https://laworfiction.com/
https://find-and-update.company-informa ... 6/officers
Law or Fiction is a website for ordinary citizens, including lawyers, to understand their rights and how they have been affected, or not, as a result of the UK government’s response to Covid-19. Leaving aside argument over the cost to lives and livelihoods resulting from the sustained lockdown policy and economic damage resulting, the dressing up of unenforceable policy guidance as enforceable rule of law is an issue of serious public concern.
As well as numerous redactions of names, some minutes have never been published.
It is instructive to look at the early meetings from the first one on January 22 2020.
Then came the Arrowe Park psy-op when Diamond Princess "cases" were quarantined near Liverpool in a super media staged eventCMO [Chief Medical Officer] to share the latest iteration of the PHE isolation plan for suspected cases
and contacts with some of the SAGE participants, in particular behavioural scientists, to
get their view of its proportionality and advice on how to communicate uncertainty, in
order to improve subsequent versions.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51594507
The PHE attendee was Professor Maria Zambon whose speciality is RNA viruses and vaccines...
https://isirv.org/site/index.php/avg-co ... ria-zambon
28 January
This is just before the level 4 "NHS Emergency" was declared.Behavioural science and public understanding of risk
31. SAGE agreed on the importance of behavioural science informing policy — and on the importance of public trust in HMG's approach.
32. SAGE will keep under review whether further sub-groups, such as a behavioural science sub-group, are needed.
PHE to open lines of communication with SAGE behavioural scientists and to share available polling data on the outbreak.
31. SAGE agreed on the importance of behavioural science informing policy — and on the
importance of public trust in HMG's approach.
And these mind-benders showed up in force on March 10, shortly before the "pandemic" was declared [hmmm] with four redacted SAGE attendees.
by which time a separate Scientific Behavioural Pandemic Influenza team SPI-B had been set up to add to the SPI-M modelling group.
No use of the word threat there at the March 23 meeting, when scare stories were being promulgated that the number of "cases" would exceed NHS capacity especially in London...The behavioural science suggests openly explaining to the public where the greatest
risks lie and what individuals can do to reduce their own risk and risk to others, even if
this is ahead of measures announced by the Government — but SAGE recognises that
taking individual measures may be more feasible for some than others. Greater
transparency could enable personal agency, send useful signals about risk and build
trust.
That occurred elsewhere in the actual March 22 paper.ACTION: SAGE secretariat to share SAGE paper from behavioural scientists on options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures with CCS and HMG Communications leads
source - Peter Hitchens twitter.
And here's an interesting clip from the March 23 meeting of SAGE..
Wasn't that the key to the fake pandemic, getting the number of excess deaths up? I'd say a large proportion.Excess deaths planning
38. The science suggests that a proportion of the estimated fatalities from Covid-19 would be among those expected to die within a year.
39. NHSX and ONS data need to be combined by modelling groups to give a picture of deaths caused directly and indirectly by Covid-19.
What about "asymptomatic" spread of the fake disease?
Jan 28
LOL!!! Like they're wishing for "positive" tests.mild. Currently it would not be useful to test asymptomatic individuals, as a negative test result could not be interpreted with certainty.[/b]
Last check in for "asymptomatic carriers" May 14
Where did that go?33. It is possible that asymptomatic individuals are less infectious, but this cannot currently
be quantified. There is a key knowledge gap concerning how positive testing correlates
with the presence of live, recoverable virus (i.e. infectiousness), although PHE is
currently investigating this.
ACTION: PHE (Maria Zambon) to provide current summary of Covid-19 biology for consideration by NERVTAG (by 15 May) to inform its input to planned consortium researching infectiousness
Here, June 10, the cornerstone of the insane rules for masking up, segregating and 'distancing'....
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... usness.pdf
NERVTAG paper: Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection
I doubt this is peer reviewed.COVID- Dynamics of infectiousness and antibody responses
Dr Cariad Evans, Prof Wendy Barclay, Prof Maria Zambon and Prof Julian Hiscox
Key findings
• Viable virus has been recovered from pre-symptomatic patients, supporting the hypothesis
that patients are infectious in the pre-symptomatic phase.....
Viable/cultured virus data
Wölfel et al *** presented some early viral culture data on a small cohort of hospitalised patients and
virus was readily isolated during the first week of symptoms from a considerable fraction
other key pointsThis document attempts to ascertain the duration of the infectious period for individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2, by reviewing data on duration of viral shedding measured by PCR positivity, Ct values and viable virus culture
UK data, presented to NERVTAG on 74 UK HCID cases, demonstrated viral RNA remains detectable
until day 28 in upper respiratory tract secretions (though may persist for longer in some individuals,
including in faeces
[quote[Summary
• Viable virus was recovered from 70% of pre-symptomatic patients, supporting the
hypothesis that patients are likely infectious in the pre-symptomatic phase.[/quote]
*** Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. - no page reference to this alleged 2020 study in Nature but here it is.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2196-x
and guess what, Christian Drosten is on the paper.
Somebody needs to pull apart the Zambon paper which seems to have cherry picked various papers, at least one is unpublished.Infectious virus was readily isolated from samples derived from the throat or lung, but not from stool samples...
Although viral culture is an important method to evaluate viral infectivity and activity, it is unavailable in clinical practice and has challenges of its low sensitivity and long turn-around time for virus detection. This may account for the lack of data in this area.
Coronaviruses can be hard to culture, many cell types are refractive to infection, and some
labs may be unable to culture from samples that are still containing infectious virus...
thank you to all the hospital staff who have helped save tara & will save others 
#stayhome
