UK related articles

[xileffilex]

More about the "Joint Biosecurity" Covid-19 monitoring outfit
The Lancet
July 2 2020
https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m2604

It will provide independent, real time national and local analysis of infections, and will advise the government on how to respond to infection spikes, such as by closing workplaces.1 It will also look for clusters associated with particular parts of the economy, such as pubs.

It will build on the UK’s public health infrastructure and surveillance network—including the NHS Test and Trace programme, Public Health England, the devolved public health agencies, and researchers—to understand the covid-19 threat at any given time. It is primarily for England; its relationship with the devolved administrations has not been agreed.

It is modelled on the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre, established in 2003, which advises the government on the appropriate terrorism threat level. A key role of the Joint Biosecurity Centre will be advising the chief medical officers across the UK on the appropriate covid-19 alert level.3

i.e. in total control of the information and will shove any policies down the throats of any local authority. And it's an intelligence-led operation [as with phoney terrorism, because

Clare Gardiner, director of national resilience and strategy at the National Cyber Security Centre (part of GCHQ),has been seconded as director general to set it up

yes, our favourite "resilience" word. ... the loving benevolent state protecting its idiot voters.

[quoteA longer term role will be considered **. This will be strongly influenced by the fallout from the post-pandemic reviews. Comment in media outlets such as the Telegraph and elsewhere indicates that Public Health England will be lined up by the government for a lot of the blame, perhaps partly on the grounds that it lost its focus on infectious diseases in favour of lifestyle illnesses ***[/quote]

** Sure it will be here to stay in the total control new order.
*** i.e. real illnesses and diseases unlike Covid-19.

[UK Column has discussed this sinister twist to the Covid control plan in various videos]

[xileffilex]

It has been widely circulated that the US CDC quietly announced that only 6 per cent of alleged Covid-19 deaths had only Covid-19 on the death certificate. Such information has not been released in the UK, nor, unsurprisingly, is any of the supine MSM outlets asking this question.
Instead we have "analysts" like THE KINGS FUND" pushing the phoney stats unquestioningly....
https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publicatio ... -mortality

Who or what is the King's Fund?

The King's Fund is an independent charitable organisation working to improve health and care in England

oh, right. Why would that be? What "gap" are they filling??

Income £8.5m
so quite some lobby group 141 people listed in "the team". That's quite some bill.

people must be confident in the objectivity of our research and analysis

So let's see their work on Covid-19 and also who funds them, since they seem to be oblivious to what's going on around them....
https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publicatio ... -mortality, last updated August 19

yes, all the government propaganda, no questions asked, no in depth analysis.
44 per cent of investments [in what?] come from commercial investments. Perhaps in pharma companies?

the rest from either government, either directly or via the National Health Service, including24 per cent from commercial sourcesbut they are at pains to point out that

More than half of this was from companies hiring our venue. This also includes revenue from companies who rent office space in our building, and income from our corporate partners and supporters which accounted for just under 5 per cent of our income. The biggest single payment we received from a commercial organisation was from GSK for the IMPACT awards, which support the work of small and medium-sized charities.

So what are all these commercial "partners" - all the usual pharma companies] and "supporters" doing? It can't just be to have their logo on one page on their website?

https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/about-us/c ... e-partners

we will continue to help people make sense of the complexity of
health and care – providing independent analysis, explaining key issues, responding
to the far-reaching impact of Covid-19 and other developments across the sector.

The CEO worries about the effect of the "pandemic" on the Fund's investment portfolio. Yes, indeed! That IS something to worry about in the Great Reset.

Neatly they have a 2020-2024 stategy [nicely taking us to key year 2025

The health and care system remains complex and in a constant state of evolution.
We will continue to make sense of a complex and changing landscape due to the
impact of Covid-19 (coronavirus), the ongoing workforce and funding pressures, the
continued expansion of integrated care models and work to support culture change.
We will also support the system as it recovers from the impact of Covid-19.

whatever that system is which emerges.....



waffle. with the standard "plughole" logo.

However at least one of their strategies is laudable - where lifestyles are mentioned
https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publicatio ... ion-health
A vision for population health: Towards a healthier future
How that squares with the [world] govenment treatment of the population at large they won't be able to answer.

[xileffilex]

Two thorough blogposts from a blogger who seems like he may be providing the Covid research for UK Column

Covid 19 Scamdemic Parts 1 and 2
https://in-this-together.com/covid-19-scamdemic-part-1/
August 25 2020

https://in-this-together.com/covid-19-t ... ic-part-2/
September 6 2020

How the UK's "pandemic" was created for the Great Reset and how it might continue, with emphasis on the psychological operation to change the behaviour and perception of the population.

[xileffilex]

Another useful blogspot - Covid 19 in Proportion which has produced some useful counter-propaganda to the UK Government

http://inproportion2.talkigy.com/

For instance this diagram shows how deaths were re-attributed to Covid from other causes of death, with no significant difference from total death underlying trends in the same month of June
[bNine out of ten leading causes of death were below average in June - or were they just wrongly attributed to covid?][/b]

Answer - yes, but deliberately attributed to "Covid".
[http://inproportion2.talkigy.com/images ... death2.png]
This is actually a government produced chart, but it is astonishing that every major cause of death has reduced at the same time and the MSM just ignored it.

source - http://inproportion2.talkigy.com/cause_ ... 20jul.html

In addition, there is NO change to overall deaths among the under 45s.. those with the fewest underlying conditions, the most economically active, in comparison with previous years. - there is no pandemic.


The curious April 2020 peak in "covid" deaths was lower than the 1999 mid-winter peak in flu deaths in 1999


and most telling of all - "lockdown" did not change the rate of deaths due to influenza.


It becomes clear that the April spike was caused by either lockdown or simulated figures or a combination of the two.
Currently, we have about 4 weeks' excess deaths compared with 2017/8 [a year with higher than average respiratory deaths]

[xileffilex]

Here in the UK, we are being softened up for a second shut-down
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -days.html

with stories of doubling of covid hospital admissions - allegedly.
Perhaps every admission to hospital with any condition is being tested with a nice healthy stack of 'positives'.

hospitals have been warned they must clear beds and brace themselves for a rise in coronavirus patients in the next few weeks.

Mr Hancock said a national lockdown was the 'last line of defence'. But he warned that it was a 'big moment for the country' and the situation was 'deadly serious', with cases now doubling every eight days.


the country's faltering testing system could be outsourced to Amazon, as reported by The Telegraph

Age UK said some older people are 'dying of sadness' because they have been cut off from loved ones over a long period of time.

....and did in large numbers in April and May, left to die alone.



Here's the scaremongering graph- probably another Imperial College production




Note how the NHS official stats speak of admissions to hospital "with covid" - when something like 240,000 people a day are being tested, and once tested "positive" you are "with covid".
https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/s ... -activity/
this is another line in the hoax.

and here's how this "hospitalisation" wheeze is being pushed throughout the world simultaneously
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/science-upd ... ember-2020

e.g.

Belgium’s new cases and hospitalisations continue to rise – an average of 779 people per day tested positive
The Netherlands has seen a record number of new infections in 24h for the third day in a row

always bad news, which is what is required.

[rachel]

Well, going by that graph, clearly the Doctor$ WHO are using their TARDIS to travel into the future for their death statistics. Else they've opened the rift back into Rose's mirror reality where the Cybermen turned everyone into compliant transhumanist zombies. Oh no silly me, that's this reality.

Meanwhile, Sadiq Khan has cancelled New Year in a last ditched attempt to stop Brexit. Britain will Remain in 2020 forever.

London New Year's Eve fireworks cancelled owing to Covid-19, confirms Sadiq Khan


While I'm putting in boot in, Mr "I cancelled the London Mayoral Election with a fake pandemic" Khan ...

Labour Try To EJECT Peter Whittle from London Assembly for Saying Party Isn't Patriotic

[rachel]

How SAGE and the UK media created fear in the British public

Interesting article from Evidence Not Fear, here's a snippet...

Increased UK government media spending

Digiday, a media and marketing industry publication, reported in April that the government is becoming UK news publishers’ most important client. In the 20 April 2020 article for Digiday, Lara O’Reilly wrote:

• …the government is spending more than usual, judging by their bookings. The publishers also pointed out that the lack of activity from other advertisers in the current market means the government campaigns will have an outweighed share of voice compared with normal times.

Source: Digiday, 20 April 2020

During that period, the British public started seeing coverage across media outlets with the unified “In this together” messaging. O’Reilly pointed out that the campaign was worth £35 million over a three month period.

• Last week, the government and newspaper industry launched a three-month advertising partnership dubbed “All in, all together.” The campaign — worth approximately £35 million ($44 million) for the full course, according to sources — kicked off on Apr. 17, with all the U.K.’s national and regional daily news brands running near-identical cover wraps and homepage takeovers, which carried the copy, “Stay at home for the NHS, your family, your neighbours, your nation the world and life itself.”

So, we ask again: how did the government convince the media to go along with the plan? The answer is simple and obvious: with lots of money.

It starts with a run down of SAGE document already covered in this thread.

Government persuasion through fear

A key part of SPI-B’s behavioural change strategy that seems to have been adopted was to ‘persuade through fear.’ The Persuasion section of the document states:

• A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened.
  

Clearly, the psychologists felt that, as of late March, the public was still not afraid of COVID-19. It therefore suggested that the government increase the level of fear:

• The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging.

Appendix B of the document lists ten options that can be used to increase social distancing in the public. Option 2 advises:

• Use media to increase sense of personal threat.

"The art of Persuasion" - some things never change, from the book The Impact of Science on Society by Bertrand Russell (1952)...

impact of science on society.jpg (225.53 KiB) Viewed 1335 times

[xileffilex]

Yup, brainwashed with our own money.

[xileffilex]

How many "deaths" have Covid-19 on the death certificate and no other underlying cause of death in the UK? [A tiny percentage in the USA, apparently]


Well, someone asked about England, with a FoI to Public Health England on April 27 2020, response May 19 2020 **

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ ... s.pdf.html

How many of the deaths from COVID-19 have been attributed to COVID-19 alone
PHE response:

PHE does not hold this information. Under our Section 16 duty to provide advice and
assistance, I can advise you that you may wish to contact NHS England at the
following link:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/contact-us/foi/

I can also advise that NHS England publish figures about deaths in individuals with
confirmed COVID-19 who have died in hospital, and provide a breakdown of those
with and without underlying conditions. This is available at the following link:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/s ... ly-deaths/

One is sent back to daily figures for deaths WITH COVID mentioned on the death certificate [still being produced and no doubt will be used "advantageously" by these weasels as winter approaches.

They won't tell us, because they know it approaches zero.

** the standard prevarication, as if they have needed 4 weeks to write that. Corruption on an industrial scale.

[xileffilex]

Here's another great request July 24 2020 to PHE where PHE basically admit the virus doesn't exist.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ ... 2.pdf.html

Response 20 August 2020 - again 4 weeks to say they have no information, i.e. they won't tell the truth. Incidentally, this website is for journalists to use, but will they? Of course not.

Dear Public Health England,

I would like to see:

All records in the possession, custody or control of Public Health England describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus, directly from a sample taken from a diseased patient, where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material (i.e. monkey kidney cells aka vero cells; liver cancer cells).

Please note that I am using "isolation" in the every-day sense of the word: the act of separating a thing(s) from everything else. I am not requesting records where "isolation of SARS-COV-2" refers *instead* to:

• the culturing of something, or
• the performance of an amplification test (i.e. a PCR test), or
• the sequencing of something.

Please also note that my request is not limited to records that were authored by the PHE or that pertain to work done by the PHE. My request includes any sort of record, for example (but not limited to) any published peer-reviewed study that the PHE has downloaded or printed.

Please provide enough information about each record so that I may identify and access each record with certainty (i.e. title, author(s), date, journal, where the public may access it).”

Yours faithfully,

Andrew Johnson

Response -

PHE can confirm it does not hold information in the way suggested by your request.

So, the people issuing pandemic advice have no knowledge of any virus being isolated, and the recipient is sent on a wild goose chase to government departments.