Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
That would be so cool if you could find how much it costs.
I agree with you, about the the real question: Who sponsors Fetzer?
K Ham
Micheal Jackson had purchased most of the Beattle songs (ATV Publishing) in 1984, then went into a 50/50 deal with Sony. Sony/ATV has continued to purchase music publishing companies and is now THE larges music publishing company in the world, worth billions and billions of dollars.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles#Song_catalogue
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony/ATV_Music_Publishing
So these songs are too old to notice? Just one song, “Yesterday”, earns $100,000 a year in royalties, every year.
Americans are getting copyright infringement notices in the mail daily from our cable company.
I can’t have a Beatles song playing in the background of my video on youtube or I will get the video banned.
So how can Fetzer continue to play them?
K Ham
If this had been a real human parts bucket brigade story, the tellable memory would have been of the stench of the dead, not merely the pieces. I have a dead body story myself and I ALWAYS recall the smell, first and foremost.
Caution: Non-Sequitor approaching.
Tom and Simon,
Thank you for your sanity and humor. I am at the point where these brazen liars make my blood boil as the lies are so obvious: either from the stock broker and/or his buddy. Certainly, humor is the better route. You both deliver it quite successfully.
K Ham
Columjaddica, great idea!!! Start small. Just like the nuclear bomb hoax, I would imagine that these fake events are highly compartmentalized.
I also imagine there are competing hoaxes, but the designers of the hoaxes from competing agencies/groups/families never call out the other, for fear of their own hoaxes will be exposed.
There are a few exceptions, like the 911 victim fund fraudsters. Those people are so low on the totem pole that they know nothing, and are, in-fact good to expose.
Never-the-less, we need all the information we can gather. I bet that these smaller hoaxes, since they are so compartmentalized, don’t really know how they fit into the big picture, but WE DO.
K Ham
I love John Gatto. I find him to be very sincere as well as highly intelligent, regardless of the shenanigans of Richard Grove.
All information gleaned from the fakers will be added to shore up our flimsy fake event template. We are doing the best we can, but we are working in the dark.
Adam Curry’s six week cycle might be part of the template but who knows.
K Ham
Columjaddica, Great topic. What a great resource!!!
I had been thinking how perps can totally avoid detection in faking photos.
If a perp wanted to, one could not only manipulate a photo, but manipulate the EXIF data as to the time, place, etc that an electronic picture was taken. But I think that the sheer number of images being used in fake media prohibits such detailed manipulations from taking place.
Here is why analyzing images is troublesome:
1) The perps only need to fool the masses, not the individual. We may wrongly conclude intention of the perps by ‘sloppiness’ in attention to detail.
2) Analyzing images without knowledge of ownership can not get us any closer to the truth. One could spends hours analyzing lies.
3) We CAN compare images with reality, though. We CAN determine if an image is a fake. We CANNOT tell if an image is real.
Through identifying fakery, we get a little closer to truth.
K Ham
Oh man, the gold bricks story is from Richard Grove?
Wow, I have been hanging on to that one for a long time. Re-thinking this, the 911 psyop doesn’t need the gold brick story, as it and all the other financial scandals are just detractors and rabbit holes. Just another lie from Richard.
Having been involved in local politics and local issues (the last bastion where citizens can make a difference), I noticed some patterns with local liars and imported shills. These people invent a new reality and make up facts in presenting their case.
We have come out on top on several city projects by using the liars and shills own story against them. By making them defend their own story with known facts has proven quite effective.
A liars story is most often contradictory, so showing how the liars stated facts can’t all be true at the same time has also shut them down, and exposed them as frauds. Thankfully, we had a city council and city workers who wanted the best for our city, and so were willing to see the errors, which isn’t always the case.
Of course, Richard Grove has shown that he is incapable of defending his own story which is why he stopped communicating with Simon Shack.
K Ham
In reviewing my recent post on Richard Grove, I realized that he is claiming he knows of someone who had prior knowledge of the 911 events, the person that ‘lured’ him to the Towers on that fateful day. Let’s explore this a bit further.
Is Richard Grove’s 911 story believable?
Richard Grove claims that he was lured to the WTC on 911, in order that he might perish in the towers collapse, as payback for his whistle blowing against Marshall & McLennan.
It would seem, then, that if we could find out who lured him there, we could find at least one person who had foreknowledge of the attacks on the WTC complex, and thus be one step closer to solving this tragedy.
According to his interview on Red Ice Radio, October 14, 2012, the following paragraph is Richard’s story.
Richard made a phone call on Friday, September 7, 2001, and left a message with Norma C. Taddei, secretary of Kathryn Blair Lee who was in charge of the Lotus Notes project for migration. Richard’s message to Norma asked what he should do with the (whistleblowing) documents he had in his possession. In response to Richard’s voicemail, Norma C. Taddei had asked her superiors what Richard should do, and in a voicemail back to Richard on Monday, September 10, 2001, said that Richard should drop the documents off at Marshall & McLennan, on the 96th floor of WTC North Tower, so that they could confront the executive who was involved with them. This same executive also had Norma C. Taddei as a secretary. This implies that Norma told him that he might be in trouble. This unnamed executive was brought in special by Jeffrey W. Greenberg, personally.
One of these names from the story had foreknowledge of the event, as they lured Robert to WTC on 911:
Norma C. Taddei
Kathryn Blair Lee
Unnamed Executive
Jeffrey W. GreenbergWhere were these people on 911 and where are they now?
Norma C. Taddei-Died on Sept 11 in the North Tower, Name on 911 Memorial at N-13
Kathryn Blair Lee-Died on Sept 11 in the North Tower, Name on 911 Memorial at N-9
Unnamed Executive-unknown
Jeffrey W. Greenberg-Was at MMC’s midtown headquarters, which has an unobstructed view of Lower Manhattan so he saw the smoke rising from One World Trade Center and the fireball erupt from the second tower. He is currently chairman of the private equity firm he founded, Aquiline Holdings.We can cross two of the suspects off of our list. Who do we have left? Unnamed Executive, and Jeffrey W. Greenberg. We should ask Richard why he has not made his case the he has personal knowledge of pre-planning in the 911 attacks to the courts?
If he could really solve this mystery, he could right a very big wrong. Isn’t that what Richard is about these days with Tragedy and Hope? Doing the right thing?
If Richard was serious about his claims, he would muster up the necessary funds (and we know how good he is at doing that) and hire a team of lawyers to finish the 911 mystery once and for all.
The fact that Richard has not taken the remaining two suspects to task for their duplicity shows that Richard is not only insincere in his journey for good, but that his character is seriously flawed.
I find it interesting that Richard’s story of his kiss with death includes two dead people whom can’t be interviewed, one unknown who can’t be found to corroborate his story, and one who seems above reproach.
This is why I find it impossible to believe Richard Groves 911 story.
K Ham
Rod,
I enjoyed your talk on air with Ab on Saturday, 1/24/2014.
I noticed you have a bit of an Eastern European accent. Having spent a lot of time around both kiwis as well as Eastern Europeans, it was easy for me to hear it.
It is great how Ab’s site has attracted people from all over the world with a lot of international experience. Being an American, this is one thing our media sorely lacks. It is a wonderful thing to hear the opinions and ideas from people like you!
What Eastern European country are you originally from?
K Ham
Tom, You are absolutely right. This psyop is not mini at all. It spans centuries. I was thinking in terms of one part of a whole bunch of control mechanisms.
Keeping humans from their true potential achieves several goals: we don’t rise up against our rulers as we don’t feel worthy, rulers get to keep their secrets as we are now not clever enough to find them, and the status quo remains.
By the way, there is still a set of Egyptian hieroglyphs that cannot be translated. I always wondered if that was on purpose? Or perhaps we need our third eye to understand it.
K Ham
Well, wuyi, if one part of Richard Groves story contradicts with known facts, then we must conclude Richard is lying. Now we must discuss reasons for lying and what it means.
Richard Grove said he was only a couple of blocks away from the WTC complex, stuck in traffic, when the second plane hit.
We must call shananigans on Richard. There was a drill going on that day, prior to any alleged terror attacks. Subway trains were not running to lower Manhattan, and roads were closed. There are several witnesses to attest to this, that have no ties to media.
This quote from Veritasirl October 27th, 2010, 11:40 am, on Clues Forum says it best:
“Is his story meant to reinforce the notion that the Towers were occupied before 9/11?”
This might very well be one of the purposes of Richards lie. To add legitimacy to Richards story, he mentions floors that the banks occupied, that he found out later were never finished, they were empty floors.
To a researcher, this might sound like gold, until one hears the rest of Richards tale.
Richard Grove is a good example of a Limited Hangout. He releases some gems of information, while redirecting us away from the real story.
I am confident in Clues Forum analysis:
1) WTC 1&2 were mostly empty
2) Lower Manhattan was closed off in the early morning of 9/11/2001
3) No actual footage of the events existWhen I find contradicting information, it needs serious vetting. So far, no contradicting information has held up as real.
I am willing to give new ideas a chance, but so far I have been disappointed, and have learned that there are a lot of liars out there.
K Ham
I like Lenon Honor’s take on our third eye. He says:
who told you that it was closed. What experiences in your life has shown you that your third eye was closed?
Your third eye is your bio-spiritual interface and we all have it, naturally, and that it is always open.
All those experts/websites that show you complicated ways to ‘open’ your third eye, are actually telling you to assume that your third eye is closed, and that if you don’t make time to do the complicated procedure to open it, your 3rd eye will just stay closed.
Conditioned to believe: Your 3rd eye is closed (need help to open it)
Reality: Your 3rd eye has always been open (no one can take your spirituality/connection to the universe from you)
This is a brilliant mini-psyop to have us give over control to experts and to limit our self-actualization.
See “Deep in the Garden of Consciousness” by Lenon Honor. Or google Lenon Honor Third eye.
K Ham
Great Job Columjaddica. You bring up a good point about who the witnesses are.
I have been through some violent events in public. One was a casino shooting, two women down, right at my feet. Blood spreading everywhere. We were all told to leave. We did. Who hangs around for the interview??? We had blood on the bottom of our shoes. We hugged each other and went home.
Say I want to hang around in hopes to get interviewed by the media. I have to wait for police and EMT’s to arrive. My shoes are sticking to the cement as I adjust my stance. I have to wait outside as the police emptied the casino. I am getting hungary, so take a short trip to MickeyD’s and return. Should I change my shoes? I have a spare in the car. No, the media might want to see the blood stains. 25 minutes after the police and EMT’s, some media arrives. They look around, then start interviewing officials. They ignore me. To get notices, I start meandering towards them. Good thing I didn’t change my shoes. I should have got more blood on my shoes when I walked past that bleeding lady. I walk closer and closer. They still don’t notice me. I say outloud, “Hey, I saw it, Hey!” One lady comes to interview me. But only gets a few lines then walks away. I walk right up to a camera man and tell him I saw what happened. He takes my cell number and says he will call me. So I wait 1 more hour . . .
Consider the above scenario, what human being does that? Just the time elapse between a real event and the media arriving is what, about an hour?
By the time we left the casino parking lot it had been 40 minutes, still no media.
In all of these events I would like to know
1) How did the media find out?
2) How long did it take them to get there?
3) How do they find their witnesses?K Ham
I like where you want this to go. Fake name seems appropriate for a fake story, lol. I would think you will get more flies with honey. Repeat the details, then ask for one detail more. Just that simple. Since tweets are short any way, you won’t get much on them.
Tweet one known fact, then ask for one unknown fact, but send out several tweets.
Why stop at one account? Maybe one account is for ‘where’, once account is for ‘when’, etc. I’m thinking out loud here.
What do you think?
K Ham
I have updated the above video to include some counter-examples. The previous video is no longer available.
Conflicting information, which is a common trait of psychological operations also includes confusing, incompatible or antithetical information. The idea is to cause psychological trauma.
According to Lenon Honor (911 Fear Based Mind Control Program), conflicting information creates unsolvable problems. Our conscious mind is unable to deal with this conflict which causes psychological trauma. In order to protect our conscious mind, our subconscious mind takes over and submerges this conflict into the subconscious to relieve our conscious mind of trauma and stress, thus allowing us to move forward.
So now all these traumas are submerged in our subconscious. This is a subtle form of programming because now you may be making subconsciously processed decisions based on previous traumas.
However, if you are aware that certain media is presenting conflicting information on purpose, and that these conflicts can never be resolved, then you have just accessed your subconscious, and relieved yourself of layers and layers of unresolved media-based trauma.“Hey, that does not make sense. Yesterday Diane Sawyer said there were 2 gunman, but today she is saying there is only one. Where did the other gunman go? Why is no one talking about the second gunman today?”
“Why of course, this must be the beginning of a psyop. Diane Sawyer just presented conflicting information. But now that I know this, I don’t have to worry about resolving this conflict because it is meant to NEVER be resolved, in order that I may experience subconscious trauma. Too late Diane, I am on to you and thus refuse your subtle programming.”
K Ham
How to Tell if Sandy Hook is a Psyop
In this video, I discuss a common technique used in psychological operations: provide plenty of conflicting information. In just one online article, there are several pieces of incorrect information and items to mislead you. I get a little snarky, it’s hard not to get frustrated.
I encourage people to look for conflicting information for themselves to decide if a media event is a psyop.
K Ham
You must be logged in to post a comment.