Déjà vu: The H1N1 Swine Flu "pandemic" of 2009/10

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
xileffilex
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 346 times

Déjà vu: The H1N1 Swine Flu "pandemic" of 2009/10

Unread post by xileffilex »

it is instructive to look back on this "pandemic" which also seemed to follow a script. For some reason, it had a nice neat ending to it. Perhaps it was a dry run, too soon after the banking crash to run its course.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_swine_flu_pandemic
The number of lab-confirmed deaths reported to the WHO is 18,449,[7] though this 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic is estimated to have actually caused about 284,000 (range from 150,000 to 575,000) deaths.[14] A follow-up study done in September 2010 showed that the risk of serious illness resulting from the 2009 H1N1 flu was no higher than that of the yearly seasonal flu.[15] For comparison, the WHO estimates that 250,000 to 500,000 people die of seasonal flu annually.[9]
mostly under 65 year olds, allegedly, the inverse of Covid-19.
Few young people had any existing immunity (as detected by antibody response) to the (H1N1)pdm09 virus, but nearly one-third of people over 60 years old had antibodies against this virus
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resour ... demic.html

For reference the complete H1N1 pandemic narrative is here
https://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/cdcresponse.htm

Pandemic timeline
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resour ... eline.html

June 11 2009 - pandemic declared
April 11 2010 - pandemic over. [which most people and nations slept through, life went on as normal, no great economic reset...]

in the middle, not the "second wave" narrative. no third wave....
August 20 - Second wave of 2009 H1N1 influenza activity began in the U.S.
Late October - Second wave of H1N1 flu activity peaked in the U.S.


The UK response, dated December 11 2009 is here [lots of 11s...]
https://www.nhs.uk/news/cancer/swine-fl ... -examined/
Swine flu is less lethal than feared, according to reports on the BBC News. The website quotes research led by Sir Liam Donaldson, the chief medical officer, which found that only 0.026% of those infected with swine flu have died.

This was a well-conducted investigation into all deaths in England attributed to swine flu up to November 2009. It found that there were 138 deaths from an estimated 540,000 cases, or around 26 deaths per 100,000 people. Because of the nature of swine flu and the difficulties in identifying cases, there remains the unavoidable possibility that these mortality rates were slightly over- or underestimated......About two-thirds of those who died had significant underlying illness, but there was still a third who did not have underlying illness,
xileffilex
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 346 times

Re: The H1N1 Swine Flu "pandemic" of 2009/10

Unread post by xileffilex »

Some interesting videos mentioned at LRF some years back
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hlk_Zfz7xhU
Jane Burgermeister - pandemic update 25 June 2012

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYSw7Ouxq7c
Jane Burgermeister - Investigating the swine flu "Pandemic" The Media - Pandemics and Power.mp4 Sep 28, 2014

Well worth watching. Some good work was being done at LRF in those days, 2009, on the the health threads.

Jane is still tweeting about the Covid 19 fake pandemic

The six videos from the Spanish [ex]researcher on the LRF page are also informative,. All the above show how the 2020 scam was trialled in 2009 but wasn't carried through because the psychological steering and threats hadn't advanced enough at that stage and the "pandemic" petered out.
http://letsrollforums.com//video-spanis ... 19675.html


someone at LRF also pointed to a fascinating podcast about H5N1 ]bird flu] manipulation subsequent to the above aborted pandemic -
One flu over the ferret's nest
http://www.microbe.tv/twiv/twiv-182-one ... rets-nest/
where some "Virologists" were chatting about scientific papers which were held up in 2012 because of the controversial ethics/security/secrecy of modifiying H5N1 viruses [for the sake of the argument] with parts of the "pandemic proven" H1N1 virus. The gist being that the modified "virus" was found to be transmitted between ferrets, with the alarming [as in films...] that it could jump to humans and then, with a R-0 value greater than one......hey we have a pan-dem-ic on our hands.
Do not try this at home with bats....

Unsurprisingly the TWiV [This Week in Virology" crowd are doing frequent YouTube calls on the current 'pandemic] which will surely keep the research grants rolling in.

Relevant papers/commentaries
Jan 25 2020
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature10884
H5N1
Flu transmission work is urgent
Yoshihiro Kawaoka
Nature volume 482, page155(2012)
Yoshihiro Kawaoka explains that research on transmissible avian flu viruses needs to continue if pandemics are to be prevented. [implications for PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS....]
To date, H5N1 viruses have not been transmitted between humans. Some experts have argued that it is impossible. But given the potential consequences of a global outbreak, it is crucial to know whether these viruses can ever become transmissible..... Work by my group (accepted by Nature) and an independent study (accepted by Science) led by Ron Fouchier of the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, suggest that H5N1 viruses have the potential to spread between mammals.
and by implication, between humans.
by droplets of course...
To determine whether H5N1 viruses could be transmitted between humans, my team generated viruses that combined the H5 haemagglutinin (HA) gene with the remaining genes from a pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza virus. Avian H5N1 and human pandemic 2009 viruses readily exchange genes in experimental settings, and those from a human virus may facilitate replication in mammals
The paper in print, after being "held up"
may 2 2012
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature10831
Experimental adaptation of an influenza H5 HA confers respiratory droplet transmission to a reassortant H5 HA/H1N1 virus in ferrets



21 jun
Second mutant-flu paper published
Just five mutations allow H5N1 to spread between ferrets.
Image
https://www.nature.com/news/second-muta ... ed-1.10875
Experimental adaptation of an influenza H5 HA confers respiratory droplet transmission to a reassortant H5 HA/H1N1 virus in ferrets
The paper is published today in Science after months of debate about whether the benefits of publishing the research outweighed the risks.
So we have a plasible narrative for the Wuhan start=up in late 2019. [all simulated, of course] And the research show must go on whoever's funding it. [probably the usual suspects]
xileffilex
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 346 times

Re: The H1N1 Swine Flu "pandemic" of 2009/10

Unread post by xileffilex »

I want to return to the Burgermeister videos [there are quite a few] but meanwhile, Dave Cullen has noted that a 2010 Forbes article on the hoaxing up of the H1N1 "pandemic" had been available online until it was removed after it circulated online
https://twitter.com/A_J_Alana/status/13 ... 8793675776
Alana #KBF
@A_J_Alana
The WHO faked a pandemic in 2009. Read this article. It’s basically a carbon copy of what’s happened in 2020. Except this time, by getting each country to over-inflate deaths and redefine a ‘case’, they’ve been more successful in faking a pandemic.
https://forbes.com/2010/02/05/world-hea ... 66de5548e8
6:46 AM · Oct 13, 2020
Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic
Michael Fumento, 02.05.10, 04:35 PM EST
The agency needed to bounce back after the avian flu embarrassment.

Removed the same day.

Archived here
https://web.archive.org/web/20100313000 ... mento.html

Fumento is still writing
https://www.fumento.com/
or more recently Oct 2 2020
https://www.aier.org/article/the-elusiv ... arty-myth/
The Elusive “Covid Party” Myth
such stories also give people a reason to distrust absolutely anything coronavirus-related...They’ve watched as the goalposts have moved lockdowns of a few weeks to “flatten the curve” to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed to sometimes permanent institutions simply to stretch out infections even while the best strategy may be to do exactly the opposite and expose people just as quickly as possible. But ordering vaccines that theoretically may kill or cause permanent harm is a whole new level. The autocrats need to try to regain the public’s confidence. Telling the truth would be a good start.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: The H1N1 Swine Flu "pandemic" of 2009/10

Unread post by rachel »

Interesting Forbes article, now taken down, archived 8 Feb 2010

https://web.archive.org/web/20100208182 ... mento.html
Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic

Michael Fumento, 02.05.10, 04:35 PM EST
The agency needed to bounce back after the avian flu embarrassment.

The World Health Organization has suddenly gone from crying "The sky is falling!" like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. "The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible," the agency claims on its Web site. A WHO spokesman declined to specify who or what gave this "description," but the primary accuser is hard to ignore.

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO's motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the "false pandemic" is "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century."

Even within the agency, the director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology in Munster, Germany, Dr. Ulrich Kiel, has essentially labeled the pandemic a hoax. "We are witnessing a gigantic misallocation of resources [$18 billion so far] in terms of public health," he said.

They're right. This wasn't merely overcautiousness or simple misjudgment. The pandemic declaration and all the Klaxon-ringing since reflect sheer dishonesty motivated not by medical concerns but political ones.

Unquestionably, swine flu has proved to be vastly milder than ordinary seasonal flu. It kills at a third to a tenth the rate, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates. Data from other countries like France and Japan indicate it's far tamer than that.

Indeed, judging by what we've seen in New Zealand and Australia (where the epidemics have ended), and by what we're seeing elsewhere in the world, we'll have considerably fewer flu deaths this season than normal. That's because swine flu muscles aside seasonal flu, acting as a sort of inoculation against the far deadlier strain.

Did the WHO have any indicators of this mildness when it declared the pandemic in June?

Absolutely, as I wrote at the time. We were then fully 11 weeks into the outbreak and swine flu had only killed 144 people worldwide--the same number who die of seasonal flu worldwide every few hours. (An estimated 250,000 to 500,000 per year by the WHO's own numbers.) The mildest pandemics of the 20th century killed at least a million people.

But how could the organization declare a pandemic when its own official definition required "simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness." Severity--that is, the number of deaths--is crucial, because every year flu causes "a global spread of disease."

Easy. In May, in what it admitted was a direct response to the outbreak of swine flu the month before, WHO promulgated a new definition matched to swine flu that simply eliminated severity as a factor. You could now have a pandemic with zero deaths.

Under fire, the organization is boldly lying about the change, to which anybody with an Internet connection can attest. In a mid-January virtual conference WHO swine flu chief Keiji Fukuda stated: "Did WHO change its definition of a pandemic? The answer is no: WHO did not change its definition." Two weeks later at a PACE conference he insisted: "Having severe deaths has never been part of the WHO definition."

They did it; but why?

In part, it was CYA for the WHO. The agency was losing credibility over the refusal of avian flu H5N1 to go pandemic and kill as many as 150 million people worldwide, as its "flu czar" had predicted in 2005.

Around the world nations heeded the warnings and spent vast sums developing vaccines and making other preparations. So when swine flu conveniently trotted in, the WHO essentially crossed out "avian," inserted "swine," and WHO Director-General Margaret Chan arrogantly boasted, "The world can now reap the benefits of investments over the last five years in pandemic preparedness."

But there's more than bureaucratic self-interest at work here. Bizarrely enough, the WHO has also exploited its phony pandemic to push a hard left political agenda.

In a September speech WHO Director-General Chan said "ministers of health" should take advantage of the "devastating impact" swine flu will have on poorer nations to get out the message that "changes in the functioning of the global economy" are needed to "distribute wealth on the basis of" values "like community, solidarity, equity and social justice." She further declared it should be used as a weapon against "international policies and systems that govern financial markets, economies, commerce, trade and foreign affairs."

Chan's dream now lies in tatters. All the WHO has done, says PACE's Wodart, is to destroy "much of the credibility that they should have, which is invaluable to us if there's a future scare that might turn out to be a killer on a large scale."

Michael Fumento is director of the nonprofit Independent Journalism Project, where he specializes in health and science issues. He may be reached at fumento@pobox.com.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: The H1N1 Swine Flu "pandemic" of 2009/10

Unread post by rachel »

Article from May 2010 (auto-traslate). False-positive HIV test after vaccine. Does that mean the COVID-19 vaccines have been sitting on the shelf waiting to be used since the fake Swine Flu epidemic that they couldn't sell to the public?
Swine flu: There is a risk of false positive HIV test after H1N1 vaccine
Posted in Swine Flu , New World Order by Blog Juízo Final on 21/05/2010

vacina-veneno.jpg
vacina-veneno.jpg (16.35 KiB) Viewed 1681 times

BRASÍLIA – The Department of STD, AIDS and Viral Hepatitis, of the Ministry of Health, released a technical note number 128/2010 on the possibility of false-positive results in immunoenzymatic tests for HIV among people who received the vaccine against Influenza A (H1N1) . The note, which you can read in full below, is categorical in stating that great caution must be exercised in disclosing the results.

It is circulating in a restricted way among doctors
The note also says that this fact was found in tests done after vaccination. "This is because when taking the vaccine, the body began to produce Immunoglobin M (IgM) antibodies, which is produced on the first exposure to an antigen", he says. Below is the full text of the note:

Health warns about risk of false positive result in HIV tests of people who have taken vaccine against H1N1
The Department of STD, AIDS and Viral Hepatitis, through the Ministry of Health, advised health services on the possibility of obtaining false positive results in enzyme-linked immunoassays, carried out to detect antibodies against the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) type 1 .

According to Technical Note No. 02/2010 – GGSTO/DIDBB/ANVISA, of March 8, 2010, due to the accelerated form of industrial production of the vaccine against the Influenza A (H1N1) virus, with the use of new technologies of production and adjuvants, there is currently no data available on all adverse effects, but it was observed that people who took the vaccine, when doing the HIV-1 test, had a false positive result, that is, the results indicate that the virus is present , when in fact it is not.

This is because when taking the vaccine, the body began to produce Immunoglobin M (IgM) antibodies, which is produced in the face of the first exposure to an antigen. And non-specific reactions or the presence of antibodies directed to other infectious agents that may be antigenically similar to HIV can produce false positive test results.

According to guidance, in case of reactive samples in HIV-1 tests, it is recommended to carry out another test to verify the result, and this second test should not be reactive in case of cross-reaction with antibodies produced in response to the vaccine against HIV-1. Influenza A virus.

However, a negative result in these tests does not rule out HIV infection, since the patient may be in the serum conversion state, or even have another illness that interferes with the results of the HIV test.

In these cases, the investigation must be carried out until the final result of the diagnosis for the virus, or until the cross-reactivity of the IgM produced against the vaccine is undone in relation to the HIV-1 tests.

Health professionals are responsible for the serological diagnosis of HIV-1, and should inform patients who have received the vaccine against the H1N1 virus about the possibility of false-positive results in tests that detect the AIDS virus. If necessary, they should also call the patients to perform a new collection after 30 days, until the diagnosis is definitive.

To check the note, also available on the website http://www.aids.gov.br (links to documents and publications, complete list): https://europepmc.org/article/MED/19936563

Source: JB Online
Remember...from December 11, 2020:
https://www.livescience.com/australia-c ... tests.html
Why an Australian COVID-19 vaccine caused false-positive HIV tests

fFcLJh3NWuaDCrVgRnH5aG-970-80.jpg

An Australian COVID-19 vaccine that had shown promising results in early trials is being abandoned after researchers found that the shot caused false-positive results on HIV tests.

On Friday (Dec. 11 2020), Australian officials said they had canceled an order for some 51 million doses of the vaccine, which was being developed by The University of Queensland and CSL Ltd., a local biotech company, according to The New York Times.

In an early trial with 216 participants, the vaccine appeared to be safe and to produce a robust immune response against COVID-19, according to a statement from CSL. But some volunteers falsely tested positive for HIV, which officials feared would undermine trust in the vaccine, the Times reported.

"[The vaccine] was likely to work. But we knew that we didn't want to have any issues with confidence, and this false-positive test may have caused some confusion and lack of confidence," Brendan Murphy, secretary of Australia's Department of Health, told the BBC.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: The H1N1 Swine Flu "pandemic" of 2009/10

Unread post by rachel »

Another one, this time from March 2010, again autotraslate. I think that TED TALK did the rounds in 2020, but it is interesting to hear it from a 2010 perspective.

200.gif
200.gif (1.29 MiB) Viewed 1675 times
Bill Gates admits that vaccines are used for human depopulation
Posted in Antichrist , Swine Flu , New World Order by Blog Juízo Final on 06/03/2010

The global warming hoax continues, even as Climategate has exposed the hoax and the scientific community has woken up to the truth.

After Al Gore, it's time for the new black champion Bill Gates to make his statement.

During a February 2010 TED presentation, Bill Gates makes the startling statement that vaccines should be used to reduce Earth's population, control global warming and reduce CO2 emissions (which we already know is harmless to the planet).

At the heart of Gates' speech is the dogma of Global Warming, which says that the emission of CO2 emitted by human beings is the primary cause of unwanted warming of the Earth. Since this (false) claim says that artificial warming of the planet is human-induced, and that the process will be irreversible if we do not change our attitudes, proponents of the Global Warming dogma defend the point that CO2 emissions by humans must be radically reduced.

Then comes Bill Gates, who casually broaches the subject. During his keynote, Gates claims that one way to achieve the CO2 reduction goal is to reduce the global human population.

He postulates an equation, giving an estimate of the CO2 emitted by man annually, as seen below:

ScreenShot-VideoID-JaF-fq2Zn7I-TimeS-257.png

CO2 = P x S x E x C

Where:

P = human population
S = average services per person
E = average amount of energy units used per service
C = average CO2 emitted by service units per year

Thus, CO2 = projected amount of CO2 emitted by the entire population per year

Today Earth has 6.8 billion people. Assuring that the population is heading dangerously towards 9 million people, Bill Gates said: “…if we do a really good job with the new vaccines, Health and Reproductive Health Services (ie the abortion industry), we could reduce the population by maybe 10% or 15%” ( which is equivalent to 680 million to one billion and 20 million people ) .

The only thing left to say is that the rest of the population will be eliminated through wars, chemtrails and HAARP, with its created catastrophes... But this is not Gates' beach, because, as the video below shows, "he loves vaccines".



Note that Gates does not speak of vaccines in the sense that we all know, that is, increasing the capacity of our immune system by inserting dead or attenuated viruses and bacteria into our bodies – thus improving our quality of life. On the contrary, Bill Gates considers that vaccines are desirable to reduce population numbers. It is like? Basically, with all the properties that prevent people from having children, through infertility, sterility and senility (see cases where the H1N1 vaccine was used and the number of autistic people exploded).

Sarcastically, on the Foundation's website, we find Melinda Gates's quote on vaccines: “Vaccines are a miracle – with just a few shots they can prevent a lifetime of dead disease”.

Now see the article published in Estadão: Bill Gates donates US$ 10 billion for the production of vaccines.

And this one in Mídia News: Bill Gates' NGO hires FDA for new vaccine

Death in Africa, in other poor countries, and in China. Convenient, isn't it?

I hope by now everyone understands why the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is one of the major sponsors of the World Seed Bank, the Svalbard Global Seed Silo, formed jointly by Monsanto, Rockefeller and Syngenta - all Illuminati percent.

The Foundation's website even displays one of its missions: "The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is dedicated to bringing innovations in health and learning to the global community."

I want to die “dumb” and “sick” depending on people and institutions like that…

Source: Ecocide
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: The H1N1 Swine Flu "pandemic" of 2009/10

Unread post by rachel »

It really is Groundhog Day:

The vaccines are far more deadly than the swine flu
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-vacci ... -flu/14869
By Dr. Mae-Wan Ho and Prof. Joe Cummins
Global Research, August 21, 2009
Institute of Science in Society 27 July 2009
The vaccines are far more deadly than the swine flu. Mass vaccinations is a recipe for disaster Dr. Mae-Wan Ho and Prof. Joe Cummins

This report has been submitted to Sir Liam Donaldson, Chief Medical Officer of the UK, and to the US Food and Drug Administration

A swine flu outbreak occurred in Mexico and the United States in April 2009 and spread rapidly around the world by human-to human transmission. The new type A H1N1 influenza virus is unlike any that had been previously isolated [1, 2], judging from the first data released in May.

It is a messy combination of sequences from bird, human and swine flu virus lineages from North America and Eurasia. A senior virologist based in Canberra, Australia, told the press he thought that the virus could have been created in a laboratory and released by accident [3]. Some analysts even suggest, without corroborating evidence, that it was made intentionally as a bioweapon [4], while others blame the intensive livestock industry and extensive trafficking of love animals over long distances, which provide plenty of opportunity for generating exotic recombinants [5].

But what worries the public most is the mass vaccination programmes governments are putting in place to combat the emerging pandemic, which could well be worse than the pandemic itself.


Watchdog opposes fast-track vaccine for school children

The US government is intending to vaccinate all children in September when school re-opens, and the country’s vaccine watchdog National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has called on the Obama Administration and all state Governors to provide evidence that the move is [6] “necessary and safe”, demanding “strong mechanisms for vaccine safety screening, recording, monitoring, reporting and vaccine injury compensation.”

The US Departments of Health and Homeland Security had declared a national public health emergency in April soon after the swine flu outbreak. As a result, some schools were closed, people quarantined, and drug companies were given contracts worth $7billon to make vaccines that are being fast tracked by the Food and Drugs Administration [7]. That means they will only be tested for a few weeks on several hundred children and adult volunteers before being given to all school children this fall.

Furthermore, under federal legislation passed by Congress since 2001, an Emergency Use Authorization allows drug companies, health officials and anyone administering experimental vaccines to Americans during a declared public health emergency to be protected from liability if people get injured. US Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius has granted vaccine makers total legal immunity from any lawsuits that may result from any new swine flu vaccine. And some states may make the vaccination mandatory by law.

The NVIC is asking whether the states are prepared to obey vaccine safety provisions in the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which include: 1. Giving parents written information about vaccine benefits and risks before children are vaccinated; 2. Keeping a record of which vaccines the children get, including the manufacturer’s name and lot number; 3. Recording which vaccines were given in the child’s medical record; and 4. Recording serious health problems that develop after vaccination in the child’s medical record and immediately making a report to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

NVIC also wants to know if the states are prepared to provide financial compensation to children injured by the swine flu vaccines, whether parents will be given “complete, truthful information about swine flu vaccine risks”, and have the right to say “no” to vaccination.

Co-founder and president of NVIC Barbara Loe Fisher said [6]: “Parents and legislators should be asking themselves right now: Why are children the first to get experimental swine flu vaccines? Are schools equipped to get signed informed consent from parents before vaccination, keep accurate vaccination records and screen out children biologically at high risk for suffering vaccine reactions? Will people giving these vaccines know how to monitor children afterwards and immediately record, report and treat serious health problems that develop? And will states have the financial resources to compensate children who are injured?”

WHO and mass vaccination fever

The mass vaccination order has come from the World Health Organization (WHO) [8]. In early July 2009, a group of vaccination experts concluded that the pandemic is unstoppable, and Marie-Paul Kieny, WHO director on vaccine research said all nations will need access to vaccines, and that a vaccine should be available as early as September.

Critics point out that the ‘vaccination experts’ are dominated by the vaccine makers standing to gain from the enormously lucrative vaccine and antiviral contracts awarded by governments. But the decisive argument against mass vaccinations is that flu shots simply don’t work and are dangerous [9].

Flu shots ineffective and increase risks of asthma

There are widely acknowledged reasons why flu vaccines won’t work, as already pointed out with regard to the much touted vaccines against the ‘pandemic bird flu’ that has yet to materialize [10] (How to Stop Bird Flu Instead, SiS 35). The flu virus changes quickly – even without the help of genetic engineering in the laboratory, and especially with the help of the intensive livestock industry – whereas the vaccines target specific strains. Furthermore, flu vaccination does not give permanent protection, and must be repeated annually; the vaccines are difficult to mass-produce, and some strains won’t grow at all under laboratory conditions.

Numerous studies have documented that flu shots give little or no protection against infection and illness, and there is no reason to believe that swine flu vaccines will be different.

A review of 51 separate studies involving more than 294 000 children found that in children aged from two years, nasal spray vaccines made from weakened influenza viruses and injected vaccines made from the killed virus prevented 82 and 59 percent of illnesses. The prevention of ‘flu-like illness’ caused by other types of viruses was only 33 and 36 percent respectively. In children under the age of two, the efficacy of inactivated vaccine was similar to placebo. It was not possible to analyse the safety of vaccines from the studies due to the lack of information, and lack of standardization on the little information available [11]. A report published in 2008 found flu vaccines in young children made no difference in the number of flu-related doctor and hospital visits [12].

On the other hand, a study of 800 children with asthma found that those receiving a flu vaccine had a significantly increased risk of asthma-related doctor and emergency room visits [13]; the odds ratios were 3.4 and 1.9 respectively. This was confirmed in a report published in 2009, which showed children with asthma who received FluMist had a 3-fold increased risk of hospitalization [14]

Flu vaccines are equally useless for adults, including the elderly, giving little or no protection against infection or illnesses including pneumonia (see [9]).

Toxic adjuvants in flu vaccines

Vaccines themselves can be dangerous, especially live, attenuated viral vaccines or the new recombinant nucleic acid vaccines [10], they have the potential to generate virulent viruses by recombination and the recombinant nucleic acids could cause autoimmune diseases.

A further major source of toxicity in the case of the flu vaccines are the adjuvants, substances added in order to boost the immunogenicity of the vaccines. There is a large literature on the toxicities of adjuvants. Most flu vaccines contain dangerous levels of mercury in the form of thimerosal, a deadly preservative 50 times more toxic than mercury itself [9]. At high enough doses, it can cause long-term immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioural dysfunctions. Also associated with mercury poisoning are autism, attention deficit disorder, multiple sclerosis, and speech and language deficiencies. The Institute of Medicine has warned that infants, children, and pregnant women should not be injected with thimerosal, yet the majority of flu shots contain 25 micrograms of it.

Another common adjuvant is alum or aluminium hydroxide, which can cause vaccine allergy, anaphylaxis, and macrophage myofascitis, a chronic inflammation syndrome, In cats, alum also gives rise to fibrosarcomas at the site of injection [15]. Numerous new adjuvants are no better, and could be worse. According to a recent review in a science and business pharmaceutical publication [15], most newer adjuvants including MF59, ISCOMS, QS21, AS02, and AS04 have “substantially higher local reactogenicity and systemic toxicity than alum.”

Current status of swine flu vaccines

Five different companies have been contracted to produce vaccines worldwide: Baxter International, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Sanofi-Aventis and AstroZeneca [16]. Already stretched beyond capacity, there is every intention to make smaller vaccine doses go further with a range of new adjuvants [17], with the blessing of the WHO (see later).

Flu vaccines are traditionally produced from non-virulent (attenuated or weakened) influenza viruses (see Box for a description of the viruses). To be effective, the genes of the non- virulent virus used must match those of the viral strain spreading in the population. Activation of the immune system by exposure to the non pathogenic form of the circulating pathogenic strain leads to the production of antibodies that will confer protection against the pathogenic strain. Producing the non-virulent virus involves first identifying and then recreating the subtypes of two of the virus’s surface proteins, haemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N), which determine the strain’s virulence and ability to spread, and are also the target proteins for vaccine production.

Influenza viruses

There are 3 types of influenza viruses, A, B and C. The influenza A type virus is the main one that cause diseases in birds and mammals. Its genome consists of 8 segments of RNA coding for 11 proteins, and the viruses are further classified by subtype on the basis of the two main surface glycoproteins (proteins with complex carbohydrate side chains): haemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N) [18]. The segmented genome enables the virus to’ reassort’ (shuffle) segments as well as recombine within segments, thereby greatly increasing the rate of evolution and generation of new strains. Reassortment is also widely exploited in the laboratory in the process of creating vaccine strains. To-date, 16 H and 9 N subtypes have been detected in numerous combinations circulating in wild birds [19].

Seed viruses are first made to provide the starting material for large scale production of live non-virulent flu viruses. The seed viruses are approved by the WHO or the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA). The usual method of seed virus production is reassortment (see Box). Fertilized chicken eggs are injected with both a standard non-pathogenic influenza strain known to grow well in eggs and the strain that carries the genes expressing the desired vaccine H and N protein subtypes. The two viruses multiply, and their eight genome segments reassort with 256 possible combinations. The resulting recombinant viruses are then screened for the desired virus with the six genome segments that allow the standard strain to grow so well in eggs and the H and N genes from the circulating strain. The seed virus is then injected into millions of eggs for mass production of vaccine. This conventional method of seed stock production takes about one to two months to complete [20].

Cell culture systems may eventually replace chicken eggs. Baxter International applied for a patent on a process using cell culture to produce quantities of infecting virus, which are harvested, inactivated with formaldehyde and ultraviolet light, and then detergent [21]. Baxter has produced H5N1 whole virus vaccines in a Vero cell line derived from the kidney of an African green monkey, and conducted phase 1 and 2 clinical trials with and without aluminium hydroxide as adjuvant [22, 23]. The main finding was that the toxic adjuvant did not increase neutralising antibodies against the vaccine strain. Baxter has agreed to ship H1N1 vaccine by the end of July or early August 2009 but details of the production of that vaccine have not yet been released to the public [16].

In December, a Baxter facility in Austria sent a human flu vaccine contaminated with the deadly H5N1 live avian flu virus to 18 countries, including the Czech Republic, where testing showed it killed the ferrets inoculated [24]. Czech newspapers questioned whether Baxter was involved in a deliberate attempt to start a pandemic.

Norvatis, another big pharma, announced on 13 June that it, too, has produced a swine flu vaccine using cell-based technology and the proprietary adjuvant MF59®. The MF59® adjuvant is oil based and contains Tween80, Span85, and squalene [25]. In studies of oil-based adjuvants in rats, the animals were rendered crippled and paralyzed. Squalene brought on severe arthritis symptoms in rats, and studies in humans given from 10 to 20 ppb (parts per billion) of squalene showed severe immune system impact and development of autoimmune disorders [26].

Novartis was in the news in 2008 for a clinical trial of a H5N1 vaccine in Poland. The trial was administered by local nurses and doctors who gave the vaccine to 350 homeless people, leaving 21 died; and were prosecuted by the Polish police [27, 28]. Novartis claimed the deaths were unrelated to the H5N1 vaccine [29], which had been “tested on 3500 other people without any deaths.”

GlaxoSmithKline’s vaccine will be made up of antigens of the recently isolated influenza strain, and also contains its own proprietary adjuvant system AS03 that has been approved in the EU along with its H5N1 bird flu vaccine in 2008. According to the European Public Assessment Report [30], AS03 adjuvant is composed of squalene (10.68 milligrams), DL-α-tocopherol (11.86 milligrams) and polysorbate 80 (4.85 milligrams). The H5N1 vaccine also contains 5 micrograms thiomersal, as well as Polysorbate 80, Octoxynol 10, and various inorganic salts. The company is aggressively promoting various adjuvant systems as its ‘adjuvant advantage’ that reduces the dose of vaccines [31].

A recent WHO survey of primary vaccine producers concluded that the potential output of 4.9 Billion doses of H1N1 vaccine per year is a best-case scenario, assuming among other factors that the most dose-sparing formulation (that will include toxic adjuvants) be selected by each manufacturer and that production will take place at full capacity. WHO Director-General, Dr .Margaret Chan, and the United Nations Secretary-General, Mr Ban Ki-moon, met with senior officials of vaccine manufacturers on 19 May and asked them to reserve part of their production capacity for poor countries that would otherwise have no or little access to vaccine in the case of a pandemic [32].

The last mass-vaccination in the US was a disaster. In 1976, cases of swine flu were found in soldiers at Fort Dix, New Jersey, and one of them died, most likely of physical overexertion rather than from the infection [7]. This led to the launch of a mass vaccination of 40 million against a pandemic that never materialized. Thousands filed claims for injury. At least 25 died and 500 developed paralyzing Guillain-Barre syndrome [33, 34].

Swine flu syndromes mostly mild

As of 22 July 2009, the CDC listed a total of 40 617 cases in the US, with 319 fatalities, giving a fatalites/case ratio of 0.8 percent [35]; though the real death rate – among all cases of infection including the mild ones that go unreported – is probably much lower. Experts estimate that only 1 out of 20 cases are reported [36].

The UK is the worst affected European country, and the pandemic is in the headlines everyday in July. A new telephone helpline was set up on 23 July to let people get advice and tamiflu without seeing a doctor. In that week, there has been a record rise in cases to 100 000 and a total of 30 deaths so far [37], giving a fatalities/case ratio of 0.03 percent, a more accurate reflection of the actual death rate.

UK’s chief medical officer Sir Liam Donaldson has ordered the NHS to plan for as many as 65 000 deaths, with 350 a day at the peak [38]. There has been no plan as yet for mass vaccination; but the UK government has advance orders for 195 million doses of vaccine with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).

The vaccine that GSK is developing will be tested on a limited number of people as the UK drug company reportedly [39] “weighs the pandemic danger against the risks of an unsafe shot.” This was criticized as “risky” by Prof. Hugh Pennington, a retired microbiologist at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland. “By limiting clinical trials, Glaxo raises the danger that the vaccine dose isn’t properly calibrated, and could lead to shots that don’t protect people from the virus or at worse are unsafe,” Pennington said.

Pennington added that the shot’s ability to trigger the body’s defences is crucial and requires tests to determine the best dose and whether an adjuvant is needed to bolster the immunity. (As we know, GSK is definitely promoting its new range of toxic adjuvants.) He also referred to the Fort Dix incident in 1976 (see earlier).

France has ordered vaccines from Sanofi, GSK and Novartis, but sees no reason to ask vaccine makers to shorten or skip clinical trials [16]. Sanofi-Aventis, the French drug maker developing its own swine flu vaccine will begin testing the product in early August, and estimates it will need as much as two and a half months of tests before having a shot that’s “both safe and protective”, according to Albert Garcia, speaking for the company’s vaccine unit, “the vaccine will be ready in November or December, he said.

Baxter, however, will produce a vaccine by early August for clinical tests.

Glaxo also said it is developing a face mask coated with antivirals to prevent infection and boosting production of its Relenza drug for patients already suffering from swine flu.

There are obviously safer and more effective ways to combat the pandemic than mass vaccinations: washing hands often, sneezing into a tissue that can be safely disposed of, avoiding unnecessary gatherings, and delay opening schools – all advised by governments – and we would add, eating healthily, exercise, and getting enough vitamin D to boost your natural immunity [10].

References

1. New details on virus’s promiscuous past”, Jon Cohen, Science 2009, 324, 1127.

2. Garten RJ, Davis CT,Tussell CA et al. Antigenic and genetic charaatcteristics of swine-origin 2009 A (H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science 2009, 325, 197-201.

3. Virologist to make his case for lab origin of swine flu”, Peter Duveen, Opednews.com, 4 July 2009, http://www.opednews.com/articles/Virolo ... 0-103.html

4. Is swine flu a biological weapon?”, Paul Joseph Watson, PrisonPlanet.com 27 April 2009, http://www.prisonplanet.com/is-swine-fl ... weapon.htm

5. CDC confirms ties to virus first discovered in U.S. pig factories” Michael Greger, 3 May 2009, http://www.hsus.org/farm/news/ournews/s ... 42909.html

6. “Swine flu vaccine should not be given to children in schools”, Barbara Loe Fisher, National Vaccine Information Center, 22 July 2009, http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/J ... ldren.aspx

7. “Now legal immunity for swine flu vaccine makers” F, William Engdahl, Global Research 20 July 2009, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... &aid=14453

8. Swine flu pandemic now ‘unstoppable’: WHO official”, Agence France-Presse 13 July 2009, Calgary Herald, http://www.calgaryherald.com/Swine+pand ... story.html

9. What are the dangers of mandatory swine flu vaccination? Dr. Mercola, June 2009, http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvot ... ation.aspx

10. Ho MW. How to stop bir flu instead of the vaccine-antiviral model. Science in Society 35. 40-42, 2007.

11. Jefferson T, Rivett A, Harnden A, DiPietrantoni C, and Demicheli V. Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children (Review). Cochrane Database Systematic Review 23 April 2009, http://mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochr ... df_fs.html

12. Szilagyi PG, Fairbrother G, Griffin MR et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness among children 6 to 59 months of age during 2 influenza seasons: a case-cohort study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008, 162, 943-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18838647

13. Christy C, Aligne C, Auinger P, Pulcino T and Weitzman M. Effectiveness of influenza vaccine for the prevention of asthma exacerbations. Arch. Dis Child 2004, 89, 734-5, http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articl ... d=15269071

14. Flu vaccination may triple risk for flu-related hospitalization in children with asthma, 25 May 2009, http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/703235

15. Petrovsky N, Heinzel S, Honda Y, Lyons AB. New-age vaccine adjuvants, friend or foe? BioPharm International 2 August 2007, http://biopharminternational.findpharma ... =&pageID=5

16. “Update: 1-Baxter can take no more H1N1 flu vaccine orders”, Bill Berkerto, 16 July 2009, Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsn ... 716?rpc=33

17. H1N1 ‘swine flu’ vaccine, postnote, May 2009, number 331, http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/postpn331.pdf

18. Avian Influenza (Bird Flu) CDC, 18 November 2005, http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avian/gen-info/flu-viruses.htm

19. Olsen B, Munster VJ, Wallensten A, Waldenstrom J, Osterhaus ADME and Fouchier RAM. Global patterns of influenza A virus in wild birds. Science 2006, 312, 384-8.

20. Hood E. Environews Innovations 2006 Environmental Health Perpectives 114,A108-111.

21. Kistner,O,Tauer,C, Barrett,N. Mundt,W. Method for Producing Viral Vaccines 2009 Patent application US2009/0060950A1

22. Ehrlich HJ, Müller M, Oh HM, Tambyah PA, Joukhadar C, Montomoli E, Fisher D, Berezuk G, Fritsch S, Löw-Baselli A, Vartian N, Bobrovsky R, Pavlova BG, Pöllabauer EM, Kistner O, Barrett PN; Baxter H5N1 Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Clinical Study Team. A clinical trial of a whole-virus H5N1 vaccine derived from cell culture. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2573-84.

23. Ketel.W,Dekker,C,Mink,C,Campbell,J,Edwards,K,Patel,S,Ho,D,Talbot,H,Guo,K,Noah,D,Hill,H.Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated, Vero cell culture-derived whole virus influenza A/H5N1 vaccine given alone or with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant in healthy adults Vaccine 2009 in press doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.015

24. “Bird flu mix-up could have spelled disaster”, NewScientist 6 March 2009, http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126983.400

25. Kenney RT and Edelman R. Survey of human-use adjuvants. Expert Review of Vaccines April 2003; 2(2):167-88, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1289 ... d_RVDocSum

26. “Vaccines may be linked to Gulf War Syndrome”, Chiroweb.com, June 12, 2000, http://www.chiroweb.com/mpacms/dc/article.php?id=31730

27. “Homeless people die after bird flu vaccine trial in Poland”, Mathew Day, Telegraph, 2 July 2008, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... oland.html

28. “Homeless people die after trials of bird-flu vaccine”, 10 July 2008, Pharmaceutical Portal for Poland, http://www.pharmapoland.com/next.php?id=62409

29. “Polish industry not dented by deaths”, Emma Dorey, Entrepreneur, 21 July 2008, http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejourna ... 91358.html

30. Pandermrix = European Public Assessment Report [EMEA] 27 September 2009, http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/Hum ... demrix.htm

31. Vaccine adjuvant system technology background information. GlaxoSmithKline, accessed 25 July 2009, http://www.gsk.com/media/flu/flu-adjuvant.pdf

32. Collin N, de Radiguès X, Kieny MP; the World Health Organization H1N1 Vaccine Task Force.New influenza A(H1N1) vaccine: How ready are we for large-scale production? Vaccine. 2009 Jun 26 in press doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.06.034

33. 1976 swine flu outbreak, Wikipedia, 22 July 2009, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak

34. Haber P, Sejvar J, Mikaeloff Y and DeStefano F. Vaccine and Guilaain-Barre syndrome. Drug Saf 2009, 32, 309-23.

35. 2009 flu pandemic in the United States”, Wikipdeia, 22 July 2009, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_flu_p ... ted_States

36. 2009 flu pandemic, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_flu_pandemic

37. “Swine flu website overwhelmed by demand as new cases double in a week”, Owen Bowcott and Severin Carrell, The Guardian, 23 July 2009, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/ju ... verwhelmed

38. “Swine flu: medical chief orders NHS to prepare for 65 000 deaths – with a toll of as many as 350 a day”, Daniel Martin, The Daily Mail, 17 July 2009, T, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... –when.html

39. “Glaxo to limit tests of flu vaccine, citing urgency”, Jason Gale and Trista Kelley, Bloomberg Press, 22 July 2009, http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... kg_4J.PCEw

The original source of this article is Institute of Science in Society
Copyright © Dr. Mae-Wan Ho and Prof. Joe Cummins, Institute of Science in Society, 2009
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: The H1N1 Swine Flu "pandemic" of 2009/10

Unread post by rachel »

Groundhog-Day-AGAIN.gif
Groundhog-Day-AGAIN.gif (539.55 KiB) Viewed 1632 times

So as we can see from the dates above, The Simpsons predicted nothing. Just write a satirical take on what previously happened after the fact, give it a couple of years, and as the events are memory-holed, it will seem magically that you predicted it all the next time they pull the same shit.

The Simpsons predicts the Covid plandemic (Nov. 21, 2010)
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: The H1N1 Swine Flu "pandemic" of 2009/10

Unread post by rachel »

Where to put this one, COVID death...Australia...well since I've been talking about Swine Flu vaccines and AIDS, let's put it here. A recap from previous post...
rachel wrote: Thu Feb 09, 2023 9:31 pm Swine flu: There is a risk of false positive HIV test after H1N1 vaccine
Posted in Swine Flu , New World Order by Blog Juízo Final on 21/05/2010

Image

BRASÍLIA – The Department of STD, AIDS and Viral Hepatitis, of the Ministry of Health, released a technical note number 128/2010 on the possibility of false-positive results in immunoenzymatic tests for HIV among people who received the vaccine against Influenza A (H1N1) . The note, which you can read in full below, is categorical in stating that great caution must be exercised in disclosing the results...

It is circulating in a restricted way among doctors
The note also says that this fact was found in tests done after vaccination. "This is because when taking the vaccine, the body began to produce Immunoglobin M (IgM) antibodies, which is produced on the first exposure to an antigen", he says. Below is the full text of the note...
So, an update on CORONA VIRUS vaccines and AIDS...

https://nworeport.me/2023/02/10/cdc-dat ... -lifespan/
CDC data reveal that multiple covid jabs can knock up to 24 years off a person’s expected lifespan

(Natural News) The latest health data from the government of New South Wales (NSW) in Australia confirms something we have been warning you about for quite some time now: that covid “vaccines” produce vaccine-induced AIDS (VAIDS), which in turn sheds many years of a person’s life – and progressively more so with the passage of time.

Last year, an average double-injected Aussie who took the initial covid jab series was found to be 10.72 times more likely to “catch Omicron” compared to his unvaccinated counterpart. This year, that same double-jabbed Aussie is 20 times more likely to get sick, while his triple-vaxxed and beyond counterparts are at least 35 times more likely to fall ill.

To corroborate this, a new study from the Cleveland Clinic shows that the risk of illness and early death increases exponentially with each subsequent injection – and that risk continues to increase indefinitely and never wanes as some people previously believed was the case.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) all-cause mortality data serves as another indicator of all this, showing that the mortality rate in 2022 increased by 7 percent compared to the mortality rate in 2021.

“So if you have had 5 doses then you were 35% more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021,” explains The Exposé. “If you have had one dose then you were 7% more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021. If you are unvaxxed then you were no more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021.”
I'd be wary of the PLACEBO effect of this article; if the CDC is telling us this, it's probably also a pile of FESTERING BULLSHIT.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 1612 times

Re: The H1N1 Swine Flu "pandemic" of 2009/10

Unread post by rachel »

HIV documentary pulled before being aired on the BBC.


A production company named Meditel Productions devoted 3 years to the making of this BBC Documentary that never aired because of political pressure.

They were given a testing budget and brought in world renowned scientists to properly conduct the scientific tests needed to prove their theory, that HIV has never been isolated, a direct threat to the orthodoxy that by then had already been deeply entrenched within the medical industrial complex and the culture at large.

It was to be a one hour exposé to be aired on World AIDS day 1998. The channel 4 news editor started to get cold feet and said they would only broadcast a 10 minute report that day, something that didn’t sit well with the production company.

The day before the transmission, the editor Jim Gray said he has a “tectonic shift” and refused to broadcast the report.

In this thread I have provided a screenshot of the press release from Meditel announcing the project and one that condemns the censorship of the broadcast.

I have also included a link for the extra skeptical out there to an archive of the correspondence between Meditel and the BBC. It proves the sad story about the film that never aired on television.

Until now and I think once you have viewed this, you will understand why it has been censored for 25 years. I don’t claim to know the absolute truth in regards to this matter but the evidence presented is extremely compelling.

While watching this I found that it has eerily similar parallels with how COVID has been handled. Judge for yourself.


To add some interesting context to this post, watch this interview with Kary Mullis who won a Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR technology.

This is the technology that was used to prove if someone is HIV+ and wouldn’t you know? The same technology used to prove if someone is COVID+.

Mullis spoke out at the time, protesting the use of his technology as a means to demonstrate someone’s HIV status.

This also features Dr. Rodney Richards, Neville Hodgkinson, Dr. Christian Fiala, and Rian Malanp. All whom explain why they began questioning the story behind AIDS.
F0dkkngX0AEk-X6.jpg
F0dkknfXsAA5GzN.jpg
F0dkknfXoAEC1_5.jpg


In case the tweets above go away, here are the videos.

Post Reply