Structure of the emerging Bio-Security State

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
SaiGirl
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 9:42 pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Structure of the emerging Bio-Security State

Unread post by SaiGirl »

It's a new universal business model or paradigm for not only vaccines, but for "public health" as a whole.

I will briefly describe its content:

Webb outlines the complete restructuring of "health care" in the new Normal.
"Health Care" becoming the cornerstone of a "Great Re-Set": the 4th Industrial Revolution.

The three biggest elements of this are militarization, secrecy and the technocracy.

Trump was selected as a "Judas goat" to sell the initial implementation.
Who knows whether they will continue using him, or risk chaos by attempting a replacement.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/iWbnFpVKwQw/

They will build an entirely new global economy, politics and universal culture / religion, around this bio-security management paradigm.
xileffilex
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 359 times

Re: Structure of the emerging Bio-Security State

Unread post by xileffilex »

A long video - the Securitisation of Health
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1rcp8xPTPY
COVID 19: A - Z (From the moon to South Tyneside)
115 views•Oct 14 2020

He speaks slowly, so can be speeded up a bit. 3 hours. Well worth watchig, amazing research
xileffilex
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 359 times

Re: Structure of the emerging Bio-Security State

Unread post by xileffilex »

Details of the CommonPass - or Covid pass which will become permanent for travel, just as post-9/11 constraints became accepted as normal

https://www.weforum.org/projects/commonpass

From the World Economic Forum, as expected.
Soon to be trialled in ....London
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/ne ... 58756.html
October 7 2020
to be trialled also between CHINA and Hong Kong
United Airlines will debut the trial with volunteers flying between London Heathrow and Newark Liberty International Airport.

“For some time now, Heathrow has been calling for the creation of a Common International Standard and cross-border pilots such as these could help governments across the world and the industry to unlock the benefits of testing in aviation,” said Heathrow’s process improvement director, Mark Burgess.
The project is being implemented in collaboration with government representatives from 37 countries around the world, as well as public and private partners.
Because, like fake airline terro-ists, walking, talking Covid carrying terro- ists will never go away.

And returning to Securitisation...
May 11 2020
https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/fik ... ritization
The coronavirus in Jordan has gone beyond identifying the diseases a "critical public health crisis" due to concerns that a medical emergency would not provide the speed and agility necessary for dealing with the virus and to prevent its spread. Jordan’s “securitization model” has in many ways proven itself as an effective, quick, and strict way to mobilize all needed resources available in the face of the pandemic to preserve lives and property before the disease was able to infect a large proportion of the population.....a quick and decisive response to the crisis was seen as a necessity to prevent a mass outbreak because of the government’s awareness of the lack of the necessary resources to deal with the COVID-19 crisis.
caveat time...
There are also drawbacks specific to securitization. Securitization runs the risk of stunting human development, democratic transformations, and the evolution of political, parliamentary and civil society institutions, especially when emergency laws are extended. In the medium turn, a sense of decreased freedoms may lead to the emergence of serious societal challenges, such as high crime, robbery, theft, widespread drug use, increased mental illness, and possibly suicide.
these are the kind of risks which the behavioural psychologists have already pondered.
, Jordan can build on its successes from short-term securitization by ensuring that this securitization does not become a continuous state of affairs.
One wonders how things have turned out. Certainly, in the UK, securitisation is alive and well 5 months after the above article appeared.
xileffilex
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 359 times

Re: Structure of the emerging Bio-Security State

Unread post by xileffilex »

Mass testing in Slovakia - a dry run for entry into the bio-security state.

https://www.bi.team/blogs/how-slovakia- ... e-weekend/
November 5 2020

In one weekend
Slovakia tested 3.6 million people for coronavirus – 97% of the eligible population of people aged 10-65.

The goal was to identify as many positive cases as possible, and take them out of circulation – with the idea being that this could help the country avoid having to enter lockdown. This idea could help to achieve the compromise of saving lives and livelihoods at the same time.
reminder - average age of "with Covid" deaths is average age at death - i.e. old people in their last years

who went to Slovakia? The UK Behavioural Insights team using the Slovaks as guinea pigs
We are jointly owned by the UK Cabinet Office, innovation charity Nesta and our employees.
Dr David Halpern
Chief Executive
Halpern attended a SAGE committee meeting on March 23 when it is recorded that
Excess deaths planning
38. The science suggests that a proportion of the estimated fatalities from Covid-19 would
be among those expected to die within a year.
39. NHSX and ONS data need to be combined by modelling groups to give a picture of
deaths caused directly and indirectly by Covid-19.
[why does actual data need modelling]

Back to BIT in Slovakia
The mass testing has been an enormous success – it identified 38,000 new cases in two days, 15 times more than the Slovakian testing system identifies on an average day. BIT visited Slovakia to see how they did it, and what lessons this holds for to the UK.
Slovakia used ‘lateral flow’ tests, a new coronavirus testing technology which can return results in about 15 minutes, without the need to send the test kits off to a laboratory. But, this cutting-edge technology was underpinned by a paper-based system for registering people’s test results. People who tested negative were provided with a paper certificate and released from a strict curfew. People who tested positive had to self-isolate, along with their households, for 10 days.

Image

If other countries were to replicate this, they would need about 1,000 locations and 8,000 staff per 1m of the population.
so, for UK, say 60,000 locations nearly 500,000 staff!!
to escape this curfew [lockdown]; people who tested negative at the weekend would be allowed to resume going out to work and shops and restaurants (outdoor service only), in compliance with other guidelines. ....Those without certificates showing a negative test result would have to continue living under the curfew until the next round of testing this weekend [7/8 Nov] or till mid-November.
written by
Kristina Londakova
Policy Advisor to the CEO of the Behavioural Insights Team, previously seconded to the Cabinet Office’s Economic and Domestic Affairs Secretariat.
https://www.bi.team/people/kristina-londakova/

Here's the report on the exercise -
citizens who did not wish to participate could instead opt to self-isolate for 10 days, but would not benefit from the early release from lockdown
https://web.archive.org/web/20201105174 ... Report.pdf
HOW SLOVAKIA TESTED ITS WHOLE POPULATION FOR COVID-19 October 31 - Novembver 1 2020
In late September, Slovakia started to see a second wave of COVID-19, eventually reaching the current 7-day median of 2,500 cases, with 458 cases per 1,000,000 (the UK is currently at 329 cases per 1,000,000). This came as a big shock, because the country hardly saw any cases in the first wave.
..all blamed on the laissez-faire conditions during summer, lol! And there is no data presented on comparative tests/head of population.
The operation was conducted by the military .... 6,000 soldiers, [5 million population total, but including under 18s and over-65 also]

results - 38,000 new "positive cases" were identified - is that the real reason for this huge operation? Not really.
results.... including...
No need for official tracing: At 90%+ compliance, and with re-testing of key areas in a week’s time, there is no real need for official tracing

s: At 70% specificity, circa 3 in 10
positives were likely not picked up. However, these should be the less infectious
cases
but all "negatives" are still potential bio-security hazards and must do all the ridiculous operations to save granny.
Reduced Wave 2 whole country testing: Only 54% of population will be retested from the so-called ‘red-region’
...i.e Slovakia divided into different bio-secure regions. And here come the psychological messages for the UK
How BI could improve mass testing
● Use empowering messaging: Motivate people by creating a spirit of national resistance to the virus, highlighting the ability to make a positive action and contribute to the national effort to save lives and livelihoods. Use ‘save Christmas’ messaging.
● Use powerful and trusted messengers: Enlist the royal family, the cabinet, the parliament, and local government as supporters of the project. Reach out to the community to encourage them to get tested through trusted institutions and leaders (e.g. a personalised letter sent from NHS, local GP, or a community or faith leader.
● Package of support for positive cases: When leaving the testing site, positive cases could receive a ‘care package’ with information on support offered by local council (eg. linking people up with local volunteers, giving them priority delivery slots for supermarkets, or providing temporary housing to isolate outside of their home if they live with vulnerable people).
● Non-financial incentives for volunteers: Offer additional benefits to motivate volunteers to help with organisation, such as free parking, free public transport pass, free museum and gallery entry, etc.
● Wristbands to improve monitoring: Along with certificates, distribute paper wristbands to all people who tested negative for easier recognition of whether they can enter venues. **
● Provide additional and rewards for testing: for example, through lotteries and partnerships with local businesses.
● Offer travel provision or subsidise the cost for people who live far away from a test site or are currently in receipt of financial support
** like shops? transport?
xileffilex
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 359 times

Re: Structure of the emerging Bio-Security State

Unread post by xileffilex »

More detail from The Lancet....October 31, before the country-wide event fully backed by its countries servile [to the UN] politicians.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanc ... 3/fulltext
Failure to [produce the paper proof of negativity] could result in a fine of €1650. The testing is voluntary, but anyone not participating must self-isolate in their homes for 10 days. Breaking this quarantine also carries a fine of €1650. Individuals older than 65 years who spend most of their time at home have been urged not to participate, but the government has said that it will carry out testing of older people in care homes. Testing will also be done in hospitals.
Good gracious. The big stick, and hoping all the oldies die off at home at the same time
An initial 3-day pilot testing scheme in four regions in the north of the country that have become infection hotspots began on Oct 23
as in Liverpool is in the UK.....

The test performed was an ANTIGEN TEST - and was only announced two weeks previously.
Julian Peto, professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK, who has been campaigning for the UK Government to adopt regular mass testing, told The Lancet that the testing in Slovakia “sounds like a great idea, and I am delighted someone has decided to try it, but this seems like a very bad way of doing it. This kind of testing can't be implemented overnight. Doing so would be optimistic to the point of fallacy. It needs to be prepared properly”.
xileffilex
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 359 times

Re: Structure of the emerging Bio-Security State

Unread post by xileffilex »

The WEF via its chums the IMF on its covid platform is very keen on mass testing.
obviously to get the economy running again LOL!!! Nothing to do with population control..
https://www.weforum.org/platforms/covid ... -heres-why
This is why we should test everyone for COVID-19

18 Dec 2020
Reda Cherif Senior Economist, IMF Fuad Hasanov Senior Economist, IMF

...universal testing and isolation
It has been shown unambiguously that continuous testing of the population at a relatively high rate – between 10-20% of the population each day – would squash the spread of the virus and prevent any resurgence
the "unambiguous" study is actually an in-house IMF paper, lol!!! It talks about such garbage as 'flattening the curve'
The estimated cost of testing is dwarfed by its return, mitigating the economic fallout of the
pandemic.
The universal testing is about
implementing an industrial policy to ramp up the production of tests quickly.
which would be antigen tests.

These idiots are still talking about a "vaccine being found" but we know full well that the vaccine is a diversion -apparently it won't do anything. It seems the way to impose some kind of bio-security state is daily at home testing.

Paul Romer and Michael Mina are two advocates of mass testing.

Mina has authored the following paper - published Nov 26 2020 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity — A Strategy for Containment
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2025631
A regimen of regular testing works as a sort of Covid-19 filter, by identifying, isolating, and thus filtering out currently infected persons, including those who are asymptomatic.
"filtering out" - a lovely way to describe it....
tests used in effective surveillance regimens intended to reduce the population prevalence of a respiratory virus need to return results quickly to limit asymptomatic spread and should be sufficiently inexpensive and easy to execute to allow frequent testing — multiple times per week....when the current surveillance approach does identify infected people, they can still spread the infection for days before notification, which limits the impact of isolation and contact tracing.

Apparently
October 21, 2020
The Challenges of Expanding Rapid Tests to Curb COVID-19
Rita Rubin, MA

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2772299
positive results from antigen tests are highly accurate, but there is a higher chance of false negatives ***….” Symptomatic people with a negative antigen test may need to have their results confirmed with a PCR test, according to the FDA.
*** no chance of false positives, then...
f Michael Mina, MD, PhD, had his way, testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) would become simple and routine—as easy as brushing one’s teeth in the morning.I
Can we see where this is going when linked up to smart phones?
A negative result would mean it was safe to go to work or to school, as long as other basic mitigation measures—mask wearing, social distancing, and handwashing—were practiced. A positive result, seconded by a different test, would necessitate self-isolation.
This is of course tied up to the bogus study of asymptomatic transmission using a PCR cycle threshold of 40 [ in the paper of Xi He et al]
Given that an estimated 40% of people with SARS-CoV-2 infection have no symptoms but can still transmit the virus to others
And if your daily antigen test were positive, you would be isolated until confirmed, and then, one assumes, released by a PCR test of unknown cycle threshold. And there's no discussion abouto whether one has to prove one has been tested [negative] to go to school,, work, travel each day. But they is not beyond the bounds of possibility.

One more gem....
By contrast, the gold standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test **** used to diagnose COVID-19 requires laboratory processing that sometimes takes days, not minutes, to obtain results, due to backlogs and supply shortages. So an individual could be negative when tested but positive by the time the result is returned. As Amesh Adalja, MD, senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, said in an interview, “a PCR test that [gives] results back in 8 days is a worthless test.”
**** LOL!!! It's a worthless test full stop. Nice try.
xileffilex
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 359 times

Re: Structure of the emerging Bio-Security State

Unread post by xileffilex »

The mass testing as per above is already being carried out in UK schools [allegedly voluntarily but one imagines the take-up will be high through peer pressure]
These are lateral flow tests
validation studies conducted by Oxford University and Public Health England, they were shown to be as accurate in identifying a case as a PCR test (99.68% specificity). The tests have lower sensitivity but they are better at picking up cases when a person has higher viral load, hence the need to test frequent
Who has written this one wonders. not a teacher that's for sure. It's a government template letter, actually from the Department for Education e.g.
https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/JTXJWYH

The same letter is being sent out by every school.
Pupils will need to take a further ‘PCR test’ (similar to those done in local and regional testing sites) on the same day (or as soon as possible). [School / college] will be able to provide these PCR test kits to perform at home or you can go to www.gov.uk/get-coronavirus-test or call 119 to book a follow-up test. If ordering a PCR test yourselves, they should choose to visit a drive-through test site if possible, as it is faster than requesting a home test.
During this time while they wait for the PCR result (via text / email) they will need to self-isolate.
If the PCR test returns a positive result you will have to self-isolate and follow the guidance from NHS Test and Trace.

What if a close contact at school/college tests positive?
A close contact of someone in school/college who has tested positive for COVID-19 will be able to return to [school/college] if they agree to be tested once a day for 7 days and the test is negative. If they do not want to take the test, they will need to self-isolate as per the national guidelines. This does not apply to household members or close contacts outside of [school/college] who will still need to self-isolate.
This is all just for pupils who are perfectly well - i.e. potential bio-terrorists. There will be no forseeable end to this nonsense.

and once again, the bogus asymptomatic infection rate is cited, though now it's been downgraded to 30 percent....
. Up to one third of people who have coronavirus experience no symptoms.
4


PS in fact SAGE is now suggesting it's schoolchildren who are bringing infection into familes - the 'kill granny" routine. All part of the move towards remote learning permanently.

here's the simulation...
Image
take home message - as soon as schools shut, phoney infections drop.
Post Reply