Henkus

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: EGI – Elite gender inversion #848069
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    There is already so much in this topic that I could spend months checking it all.
    Still I want to respond already.

    One of the aspects of this theory i am interested in is how ‘they’ try to capture the youth into thinking this whole transgender idea is normal and thereby changing what we all think is normal through maybe 2 generations.

    I have stumbled upon this what I consider to be a disgusting youtube channel :
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0vDmY140QjcDKZCVrTt1ag/videos

    It is a channel from a Dutch youtuber who goes from man to woman and talks about the struggles HE faces etc etc.
    Forgive me for NOT having watched all of this because I am disgusted by it but I will when I recover from my disgust.

    After hearing keywords/phrases like :
    – My parents were not okay with it at the start but after seeing the shrink…
    – I take puberty inhibitors (puberteits-remmers – Dutch)
    – I feel it is society that is the problem not me. Society NEEDS to change.

    I wonder….
    Could this be some international NGO or something sponsering or at least motivating this MAN to come out like this via youtube.
    Are there similar youtube channels, en français? Or Deutsch?

    Will do more searching into this one first….

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 4 months ago by HenkusHenkus.
    in reply to: Italy Quake 2.0 #847454
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    The video with the nuns bothers me.
    It very much smells of fakery, and I have to laugh about it.

    Why would these ‘nuns’ be behind a red tape and still get ‘evacuated’, while being filmed by..?
    Would the ‘media’ even be there if there was not already a red tape?
    When was the red tape placed there?
    I would guess the red tape was already there after the first earth quake.

    Were the nuns allowed to go into the ‘danger zone’ to still reach their, well let’s call it workhome when IT happened?
    And all the media and firemen were ofcourse there camped out for the right moment to film when it got ‘ugly’.
    Pretty sure ‘news’ stations all around the (known) world used these images.
    I mean without context these images are great to….!

    It looks like ‘film and assist’.
    Thought of this when i saw this video of a 100% hoaxed ‘attack’ :
    http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/6927545/c49202ac/wtf_aanslag.html
    Looks like a Pallywood style production.

    Compare it to ‘search and destroy’ changed to ‘sweep and clear’ in the movie Full Metal Jacket. (a great movie i have only recently watched….)
    But nowdays with social media bla bla it could be film and assist stage craft.
    Film and assist make you look like the victim = good media coverage, but the fact that you made the situation yourself is not told ofcourse.

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 5 months ago by HenkusHenkus.
    in reply to: Italy Quake 2.0 #847378
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    This somehow interested me after I saw the RTL nieuws 27 oct.
    The woman doing the report, haha I recognised her from highschool.

    Then i checked the website and saw this :
    http://www.rtlnieuws.nl/nieuws/laatste-videos-nieuws/bevingen-en-naschokken-toevallig-gefilmd

    It is a 33 second video that shows only buildings ‘collapsing’ from whatever cause.
    “bevingen en naschokken toevallig gefilmd”
    “Tremors and aftershocks coincedentally filmed”

    Looks like faked staged and edited out of context to me.
    Well at least edited out of context here can’t say about the fake part for sure .
    Could this be about scaring the public for earthquakes?

    -edit-
    Wow the website even says :
    Bevingen en naschokken ‘toevallig’ gefilmd
    ‘coincedentally’.

    They even use ” ?

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 6 months ago by HenkusHenkus.
    in reply to: THE JOE COX MURDER – BIRSTALL UK 16TH jUNE 2016 #715144
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    Ugh already see a spelling error. And I cant edit after…

    When I re-watch that video… well these guys could even be in the same room.
    The plot is most probably thicker and the referendum maybe the first layer.

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 10 months ago by HenkusHenkus.
    in reply to: THE JOE COX MURDER – BIRSTALL UK 16TH jUNE 2016 #715099
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    I know i never post on the forums and if I do i make dumb ones but yeah.

    Shouldn’t the topics name be 16th june?

    This ‘murder’ has gotten alot attention here in the Netherlands.
    We also has a referendum, remeber? It was about the Ukraine-EU treaty.
    And somehow our prime minister ‘marky mark’ has gotten away with postponing the government decision on this till ONE day after the British referendum.
    Regardless of if it is real or not it IS being used for something.
    What about the referendum angle?

    Brexit: Vote Remain Exploits Jo Cox Murder | Paul Joseph Watson and Stefan Molyneux

    Yeah two guys we as fakeologists do not really trust but they have good info from time to time I think.

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 10 months ago by HenkusHenkus.
    in reply to: EU Social Experiment: Immigration #399530
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    I can say that this picture of the ‘dead boy at the beach’ has affected my whole family.
    Its crazy how much effect a picture (with weeks of context) can have on the herd.

    When i tried to even speculate about it being fake and it being used to steer everyone, on a family day … well you all know what happens right?
    Except my brother, he can see how it CAN be fake…

    Love the posts,
    a lot info i did not see yet

    in reply to: Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 #11282
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    Check that link Banazir. It is doubled.

    It is so obvious from watching TV that this whole thing is being used as a psy-op.
    Yes, I plugged my TV back in just to see the BS propaganda on TV.

    However I have to point out that I now have heard from at least 5 different people that the person I spoke about earlier, Ingrid van der Meer and her kids, have really died.

    And of course I can’t prove any of this. I didn’t even know her.

    From what i watch on the TV last week, it is all about the team of Dutch investigators that just can’t reach the crash site. Day 5 now of the ‘investigators’ not being able to get there.
    Oh man. I just saw on the news video of these ‘investigators’ being stopped by ‘pro-russian separatists’ on some road. And they STILL CAN’T REACH THE CRASH SITE.

    I just can not believe that a team of ‘official’ ‘investigators’ can’t get there but we have seen all these photos and videos of the crash site.
    So who took these photos/video of the crash site then?
    Yeah yeah we know it’s all staged but why is NOONE asking these simple (imo) questions?

    That brings me to the so called cooling train for the bodies, of wich i am 100% convinced that what we see is not the real train. If there even was a real train with bodies.
    Who shot those photos/videos of the train then? Heh we even see the train driver make a comment on Dutch TV on how he just get orders and the train can’t leave… yet…., but who filmed this? It is shown as if the Dutch news filmed this but..
    How far from the crash could that be? And why can’t the ‘investigators’ get even there?

    Still….
    I am just so much convinced that at least this one person is dead. People close to me knew her…and they really start to hate me for not believing this whole story….
    So could it be that people died (= real event, but all planned ahead) and it is being used to create a psy-opera?

    in reply to: Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 #10972
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    Seeing that video made on Schiphol, Mother of MH17 victim calls out Putin.
    Makes me just want to go there (Schiphol) tomorrow. Maybe just for an hour and look at the media circus. Its only 10 mins by train.

    Makes me think of this : It is boring and in Dutch ofcourse.
    Reactie op Schiphol na verlies MH17 (Reaction on Schiphol after loss MH17)

    And at 9:55 and on : ‘wel een beetje gek heh als de ene verslaggever de andere gaat interviewen.’ (Abit crazy isn’t it? when one reporter interviews the other?)

    And more i saw about the ‘cooling train’ :
    http://www.martinvrijland.nl/2014/07/21/de-mh17-dodentrein-waar-is-de-koelinstallatie/

    I think he does bring up good points here.
    The whole train scenario we see is probably nothing more than a stage.

    in reply to: Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 #10947
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    Wow this topic already has great information.
    What really got me was the Donald Duck ‘de zwarte magier’ heh can’t be a coincedence.

    So my friend told me friday about one of victims he ‘knew’, Ingrid van der Meer.
    He didn’t know her personally but she lived in the neighborhood where he grew up.
    This is what he showed me: http://www.gooische.nl/site/splash.asp
    It is the website of the local hockey club where she was a volunteer, i think.

    To be honest i am not comfortable with trying to prove this person was real or this one was not, it seems too soon for this. From what i read i do believe there are people who died but sure there can be added vicims or something.
    So that brings me here :
    http://www.martinvrijland.nl/2014/07/21/passagier-malaysian-airlines-daisy-oehlers-heeft-verschillende-leeftijden/

    Small discussion, in Dutch, about people trying to find info about victims via facebook etc. I am pretty sure this guy Martin Vrijland knows about the possibility of vicsims and i think he writes nice articles from time to time.

    -edit-
    Small addition :
    http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/mh17/22876678/__Geef_MH17_een_gezicht__.html
    This is probably pure propaganda but it shows what some more info of some of the victims.

    in reply to: Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 #10777
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    Maybe it is too premature to post this but :

    Altough the whole narrative seems a gigantic hoax to me,
    one of my friends has identified one of the victims.
    I will investigate this more tomorrow it’s late now but to say there are no victims, i don’t know…

    in reply to: Aha-moments – sowing the seeds of fakeology #10461
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    Wow all these new videos will greatly increase my arsenal to convince others.
    Well at least my friends ,who i think are on the verge of accepting greater degrees of fakery than they accept now. Might even get a few of the older ones like parents/family doubting their ‘reality’.

    However i think one of the best ways to get to others is what we do right now.
    Everyone has his/her own rabbit trail to this site or cluesforum.
    My way was mainly through reading other peoples opinions and links in comments to articles.

    When I read what I consider to be far-out opinions/comments i wanted to pursue those links/ideas and find out why ‘they’ think that way.
    What really made me think there was more to everything i knew was the fact that others were so confident in saying what they believe.

    So I think we have to at least try to make others see we REALLY think/believe(?) there is more to most things in life than we were taught and use language in post/articles that shows we are confident in what we say.

    Yeah, that is what is being done here anyway.
    For me all the evidence there is something more (hidden?) out there came hand in hand with reading other people’s ,borderline emotional, comments that showed they really believed it.

    -edit-
    Oh hey almost forgot what one of my friends gave me :

    The Best of Bill Hicks: You Can’t Handle The Truth!

    Comedy maybe a great way to convince others.

    in reply to: Duck And Cover #10158
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    I had never heard about ‘duck and cover’ till…i played the video game Fallout 3 (2008).
    Yeah i (still) play video games sometimes. It helps me to escape the ‘matrix’.
    This game is all about a post atomic-war world. But in this game the war happened
    in what we know as 1950’s america. (paralelle universe, whatever).
    So in the game you see all these 1950’s propaganda things relating to the communists and nuclear weapons.

    So then i started researching this duck and cover.
    It seemed to me like some military term. But what i found was disturbing…
    It was all about teaching kids at school how to hide from (nuclear) explosions.
    Then i started to really think.

    I live and grew up in Holland/Netherlands for reference.

    My parents who are both from about 1945. They NEVER learned anything like this in school. And um… wern’t the soviet missles like… 2000 km from Amsterdam behind the iron curtain in east Berlin? That is so much closer than to the US.
    There is a lot to connect here now like the ‘bogus re-entry vehicles’ video from i think Paul from Australia. The podcast that made me join this community hehe.

    So the children in the 50’s were trained to hide from missles that really realistically threatened only west europe. Assuming ‘short’ range missles are possible back then. And um. Wern’t those very long range missles, you know the ones that go out the earth atmospshere and return with like clusters of atomic bombs for maximum damage, invented years later? Surely after they went to space right?
    So what really threatened the US here?

    /sarcasm on
    Must be the hidden U-boats that we can’t see.
    Yeah since those NAZI’s were so advanced and the redskins took that tech we are in danger of these U-boats that can just fire atomic missles of the coast of New York. And we can NEVER even see them coming.
    /sarcasm off.

    I can think of only one thing that could REALLY have threatened the USA.
    This is assuming these outer space ICBM’s are impossible.
    And that was the ‘Cuba crisis’. But that was in 1962… years after duck and cover began right? So again what really threatened the US here?

    I can only think of a few things here.
    These drills were made to raise ‘our’ parents in a certain way.
    Or hey, there maybe people here who even had these fear tactics drilled into them as kid (I feel sorry for you..). I’am from ’82.
    But i think it was to raise them with the understanding (idk a better word) that the governement was there for them and it was this big us versus them thing.
    Like how wars used to be back in the day. With big armies fighting other armies.
    A disticntive difference between us versus them. They are commies (=bad) we are well… um just good becuase… we have “freedom” or something.

    But nowdays here in NL i see the propaganda move towards something like : there is no real us versus them anymore. There are all these lone wolf or Islamic terrorists and they can strike anytime anywhere.
    But we never teach kids here nowdays (in NL) to hide from attacks by those guys.
    ‘They’ seem to want the sheeple to be totally dependant on the government and not take action for yourself.

    And there you have it. It turned into a wall of tekst….

    -edit-
    I’m not making this an edit-fest like the other post with the Jaguar ad.
    But i like to add something about that Duck and Cover video : watch?v=-2kdpAGDu8s
    The voice in this video is so charming. All these 1950’s American stuffs has the best voice actors and i’m sure if i was in sleep mode back them i would have been converted np.

    Ill just make one more edit and say that this duck and cover video makes me so sick. I can’t put it into words there is so much wrong with this and really takes a … i guess ‘fakeologist mind set’ with years of propaganda analysis to see how much is wrong here… i guess we can all feel the pain caused by these psy-ops.

    in reply to: Psychic Driving 911 #10108
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    Blows my mind thinking more of this ad… logging of for now.

    in reply to: Psychic Driving 911 #10103
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    Must say it took me a while to get this one.
    But the license plate on the car says : ‘Why 911’.

    -edit-
    Hey now i realise that this car isn’t a Porsche 9/11, wich would explain the ‘why 911’ more, but it is supposed to be a Jaguar.
    This thickens the plot….

    edit 2 haha
    Now that i think more of it. I think the message is this :
    The car looks like a Porsche 9/11 that is what i thought initially.
    Now the ad is like ‘why drive a 911’ if you can buy something that looks quite the same but it is from Jaguar. Maybe they are cheaper?

    Still it is suspicious to say the least…
    I have always wondered why Porsche named their most iconic car the 911…

    edit again yeah yeah
    Wow now that i think even more of this ad there is so much more hidden here.
    Let me take a shot at this.

    ‘Why 911’ :
    It shows the skyline of a city, wich you immediately connect with new york.
    But you don’t see the iconic 2 tall towers there so…it also reminds you of that 911 happened and the buildnings are gone now.
    ‘Why 911’ and beneath that ‘How alive are you’ OMG wow.. it is so in your face eh?

    ‘Not the usual suspect’ again is so double.
    It is not the Porsche 911. Surely also means 911 is not what it seems.
    Most probably a reference to the phantom menace Osama.

    I am sure others may have thought these things. (right?)
    I just type it out here and also show some of my thought processes.

    Last edit for typos…

    in reply to: 9/11 Artwork [predictive or post event] #10101
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    Wow the beasty boys one. I remember that photo.
    And now that i see it here, wow the 9/11 link seems TOO obvious.

    in reply to: Aha-moments – sowing the seeds of fakeology #9954
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    The two things i always (try to) use to make people go hmmm are the pictures of no plane at the pentagon (9/11) and the video at the pentagon that says 10 september. Also the CNN broadcast ,supposedly in saudi arabia, where one guy puts on his gas mask and the other a helmet.
    These are in my opinion very clear signs of media fakery and great examples to make people aware.

    in reply to: June 2014 #9747
    HenkusHenkus
    Member

    Now that i read my intro post i feel there is much more to say.
    I will try to keep it short and say a little more about my intent for joining this community.

    I consider myself fakeologist (in retrospect) since the day of 9/11.
    When 9/11 happened i was never satisfied with what supposedly happened at the pentagon.
    I remember i was waiting months (a year?) for some pictures to come via official sources of some plane at the pentagon but… we got this low frame rate video of I don’t know, some explosion? Oh and did you notice, back then ofcourse ( this is all retrospect) , that it said 10 sept in the bottom? Huh not 11 sept, i thought…
    I cant really remeber when this was but i knew we were being lied to from that day FOR SURE!

    Well that is how it all started for me.
    And obviously noone around me would even discuss these things. I was even studying artificial intelligence and NOONE there was even interested in the mechanics of this thing called 9/11. And what it did to ‘our’ way of thinking.
    That’s when I knew or found out that everyone else was ‘artificially intelligent’.

    My main intention of joining here is to have a discussion with others about how you live in the ‘matrix’ knowing all these fakery/propaganda things.
    And , probably most important, how do you interact with ‘those who were first friends but now ridicule you’?.

    I hope my honesty is appreciated here.
    Maybe this is a bad place to post? How many read would this on this topic?

    -edit- for typo’s (all in the retrospect eh)
    Just spotted the biggest typo ever. In my intro i obviously mean 2001 in the second line …not 2011…heh

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
This entry was posted on by .