[mahatmacoat]

Sorry xileffilex, i’ve only just spotted this.

Especially after reading your belly-giggle inducing work on Giles et al death(s), it pretty much wraps it up for me. Thanks.

They’re dropping like flies at these elite institutions from which have come more than just ‘a bit dodgy’ alumni.

I can whiff the clogging, rancid pungent stench of U.N. Agenda 21 all over this regarding personal transport and it’s apparent early stages of a phase-out.

Why not take the opportunity to ‘kill’ two birds with one stone? Get a new life whilst simultaneously assisting the introduction of the agenda. If/when this ever happens for real, these officially reported ‘deaths’ will be invoked to establish new case law and completely change the use of self driven vehicles in the future. It’s not unheard of for it to take five or more hours to just drive out/in of/to London, i believe this is deliberate. So do many others, however they put it down to incompetence when even i could improve it upon mere cursory inspection.

Thanks again.

[mahatmacoat]

Vespadouglas wrote:

Just to be clear. I have very little interest in whether radiation does or does not exist. They tell me it does.
I doubt it. Something made your dad poorly after visiting the hospital.Was it radiation?. Does radiation exist?
Land of a thousand questions
Regards
VD

I haven’t read acres of skin and haven’t checked up on the court cases yet, but if some of the victims of alleged radioactive isotopes were awarded damages in the form of remuneration then the question is was it actually physically proven or just ‘admitted to’ by the accused party (unless the damages awarded were for a mistreatment or something similarly vague and not radiation experiments)?

What would you conclude from this?

[mahatmacoat]

Sorry xileffilex didn’t mean to be ignorant i never noticed your post. I think i registered at cluesforum years ago with the same username as on here, i say i think because my memory isn’t what it used to be. Thanks.

[mahatmacoat]

I really can’t be certain whether or not he got ‘zapped better’, the radiotherapy was probably another pointless medical cash cow, i used my dad as an example in an attempt to speak from experience. All i know is, he was diagnosed with bollock cancer, he had a bollock chopped off (i now call him Johnny-one-ball haha), they marked a semi permanent target on his stomach and he had to keep returning over a period of time for radiotherapy which caused chronic nausea and fatigue, he finished the course of radiotherapy and recovered. But if radiation doesn’t exist as we’re told it does then i’m mystified as to exactly what they were doing to him. There’s just no telling.

I wonder if any of the eight Jesuit priests at ground zero at Hiroshima that survived supposed vapourisation by saying many rosaries through the power of Fatima contracted cancer after their return to Germany?

Thanks.

[mahatmacoat]

I did notice the later conflicting reports you posted while looking for the links, but i wanted to stay on point.

What are the known possible options for radiotherapy making my dad ill? At an attempt to simplify,

Radiation doesn’t exist at all hence so called radioactive substances aren’t possible, or
Radiation only makes you ill when you get regularly zapped with the radiation machine, or
The radiation machine is an expensive bluff and somehow some other nausea causing technology is being employed

If you think there’s no such thing as radiation how would you address the above options?

Thanks.

[mahatmacoat]

Thanks xileffilex

Do you think, when my dad was diagnosed with cancer, the doctor knowingly with $ signs (or in this case £s) in his eyes had bullshitted my dad, and after surgery, the radiotherapy that made my dad ill as fuck (they weren’t injecting him with anything e.t.c.) was fake? If they were zapping my dad with something else? What technology could they have used to make him ill? Thankfully, my dad recovered and though i know people mainly die from the treatment but i do think people legitimately die due to cancer.
How would you respond to this https://www.wiseinternational.org/book/export/html/2984 or this http://www1.american.edu/ted/SELLA.HTM#r3 do you think it’s just a mechanism to demonise nuclear power?

Ha ha that image of what’s allegedly Ouchi san’s corpse is completely incredulous to me but i’m no expert.

[mahatmacoat]

I don’t think there’s any evidence for nukes personally, apart from every time i raise it people invariably give the default stock ‘tell that to the radiation victims’ reply. This is pure conjecture, but the only way they could have pulled off this hoax is – many tonnes of TNT and a good sprinkling of any radioactive substance/and a total blanket media hoax control particularly hospital reports.
The truth is i just don’t know for certain, so i can’t declare (even to myself) declare nukes are bullshit as an absolute statement.

[Author]

Posts