was written, as Peter suggests, 50 years ago with an end date in mind, they can’t have people reading too far ahead or the whole cover will be blown. It’s the difference between reading a book thoroughly from cover to cover v. finding out how it all ends.

For me, Alex was a chapter in my search for the truth and I learned a great deal from him. But his ‘character’ is designed, I believe, to eventually turn off the serious truth seeker who will graduate beyond Alex to, let’s say, David Icke, whose outlook is a bit more nuanced and complex. I spent a long time on David Icke until I started to see the fakery for myself and was kindly directed (graduated??) to Cluesforum.

I also tend to agree with Peter that each individual needs to discover the truth for themselves and, with each new psyops, the fakery becomes increasingly obvious until the ‘bam’ and everyone finally gets the joke, so to speak.

Alex Jones is full of hot air and BS and knows much of what he speaks is an absolute lie. But since we believe him, we learn something TRUE about ourselves and our world. We might get angry about the injustices for the first time in our lives. Is that a bad thing? Actors are artists and, as so well said in V for Vendetta, politicians lie to obscure the truth, artists lie to reveal it. And because we believed these lies to be true we learned something about ourselves and our world in the process.

So I say Bravo, Alex!

[Author]

Posts