"Flat Earth" and Freemasonry

[rachel]

I have refrained from giving an opinion on Mike's crash because I've been in two minds about it. There are reasons to think he was in the rocket, and there are reasons to think he wasn't in the rocket. I do fancy he actually did complete the 2018 launch. But if we compare and contrast 2018 and 2020, we do see a few differenced between the rockets prior to launch.

Above are video frame grabs from each launch just before take off. We can clearly see Mike's white helmet in 2018, and this does move around up until launch. But there is a cut to a wider shot directly before take-off, so we don't know how much time passed between the two cuts...enough for him to get back out and be replaced by a crash dummy?

But the 2020 launch, Mike's head is mysteriously missing and the black area looks somewhat bigger. Could it be that's they just changed the design of the rocket? I'll come back to this.

Below, a series of grabs from the 2018 launch, with a couple of better resolution photos. The first one is before the top hatch is added, the second as he's taking off, we can see the white helmet with the hatch reducing the amount of black area.

This is a crop in on the second. Is there a head in that helmet? What we can tell is it is pushed right back in the cockpit, and we will see this contrasted in the images when the rocket is floating back to earth.

And that second crop in above is from the following image. And when the second parachute has been deployed Mike's head has moved more to the middle of the cockpit in the last photo.

It suggests to me that it is not a dummy, and together with Mike seeming quite serious about them not moving him too suddenly because he was worried he'd broken his back. I do fancy he was in the 2018 rocket.

[rachel]

But when it comes to the 2020 launch there seems to be some continuity problems.

This is Mike about to get into the rocket for the 2020 launch, we can match this with a frame from that second angle video I put up just before the last post. So even though it looks like he's wearing black in the video, we know it was his blue suit. We also have confirmation he's wearing a white helmet.

So, did the 2020 design hide his head? This is where we have some continuity problems. From a crop in of the video we seem to see the same sort of hatch design to 2018. And a second image shows what appears to be the same hole with blue sky showing through. We therefore should expect to see his head as we did in 2018.

Furthermore, the outside of the hatch is painted white, just like 2018. Now the below image is from an abandoned attempt, but it is confirmation of the paint scheme we should expect to see.

Interestingly, from the beginning of the last video I put up where Mile is preparing, he holds the hatch and it looks like a different design where his head wouldn't be sticking out. But again, if this is the one they did use, it's not black, we see it's painted white with a black circular logo on it.

[rachel]

So let's remind ourselves how the 2020 rocket looked as it took off. I'll use the second video, as it's nearer.

We are not seeing the white hatch, we are not seeing Mike's white helmet. I wondered if we are seeing the inside, but I don't think so. Looking at some of the other pictures, I think I know why the cockpit area is black. I think this is the clue.

I think Mike is not in there, and to hide the hole where his head should be they rapped the hatch in black tarpaulin, like is pictured above, then fastened it down. Interesting, the last thing Mike said on that video. "So, this launch right here had to happen to make the space launch happen."

Why did it have to happen? ...If for whatever reason (say word of COVID putting everything on hold for two years?) maybe the television show Mike was supposed to be in decided to cancel, this stunt wasn't part of that, but maybe it was deemed a good way to bring things to a conclusion. Who knows. But in the section of a report I posted up earlier, it stated.

...LATER ANALYSIS OF the wreckage would show that the launch apparatus Mike had put together caused the left side of the nozzle to rip free from the rocket when the water was released. Although some of the steam went through the nozzle, much of it escaped to the left, propelling the rocket to the right as it came off the launch rail. Waldo speculates that the violence of the shift knocked Mike unconscious. The rocket flew for 22 seconds after the last of the steam dissipated, but Mike never responded to radio communications. Two armed but unopened parachutes were still attached to the rocket when it came down...

Well if Mike wasn't in the rocket, we really wouldn't expect him to respond to radio communications, would we? ...So that statement although factually accurate, could equally be a lie of omission. And if he wasn't in the rocket, then there was no one to pull the second parachute on the way down. This fits the facts.

I do hope I'm correct in my conclusion.

[SaiGirl]

Background:
John Robison, professor of natural philosophy at the University of Edinburgh, was the author of Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe, Carried on in the Secret Meetings of Free Masons, Illuminati, and Reading Societies. The book was first published in 1797 and appeared in several editions by the end of the next year, including impressions in Philadelphia and New York
==========

Thomas Jefferson on “Adam Wishaupt” and the “Bavarian Illuminati”:

QUOTE
======================
Wishaupt seems to be an enthusiastic Philanthropist. he is among those (as you know the excellent Price and Priestly also are) who believe in the indefinite perfectibility of man. he thinks he may in time be rendered so perfect that he will be able to govern himself in every circumstance so as to injure none, to do all the good he can, to leave government no occasion to exercise their powers over him, & of course to render political government useless. this, you know is Godwin’s doctrine, and this is what Robinson, Barruel & Morse have called a conspiracy against all government. Wishaupt believes that to promote this perfection of the human character was the object of Jesus Christ. that his intention was simply to reinstate natural religion, & by diffusing the light of his morality, to teach us to govern ourselves. his precepts are the love of god & love of our neighbor. and by teaching innocence of conduct, he expected to place men in their natural state of liberty & equality. he says, no one ever laid a surer foundation for liberty than our grand master, Jesus of Nazareth. he believes the Freemasons were originally possessed of the true principles & object of Christianity, and have still preserved some of them by tradition, but much disfigured. the means he proposes to effect this improvement of human nature are ‘to enlighten men, to correct their morals & inspire them with benevolence. secure of our success, sais he, we abstain from violent commotions. to have foreseen the happiness of posterity & to have prepared it by irreproacheable means, suffices for our felicity. this tranquility of our consciences is not troubled by the reproach of aiming at the ruin or overthrow of states or thrones.’ as Wishaupt lived under the tyranny of a despot & priests, he knew that caution was necessary even in spreading information, and the principles of pure morality. he proposed therefore to lead the Freemasons to adopt this object, and to make the objects of their institution, the diffusion of1 science & virtue. he proposed to initiate new members into this body by gradations proportioned to his fears of the thunderbolts of tyranny. this has given an air of mystery to his views, was the foundation of his banishment & the subversion of the Masonic order, and is the colour for the ravings against him of Robinson, Barruel & Morse, whose real fears are that the craft would be endangered by the spreading of information reason & natural morality among men.—this subject being new to me, I have imagined that if it be so to you also, you may recieve the same satisfaction in seeing, which I have had in forming the Analysis of it: and I believe you will think with me that if Wishaupt had written here, where no secrecy is necessary in our endeavors to render men wise & virtuous, he would not have thought of any secret machinery for that purpose: as Godwin, if he had written in Germany, might probably also have thought secrecy & mystycism prudent.—I will say nothing to you on the late revolution of France, which is painfully interesting. perhaps when we know more of the circumstances which give rise to it, & the direction it will take, Buonaparte, it’s chief organ, may stand in a better light than at present.
==========================================================================
UNQUOTE

https://www.founders.archives.gov/docum ... 31-02-0297

Anti-Illuminatist narratives and the Presidential election of 1800:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/ ... ion-152934

Jefferson advertising for the return of a runaway slave.

https://encyclopediavirginia.org/346hpr ... 5eeba2ae2/

[SaiGirl]

The strange thing to consider is that freemasons (especially those of upper class or noble birth) were often on different "sides" in any given war or revolution.

The American war for independence boasted freemasons on both sides.
As did the French Revolution.
And the US "civil war".

However, freemasonry in general tended to favor radical or revolutionary movements towards republicanism and the abolition of absolute monarchy.
Freemasonry's views on slavery also seem divided.



It might be worth exploring those treaties and settlements that ended these conflicts; as negotiated arrangements amongst elite freemasons who shared certain common interests.

Perhaps the initiation and continuation of "conflict management" is a specialty among them.

[SaiGirl]

Freemasonry was always in the crosshairs of the NSDAP.
For some rather ironic reasons.

Alfred Rosenberg, along with his NSDAP associates from the old “Thule Society” and “Ostara” magazine; harbored a lifelong fascination, obsession and suspicion of freemasonry; and especially of the French freemasons for their central role in the founding of the “Third Republic” and their close identification with liberalism.

Third Reich policy toward historic European freemasonry and the latter’s republican legacy was separate and distinct from its policies towards European Jewry; yet bore close similarities.

[SaiGirl]

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the IMF and freemasonry:
A media storm, for a while.

Here’s a scandal that is now almost completely forgotten.

On 14 May 2011, IMF Chairman Dominique Strauss-Kahn was arrested and charged with the sexual assault and attempted rape of 32-year-old Nafissatou Diallo, a housekeeper at the Sofitel New York Hotel in the Manhattan borough earlier that day.

https://time.com/3919026/strauss-kahn-acquitted-lost/

A small scandal here in the US, for about a week.
But a much larger and more consequential scandal in France at the time; since its central character could easily have been the next President of the Republic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_Strauss-Kahn

You can skip Bloomberg with their stupid paywall.
But you can get the spin just from their sensationalist headline.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ill-feared
=============================

More:

QUOTE
==============
Sophie Coignard covers the Mason beat at Le Point magazine and wrote the book “A State Within A State”.
“Most of the Masons I know are hyper-honest,” says Coignard.
“But it’s also fair to say that in most of the big financial-political scandals of the past 20 years, you’ll find Freemasons.”
Coignard ticks off the Elf-Aquitaine African bribery scandal, the Paris housing projects scandal in the 1990s, and now the Carlton affair—an ongoing investigation of a prostitution ring in Lille.
“They’re mostly all Masons,” says Coignard of the Carlton’s ringleaders (Dominique Strauss-Kahn, also embroiled in the Carlton affair, is not a Mason.)
The solution, says journalist and author Eric Giacometti, is for French Masons to come out of the closet. It would help them clean house, and it would take the fun out of trying to peek through the closet keyhole.
====================
UNQUOTE

https://njlore1786.com/images/trestlebo ... ne2012.pdf

The statement above made by that “njlore” author about Strauss-Kahn is a deliberate deception.
Whether technically correct or not, it is misleading as hell because …..

======================================================================
QUOTE
==========
Strauss-Kahn was born in the wealthy Paris suburb of Neuilly-sur-Seine, Hauts-de-Seine. He is the son of Gilbert Strauss-Kahn, a lawyer, who specialised in tax law, and member of the Grand Orient de France, and journalist Jacqueline Fellus. Strauss-Kahn's father was born to an Alsatian Jewish father and a Catholic mother from Lorraine; Strauss-Kahn's mother is from a Sephardic Jewish family in Tunisia.
==============
https://en.geneastar.org/genealogy/stra ... rauss-kahn


So his FATHER was a mason but he’s not????

==============================================
Perhaps the following detail is completely unrelated.
The hotel chamber maid who accused Strauss-Kahn bears the same last name (“Diallo”) as the victim of a “police shooting” back in 1999, that became a major media story and cause for Rev. Al Sharpton’s campaign against “racist police brutality”.

I have no idea how common the surname of “Diallo” is in west Africa.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Amadou_Diallo