The chemtrail conspiracy conclusion, apparently

General chatter that doesn't fit any forums below.
User avatar
dirtybenny
Posts: 1575
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2020 2:52 pm
Has thanked: 927 times
Been thanked: 734 times

"Chemtrail Planes"....a scientific study. Colin Bennett

Unread post by dirtybenny »

I have written many times in the past about my observation and interaction with "chemtrail planes"

My model is that they are not physical planes but visible manifestations of demonic energies in the realm. I had one over my front yard last week, aiming for my sun/sol/soul. I verbally said outloud, "You are nothing, don't even try to attack me with your tricks" several times. As soon as it bisected my sun/sol/soul, the "plane" and trail disappeared right before my eyes. I watch them with binoculars and the planes are nearly transparent.

https://dirtybennywrites.blogspot.com/2 ... -they.html

https://dirtybennywrites.blogspot.com/2 ... craft.html

https://dirtybennywrites.blogspot.com/2 ... -news.html

https://dirtybennywrites.blogspot.com/2 ... -bill.html
360_F_367748816_I1pdDKengaj7lvaDM9VkawTbSZhuIsSR.jpg
There was an article by Colin Bennett on chemtrails published in the January 19th, 2005 issue of Phenomena, a now-defunct online magazine that dealt with all sorts of odd things. Bennett was part of a team in Europe and the U.S. that were researching and observing the chemtrail aircraft.

They found that these planes, most of which (only superficially) resembled a Boeing 757, were measured moving at speeds of from 1200 to 1500 mph, well in excess of of that aircraft’s top speed and which velocity is in fact supersonic, although no sonic booms were ever heard. Their altitudes were measured as being generally between 40,000 and 50,000 feet. Additionally, when traced by multiple observers over distance, these planes were never seen to decrease altitude and land. Hundreds of them were observed to be airborne at once across the world.

After months of study, the conclusion the team came to was that these were an entirely paranormal phenomenon, similar to UFOs.


Chemtrails: What's Going On? Colin Bennett

The so-called "chemtrails" that are seen almost everywhere in the skies of the world are an incredible phenomenon of our time, if only because like UFO sightings, the broad span of social, political, and intellectual life of major nations largely ignores such things utterly. Even those with imagination (artists, playwrights, novelists, poets) ignore such anomalistic things as UFOs and chemtrails, even though they offer images, symbols, metaphors, intrigue, mysterious technology, and much more besides!

This changing of the skies of the world full previously of traditional pantomime clouds to a sky scored by lines of whitish-grey streaks is totally ignored by major news, media, and communication outlets. This is strange again given that the effects are quite spectacular and beautiful when lit by the evening sun. The trails spread out at different rates, they come from different angles, and the aircraft that create them can be seen streaking across the sky, often several at once, and at extremely high speeds.

The word "chemtrails" is used here for lack of a better word, but it is unlikely that what we see spreading out across the sky are chemicals of some sort. Such an amount of chemicals would surely have the most immediate and obvious effect on both our minds and environment. We would be pleased to hear from environmental groups who have more specialized knowledge about any kind of chemical/environmental approach.

Over the past year, the Combat Diaries team have conducted a special investigation of chemtrails over Britain. With the help of specialists (some ex Royal Air Force), we conducted a 16 hour period of observation by web, telephone, and amateur radio of the skies over America and Central Europe, from first light to last light, taking into account time differences. The results were quite disturbing. It was obvious that simultaneous operation by large numbers of quite visible aircraft were being mounted over continental areas on both sides of the Atlantic. Through contacts, we managed also to get reports on this selected same day from the civilian staff of merchant and cruise ships crossing the Atlantic. They reported that sky trails were visible whilst sailing in mid Atlantic.

Thus we concluded that chemtrails represent a continuous operation of incredible magnitude. The aircraft involved show remarkably similar characteristic and performance, though their profile we have yet to find in any book of aircraft recognition. Roughly, they resemble in shape and size the Boeing 757 (the type that crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11), but carried no markings. This is remarkable in itself, because technically it is illegal. Measured by range theodolite and ex-service hand-held rangefinders, they were doing approximately the same speed at the same height. The speed was steady, quite precisely maintained, being 1200-1400 mph. This is somewhat high for an outmoded passenger aircraft type, meant for inland short/medium range commuter flights at a top speed of 450 mph!

These things are wonders in themselves, but it is the sheer number of these pseudo 757-type aircraft that is beyond belief. On this chosen sample day, our reporters in France, Germany and Holland, Spain, Italy and Israel alone reported at noon the sky trails of no less that 234 almost identical aircraft at between 40-50,000 feet. Since this hourly rate continued during the day it represented some 2340 sorties over ten hours. Worldwide, multiplying the quite reasonable factor of 10, we have 23,400 sorties per day by planes of a non-military non-supersonic configuration, travelling at speeds equivalent to the combat speed of F16 or Typhoon Euro-fighter.

By comparison, NATO figures for annual full-scale exercises amount to something like 300 (jet supersonic) combat sorties at full stretch for the same time period, involving some no more than 150 aircraft. Again, the absence of reported noise is strange. Even a single Tornado on afterburner over central London would shake the population up considerably.

Since our observers at military and civilian airfields reported no such activity by any such aircraft, we have here a modern mystery in our skies visible to all on a clear day. National airspace regulations don't appear to be a problem at all with any country as far as these infringements are concerned.

This vast number of aircraft appear to have no detectable bases, they have no apparent air-refuelling needs, they do not carry drop tanks, and the routes appear to stretch across the sky from all compass points, often crossing one another on a pretty random basis. They appear also to have no detectible manufacturers, support base, or refuelling facilities. And they don't appear to land or take off! Again, since no air force in the world (not even the United States Air Force) has any supersonic transport aircraft, the presence of many hundreds of supersonic transport aircraft is rather strange!

The cost such of such visible operations on a worldwide basis by approximately the same type of powerful aircraft must be stupendous. The maintenance, fuelling, and repair facilities of such a great number of high-performance aircraft can only be imagined. The training schemes and accommodation of the personnel appear not to exist! Since no such numbers of this aircraft type are on manufacturer's lists, and the number that have been manufactured are all busy on conventional routes flying conventional passengers and cargo, we have here a true mystery of our time.

Where are they from, and what are they doing on their seemingly purposeless routes across the sky?

Investigations are continuing. We are trying, by various means to monitor their VHF, but they do not appear to have any measurable frequency signature and neither do they appear to make any physical noise. This again is amazing because the represent a very great number of aircraft that are entering and leaving (an indeed manoeuvring) inside national airspace at will, with no recognition signals, and no visible identification. Since they are supersonic, they are over the visible horizon in seconds (the comparatively lazy motion of a 400-mph 747 Jumbo may be compared to them). Where these many aircraft all break into Mach 1 is another mystery.

We have discovered something else that multiplies these astonishments. Using (passive) night scope infrared amplifiers, we found that the operations did not cease after nightfall!

This means that roughly speaking we can possibly multiply the scale of operations by a factor of two, bringing us into absurd realms as regards cost, maintenance, and purpose.

Our collective "not-seeing" is unusual if only because chemtrails are much more visible and more frequent than UFO visitations. We are forced to consider the idea that levels of conscious acceptance and recognition within a culture have often nothing to do with how much "evidence" is available. All anomalistic structures have this common peculiarity. Somehow, like a bioelectric switch, as a society we turn most anomalies "off" as far as social cognition is concerned. This is a most common effect. The phenomenon may be large or small, fantastic or mundane, it makes no difference. We cannot see the kitchen matchbox in front of us, say, because we are have been diverted into thinking about something else. We don't have enough RAM to hold all our files open at the same time!

From a Fortean point of view, the phenomenon of chemtrails might enable us to construct a new and healthier definition of what we mean by "skepticism." We might see skepticism not a revealing of mundane truth, so much as an automated control mechanism by means of which maintain a kind of wonder-management rather than differentiate fact from fiction. This was Charles Fort's original view of the function of skepticism. It puts "doubt" in a new dynamic context rather than it being seen as a depressing semi-automated denial of all that is wondrous and magical in the world.

Meantime, we are starting the long, hard road of corresponding with the appropriate civil and military authorities about chemtrails.

We can hear both Franz Kafka and Charles Fort laughing from their graves!

About the author:

Colin Bennett was born in Robin Hood’s Sherwood

Forest, within arrow-shot of the Sheriff of

Nottingham’s castle. He left school after studying

science and mathematics, became a professional

musician, then a mercenary soldier before winning a

scholarship to read English at Balliol College,

University of Oxford.

After leaving Oxford, he had several plays performed

on the professional stage in London including the

Royal Court Theatre before retraining as an

electronics engineer to cure what he calls “a bad dose

of left-liberal decadence.” After his reconstruction,

he then ran his own electronics consultancy and

printing firm. He has had two novels published, and

now lives within a spear-throw of Portobello Road,

London, and hopes he has done with reconstructions. He

is frequently consulted on security, conspiracies, and

computer hacking. He now heads a team who spend all

their time running the Combat Diaries web site at

http://www.combat-diaries.co.uk

His third biography is due out in March 2005. This is

An American Demonology (Head Press) the story of

Captain Edward Ruppelt, who headed Project Blue Book

in the early 1950s. This Project was the official

United States Air Force investigation into the UFO

phenomenon.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3882
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1371 times
Been thanked: 1659 times

Re: "Chemtrail Planes"....a scientific study. Colin Bennett

Unread post by rachel »

dirtybenny wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 8:09 pm Thus we concluded that chemtrails represent a continuous operation of incredible magnitude. The aircraft involved show remarkably similar characteristic and performance, though their profile we have yet to find in any book of aircraft recognition. Roughly, they resemble in shape and size the Boeing 757 (the type that crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11), but carried no markings. This is remarkable in itself, because technically it is illegal. Measured by range theodolite and ex-service hand-held rangefinders, they were doing approximately the same speed at the same height. The speed was steady, quite precisely maintained, being 1200-1400 mph. This is somewhat high for an outmoded passenger aircraft type, meant for inland short/medium range commuter flights at a top speed of 450 mph!

Do you think a plane crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11?
If not, you should see the 911 reference as a red flag. Because what the author appears to be doing is trying to use one set of unsubstantiated assertions to fill holes in an older set of unsubstantiated assertions.
Personally, that's enough for me to dismiss it. Because if I accept it, it follows I am agreeing to the idea one of those said planes was used to fly into the Pentagon......and that's exactly the way the opposition play this game.
User avatar
dirtybenny
Posts: 1575
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2020 2:52 pm
Has thanked: 927 times
Been thanked: 734 times

Re: The chemtrail conspiracy conclusion, apparently

Unread post by dirtybenny »

I do not believe a plane was flown into the Pentagon...but I do not see it as a red flag.
Nigel Tilbury
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2024 6:43 am
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: The chemtrail conspiracy conclusion, apparently

Unread post by Nigel Tilbury »

heretical1 wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 11:03 pm I've leaned towards Aaron Dover's take:


Thanks heretical1 for bringing a "Doveman thought" to the forum.

The late great Aaron Dover's work was never finished, on any of his topics. He wouldn't have stopped unless he was satisfied he was wrong or it was printed in an encyclopedia.

What if the randomness of Chem trails appearing or not appearing, is the amount of fuel being used in the jet engines.

If engine is capable to operate with little fuel, we see this cloud effect. If the weight of its load or the conditions, like lack of moisture in the air, cause it to operate on mostly combustion?

"Chem trail" is cruisin' and "No chem trail" is combustion emissions.

Are there any accepted or agreed upon reasons they do and don't happen?
Attachments
So, maybe the only video that shows up easily on mainstream platforms, to laugh at, should have a big fat asterisk?
So, maybe the only video that shows up easily on mainstream platforms, to laugh at, should have a big fat asterisk?
Also, when they are full of fuel.
Also, when they are full of fuel.
Nigel Tilbury
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2024 6:43 am
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: The chemtrail conspiracy conclusion, apparently

Unread post by Nigel Tilbury »

Helena wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2022 5:38 am I have an open mind on the possibility of chemtrails but I can honestly say I remember pure blue skies and fluffy white clouds without the endless streaking patterns I see now.

However, it’s all been put to bed now so nothing to see here because even if they did want to use them they couldn’t. https://metro.co.uk/2018/11/23/scientis ... g-8171211/


User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3882
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1371 times
Been thanked: 1659 times

Re: The chemtrail conspiracy conclusion, apparently

Unread post by rachel »

You know for the 'thought leaders' who keep saying "lets put particles into the air", respond to them, well let's go back to burning coal, because that puts particles into the air (factual statement).
napoleon
Posts: 3997
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 3:23 pm
Has thanked: 1719 times
Been thanked: 712 times

Re: The chemtrail conspiracy conclusion, apparently

Unread post by napoleon »

napoleon
Posts: 3997
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 3:23 pm
Has thanked: 1719 times
Been thanked: 712 times

Re: The chemtrail conspiracy conclusion, apparently

Unread post by napoleon »

not gonna lie to you .if i win the lottery ,im making this lotus
Post Reply