Compulsory Vaccine articles

[xileffilex]

Pushing continuous mass and continuous vaccination....

A nice BBC propaganda video by Olivia le Poidevin
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av-embeds/54 ... d/p08yf1jd
emphasising how important it is to vaxx the young because, you know, they're the real granny-killing spreaders.
And we won't reach "herd immunity" until everyone's been vaxxed. There's really nothing to worry about, because it's been rigorously tested....


Challenges in creating herd immunity to Sars-Cov-2 - Nov 21 2020 The Lancet.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanc ... 7/fulltext

here comes the required nugget...

Data on immunity to [color=[red"]other coronaviruses [/color]suggest that immunity to SARS-CoV-2 might be short lived, perhaps 12–18 months in duration.[6]

And what might reference 6 refer to?
Kiyuka PK Agoti CN Munywoki PK et al. Human coronavirus NL63 molecular epidemiology and evolutionary patterns in rural coastal Kenya.
J Infect Dis. 2018; 217: 1718-1739

A nice tenuous connection with Covid-19

Developing the structure of a within-country immunisation programme will be crucial, including defining priorities for receiving vaccination, solving distribution challenges, and encouraging public acceptance of vaccination. Addressing vaccine hesitancy will require good communication strategies on the value of being protected as an individual and the benefits for the community in reducing viral transmission

we'll leave that to the behavioural psychologists.

There is less clarity about the main priority of mass vaccination in the shorter term. Is it to minimise net mortality per year, or is it to maximise the average number of years of life gained by an individual receiving the vaccine? To maximise the average years of life gained, calculations need be made using demographic and epidemiological data. For example, with the recorded case fatality rates in the UK during the first COVID-19 wave and with the UK demography, we estimate that vaccinating people older than 70 years in the UK saves more lives than focusing on those aged 50–70 years (appendix). The reason for this is the steep rise in the case fatality rates in the very oldest age groups (appendix). We suggest that governments should therefore minimise mortality in the short term, unless vaccine supplies are short of what is required to protect the entire population for 1 year or more. Such calculations should be expanded to include other statistics, such as years of disability-adjusted life-years gained and impacts related to minimising symptoms of long COVID-19,13 influenced by vaccinating different age groups.

This completely ignores the fact that the global economy was deliberately shut down, ostensibly to give a few extra weeks/months of life to the very old or very sick or infirm [average age of "with covid" death was not distinguishable from normal life expectancy] The whole concept of 'saving lives' is specious when the very old or sick have died allegedly with covid-19. This is the lie which has been sold to the brainwashed public.

Assuming the vaccine is real, one could make a calculation that the cost of each vaccination will produce x years of extra life. This could also have been done with the 2020 global economic shutdown and it would have made no economic sense unless the purpose was to wreck the "old" economy using the "virus".

Since repeated vaccination of individuals as they age is likely to be required for SARS-CoV-2 control, the pharmaceutical industry should focus on improving the efficacy of the initially licensed COVID-19 vaccines over the coming years.

NOTE - see the supplementary material -
https://www.thelancet.com/cms/10.1016/S ... a/mmc1.pdf
which has a very interesting table of deaths "ASSOCIATED WITH COVID-19, March 7 to June 26 2020, almost 48,000 deaths in the UK, and for each band the average extra years of expected life is calculated and added ....getting on for half a million 500,000 lost years "associated with sars-cov-2. This is the HUGE LIE which has been propagated and not criticiised - people die from many ilnesses and diseases, many of which have a greater proportion of younger people dying and nobody is calculating the loss of years even for what was previously described as 'flu in past years, or indeed recommended shutting the economy for the "infectious flu" either.

great news for the pharma industry!

policy makers will have to consider whether to mandate vaccination and to create a certificate to record immunisation for school, college, or university, and the workplace. Given vaccine hesitancy, the creation of herd immunity by vaccination is likely to be challenging in many countries..... but equally challenging over the coming year will be persuading governments and populations to use COVID-19 vaccines effectively to create herd immunity to protect all.

phew!

And the lead author was a non-exec director of GSK for 10 years to 2018...

and to scare us a photo of Manaus in Brazil which let the 'virus RIP' - an excellent image to push the vaxx narrativwe

source -
Nature Oct 21 2020
The false promise of herd immunity for covid-19

[xileffilex]

RT entertains sceptical discussion of the coercive "vaccine"
Dec 7 2020
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508930-covid19 ... passports/
Why I fear the introduction of Covid-19 vaccination cards will lead seamlessly to us being forced to carry ‘immunity passports’
Neil Clark


An informed Dutch speaker [English subtitles] Mieke Mosmuller tells us her government is using the same template of coercion rather than compulsion, through denial of access to the life as we had in 2019

[rachel]

Rate Of Adverse Reactions To COVID Vaccines Already 50x Higher Than Flu Shot

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/rate ... r-flu-shot

The CDC's VAERS reporting system was set up to track vaccine-related injury, Most patients can expect to experience some kind of adverse reaction, but for the vast majority of patients, symptoms will be relatively mild and clear up within a couple of days. But amid a rush of reports about patient deaths, Berenson points out that the number of patients seeing serious complications per the number of doses distributed is roughly 50x higher than the rate of 'adverse' reactions caused by the flu vaccine.

1/ Through Dec. 22, with fewer than 1 million doses of the #Covid vaccine given, @cdcgov's vaccine injury reporting system received 307 reports of ER visits and 17 "life threatening" events.

[SaiGirl]

More blow-back from the relatively untested serum.
But perhaps also an intentional subplot of the narrative:
Some must be sacrificed so that all may be saved.
On the road to "herd immunity".
Some may fall by the wayside, with Bell's palsy or new allergies.
They will be recalled as the martyrs and heroes who sacrificed themselves for others.
An example to us all.

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/u ... e/2496072/

[rachel]

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: Are all the vaccine deaths a coincidence?

https://www.sott.net/article/447503-Rob ... oincidence

Danish deaths, Swedish deaths, Israeli deaths, Switzerland deaths, U.S. deaths, Mexican deaths, Portuguese deaths, all after taking the first shot all death by coincidence.

Shortly after reporting the Danish deaths and prior to any autopsies, Tanja Eriksen, acting head of Denmark's Pharmacovigilance Unit, told the Danish newspaper, EkstaBladet, that the Danish Medicines Agency had determined that coincidence probably killed the two Danish citizens whose deaths followed their vaccinations.

One of the deaths was a citizen who had "severe lung disease." The existence of the comorbidity suggested that the death was therefore coincidental. The second citizen received the vaccine at a "very old age," and therefore also expired from coincidence.

"When vaccinated in fragile groups, one would expect there to be deaths," explained Eriksen, using logic seldom applied by health officials to deaths from the COVID-19 virus. "This will happen regardless of whether they are vaccinated or not."

These simple declarations — that deaths and injuries following vaccination are unrelated coincidences — are becoming a pattern.

Yet when it comes to death by covid:

The routine of reflexively dismissing suspicious deaths and injuries as unrelated to vaccination not only calls into doubt the official data tallies on vaccine injuries, it also contrasts markedly with the habit among public health officials of authoritatively attributing every death to COVID-19 so long as the deceased tested positive for COVID within 60 days of death using a PCR test notorious for producing false positives.

In fact, the $48 billion COVID vaccine enterprise shares three defining features with every new vaccine introduced since 1986:

1. Systematic exaggeration of risk from the target disease. (Pharma calls this project "Disease Branding.")

2. Systematic exaggeration of vaccine efficacy.

3. Systematically downplaying vaccine risks.

The stats for vaccine injury:

Public health officials and industry spokespeople like to say that the risks of serious injury from vaccination are "one in one million.. However, in the first week of distribution, Americans took 200,000 COVID vaccines and reported 5,000 "serious" (meaning missed workdays or medical intervention required) injuries.

This is an injury rate of 1 in every 40 jabs. This means that the 150 shots necessary to avert one mild case of COVID will cause serious injury to at least three people.

If the clinical trials are good predictors, that rate is likely to increase dramatically after the second shot (the clinical trials suggested that almost all the benefits of COVID vaccination and vast majority of injuries were associated with the second dose).

[rachel]

MEDICAL SHOCKER: Scientists at Sloan Kettering discover mRNA inactivates tumor-suppressing proteins, meaning it can promote cancer

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-03-02- ... teins.html

(Natural News) There’s a secret layer of information in your cells called messenger RNA, that’s located between DNA and proteins, that serves as a critical link. Now, in a medical shocker to the whole world of vaccine philosophy, scientists at Sloan Kettering found that mRNA itself carries cancer CAUSING changes – changes that genetic tests don’t even analyze, flying completely under the radar of oncologists across the globe.

So now, it’s time for independent laboratories that are not vaccine manufacturers (or hired by them) to run diagnostic testing on the Covid vaccine series and find out if these are cancer-driving inoculations that, once the series is complete, will cause cancer tumors in the vaccinated masses who have all rushed out to get the jab out of fear and propaganda influence. Welcome to the world of experimental and dirty vaccines known as mRNA “technology.”

[rachel]

5 ways they’re trying to trick you into taking the Covid “vaccine”

https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/04/5-w ... d-vaccine/

1. BRIBERY
2. CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENTS
3. FORCED “SCARCITY”
4. FAKE “POPULARITY”
5. “RESISTANCE IS USELESS”

[rachel]

Are We Killing The COVID Canary?
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4907/rr-4

Dear Editor

Are We Killing The COVID Canary?

Cough is one of the most important warning symptoms of COVID-19. It's like a canary in a coal mine... A warning of possible infection. It warns workers to stay at home… to self isolate. It warns the cougher to get tested… It warns contacts to ’stay away,' be careful, to self isolate and get tested, 'just in case.' In a sense cough and other common symptoms are a Covid-19 canary.

Clinical trials have shown that Covid-19 vaccines suppress symptoms including cough. If the vaccines stop symptoms, but don't stop transmission then we’ve lost our warning. No staying at home 'just in case.' No testing to find out our COVID-19 status. No self isolation to protect others. No followup contact tracing. Vaccinated but infected people just going about their daily activities infecting others. Infecting the vulnerable we think we are protecting by being vaccinated. Infecting our colleagues at work. Infecting our family and friends in the community. All of the above.

In New Zealand, border staff are being prioritised for vaccination on the assumption that vaccination stops transmission thereby protecting the community from border breaches. If the vaccines are suppressing symptoms but not stopping transmission then are we actually increasing the risk of community transmission rather than reducing it?

What does the FDA say in its Q&A’s regarding fast tracking these vaccines?

Q: If a person has received the the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, will the vaccine protect against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from individuals who are infected despite vaccination?

A: Most vaccines that protect from viral illnesses also reduce transmission of the virus that causes the disease by those who are vaccinated. While it is hoped this will be the case, the scientific community does not yet know if the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine will reduce such transmission. (1)

In other words, these vaccines have been allowed to be marketed (not approved) in the HOPE that they will reduce transmission.

In a subsequent press release the FDA have said, "At this time, data are not available to determine how long the vaccine will provide protection, nor is there evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person.” (2)

The UK’s deputy chief medical officer, Professor Jonathan Van-Tam, went a step further and used the word ‘magic’ and ‘hope’ in the same breath in explaining that people must continue to be extremely cautious about transmission even after they’ve been vaccinated. (3)

The scientific community actually knows quite a lot about the relative ineffectiveness of intra muscular vaccines in preventing transmission of respiratory infections. We know that IM vaccines stimulate an IgG immune response, but they don’t stimulate a mucosal IgA immune response. We know that mucosal IgA immune response is a major component of prevention of infection and transmission of respiratory infections.(4)

Without prevention of transmission there can be no vaccine herd immunity, the very thing we have been promised to break the back of the pandemic.

The first person to be given an FDA authorised COVID-19 vaccine generated the headline, "I Trust Science.” (5)

Another early recipient of a vaccine, a nurse, was interviewed on TV and said, “I have had the vaccine because now that I’m protected, it will be safe for me to go and visit my elderly parents whom I haven’t been able to visit for nearly a year.”

Given that it is a year since these vaccines were conceived it beggars belief that our regulators haven’t mandated the simple addition of tests for carriage and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus post vaccination. It is as if they don’t want science to get in their way of their hope and magic.

When scientists talk in terms of “hope" and “magic,” on what basis do we trust science?

Are we killing the COVID-19 canary?

Ron Law
Risk & Policy Adviser

[xileffilex]

And certainly coming to the UK for cross-border travel
https://www.politico.eu/article/boris-j ... passports/
April 1 2021

And then no doubt extended internally...
The BMJ discusses the ethics...
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n861

vaccine passports incentivise vaccination,3 an international public good with many positive benefits4 including individual and population immunity...

brining up that old canard of Yellow Fever vaxx passports - as if that is a useful comparison...
As can be seen from the WHO website, many of the recommendations are for travellers from other countries with high risk. e.g. see Brazil's requirement. Many countries want to restrict access to travellers from high risk countries to lower risk ones e.g. Guyana.
https://www.who.int/ith/ith_country_list.pdf.

Yellow fever vaccination
Yellow fever vaccination is carried out for two different purposes:
1. To prevent the international spread of the disease by protecting countries from the risk of importing or spreading the yellow fever
virus. These are requirements established by the country.
The countries that require proof of vaccination are those where the disease may or may not occur and where the mosquito vector and potential non‐human primate hosts of yellow fever are present. Any importation of the virus into such countries by infected travellers could result in its propagation and establishment, leading to a permanent risk of infection for the human population. Proof of
vaccination is often required for travellers arriving from countries with risk of yellow fever transmission and sometimes for travellers in transit through such countries.
A meeting of yellow fever experts organized in 2010 proposed that under 12 hours of airport transit the risk of yellow fever is almost non‐existent and therefore that a proof of vaccination might not be necessary. T
The fact that a country has no requirement for yellow fever vaccination does not imply that there is no risk of yellow fever
transmission.
2. To protect individual travellers who may be exposed to yellow fever infection.
The risk of yellow fever transmission depends on the presence of the virus in the country in humans, mosquitoes or animals. As yellow fever is frequently fatal for those who have not been vaccinated, vaccination is recommended for all travellers (with few exceptions,
Chapter 6) visiting areas where there is a risk of yellow fever transmission.
WHO determines those areas where “a risk of yellow fever transmission is present” on the basis of the diagnosis of cases of yellow fever
in humans and/or animals, the results of yellow fever sero‐surveys and the presence of vectors and animal reservoirs.4
Decisions regarding the use of yellow fever vaccine for travellers must weigh several factors, including the risk of travel‐associated
yellow fever virus disease, country requirements, and the potential for serious adverse events following yellow fever vaccination
(Chapter 6).

These are the countries which require certificates of vaccination for entry. Other countries only require them if arriving from such countries or having transited through them... for some other countries it's recommended.
Compulsory:
Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo, Democratic Rep of Congo, Guinea, Gabon, Guinea Bissau,Liberia, Mali, Niger, Sierra Leone, Togo.

Not your average tourist destinations from developed nations.
So what is the Yellow Fever "virus" then?

The BMJ article ends with the suggestion that the vaxx passport should be inclusive - take home message, they will probably be handing out smart phones to people to make sure they have something to record their enforced vaxx on.
Solution 1 - avoid international travel.
But that will only be the start....

** stay in an airport lounge in Burkina Faso for more than 12 hours and the yellow fever virus strikes..... sounds rather like the capricious behaviour of the covid-19 virus in restaurants, only active when people stand up...

[xileffilex]

As the UK government rushes to introduce vaxx passports / digital certification of immunity [lol!] the appropriate phrase CHECKPOINT BRITAIN has been coined by critics of this tyrannical control system
https://truthtalk.uk/2021/exclusive-glo ... -identity/
April 2 2021
as predicted by Bill Gates as early as March 25 2020! *** two weeks into the "so called pandemic, and less than two months after the WHO's declaration of a PHEIC.
Exclusive: ‘Globalists Push One World Digital Identity’
APR 02, 2021by SIKH FOR TRUTHin COVID
Covid passports are to be trailed at UK events within weeks including the FA Cup Final at Wembley Stadium and the World Snooker Championships as @BorisJohnson and his globalist masters push ahead with their plans despite a growing rebellion among MP’s, Publicans, Civil Rights Groups, and the public.
***https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe8fIjxicoo&t=2053s

An earlier post
Vaccine Passports Just The Tip Of The Iceberg
MAR 31, 2021by SIKH FOR TRUTH
https://truthtalk.uk/2021/vaccine-passp ... e-iceberg/

Vaccine Passports Just The Tip Of The Iceberg
MAR 31, 2021by SIKH FOR TRUTHin COVID
Since the early days of the pandemic, it became clear that ‘health passports’ would be implemented & in recent months, the reality of what we’re facing is getting clearer.

Make no mistake: The voluntary Vaccine Passports being rolled out are just the tip of a large and dangerous iceberg.

These passes, once mandatory will restrict our ability to move about & engage in social activities if unvaccinated, we may even face financial penalties. Even our ability to obtain employment will ultimately be based on certain medical decisions.


It’s now beyond clear that COVID-19 is being used as the justification for the implementation of a new identity & social system that have been decades in the making. Their goal is to digitize you & your family, & convert everyone into digital assets.

Once implemented the control system will be fully automated. To use the Vaccine Passports as an example, say you miss your vaccination. The system will know you didn’t show up & access to travel & banking might be cut off until it registers that you got your inoculation.

There doesn’t need to be any humans involved, your body, health records, geo-location, activities & financials are all connected & trackable in real time by AI that analyses everything we do.

The elite need us to passively acquiesce, because there are far more of us than there are of them. That’s what pandemic measures are achieving. We’re growing to accept work, travel restrictions. Growing to accept where and how we can holiday & with whom.

Segregating society into classes based on vaccination status achieves nothing but except the wilful destruction of our freedoms. By tying healthcare into the digital surveillance apparatus, we end up with a very robust platform for automated mass control.

While government’s have a duty to protect the health and welfare of its citizens, this duty must be balanced against the loss of individual rights and liberties. The next step is to introduce bi/tri weekly testing.