Unreal

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 81 through 100 (of 460 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: FAK super skeptic scrutiny #856609
    Unreal
    Participant

    Addendum:


    When it comes to facts in alternative research, we all will be accustomed to how deception is closely matched with falsified documents. The importance of an event will determine if such material is produced or not, as such fabrications demand time and expertise.

    If an intended deception or hoax does not require falsified documents and papers in order to be believed, this type of production will evidently not take place.

    In the occasion where no false documents have been produced to accompany a deception, lie or false narrative and at the same time it becomes impossible to maintain believability in said deception/lie/narrative without proper sources – then after-production may be necessary.

    So when ducuments and references are asked, the time it takes to produce relevant material is an important aspect. In the particular case of Jasmine Jae, it is important to point out how the necessary facts and verifiable papers are of very basic nature and should require only minimal efforts and time to produce.

    in reply to: FAK super skeptic scrutiny #856608
    Unreal
    Participant

    On bully-like behaviour, all I can say is that in these areas of research, I think it’s our duty to call bullshit when we see it.

    I apologise for anything personal I’ve said, fair point, text bickering can be so catty, however, in the main, what I’ve been calling bullshit on is the information and latterly what I’ve been doing is defending my honour.
    You are directly calling me a liar.

    Let’s meet in audiochat and talk it out? Anytime.

    I’ll certainly be civil and merely want to defend my honour and make, what I think, is a valid point and perhaps a worthwhile lesson for us all, in this field of research.

    When someone defend their honor dishonorably, are we not speaking of vanity?

    What matters to me is not personal intrigue and unverifiable stories, but rather checkable facts, documented and referenced research. If anything should stand as a lesson for us all it would be to make verifiable contributions and diligent, courageous research. In order to properly reference and share such research – written records remains essential and the base for any shared information.

    Despite the change of tone, your insistence on controlling my opinion is still unbecoming. I am in my full right to hold my own opinions, and to think and say exactly what that opinion is. As it is in this case, you (Tom Dalpra) have yet to produce any document to the effect of fact-proving your claims.

    The irrational position in this case is yours, Tom Dalpra. So less you produce factual research and valid proof of your claims – what reason do i have to discuss anything with you* in this case? And generally speaking, you have done nothing but disrupt any topic i’ve researched lately – such as Voice Disguise, The Conspiracy Conspiracy and the K Shooting : at the origin of this derailing debacle.

    Regarding your civil response here-over so it that something i do welcome – despite that i find your arguments and proposition uninteresting. I’m not all that enthusiastic about the trivial aspect of current FAC broadcasts, but remain available for audio and interviews topically on the research i conduct (blog articles & forum topics).

    *have no interest in discussing hearsay and personal stories i cannot verify, and regarding your honor you should start with proving what you say with facts, and while it’s too late for that – not act as a bully caught red-handed

    in reply to: FAK super skeptic scrutiny #856596
    Unreal
    Participant

    Good to see Tom Dalpra finally not spamming the “K Shooting” forum topic and also that the threat level and emotion is turned off as he now seems to converse in an understandable fashion.

    Now, why would the Fakeologist members not read this particular forum topic like every other topic? Maybe Tom Dalpra is of the opinion the K Hammad investigation is rather more interesting than discussing hearsay like “EGI is BS” as Tom Dalpra managed to derail on in the dedicated K Hammad Muckleshoot Casino shooting thread. And where Tom Dalpra contributed with… No research.

    “The liar was the hottest to defend his veracity, the coward his courage, the ill-bred his gentlemanliness, and the cad his honor”
    Margaret Mitchell

    My personal opinion about Tom Dalpra being a disruptive agent has less to do with the fact he can lie about a case like Jasmine Jae (opinion based on the above Discord discussion, press references and company records), and moreso with how Tom Dalpra never contributes with anything concrete when when it really matters (recent examples: John Adams, K Hammad) and instead chooses to inject non-related material and ridicule as other Fakeologists uncover paid intelligence operators* and explore new topics of alternative research in general – to Tom’s undocumented, vocal dislike.

    Of course, Tom Dalpra’s attitude* makes it a bit curious he chooses to expose himself so blatantly in the case of Jasmine Jae (my opinion, as i’m entitled to and however see fit). Despite the change of tone, Tom Dalpra still provides no further supportive evidence that Jennifer Margaret Chalmers changed her name at any other occasion than when she became an adult actress and choose – as custom has it in that business – a name derived from her given name Jennifer (Jen/Jasmine J/Jae).

    There is no chance a compulsive liar will ever admit to lying, so after using threats, insults and anger, Tom Dalpra now tones down his message and still include no facts! Just more subjective storytelling while asking me to do more research! lol

    Sure Tom, you’re the boss!

    The inversion of the burden of evidence is an interesting point, as Tom Dalpra qualifies me as a poor researcher whereas i’m the one who actually have dug up business records, addresses and press coverage of Chalmers, thus proving my points. Tom on the other hand, contends his hearsay weigh in more heavily as he considers himself an authority on truth, i presume. Being a natural English speaker and all.

    Tom Dalpra has shown no ability or will to support his claims with neither facts, reason or decency on neither JJ nor regarding EGI being BS.

    Oh – and throwing out a strip club name with no employee record or any other factual link is just more storytelling – much easier now of course with some time to think about a new strategy. At the time, Tom Dalpra’s strategy was to prove his good intentions by taking a lie detector test and meet up in Paris… Sure,,, lol

    Discord Lie detector test in Paris
    Discord Lie Detector proposition…

    Now Tom Dalpra isn’t being quite honest when he faints to genuinely participate in the Discord #EGI thread, where repeatedly have attacked EGI research and insisted on how Elite Gender Inversion is ridiculous and a waste of time. Tom Dalpra attempts to deceptively disguise his disruptive efforts on EGI as a research topic by insinuating he participated in the #EGI discussion as a contributor, which could not be further from the facts.

    Not only did Tom Dalpra participate in the #EGI to belittle the research conducted in that section – he brought with him an example that he felt would “disprove” EGI as a research topic. There are of course no good intentions at play here from Tom, and questioned about his most recent monkey-wrench example, the authority fallacy of knowing the the person in question (Jasmine Jae) clearly was intended to serve his efforts to invalidate EGI research.

    So here we have Tom with a proven motive of ridiculing EGI research and an example that only works with his “personal” knowledge… And as any other deceptive agent, Tom Dalpra clearly dislikes to be caught in his act as this would undermine his both his person and his anti-EGI intentions. So here we are.

    Not only does Tom Dalpra need to prove Jennifer Chalmers name being Lorraine with verifiable facts, he also needs to properly justify his derogatory statements about EGI being bunk – as my previous post explains in detail (here).

    Tom Dalpra being disruptive on Discord
    Other Fakeologists also notice Tom Dalpra’s disruptive behavior on Discord

    No professional liar will ever admit to his lies, so i expect no “confession” from Tom Dalpra on Jasmine Jae’s real name (Jennifer Margaret Chalmers) – nor do i expect Tom to change his tactics of asking me for more research. As it is however, the factual evidence is provided only from my contributions while Tom Dalpra asks for yet more trust in his personal narrative and unsupported story.

    Anyone is free to make their own choice between facts and storytelling, and i make no qualms about not believing Tom Dalpra’s word and calmly place my opinion in the hands of existing documentation. Well – there is also the typical guilty behavior and repetitive bullying as circumstantial evidence, but I count on Tom that he’ll work hard on a new scheme to prove his good intentions – as lie detectors and Paris meetings is true BS…

    *by their behavior, association and cover up of now proven (K & Adams) agents also other researchers like Chris Kendall, NotSoFreemason, Rollo, Roch3llo, Hoi Polloi, Patrix, Simon Shack prove to be controlled opposition

    “I’m always impressed when people can converse and research in a second, sometimes third, language. UNreal does a great job of communicating his thoughts in English”

    Does Tom Dalpra get bonus points on logic for being British? lol – thanks for your well disguised sophism, Tom !

    Tom Dalpra caugh red handed lying
    Screen capture of Tom Dalpra caught red handed live on Discord

    in reply to: K shooting #856593
    Unreal
    Participant

    I’m sorry Tom, i didn’t read your insightful contribution to this Forum topic in it’s entirety.

    Again, your insistance on posting your bully-like behaviour to this topic discussion is quite direspectful, not only to me, but also to other Fakeologists who might not care much about how I or you “feel”, but rather hope to read factual research and discussion in an orderly manner and on topic.

    You are served, Tom Dalpra, with my direct response to your predictable behavior here

    in reply to: K shooting #856591
    Unreal
    Participant

    Fuck that. I helped build these forums here at Fakeologist

    Again – you continue derailing this topic, now systematically.

    Your nasty attitude really shine through above, and you (Tom Dalpra) behave directly opposite of how anyone innocent would.

    Direct response to Tom here

    in reply to: FAK super skeptic scrutiny #856590
    Unreal
    Participant

    Fuck that. I helped build these forums here at Fakeologist, I don’t need your
    suggested censorship.

    You accuse me of openly lying. I’m not.

    If you want a highly motivated person on your case pulling apart your crap, then just keep winding me up and I’ll just keep saying how I see it.

    This is your last warning here, from me, UNreal.
    Shut the fuck up with your false accusations that I am a liar or I’ll actually really start getting on your case. I really don’t like that sort of false accusation.

    Don’t mention me again on this thread and I’ll leave it alone.
    Is that clear ?
    I repeat, don’t mention me again on this thread and I’ll leave it alone.

    You have falsely accused me of lying and then shown no sign of any value at all, as a real honest researcher, by completely ignoring the fact you’re wrong about something.

    You failed the test UNreal.

    Now, as I said. Shut the fuck up about me being a liar, and I’ll leave it alone. This will be my last word on this thread unless
    you wanna drag this out. If you want to, fine, I’m highly motivated and I’ll be all over you like a rash.

    Your choice, fool.

    Wow Tom Dalpra – are you going to tell me what to think and do now, and electronically threaten me ? You behave just as compulsive liars and sociopaths behave when they are exposed, all rage and emotion, no facts or meaning. Just like Brian Stavelie, Markus Allen etc. ad infinitum.

    The concrete facts i base my opinion are very clear and accessible for everyone to read and interpret as they freely want to as they read the Discord dialogue (above or here) on Jasmine Jae aka Jennifer Chalmers.

    I’m aware compulsive liars with a superiority syndrome will never admit to lying even when it as unmistakable as in this case (imo) – what is expected from your ilk would be that you try distract attention by making a lot of noise and now threats in order to appear (in your eyes) like you are innocent.

    Sorry to inform you Tom Dalpra, but someone truly innocent do not make nonsensical, un-intelligible threats and claims. Innocent individuals actually look for intelligible dialogue, exactly unlike yourself.

    The now proven fact you (Tom Dalpra) keep on derailing the K Hammad topic with your self-centered griefs further emphasize your lack of decency and ill motivated action de facto. Not a very bright idea to insist, but i count on the fact you will, as liars do despise being caught – especially by a fool like me.

    in reply to: K shooting #856587
    Unreal
    Participant

    I watched the video and it looks and sounds scripted, as KHam says [take home message, perhaps, Muggleshoot was real….]

    Very good point on the “take home message”.

    Indeed, when we combine Patrix’ short post and K Hammads “expert” response casting doubts (from her own experience – lol), the dialogue seems very much like a set-up.

    So not only is Simon Shack dressing up a pig here – so is Patrix, habitually all over diet and space in no short way or form. The fact so much hard work is done to cover up an evident fraud is slowly making everyone at Clues Forum complicit in K Hammad’s false testimony and (paid) participation in a media hoax.

    Dissappointing and very telling of how PsyOps equally include the aftermath in the conspiracy theory realm – here CF, habitually selfproclaimed champions of scrutiny and no-nonsense research… Who better suited to “investigate” and bring forth interesting details than those with inside knowledge ?

    Hereunder the Laney Sweet, the wife and high school Sweet heart of Daniel Leetin Shaver giving her best to bring forth the tears for a heartbreaking, fundworthy performance,,,

    Widow of man shot & killed by ex-Mesa police officer talks about acquittal, family
    AZ family – 12 Dec 2017 – 01:59 (mm:ss) – 3K views

    in reply to: K shooting #856584
    Unreal
    Participant

    Clearly you’re not capable of that.

    I’ve already explained in detail where to take your grief and falsehoods – yet you still continue derailing in this topic, thrice*.

    FAK super skeptic scrutinydirect response to Tom Dalpra here

    *would be good Admin could direct discussion where it belongs

    in reply to: K shooting #856582
    Unreal
    Participant

    No blood, T-shirt intact after 5 close range semi-automatic assault rifle shots…

    Video still taken 4 seconds after Daniel Shaver was shot 5 times BY police officer Phillip Brailsford
    Video still taken 4 seconds after Daniel Shaver was shot 5 times with police officer Phillip Brailsford’s AR-15 rifle.

    in reply to: K shooting #856581
    Unreal
    Participant

    Looking closer at the thread and referenced incident K Hammad commented December 2nd (above) with her crisis actor shooting experience, it is in fact rather intriguing it concerned a supposed “real” body cam police shooting that took place in Granbury, Texas (18 Jan 2016, wiki).

    The Daniel Shaver shooting is an incident that occurred in Texas prior to the significant mass shootings of Sutherland Springs church shooting (26 dead and 20 injured) and later Santa Fe High School shooting (7 deaths and 17 injuries).

    As of now i’m not aware of any media fakery research on the 2016 Daniel Shaver shooting, but from the video* referenced by Patrix at Clues Forum, it looks pretty groce and real – and Patrix comments and question really doesn’t help the casual reader (here me…lol) to be much wiser.

    Psychological terror. How would you feel if an officer pointed a gun at you, if you had watched this believing it was real?
    Patrix CF, 1 Dec 2018

    There is no research on the Shaver police shooting on Clues Forum as far as i can see, nor here on FAK or on YT for that matter. So as it is, Patrix rejoins the ranks of supportive evidence for “realness” in the press and for gun violence. Sound familiar ?

    Intel modus operandi seems to be clear, when doubt is cast on one of their field operators, other agents comes to help with their plausible denial insinuations made to cast doubt on the realness of violence – or not. Why did Patrix never question this event before, and howcome he mentions it now that it effectively shows yet another close gunshot scene much like the Muckleshooter narrative ?

    *Body-Cam Video Of Daniel Shaver Shooting (approx @ 04:20)
    Los Angeles Times – 8 Dec 2017 – 05:02 (mm:ss) – 2.246K views



    Justice For Daniel Shaver
    https://www.gofundme.com/danielmemorialfund

    in reply to: K shooting #856580
    Unreal
    Participant

    I don’t expect Kham to clear up the mess she left in a pile at Cluesforum

    K Hammad is still active and doing well on Cluesforum as an Admin. She posted about her shooting expertise not later than yesterday.

    ”   If guns were pointed at me in such a scenario my first reaction would be to look behind me and see if the guns were pointed at someone else, such as a dangerous perp in the background, as the use of such ridiculous force against unarmed civilians is extreme and logically not intended for me. Neither of the couple looked behind them. A plain clothes police person could have easily and quietly escorted the pair into a conference room on the first floor when the pair entered the hotel where a few officers with handcuffs could be waiting.   ”
    K Hammad CF – 2 Dec 2018

    There is no doubt K Hammad continue to pretend with her “friends” at Clues Forum that nobody has noticed she’s a fraud and a paid media hoax participant as early as 2011. I would imagine being part of Clues Forum is a step up from her poor Muckleshoot Casino crisis actor performance. And by standing so tight together, the majority of Clues Forum admins and active posters confirm being OK to be identified with “K” thus backing K Hammad’s version of the hoaxed Muckleshoot Casino shooting facts.

    in reply to: K shooting #856579
    Unreal
    Participant

    Not surprised Tom Dalpra do bring his off-topic emotion and hurt feelings into the wrong forum – again. More confirmation of Tom Dalpra’s disruptive stance and navelgazing as predicted in previous post (here)

    The proper forum is here, illustrated as well.

    Thanks for keeping to contributing topically only here about the “K Shooting” and related matters in this thread. For any other matters you should address these concerns and ideas where they belong.

    FAK super skeptic scrutiny (post answering EGI blanket statements)
    http://fakeologist.com/forums/topic/fak-super-skeptic-scrutiny/#post-856574


    FAK super skeptic scrutiny (topic)

    in reply to: K shooting #856576
    Unreal
    Participant

    What does the evidence of K Hammad lying about her witness testimony of the 2011 Muckleshoot Casino shooting further imply – other than K Hammad being a paid operative ?

    If anyone take the time to really listen to the interviews she did with Roch3llo and Hoi Polloi, there is little doubt that both these individuals played knowingly along with K Hammad as she gave her false account of the Club Galaxy shooting.

    While some might like to wishfully think both these individuals (Hoi & Roch3llo) were leading the interview in any type of genuine way – listen back anew. The blatant foreknowledge, leading questions and supportive commentary*. So it is clear we do not deal with only one outed agent in this case – but three. Hoi Polloi, Roch3llo and K Hammad – all lying their teeth off and degrading both this site and its members by their false witness.

    It would be a relief to see genuine researchers react and be repulsed, even angry. But the reality is worse. Most “genuine” Truthers seems to not care much and continue discussing other more important topics of which there are very and no written record.

    The worst case here is undoubtedly Clues Forum who have nurtured K Hammad into their inner circle, yet ask her no answers and mentions not how K Hammad on this site (that they do follow) has been proven to lie in a very clear issue of major importance – Khams unmistakeable claim that two people died in the Muckleshoot Casino media hoax of 2011.

    This is verifiably a case of outright false testimony to a media hoax where a Clues Forum Administrator has participated. The cold fact is the Clues Forum brand of Truthers are complicit in the cover up of a media hoax – not to mention their rufsal to inquire.

    If anyone just read his unbelievable Norwegian Woods tale of “supportive evidence” delivered by none other that Shack himself and match that with his silence that protect K Hammad…

    “All of a sudden, a “bang” echoes in the air – and almost instantly, I see some tiny object splashing in the water right next to me – no more than a couple of meters away from the boat. In fact, I simultaneously heard a faint “whoosh” next to me – that is, pretty damn close to my ear! The three of us kind of freezed – and after a few seconds staring at each other, we all said – almost in unison – “whaat the HECK was THAT?!” I told my friends about the splash and the whoosh – and we concluded to our horror that it must have been a bullet. My first thought was that perhaps some duck hunters had mistakenly shot at us. The problem was that…there was not a single duck in sight! As we looked around us – someone caught a glimpse of something moving in the tall grass on a little mound by the lakeside. So we started rowing towards that spot (don’t ask me why were such fearless daredevils!) and as we landed there, we walked up the small “grassy knoll”. There we almost stumbled over two old drunkards sitting in the grass, surrounded by empty beer cans. One of them was still holding a revolver (I’m no gun expert, but it had that typical barrel) – and smiling meekly, like a child caught stealing cookies…”
    Simon Shack CF 14 Nov 2018

    All so fun and light*, Simon’s story sound quite a bit like Roch3llos 7mph car accident or Chris Kendalls one block away car crash following the Annette Carrion debackle. Sure thing, these seem to be on the same paid page by their own silent admission and absence of attention and investigation.

    And yet, all is quiet and peaceful in the land of no shills & no paid agents.

    *Roch3lle’s 7mph car accident is just as false as K Hammads two dead bodies falling to the floor bang-bang-bang VRcade style…

    *noteable here is Simon Shack’s conscious NLP use of the word “bang” that coincides with K Hammads ridicule bang-bang-bang. Oh and by the way, in Norway arms are forbidden and anyone with a firearm would have a licenced rifle, but a gun fits better with Khams Muckleshooter i guess,,

    in reply to: K shooting #856575
    Unreal
    Participant

    It reminds me of the EGI thread here at Fakeologist, you quoted earlier, which is replete with utterly spurious speculation that x is y.

    Doing research in the FAK Forums should normally be all about contributing topically, which for some reason seems to escape Tom Dalpra who does his outmost to circumvent meaningful contributions with proposing no relevant topical research of his own and yet voices contradicting opinions on the uphill research effort shedding light on the 2011 Muckleshoot Casino shooting and subsequent K Hammad witness testimony analysis.

    It is no surprise that a continuosly negative, disruptive commenter like Tom Dalpra comes into a thread where my research figures, and Tom has already well proven his questionnable endeavors on my account as he in this “K Shooting” discussion does no proper research on the case at hand and rather adds insult to sophistry by bringing up one of his favorite appeal to ridicule arguments : that EGI is BS*.

    I have responded to Tom Dalpra in no unexact terms in dedicated EGI discussion repeatedly, and it seems that despite TD’s lack of arguments on the topic of Elite Gender Inversion that he’s just as fine with repeating empty hearsay in an ongoing effort to slander research that is in fact unique (EGI) to Fakeologist in that it actually analyses both the public agenda of gender politics as well as the hidden motives of gender propaganda as well as EGI research also describes what we know of the Elite’s sectret practices of gender bending and related deceptions about their public personas.

    With the limited amount of new research presented on this site and forum, it is quite unproductive that any researcher would consider themselves commissionned to interuptongoing research on any topic. Conspiracy theory is, beyond any other field, a work in progress and easily disrupted.

    Although i personally see many faults in the interpretation Tom Dalpra makes of his favorite Sports topic, i still find it valuable he does engage in such research, and find it inapropriate for me to discourage his efforts by merely posting negative opinion and throw in off topic blanket statements. Critique shpould be respectful of the research conducted and properly references and argued with factual support and on topic.

    One of the reasons a naysayer like Tom Dalpra comes onto topic threads they do not support is of course that they hope to disrupt discussion and derail attention. Naturally, such intentions will result in vivid reaction with much emotion and anger when their obvious behavior is pointed out. This cast of characters use such reactions as “opportunities” to persue their negative efforts in long posts asking for much evidence and justification to come to their deaf ears and disinterest. Reality is of course these individuals propose no referenced research of their own anyhow and initiated word-battle and derailing in the first place, using known topics of controversy and belittling insinuations.

    In these days of advanced online deception it seems necessary to emphasize that such behavior as Tom Dalpra demonstrates repeatedly is a targeted discrediting effort of both the topics themselves and here Terran Downvale and myself as researchers. In other words, Tom Dalpra behaves exactly as an intelligence operator tasked with sidelining both research effort and those behind the research.

    The fact Tom Dalpra behaves exactly like a “shill” does not of course mean he necesserily is one. And by “shill” i mean a paid shill, an intelligence field operator. What is curious however is that Tom Dalpra does not seem intellectually challenged or personally related to either the topics he propagandises nor the researchers (here me & Terran) he targets in his disrupting and derailing (gatekeeping) efforts. And i do know Tom Dalpra does not mind blatantly lying to make a “valid point” on “personal experience” much like K Hammad.

    “If you look for truth, you may find comfort in the end: if you look for comfort you will not get either comfort or truth—only soft soap and wishful thinking to begin with and, in the end, despair.”
    CS Lewis

    Just by responding to Tom Dalpra with this post i’m sure response will be longwinded and cover a wide range of non-related arguments in order to defend the alternative honour of poor Tom, who will feel unreasonably “attacked” by coming into this thread about Kham offering no personal research and faulting at nitpicking on myself (here) and thereafter goes onto the next best victim – Terran*. Very constructive and supportive indeed…

    Responding to someone as duplicious and false as Tom Dalpra will yield much dialogue to follow, nevertheless it should be as clear to Tom as anyone else that such discussion has nothing to do in this particular topic about K Hammad’s false testimony of the Muckleshoot Casino 2011 shooting. However such polemics as raised by Tom Dalpra’s disruptive efforts could nevertheless merit further discussion – at least in Tom Dalpra’s world of sports.

    To the effect of intellibly hold derailing discussion in a different forum or format than inside any specific research subject – there is now a dedicated forum thread that hopefully can help keep topical discussion topical, not derailing or repeatedly dismissive of other members efforts and initiative

    FAK super skeptic scrutiny
    http://fakeologist.com/forums/topic/fak-super-skeptic-scrutiny


    Hopefully, super skeptics like Tom, QOR, Typo, Zal, and others can bring the scope of their factual arguments supportive of their repetetive critique into its dedicated space, rather than regurgitating their one-liners and un-referenced hearsay and/or opinions incessantly out of context.

    *topical discussion about EGI being real or not has taken place in length before, and is once again best adressed in the proper FAK subsite and forum (as here, or here)

    *transcript of the public discussion where Tom Dalpra openly lies about knowing British porn star Jasmine Jae can be found on Discord (#EGI thread dated 10/10/2017) or downloaded here or discussed in the FAK super skeptic scrutiny Forum thread here

    [ in essence Tom Dalpra much like K Hammad gives “personal testimony”, in this case of being a private friend of an adult movie actress whose private name is verifiable (business record & press) but that Tom Dalpra missed completly – unless Jennifer sounds like Lorraine to you… “Opinion” may vary, facts less so.. ]

    *despite Terran Downvale’s style of contribution that for some may appear extravagant, he does have the merit of bringing in information in a constructive manner to the topics he participate in. And Terran Downvale also is aware of going on tangents himself as he mostly will specify when he goes after hard-to-determine points of convergence/coincidence

    in reply to: FAK super skeptic scrutiny #856574
    Unreal
    Participant

    ===
    Hasty Generalization: EGI is BS
    ===

    Quite often i encounter self-confirming one-liners such as Elite Gender Inversion research is BS. This opinion is of course valid, but the proponents of such critique seem to be very poorly informed about what EGI research is really about and why this research figures on the Fakeologist blog as a subdomain and as this websites most commented forum topic.

    To put it shortly, EGI is the acronym for Elite Gender Inversion and was started as a forum topic on this blog in November 2016. The aim of studying this topic (EGI) is to understand how come Elite individuals and celebrities impersonate as the opposite gender of which they were born.

    One of the recurrent critiques of this research is that it is based on just speculation and image analysis. While it is true that unwinding hidden practices does not come with a state funded manual, it is not true that we cannot prove there are indeed Elite individuals that have live and have lived as the opposite sex deceptively before either coming out of their uncomfortable role of their own volition or being in some form or fashion publicly questioned and/or “outed”.

    The publicly available information makes it nonsensical to contend what is here described as EGI (or hidden transgenderism if you will) to be fantasy or “wrong”. The examples of such admitted practice are many and easily verifiable: Bruce Jenner, Bradley Manning, Chaz Bono, Elliot Kukla, JJ Totah, Teddy Geiger, Lewis Maday-Travis, Narcissa Wright, Madeline Snyder, Eddie Ayres, Jordan Raskopoulos, Carrie Marshall, etc*.

    The fact all these people above have lived their lives acting as the opposite gender to which they were born might be considered “normal” by some, but be that as it may, it still represents a very profound deception up to the point these people have “come out”, thus admitting to having inverted their public gender appearance. The hidden nature of a person’s natural gender such above-mentioned cases is what is referred to in the dedicated forum as an EGI person*.

    It is the period when an individual does not openly disclose their real gender that is of the most attention in the study of EGI as this obviously is a period comprised of very advanced deception – fake breasts, gender affirming surgeries, voice alteration, hormone treatments and a whole other range of other techniques that makes it very hard for non-informed individuals to uncover if a person really is the gender they claim – or not (see the EGI forum thread here).

    A number of Fakeologists are of the opinion this research is either uninteresting and/or poorly documented. The fact everyone would be interested in such a topic never was the ambition of EGI research, and disinterest would normally mean one would leave the topic alone and pay no attention findings, theories or casual speculation.

    For some – they act all the contrary in regards to Elite Gender Inversion. They claim to take no interest in the topic – yet talk derogatory of the topic unasked for and as the case of Tom Dalpra – out of context and used as a fallacy.

    I’m not sure how any thinking person would ever consider how not doing research can result in obtaining better information. This really should be too idiotic a stance to comment, yet many naysayers still proffer such idiocies…

    Not only does EGI research bring plentiful of factual research into light, it also covers the origins of hidden transgenderism which is loudly claimed even by the official Transgender community itself (https://forlackofsomegoodwriting.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/susan-stryker-and-stephen-whittle-eds-the-transgender-studies-reader.pdf). And the Transgender community trace their origins way back, even far beyond Christ* – which goes to show how EGI is nothing new nor unrecorded.

    Now it seems that what is disliked by the naysayers would be the hidden transgender individuals that have not yet “come out” and the existence or not of those who never will. Even in this case there are numerous examples (Zeke Smith, Jenna Talackova, and Caroline Cossey to name but a few) and for evident reasons, much deception is used to cover such cases up.

    It is also recurrent that those who do proffer blanket statements, such as Tom Dalpra or Zallian have not even read the material presented in the EGI thread – or elsewhere. Still many feel we owe it to these “researchers” with no factual insight or documented contribution to believe them when they claim “EGI is Bullshit / EGI is Crazy Speculation”. I think not highly of such moral and ethical deficiency.

    So in summary, to claim EGI does not exist or that EGI is BS cannot be more factually wrong.

    *a transgender will have to spend considerable time and money to appear as the opposite gender, 100K$ is considered standard which leave average Joe out of the equation and reserves this practice to Elite individuals – despite current incentives to lower the price and access for gender related hormone treatments, plastic and genital surgeries. And further back in time gender transition would be even moreso unaffordable for average income households, which is why these practices have been pioneered by Elite individuals

    *the list of celebrities and Elite individuals who have “come out” is extensive, wiki here

    *i would nevertheless caution about the official Transgender community timeline – and Christ…

    [ hereunder Discord chat screen capture of Tom Dalpra caught lying as he invents a personal testimony in his case against EGI – a big mouth doesn’t mean someone is right, despite Tom does his best as often he can ]

    tom dalpra does not know Jasmine Jae

    in reply to: K shooting #856565
    Unreal
    Participant

    Check out the link on the right of that same page for another featured Muckleshoot activity. A virtual reality shooting game!

    VRcade shoot em up

    It is rather macabre to stage VR shooting games on the scene of a crime. Not only is this a blatant monetizing of a grotesque past – but it also shows an immense lack of respect for supposed victims by staff and direction at the Muckleshoot Casino for even going through with such a sinister plan : fun shooting at a location many were traumatized for life and injured, possibly taking place on a floor still somewhat bloodstained as mopping is cheaper than replacing flooring.

    On the other hand – if there were no real shooting that took place in 2011, it would make sense that the video the Police and legal case relied upon could in fact have been filmed on location and that using the very set-up from the hoaxed event later again could stem from commercial incentive.

    It would be quite cheap to keep all the camera setup and technical equipment from the 2011 shooting and re-use it all for the 2014 introduction of VRcade wireless virtual shooter game.

    Muckleshoot Casino was the first casino in the United States to offer a permanent VRcade installation. There are now 55 others around the world.
    Muckleshoot Casino General Manager, Conrad Granito

    infrared cameras create immersive VR experience at Muckleshoot Casino
    High above, infrared cameras have replaced the security cameras that were set up to film the 2011 Muckleshooter, and today create an immersive VR experience.

    All in all, the Muckleshoot Casino seems to be all about shooting contests and a Mexican/Indian media-hoax would in this case would benefit several outcomes. Financing a new attraction like the Muckleshoot Casino VRcade virtual reality shooting games seems beneficial for both the Casino, the Gaming company and Intelligence/Press. Not to forget K Hammad of course, who seems to at least have won a 9K award before misfiring her trained vocal cords.

    in reply to: K shooting #856547
    Unreal
    Participant

    In the Talkbox June 2016 show with K Hammad and Roch3llo (here), there is a detail that culturally strike me as unusual. K Hammad stated during the Talkbox show that she was at The Galaxy Club (FB) for a Bachelorette Party (wiki).

    From the Clues Chronicle 23 interview with Hoi Polloi and the California Bar Shooting post, we also learn how K Hammad was at the Club Galaxy with her daughter.

    Maybe Bachelorette Parties are organised very differently in the US than in Europe where such festivities are held by a brides close friends and involvolving no family as part of the intention is to act out one last time before bonding to marriage. In the event of a bachelorette party being held without alcohol or debauchery it is usual this exclude visiting nightclubs and more often would be an event in the form of a dinner or lunch.

    In the case of K Hammad it is therfore unusual for me that she would be out that late at a club whose special deal these days* seems to be “Make It a Double” if the Bachelor party was family friendly at 1:09 a.m.

    Not only is it unusual to bring your children to a party to honour the bride-to-be, it is even moreso curious if the event is held at a Night Club that by nature is conceived for casual encounters and wild behaviour. Not quite Hallal…


    ”   Cheap drinks but every time I’ve come here, the experience has gotten less and less stellar. This crowd is sleazy as hell (…)   ”
    Yelp 2018 review


    *club Galaxy’s current special “Make it a Double” deal here

    in reply to: K shooting #856542
    Unreal
    Participant

    The Muckleshoot Casino seems to be more branded with a focus on Veronica Arroyos Morales in the hispanic press which seems appropriate if she really is/was a well known Mexican female basketball player. It is curious however that such facts never even get a mention in the english speaking press – and conversely no surprise that this particular event was later chosen by Kham’s intel friends for benefitting her credence in conspiracy culture.

    The quote above is the context for my opinion that K Hammad’s intelligence cell chose to give “K” a shooting script that was more/wider covered in the Hispanic press moreso than in the English press. This closely matches how John Adams also appear to have chosen the Annette A Carrion “death” for very similar reasons*.

    It should also be noted that K Hammad “broke” her story (afaik*) on launching her own Talkshoe channel and that being a “real” shooting witness must be seen in light of this and the fact the script appears to have been planned for giving her credibility.

    Once more, the fact K Hammad even have gotten research scrutiny is not as much due to Clues Forum who seemingly does nothing else than asking “K” questions, doing no proper research which has been only done here on the FAK forums – after Faye brought this up in a recent audio-chat (FAC511).

    The use K Hammad have made of this event is rather plain as she repeatedly has used the Muckleshoot Casino “Galaxy” Club shooting to reinforce the weight of her opinion – the fact a short handfull of researchers now have dug up facts and newsreports is clearly not something “K” or her handlers had in mind.

    In a way, it seems K Hammad felt so safe about her fake witness testimony that she added some narrative freedom with having two dead bodies fall to the floor – not remembering these two fallen bodies never went dead…

    So if K Hammad had not slipped up as she seeked out to position herself above others as an “expert” in the CF California Bar shooting thread, this would have remained a he-said-she-said story – which probably was the real ambition : to cause storm in a glass of water.

    *the Annette A. Carrion motorcycle death was largely covered by the hispanic press as referenced in the dedicated forum thread (here)

    *the “Galaxy” club is equally a humerous reference if taken into consideration that Clues Forum now in part is just that – a Tacos Galaxy club of contrived Truthers

    *in a recent audiochat, Ab did mention K Hammad had brought up the Muckleshooter before, possibly on Kham Radio, but i have no record of that presently. Anyone who overheard anything on the shooting before the june 2016 Talkbox show are invited to post the info in this forum thread

    *little else than insider member intrigue happens at CF these days, unless you’re into diet or rocks orbiting space on Nasa coordinates

    in reply to: K shooting #856536
    Unreal
    Participant

    From recent feedback* it seems K Hammad first mentionned being a witness to the 2011 Muckleshoot Casino shooting in 2016 on the Talkshoe show Talkbox that K Hammad hosts with Roch3llo (the show seems to be on a halt after publishing material mostly in 2016).

    KHam & Roch3llo : Talkbox (Talkshoe page)
    • Eavesdrop #1 Doubtful Orlando Shooting Witness 6/17/2016
    Show Page: https://www.talkshoe.com/episode/4817247
    Direct download: http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-140628/TS-1088878.mp3

    The narrative presented by K Hammad about the Mexican Muckleshooter starts at 51:40 (mm:ss) into the show and is preceeeded by Roch3llo’s testimony of her real life car accident. There isn’t a lot of precisions about how many individuals were injured or dead in this version of K Hammads dramatic experience*, and a lot of attention is focused on the gun and shooting – emptying of the clip, bang-bang-bang etc.

    Audio clip of “K” on the July 24th Muckleshoot Casino shooting (03:51 mm:ss)



    Audio clip of Roch3llo crashing her car May 25th at 7mph (01:23 mm:ss)


    *many thanks to Delcroix of Outside Radio for finding back to this particular Talkbox episode

    *it is in the Nov 12th post on Clues Forum (here) that K Hammad details how 3 individuals were injured and 2 were shot dead – which clearly is wrong according to all other sources (Police, Press, Legal).

    in reply to: Voice Disguise Deception #856450
    Unreal
    Participant

    ===
    Voice Disguise Deception
    Suspicion of live Voice Morphing
    ===


    From the hostile attitude and repetitive, numerous appeal to ridicule arguments it is obvious that those involved with voice manipulation are working hard not to discuss this topic in any serious way, despite it is undeniable that voice disguise is a very real, efficient technology with definite benefits for intelligence operators in the field of conspiracy research.

    There are many ways one can deduce how voice acting and electronic voice disguise represent a very concrete technique for disguising agents and protecting their ‘real’ private life and how it is useful to recycle agents as PsyOps and conspiracies evolve and change. Silence and superficial rebuttals are part of the tacit admission we currently can verify as being overly present in an audience that on the contrary is supposed to be inquisitive and open to argumented opinions and research.

    In regards to voice disguise we see very little of what should be a natural reaction to suspected hoaxery and prominent revelations which should be astonishment and curiosity. It is of course too late to be astonished or surprised by now for those who do follow this forum thread, recent articles (here) or current discussion on Fakeologist (comments).

    As anyone can establish by following alternative media, most Truthers have a definite broadcast quality voice and above average representational skills which of course is not by accident, but rather comes from targeted training of voice, expression, argumentation and rhetoric.

    For musicians and trained presenters, modelling voice is a craft that is central – so for a large part it will be possible at a minimum to rehearse a general voice that is differentiated enough from their private voice as to their family and friends would not be able to find an exact match online or in the media.

    To find the “true” voice of any lifetime actor or contrived Truther will by nature be very difficult as we simply do not know who these people are, where they really live and come from. Suffice to say that American intelligence operators will often easily take on a Canadian accent, and British intelligence operators will be more at ease impersonating Australian and New Zealand accents.

    So, if anyone wonders why there are so many Australians that are Truthers – it is probably not the right question to ask – the British intelligence community is quite a ways more advanced and prominent. The same goes of course for the American intel operatives who seemingly are quite at ease with Canadian. Common for all is the fact they like to emphasize and linger on particular words that are typically recognizable – try listening closer and you might hear what i’m alluding to.

    Nothing of what is stated so far in this post is really as “far out” as some will probably comment upon at a later stage – and it really is merely pointing out what is obvious when we are aware that conspiracy theory was invented by intelligence services and still is operated in majority by intelligence agencies and their paid operators.

    At the outset then we must presume an intelligence field agent who actively participate in the Truther scene will have extensive broadcast training and at least one solid voice impression with some element that differentiate their real life voice from their alter ego Truther voice. This might be very slight variations and merely consist of moderate alteration of merely a slight accent or the use of chosen words that are pronounced with an altered intonation.

    The fact that many Truther outlets contend to be open platforms for public participation is clearly where electronic means for voice alteration seems the most efficient as such personas do not have extended presence and therefore provide little opportunity for comparison and analyses.

    The benefit of voice morphing used on fake fans is therefore huge as it is easy to do and efficient regarding the content – just as in regular radio they use planted participants to stimulate dialogue and create conflict and interest. Just as we can see patterns in how Truthers jump from show to show appearing with many of the same fake truthers – so is it plausible these operators can assist with additional help by “calling in” or perticipating with voice disguise in order to help certain narratives or policies.

    When we look back at the few “voice morphing” scandals we will quickly be able to see how these cases all are similar in that they concern apparently “regular” members or pretended “layman” researchers. This is clumsy by nature, but also a sign that electronic voice disguise is in use – there would be no such examples if voice morphing was NOT in use…

    The unfortunate fact is nevertheless that electronic voice alteration is so performant that we normally should not have any cases of malfunction, but we do (Sami, Psyopticon, etc) which in my opinion is a sign not only that such technology is in use, but more probably systematically used and probably widely used – for obvious reasons.

    As an example how “Everybody knows things are bad” as Howard Beale would have coined it, hereunder is a sample from a recent audiochat where Dante from NY came on air with very obvious duping delight as he testified to being very real and different from Marcus Allen who i still suspect him to be – even so if he hides behind a voice morpher and is cleverly produced by Love/Velo under his technical audio-mastery.

    Not only does Dante have digital artefacts that show in his voice-print, but everyone present in the conversation seems to be equally amused and thriving in dupers delight together as they all seem to be in on the hoax performed live on air.


    FAC493b-9/11 Special part 2extract (from 7:29 h:mm, 46 seconds clip)

    Dante Voice Pitch analyses
    Voice print of “Dante” shows artefacts of digital sampling and a broken baseline

Viewing 20 posts - 81 through 100 (of 460 total)
This entry was posted on by .