Corona madness

[rachel]

Another blast from the past.

St John’s Ambulance advice on CPR 2020:

[rachel]

[SaiGirl]

"Dr. Phil" doing his part for the media fear narrative.
Millions watched this. And were instantly hypnotized by it.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11986688/

[rachel]

https://x.com/1MikeFairclough/status/17 ... 3630549290

My former employer @EastSussexCC allowed children to receive this NHS leaflet in their schools, promising not to inform their parents if they booked a Covid vaccine. I found this profoundly unethical so I blew the whistle.

"Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust has promised youngsters that they will not inform their families or teachers if they get in touch to organise a vaccine.....

"Mike Fairclough, a headteacher in Sussex, said he came across the leaflets, which were being handed out to children at local secondary schools.

'Saying to children "don’t worry we won’t tell your parents" is usually frowned upon and considered really sinister' he said. "We will keep it quiet from your parents" sends out a really bad message'. Telegraph 2021

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/1 ... ot-inform/

[rachel]

Since the NHS's website has now set this to PRIVATE, I guess because they want us to FORGET.

The rhythm of life | NHS

Original NHS Youtube: https://web.archive.org/web/20210929201 ... PjoQ3XpzkM

Originally Published: NHS Youtube Channel
Date: Jul 2, 2021

Celebrities including Jim Broadbent and David Walliams have joined forces with the NHS to encourage everyone to get their COVID-19 vaccines in a new uplifting film released today. Set to the toe-tapping tune The Rhythm of Life, written by Cy Coleman and Dorothy Fields, from the 1966 classic musical, Sweet Charity, and donated by the Cy Coleman estate, the heart-warming film will celebrate the success of the vaccination programme in supporting the easing of restrictions as outlined in the roadmap. Conceived and directed by Josie Rourke, the former artistic director of the Donmar Warehouse, the short film, written by Rourke and James Graham, is being released ahead of the NHS’s 73rd Birthday. It first sees Jim Broadbent enter an empty theatre before a star-studded cast of David Walliams, Asa Butterfield, Colin Salmon, Derek Jacobi, Don Warrington, Nicola Roberts, Russel Tovey, Sandra Marvin and West End dancers - dressed in iconic NHS blue - take to the stage to passionately perform the song.

Vaccines are available free of charge and from thousands of vaccine centres, GP practices and pharmacies. Around 98% of people live within 10 miles of a vaccination centre in England, which includes Riverside Park Stadium, Hull City Hall and Sunderland Nightingale amongst others. The NHS will also be running hundreds of walk-in COVID-19 vaccination sites for adults aged 18 and over to turn up and grab a jab without needing to book in advance.

[Johnston]

This is very important article from russian futuro/sociologist about real purposes of covid(whether virus was real or not, doesnt really matter) who works with wef, club of rome etc. Never mentioned in west or conspiracy land. Now we have face scanners on airports, russia and ukraine both launched digital-id:s in the middle of the "war". Eu already said 2026 and trump will likely bring up freedom-ID.

2022.01.27
THE HEAD OF THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC FORUM INCLUDED LEONID E. GRININ AND ANTON L. GRININ INTO THE LIST OF 50 “FOREMOST GLOBAL THINKERS AND OPINION-MAKERS"

According to the World Economic Forum, Leonid E. Grinin and Anton L. Grinin are included in the list of 50 “foremost global thinkers and opinion-makers”. Their and other thinkers' interviews concerning the vision of the future world contributed to the new book "Great Narrative For a Better Future". The book is now widely discussed around the world, while the contributors received a personal gratitude from the chairman of the forum, who noted that the interviews became “a great inspiration to the book, making it intellectually rich and diverse”.

https://www.sociostudies.org/almanac/ar ... o_e-state/

Among many influences that the pandemic has and will have on society and the World System as a whole, one of the most important is the acceleration of the start of a new technological wave and a new technological paradigm in the near future. This impact is determined by the growing need for the development of a number of areas in medicine, bio- and nanotechnology, artificial intelligence and others, which we denote as “MANBRIC convergence”. It is shown that the experience of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic has confirmed that the final phase of the Cybernetic Revolution will begin in the 2030s at the intersection of a number of medical, bio, digital and several other technologies, with medical needs as an integrating link. Among the multitude of self-regulating systems in the economy and life (which, in our opinion, will flourish during the Cybernetic Revolution) socio-technical self-regulating systems (SSSs) will play a special role. Thus, COVID-19 becomes a powerful impetus not only in terms of accelerating technological development and approaching the final phase of the Cybernetic Revolution, but also in changing sociopolitical (and socio-administrative) relations in the forthcoming decades.

Among the existing and future self-regulating systems, we pay special attention to what we designate as socio-technical self-regulating systems (SSSs). These are technologies designed to regulate administrative and social relations in society through combining the AI with other technologies; in some respects, they are able to perform functions of administrative/law enforcement bodies. The development of the SSSs will notably affect the change in social and even political relations, as well as it will lead to the transformation of the state into an e-state. 

Numerous social self-regulating systems will begin to take shape. The proliferation of such social self-regulating systems will have serious consequences, possibly even fundamental ones. It will become possible to create certain systems of motivation and control over people's behavior in order to make it more predictable.

The controversial role of the grandiose mRNA vaccine experiment is worth mentioning further. It is important to understand that one of the most serious obstacles hindering the development of the pharmaceutical industry from becoming more flexible is the overregulation of the new drug approvals. It takes many years, sometimes up to 15–20 years, before a new drug is approved. The reason is obvious: the need to protect patients' health from unapproved drugs. But this system makes the development of new drugs so expensive (and requires good ties in the government) that only very large companies can afford it. As a result, a number of more flexible small and medium-sized companies are deprived of the opportunity to operate on the market. Due to Covid-19, the procedures for vaccine inspection, testing, etc. were essentially removed. One cannot call this experience a success, because the vaccine effectiveness appeared to be far below expectations and the side effects very serious.

In addition, it is important to note that the transition to anti-crisis management of society and monitoring of the implementation of anti-epidemic regulations, including tracking of movements and contacts, has caused a surge in demand for artificial intelligence technologies, mainly for medical administrative purposes. This led to the introduction of techno-social innovations into society's life. We believe that these measures can accelerate the development of e-state technologies, change social relationships, as well as increase confrontation in society.

The fact is that new combined technological systems are being formed on the basis of AI technologies that collect, store and analyze information about billions of people, as well as networked ICTs. Such systems are aimed at administrative, legal, social and even political regulation and control over the behavior of individuals, social groups and even society as a whole, up to the regulation of the World-System. SSSs will be used to regulate many legal aspects, sometimes hierarchical relations in society, and may cause the formation and widespread use of social ratings. In short, there is a tendency to delegate more and more tasks (Plebe and Perconti 2020) from the authorities to socio-technical systems. At present, such systems are actively implemented, for example in face recognition, location tracking systems, traffic control (e.g., Transparency Market Research 2020), imposition of fines, electronic registration, issuance of documents and many others that were previously the prerogative of the authorities.

The pandemic and the emerging need to control anti-epidemic measures have dramatically accelerated the development of such SSSs. In particular, electronic pass systems, control of movements, system of punishment, accounting systems, systems of businesses control and many other systems emerged as a result of the lockdowns and they can be considered as prototypes of SSSs and even drone monitoring (Lyon 2001; Morley et al. 2020; Ram and Gray 2020; Richards 2012; Wang et al. 2020) as well as electronic passports (COVID immunity passports) (Hasan et al. 2020; WHO 2020b; Leswing 2021), QR codes which are supposed to record all vaccinations (Barnes 2021), etc. Thus, the coronavirus pandemic has shown that the introduction of SSSs can become a fast developing process which will unfold within 10–20 years. In the future, one may expect that the development of the socio-technical self-regulating systems will proceed in different directions while continuing to develop in the field of medicine. For example, there may emerge systems for continuous monitoring of health and critical parameters of not only patients in hospitals but also of people staying home (Grinin L. and Grinin A. 2015), including chronically ailing and elderly people.

The need to monitor compliance with COVID-19 restrictions led to the fact that such technologies began to be actively implemented by the authorities. However, their introduction not only improved the control, but has also brought up some problems, for example connected to the techno-social ranking of people (this issue [but with reference to commercial companies] has been discussed for a long time [see, e.g., Lyon 2001]). Anyway, the positive aspects of SSSs are quite obvious, which is why they are spreading. SSSs in many different ways can significantly improve the social environment. 

However, such a rapid and uncontrolled implementation also carries serious risks. Obviously, there is a danger of increasing standardization of people and losing their individuality. One of the main problems is that over many decades people have become accustomed to freedom of behavior and this kind of regulations can cause and already are causing protests (Brennan 2020; Kowalewski 2020). As a result, SSSs can lead to the emergence of a considerable behavioral stratification in society, which will negatively affect its consolidation.

In general, it is not surprising that we observe a sharp increase in public and government anxiety and negative reaction on a part of a large sector of society (Brammer et al. 2020) and even massive protests against the COVID-19 restrictions. At the same time, we notice the division of society into groups caused by medical measures (Brennan 2020; Carothers and Press 2020; Kowalewski 2020; Gerstenfeld 2020), and cases of discrimination in relation to medical care, vaccines, etc.

So since 2020 there has been occurred a split society causing strong behavioral stratification, social tensions and turbulence. However, there may appear a large number of outsiders, that is, a mass of people who fail to fit into the rather strict requirements of the SSSs and electronic state. Besides, deviant behavior will increase, such as rejection of such demands (e.g., Kowalewski 2020).

The processes of active implementation of SSSs and other information and digital technologies, as described above combined with the COVID-19 restrictions, have intensified the role of the state, which, to a certain degree, is beginning to turn into an electronic/digital state (or e-state).

Consequently, societies and the World System received a strong impulse to move in the direction we have defined. However, such an accelerated progress of the technological wave and transformation of society can be quite painful, and inevitably causes and will continue to cause strong social and political tensions, protests and conflicts, while trust in governments may decline (Strandberg 2020; Vieten 2020). We witnessed this in 2020–2021 (Brennan 2020; Kowalewski 2020, whilst protests often take the form of violent clashes, occasionally intensifying (Carothers and Press 2020; ACLED 2020). We observe a return to the pre-pandemic logic of protest that underscores the depth of the crisis of power exposed by the COVID-19, during which inequality increased (Gerbaudo 2020). Therefore, it is important to study these kinds of social and political risks, which in some cases can lead a society to a deep crisis. Due to the negative impact of SSSs on violation of citizens' rights, at first, their expansion may cause additional growth of frustration, alienation and conflicts in society. We believe that due to the mutual adjustment of the SSSs and the mentality of society, the former will gradually improve, more and more adapting to the positions of different strata of society, until they reach the optimum. However, the process of adjustment of new socio-political institutions and technologies, as well as of the e-state, on the one hand, and the interests of various social strata, constitutional rights and freedoms, mentality, on the other, will be quite difficult (for the arguments in favor of increasing unrest see Reicher and Stott 2020). It is necessary to develop completely new laws that would optimize socio-technological interventions in people's lives, especially intrusion in their privacy. It takes a hard way through trial and error to move forward on the path to harmonizing technological process and social life.

So, in 2020–2022 we witnessed a huge social confrontation related to the compulsion to vaccinate against COVID and the unwillingness of a large part of society to obey this compulsion and restrictions. This confirmed our assumptions that already ‘in the nearest two decades before the beginning of the Cybernetic Revolution one can expect not only significant success in the field of biotechnologies, but also the intensity of social struggle and fierce competition between various forces’ (Grinin L. and Grinin A. 2015: 254). We have already mentioned that this intensity of struggle is related to two major trends characteristic of the modernization phase of the Industrial revolution, that is, of the period before the beginning of the final phase of the Cybernetic Revolution: 1) the wide spread of new technologies with their simultaneous improvement; 2) the increasing public opposition to many changes. Therefore, on the one hand, in the next 15–20 years we will observe a widespread introduction of biotechnologies in our lives; on the other hand, this will undoubtedly intensify social, diplomatic and economic struggle against changes in traditions, national characteristics, real or perceived harm, etc.

Snippet from his 2015 work "The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch
of Self-Regulating Systems. Pdf available

On the one hand, these(note:usa/eu) countries have the strongest democratic traditions, and on the other, the ethnocultural disproportion is also the most notable here (thus in the future, one can expect in the USA an opposition between the young Latin and elderly white population, while in Europe it will be be-tween young Islamic and elderly white Christian population). It means that the North–South divide will be reproduced in every country where the elderly indigenous people will live alongside with much younger al-ien population with different cultural traditions (Fukuyama 2002; on the
different education levels of indigenous people and ethnic migrants see Sarrazin 2010; Buchanan 2015).
The conflicts between generations in these countries caused by the above-described crisis of democracy will inevitably affect the destinies of the whole globalizing world.

[SaiGirl]

Pope prays to Governments for a Covid 19 Vaccine!
One world Christmas speech
26 Dec 2020

[rachel]

This is very important article from russian futuro/sociologist about real purposes of covid(whether virus was real or not, doesnt really matter) who works with wef, club of rome etc. Never mentioned in west or conspiracy land. Now we have face scanners on airports, russia and ukraine both launched digital-id:s in the middle of the "war". Eu already said 2026 and trump will likely bring up freedom-ID.

Consequently, societies and the World System received a strong impulse to move in the direction we have defined. However, such an accelerated progress of the technological wave and transformation of society can be quite painful, and inevitably causes and will continue to cause strong social and political tensions, protests and conflicts, while trust in governments may decline (Strandberg 2020; Vieten 2020). We witnessed this in 2020–2021 (Brennan 2020; Kowalewski 2020, whilst protests often take the form of violent clashes, occasionally intensifying (Carothers and Press 2020; ACLED 2020). We observe a return to the pre-pandemic logic of protest that underscores the depth of the crisis of power exposed by the COVID-19, during which inequality increased (Gerbaudo 2020). Therefore, it is important to study these kinds of social and political risks, which in some cases can lead a society to a deep crisis. Due to the negative impact of SSSs on violation of citizens' rights, at first, their expansion may cause additional growth of frustration, alienation and conflicts in society. We believe that due to the mutual adjustment of the SSSs and the mentality of society, the former will gradually improve, more and more adapting to the positions of different strata of society, until they reach the optimum. However, the process of adjustment of new socio-political institutions and technologies, as well as of the e-state, on the one hand, and the interests of various social strata, constitutional rights and freedoms, mentality, on the other, will be quite difficult (for the arguments in favor of increasing unrest see Reicher and Stott 2020). It is necessary to develop completely new laws that would optimize socio-technological interventions in people's lives, especially intrusion in their privacy. It takes a hard way through trial and error to move forward on the path to harmonizing technological process and social life.

So, in 2020–2022 we witnessed a huge social confrontation related to the compulsion to vaccinate against COVID and the unwillingness of a large part of society to obey this compulsion and restrictions. This confirmed our assumptions that already ‘in the nearest two decades before the beginning of the Cybernetic Revolution one can expect not only significant success in the field of biotechnologies, but also the intensity of social struggle and fierce competition between various forces’ (Grinin L. and Grinin A. 2015: 254). We have already mentioned that this intensity of struggle is related to two major trends characteristic of the modernization phase of the Industrial revolution, that is, of the period before the beginning of the final phase of the Cybernetic Revolution: 1) the wide spread of new technologies with their simultaneous improvement; 2) the increasing public opposition to many changes. Therefore, on the one hand, in the next 15–20 years we will observe a widespread introduction of biotechnologies in our lives; on the other hand, this will undoubtedly intensify social, diplomatic and economic struggle against changes in traditions, national characteristics, real or perceived harm, etc.

Take heart, this is more BEHAVIOURAL CHANGE propaganda from wonks...it talks as if it is already a done deal. But we see here it is lying about violent protests...the most violence we saw during the COVID restrictions were agent provocateurs pretending to be BLM supporters, purposely smashing up U.S. small businesses. ...We can therefore take that manipulation of facts as a measure for the honesty in the rest of the document.

[SaiGirl]

Genetic vaccines & PCR tests: Russia is ready for Disease X

Did you know that the head of China’s CDC recently said that “accelerating global climate change” and “expanding human activities” are increasing the likelihood of a Disease X Global Murder-Plague?

If Disease X is exclusively a Western Davos Pfizer scam, why is China warning that this hypothetical pox will ravage the globe unless we reverse “climate change” and put an end to “expanding human activities”? Curious minds want to know.

https://off-guardian.org/2024/03/20/gen ... disease-x/

[Johnston]

Genetic vaccines & PCR tests: Russia is ready for Disease X

Did you know that the head of China’s CDC recently said that “accelerating global climate change” and “expanding human activities” are increasing the likelihood of a Disease X Global Murder-Plague?

If Disease X is exclusively a Western Davos Pfizer scam, why is China warning that this hypothetical pox will ravage the globe unless we reverse “climate change” and put an end to “expanding human activities”? Curious minds want to know.

https://off-guardian.org/2024/03/20/gen ... disease-x/

It goes much deeper. Riley is most likely somekind of asset/gatekeeper. He is not allowed to talk on many topics.

Russia is all-in on ai-,nano-,biotechnologies and brain-interfaces in middle of the "war". Weapons and military are sideshow. Where are they purchasing all hardware for AI? I don't believe that there are any other options than USA based companies...

Russia carbon neutral 2060 approved october 2023 by Putin.
https://forumvostok.ru/en/news/v-rossii ... -doktrina/

Please check these. There is a lot of info, but you quickly see what riley won't tell his audience.

https://vigilantcitizenforums.com/threa ... ere.10576/
https://vigilantcitizenforums.com/threa ... e-3.11573/