UK related articles

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
xileffilex
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

here we go four-week England lockdown
October 31 2020
But here's the best bit to scare us all...
.... hospitals even in the south-west of England, where cases are among the lowest, will run out of capacity in weeks.

"Doctors and nurses would be forced to choose which patients to treat, who would get oxygen and who wouldn't, who would live and who would die," Mr Johnson said. *

Christmas is going to be different this year, perhaps very different..


The current surge in the virus has seen the UK's total number of positive cases pass the one million mark - it now stands at 1,011,660....But the true number of infections *** is expected to be higher due to a lack of widespread testing at the start of the pandemic.

Premier League to continue under lockdown**


"Over the next few days and weeks we plan a steady but massive expansion in the deployment of these quick turnaround tests," he says.

They could be used to test "whole towns and even whole cities", says the PM, adding that the programme will "begin in a matter of days" and will be assisted by the military.
* Gates and Schwab would prefer millions, nay billions to die

** football to big to fail, like the banks
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54763956

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-54762974

would you know anything was any different from any other year apart from all the idiots wearing masks and closed businesses?

*** of people who don't even know they're ill.

the insanity continues following the Book of Schwab
xileffilex
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

Here we go in the UK - a dry run for mass testing and mass incarceration, using Liverpool as the guinea pig city - it's al voluntary at the moment although the army is out in force to "assist" with the £500 carrot being dangled in front of the population. Naturally it won't just be those who "test positive" who will have to isolate but also contacts.

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/li ... 9-19210041
The pilot will help to inform a [color="blue"[blueprint[/color] for how mass testing can be achieved and how fast and reliable covid-19 testing can be delivered at scale.

If successful in Liverpool, the programme will be rolled out across the rest of the city region and then in other areas of the country.

It is hoped that the mass testing programme will give cities, like Liverpool in this first instance, a much clearer picture of the number of cases in any one area, enabling local leaders to make informed decisions to manage the spread of the virus and support local people.

Anyone who tests positive, using either a lateral flow test or an existing swab test, must self-isolate along with their household immediately and their contacts will be traced.

Those who test positive – and contacts who are required to self-isolate - will be entitled to the £500 Test and Trace Support Payment in the same way as a regular swab test ordered through NHS Test and Trace.

actually, it would be quite easy to shut down the whole city with everyone isolating based on these mysterious 'tests' - and hey presto, you have UBI by the back door.

BBC report, Nov 3
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54786130
Liverpool has one of the highest rates of coronavirus deaths in England.
which may be due to a less healthy, poorer **, older population than many towns and cities.
** for whom £500 is a large amount.

Here comes Sir John Bell of Oxford University stoking up the fear
Sir John told BBC Radio 4's Today that "there are risks" that people who get a negative result from the rapid tests will think they are in the clear - and that is an "inappropriate conclusion".

"We believe that we can identify the majority of people who are likely to spread the virus and all the people who are likely to be super-spreaders or substantial spreaders - but we will not be able to identify everybody with the virus."
So, in other words, we are all super spreaders. We are all potential bio terrorists at all times. Even all those top sports celebs who are above all this circus.

A doctor [or several] writes - [taking their clue from Northern Italy this spring
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54777741
"We are hanging by a thread," says Dr Oliver Zuzan, divisional medical director at the Royal Liverpool Hospital.
"If you don't listen to us, if you don't adhere to those restrictions, you will harm your friends," says Dr Zuzan. "You will harm your family, your neighbours, and you might even harm yourself."



We're very close to the limits of what Liverpool hospitals can cope with - Dr Tristan Cope Liverpool University Hospitals Trust medical director
i.e don't kill granny.
Is that scary enough> No, here come the plastic domes used to excellent effect in northern Italy, as ridiculed by JLB in his excellent, groundbreaking take-down of this garbage back in late March.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/StFK8QDxmg2f/
In Liverpool, the only ICU patient who appears well enough to talk is Douglas Thom, a former bus driver and crane operator. The 73-year-old is sitting up in bed, his head covered with a domed plastic hood that enables oxygen to flow into his lungs under pressure. It looks like something out of science fiction, but he is stoical.

"It's a bit claustrophobic but it's doing the job, so that's all that matters to me."

Douglas's wife tested positive at the same time as him but recovered.

He takes a dim view of those who dismiss coronavirus.

"All these people who go around saying it's a hoax or a bad cold, they need to get their heads straight because I have never ever been so ill in all my born days.
"This is an absolute crippler."

Image

verdict - an excellent piece of state propgaganda. Is "Doug" chatting away while wearing his dome?
xileffilex
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

From a comment under Dave Cullen's latest video
https://committees.parliament.uk/writte ... e/9253/pdf
Written evidence from Dr Lisa Forsberg*, Dr Isra Black**, Dr Thomas Douglas*,
Dr Jonathan Pugh* (COV0220)
Compulsory vaccination for Covid-19 and human rights law Introduction and summary
We are academics working in the areas of philosophy and law, with specialisations in, inter alia, moral and political philosophy, biomedical ethics, health law, and human rights law.
Our submission pertains to compulsory Covid-19 vaccination:1 a requirement on individuals to undergo vaccination as a condition of release from pandemic-related restrictions on liberty, including on movement and association.2
I don't know if other groups are submitting evidence...
Our chief conclusion is that, as and when a vaccine becomes available at scale, the Government should give serious consideration to compulsory immunisation as a means of reducing the impacts of Covid-19. There is an arguable case for the compatibility of compulsory vaccination with human rights law
The partity is between mental health law and human rights law.
The take-home message is that people who do not voluntarily take a vaccine due to "HESITANCY" - i.e. if clear thinking people consider it's nonsense - then one is deemed to be mentally ill. [as per the USSR]
Mental health law permits the detention of a person for treatment for the protection of others, and permits compulsory medical treatment of a person so detained.

It is arguable that if ‘lockdown’ restrictions are compatible with human rights law, so too is compulsory vaccination. Current public health law rules out medical treatment, including vaccination, but permits extensive restrictions on personal
activity, such as free movement and association. The law privileges the interest in bodily integrity over other liberties. The lockdown parity argument asks for a justification for treating bodily integrity as distinctively important relative to these other interests.

The law permits compulsory interference with bodily integrity under mental health law. This derogation from the common law principle of no treatment without consent is compatible with the ECHR. It is arguable that if compulsory treatment
under mental health law is compatible with human rights law, so too is compulsory vaccination
. Importantly, the same protected interest—that in bodily integrity—is at stake in the two contexts the mental health parity argument compares.

22/07/2020
xileffilex
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

An interesting 2017 article from the British Medical Journal which has recently surfaced -
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2017/12/06/to ... ing-doors/

Tom Jefferson: The UK turns to Witty, Vallance, and Van Tam for leadership: revolving doors?
December 6, 2017

Note - do not confuse Witty with Chris Whitty.

Vallance and Van Tam are key government influencers today.
Andrew Witty, who left the helm of GSK in April, is going to head up the UK government’s Accelerated Access Review (AAR ***) programme. The AAR is said to be aimed at helping NHS patients “get quicker access to innovative new diagnostic tools, treatments, and medical technologies.”

Meanwhile Patrick Vallance is leaving his post of head of research and development at GSK as part of a re-shuffle by the new CEO Emma Walmsley. Vallance is taking up a senior position in the UK government, as Chief Scientific Adviser. His job will be “improving the quality and use of scientific evidence in government as head of the Government Office for Science.”

Last but not least, another academic with extensive ties to industry over influenza and pandemic planning (and another ex-employee of GSK, Roche and Aventis Pasteur MSD), Jonathan Van Tam has been appointed Deputy Chief Medical Officer responsible for emergency preparedness and pandemic planning. This is a similarly senior position which holds great power and will potentially involve committing huge quantities of taxpayers’ money to projects preparing for future emergencies, which may or may not come about. It is also a very delicate role as the amount of lobbying and corporate pressure applied on governments before the 2009 influenza pandemic shows.
Interesting that both these key SAGE players and major government advisers in the staged pandemic and shutdowns were put in place in 2017.

And what became of Andrew Witty?
http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/ex-gs ... ts_1338425
April 15 2020
Ex-GlaxoSmithKline chief executive officer Sir Andrew Witty, who now serves as president of UnitedHealth Group and CEO of Optum, is temporarily suspending these roles to co-lead the World Health Organization’s (WHO) COVID-19 vaccine programme.

Witty is set to take a leave of absence from UnitedHealth Group and Optum while leading the WHO programme and is set to return by the end of the year.
“We're working with partners to accelerate the development, production and distribution of vaccines,”


See also this article by Dr Zoe Harcombe on the conflicts of interest in SAGE Committes - she doesn't even mention the shareholdings in Big Pharma of people like Vallance. The comments section has attracted obvious gatekeepers.
https://www.zoeharcombe.com/2020/11/sag ... -interest/

*** the AAR provoked the desired response from government :
an ‘accelerated access collaborative’ to bring breakthrough products to market and then to patients as quickly as possible
£86 million of government funding to support innovators and the NHS in overcoming barriers to getting new, innovative technologies to patients quickly

,,,like vaccines.
xileffilex
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

The report on the 2016 pandemic simulation exercise, Operation Cygnus, has finally been published after 4 years
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... -objective

[see old forum]



A more recent, October 29 2020, report from Imperial College reckons in developed countries the death rate from Covid "infection" is 1 per cent.
Seems like "antibody tests" are used to determine if people are "infected"

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/207273/ ... tio-about/

The researchers find that age specific IFRs [infection fatality ratio] follow a pattern, with the risk of death doubling approximately every eight years of age.

Age-specific IFRs increased from 0.1% and below for individuals under 40 years to greater than 5% among individuals over 80 years

and there's a nice scare story to tell us about middle-aged people....
Dr Lucy Okell, a co-author of the study from Imperial College London, said: “Although the elderly are by far at the highest risk of dying due to COVID-19, the risk in middle age is still high. For example, we estimate that around 1 in 260 people aged 50-55 years die if infected. We calculated COVID-19 fatality largely based on the first wave of the epidemic in a number of countries and we hope and expect to see some reduction in fatality now due to new clinical knowledge and treatment, but this remains a dangerous virus
Who are these people who are being tested? Are they in late life/care homes/hospitals/hospices with other underlying illnesses? We are not told. What we are told is...
This report covers a screening of 175 studies and identified 10 antibody surveys to obtain updated estimates of the IFR using a modelling framework.
more worthless, but fear-mongering modelling, the norm at Imperial College.
xileffilex
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

More on excess deaths. There is no argument, if the figures can be believed, against there being excess deaths way above normal in the spring. It's most reasonable to assume that many of these deaths were caused by suddenly closing hospitals, dumping susceptible old people into care homes or making emergency treatments very difficult to obtain. Some countries had NO excess deaths in Spring, especially in E. Europe.
Image

copied from
https://twitter.com/VictimOfMaths/statu ... 8550577152

Incidentally there was a massive spike in winter excess deaths in 2017-8, bigger in fact than the Spring 2020 spike
18 Jan 2018
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... oar-to-120
lu outbreak: UK deaths triple with GPs seeing major rise in patients
This article is more than 2 years old
Although flu cases are higher than at any point since 2010/11, health officials say it is still not an epidemic

==> no lockdowns

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/heal ... 60496.html
Independent 30 November 2018
50,000 extra deaths last winter, ONS says
The number of excess winter deaths in England and Wales in 2017 to 2018 was the highest recorded since the winter of 1975 to 1976,” said Nick Stripe, from the ONS Health Analysis and Life Events team."

He added: “It is likely that last winter’s increase was due to the predominant strain of flu, the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine and below average winter temperatures.”




Here's a gatekeeper "independent" [lol!] twitter feed Covid Fact Checker LOL!
https://twitter.com/fact_covid
xileffilex
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

UK column today mentioned a RESET occuring in the UK National Health Service.
NHS Reset seemed, "coincidentally" to appear around the time Klaus Schwab's book on his Great Reset appeared
https://www.nhsconfed.org/resources/202 ... k-on-track
It also suggests some changes in policy and practice that will be required as the NHS prepares to restart a wide range of services either paused or stopped when the pandemic struck.
Actually it "kicked off" late APRIL 2020!
https://web.archive.org/web/20200508004 ... /nhs-reset
30 / 04 / 2020

The coronavirus outbreak has changed the NHS and social care, ushering in rapid transformation at a time of immense pressure and personal and professional challenge.

Over the past few weeksone message from leaders and clinicians across the UK has been clear: we must build on the progress made to chart a new course.

NHS Reset is a new NHS Confederation campaign to contribute to the public debate on what the health and care system should look like post-COVID19.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200505063 ... sing-reset
https://web.archive.org/web/20200511012 ... /nhs-reset

There was no going back to the old normal, i.e. recovery...
Reset, not recovery: reframing the health and care response to COVID-19 (PDF - 1.1MB)
https://www.nhsconfed.org/-/media/Confe ... et_FNL.pdf

A global crisis has been met with the very best of community action.
The NHS Confederation believes that this initial response to COVID-19 must form the basis of a new conversation across the UK on how we think about health and care more broadly in future. This conversation will involve the full range of organisations from across the NHS Confederation’s membership, working together and with partners in the NHS, social care and beyond, to understand the opportunities and build on the renewed
motivation to ‘reset’ how we accelerate and deliver change
Obviously this wasn't knocked up on April 29....


Now, November 18 2020
International crisis-led healthcare innovation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
https://www.nhsconfed.org/-/media/Confe ... on_FNL.pdf
This report outlines some of the crisis-led innovations that have helped countries to cope during the first wave of COVID-19 infections and that may shape the ‘new normal’ in the years to come.

In just a few months, the COVID-19 pandemic crossed borders, seas and oceans, taking the lives of thousands, infecting millions and forcing billions to reckon with the economic and personal chaos of lockdown. As the global infection count rises, even the world's
most advanced economies have struggled to repurpose state and private sector capacity to meet the growing demands on health services.
....written at at time when sickness in the general population is much like any other autumn. The report is filled with the BS buzzwords like resilience, agility rethinking...

What else happened in Spring 2020?
https://trfthealthweeklydigest.wordpres ... write-off/
NHS to benefit from £13.4 billion debt write-off
APRIL 3, 2020 ~ TRFT LIBRARY & KNOWLEDGE SERVICE
Health Secretary announces over £13 billion of debt will be written off as part of a major financial reset[/b] for NHS providers |
More than a hundred NHS hospitals to be rid of historic debt, freeing them up to invest in maintaining vital services and longer-term infrastructure improvements
Comes alongside new NHS funding model to make sure the NHS has the necessary funding and support to respond to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic
And on it goes...
https://www.nhsconfed.org/supporting-members/nhs-reset
The coronavirus outbreak has changed the NHS and social care, precipitating rapid transformation at a time of immense challenge.
Over the past six months, one message from leaders and clinicians across the UK has been clear: we must build on the progress made to chart a new course.

NHS Reset
is an NHS Confederation campaign to shape what the health and care system should look like in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.
NHS Reset is part funded through sponsorship by Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited.[which is not making a Covid-19 vaccine, incidentally.

Image

what it will do...
recognise both the sacrifice and achievements of the health and care sector’s response to COVID-19, including the major innovations that have been delivered at pace
rebuild local service provision to meet the physical, mental and social needs of communities affected by severe economic and social disruption
reset
our ambitions for what the health and care system of the future should look like, including its relationship with the public and public services.
So what is so very different from 2019? Nothing really. It must be all about money and emptying the hospitals and doctors' surgeries was a dry run for what might be possible, letting people die.

i.e. goodbye old NHS. What are they planning?
xileffilex
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

xileffilex wrote: Tue Oct 13, 2020 10:08 am Kevin Corbett PhD , retired nurse, draws a parallel between HIV Aids and Covid-19

Dr Kevin Corbett Interview 4th October 2020
9,435 views•Premiered Oct 7, 2020

Kevin P Corbett is given as one of the names on the new critique [below] of the [probably never peer-reviewed] https://www.eurosurveillance.org/conten ... .3.2000045 Drosten paper in Eurosurveillance - he proofread the analyses and research of the critique. [Cormand was the first author on the paper, Drosten the last name]
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

Ex-Pfizer 'whistleblower' of the Covid scam, Michael Yeadon, also did proofreading of the analyses and research. There were 20 other co-authors, including the prime movers against Drosten, Prof Pieter Borger and Bobby Malhotra.


The Drosten paper describes the PCR test for SARS-cov-2 as..."a robust diagnostic methodology for use in public-health laboratory settings"

The above critique on a number of points comes to the conclusion that the paper, on which the UK's Maria Zambon [q.v] from the PHL in Colindale,was an author, should be withdrawn.
xileffilex
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

From the disgraceful BBC
Covid-19: UK sees over 80,000 excess deaths during pandemic
December 22 2020
Image

Nearly 524,000 deaths have been registered in total compared to just over 442,000 seen in the same weeks, on average, in the last five years.
This total is not much more than in 2017 when the whole of society and the economy wasn't shut down and the health service essentially also closed, with long term effect continuing of missed operations, treatments, not forgetting the DNAR notices slapped on the elderly and sick.

There were 533,253 deaths registered in England and Wales in 2017, a 1.6% increase from 2016 and the highest number registered annually since 2003.

The UK population has also increased in the intervening three years by 1.15 million, mainly through immigration approx 2 per cent! That would in itself amount to another 10,000 deaths compared with 2017. The post-war baby boomers are also coming into the death statistics, so the trend will be upwards, also helpful to the pushers of the pandemic narrative through 2021.
sources - https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulation ... ables/2017
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/G ... rowth-rate

As Ivor Cummins points out there will always be years or periods of years with lower mortality until a kind of clearing out operation of the vulnerable and old in larger numbers in a 'bad year'. Was it a coincidence that the Great Reset was set off after a period of two quiet years, certainly in the UK?
xileffilex
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: UK related articles

Unread post by xileffilex »

The overwhelmed hospitals trope is now being pushed out to the MSM in the UK - as has been the case in many winters in past years, lol!

Sept 24 2017
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... rstretched
Overstretched hospitals face winter flu crisis, doctors warn
This article is more than 3 years old
A&E departments risk ‘grinding to a halt’ as number of patients waiting more than 12 hours for treatment soars
Seem familiar?

Here's the same story in December 28 2020 except the wait is down from 12 hours to 6. that's covid progress!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-55461390
'Six-hour waits'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55461140
A further 30,501 positive tests for coronavirus were reported on Sunday, as hospitals in parts of the UK warn they are at risk of being overwhelmed.
A separate message sent to ambulance crews on 26 December requested them, when it was safe to do so, to transport all patients to hospital on blue flashing lights in order to "reduce travel times".

Usually only the most seriously unwell patients are taken to hospital in this way.
Yes, very scary, all those sirens and blue lights - there MUST be a pandemic on!
Post Reply