The United Nations

[napoleon]

thats good ,cheered me up
even insurrection or revolution falls under the system and is expected


men are easily governed
ohh that could be taken both ways ,as a reason or an excuse
trouble is everyones getting paid .
well not everyone

otherwise id type more ,the paid pussies get paid by the letter for shilling


yes cheered me up rachel thanks

i think im gonna have to disect depps pirate movies ,they are full of clues

[rachel]

[rachel]

https://x.com/CarlTeichrib/status/1805730060365688834

On the notion of global management for a green future... from the Oct 17-20, 1990 stakeholder conference in Winnipeg, leading up to the UN Earth Summit. No thank you...

"Perhaps we will find that there is no other alternative to a system of rigid controls that some would equate to a police state. Unfortunately, in order to save the planet from biocide, there have to be very powerful constraints from doing the ‘wrong’ things. The constraints must transcend national boundaries, be world-around and enforceable. There would be a need for an agency for preventing eco-vandals from acting unilaterally. Enforcement agencies would need the power to act without being invited by the offending nation. Therefore, there needs to be an agency that is acceptable to all nation states on the planet. We can probably accept the fact that there will always be one or more nations that will not go along but there must be effective sanctions in place. If sanctions do not work, then physical occupation and the installation of a World Trusteeship would be imposed upon the offending nations."

- WEEEC report, p.15 (report title, "Sustainable Development for a New World Agenda").

[pasterno]

GLYmcWhakAAH6H4.jpg

Just a new unified religion. It's a class of fake priests doing the work of the devil.

[SaiGirl]

How the monolithic global metascript spins out subordinate scripts to reinforce the illusion of polycentrism.

https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-time- ... s-hit-iran

[rachel]

Twitter post by Carl Teichrib about the UN...more taxes. It's what killed Rome the first time around, and will kill it stone dead this time.

https://x.com/CarlTeichrib/status/1838233031468806624

Today is the last official day of the United Nations Summit of the Future. I was hoping to attend in person, as it's a development I've been following closely since 2021 when the World Federalist community started discussing what this should look like (at the time it was expected the Summit would take place in 2023). Alas I couldn't go, but I've keep my finger on its pulse.

So as of yesterday, the Summit's main document was released to the public: "Pact for the Future," paving the way for the UN's next iteration.

One thing missing from the report which was heavily pushed by the NGO community: There's no specific mention of a UN Parliamentary Assembly, an idea that has been long in circulation. However, the report does stress a number of points that were highlighted at NGO preparatory meetings, including combating "disinformation, misinformation, hate speech and content inciting harm, including content disseminated through digital platforms."

The bottom line: this Summit is meant to be a turning point for global governance, giving the international community new tools and committing to strengthening existing global structures. In lockstep with this, the role of youth and young people are highlighted.

Here's the link to the final document:
https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/fil ... dopted.pdf

And here's a briefing I wrote earlier on developments leading up to the Summit:

-------------
Briefing: Visions for the Future
By Carl Teichrib

With much anticipation, national delegates and members of accredited organizations will meet in New York City to recast the United Nations. Titled the Summit of the Future, this two-day event (September 22-23) will be a deliberation over how the world body should move forward. In the face of crisis – wars and rumors of wars, economic downturns, social unrest – how can the UN be refashioned into an effective system of global governance?

As the revised draft of The Pact of the Future, the Summit’s core document, states, “Our challenges are deeply interconnected and far exceed the capacity of any single State alone. They can only be addressed collectively…”

This is the heartbeat of the Summit; to muster collective action at the global level, over-and-above the capacity of any single nation. Thus, the United Nations must be reformed to meet these international challenges, so goes the thinking.

To that end, almost 60 action points are laid out in their working document, areas of agreement to be committed upon by national representatives. Here are a few examples from the draft:

• “Plan for the future and strengthen our collective efforts to turbocharge the full implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by 2030 and beyond.”
• “Fulfil our commitment to comply with the decisions of the International Court of Justice in any case to which our State is a party.”
• “Address the challenges posed to international peace and security by adverse climate and environmental impacts.”
• “Support the Secretary-General to strengthen the United Nations’ role in science, technology and innovation.”
• “Strengthen the United Nations system.”
• “Accelerate the reform of the international financial architecture so that it can meet the challenge of climate change.”
• “Strengthen the governance of outer space to foster its peaceful, safe, and sustainable uses for the benefit of all humanity.”

These goals carry a level of vagueness, leaving the reader to wonder how such broad ideas will be implemented. To that end, the draft offers pages of recommendations, including taxation coordination between member countries and exploring “options for international cooperation on the taxation of high net-worth individuals.” Promoting universal health coverage to support poverty eradication and “build trust” is another recommendation. In a different section of the document, interreligious dialogue is advised to “strengthen social cohesion and contribute to sustainable development.”

From “global economic governance” to supporting indigenous spiritual culture to tightening the relationship between the UN and regional authorities, the list of recommendations and proposals is long. The bottom line: the UN desires to be empowered, and in turn, to manage a range of complex issues at the global level. Supporters have dubbed it UN 2.0.

“A transformation in global governance is essential to ensure that the positive progress we have seen across all three pillars [sustainable development, peace and security, and global digitization] of the United Nations’ work in recent decades does not unravel,” the draft document explains. “We will not allow this to happen.”

But like all other UN summits, there’s more to the picture. An extensive preparation process precedes the main event, and it’s within this domain that a fuller vision emerges – dreams of what “could be,” and ideas that may be realized some other time. Actors in this process involve special interest groups, non-governmental organizations, academic associations, and international institutions. Conferences take place – both within and outside the UN system – reports are compiled and published, and momentum is generated as these different players stretch the boundaries and push the agenda forward.

Here are a few examples.

Vatican: On March 4-5, the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences hosted a workshop on the Summit of the Future, with participation from the Muslim Council of Elders, regional and global banking representatives (Inter-American Development Bank, World Bank, African Development Bank), former and current UN officials, governmental ministers, and academic experts. As the workshop agenda book describes it, “At the very heart of Pope Francis’s messages in the past decade has been the urgent need for a strengthened multilateralism to address the growing ecological and social crises of our age.”

Reiterating the Pope’s desire from his encyclical Laudato Si’, the Pontifical Academy emphasized, “Interdependence obliges us to think of one world with a common plan."

Although published texts from this event do not appear to be publicly available, what is known is that the workshop recognized the changing multipolar reality – that the Western world is declining as other powers arise – and that the United Nations will need to be reinvigorated to meet planetary challenges.

Climate Governance Commission (CGC): The CGC is a working group attached to a larger body known as the Global Governance Forum (GGF). Bringing together world thought-leaders and policymakers, and linking with organizations like the Stimson Center and Citizens for Global Solutions (formerly the World Federalist Association), the CGC/GGF puts forward recommendations for the next level of global management.

In 2023 the CGC issued a report titled Governing Our Planetary Emergency, paid in-part by the Rockefeller Foundation, which examined the climate change agenda in the light of future governance. Moreover, the report specifically highlighted the Summit of the Future, along with other UN events, as a milestone “to move the planet through a swift and just global transition.”

Here are a few suggestions from Governing Our Planetary Emergency:

• Establish a Global Environment Agency “to serve as the central node for climate, and for general global environmental/Earth system governance.”
• Establish an International Court for the Environment, which would work alongside the Global Environment Agency.
• Develop an international law for the Anthropocene, that is, a framework of law designed around the total Earth/Human relationship: that the “planet operates as a single, integrated system, and as such, should be legally recognised as an international common good.” National sovereignty would thus be subject to a framework that first acknowledges global interdependence.
• Reform the global financial architecture “to ensure that the financial system pursues climate, Planetary Boundary, and development goals in parallel.” Such a restructuring would compel private companies to partner with governments and align their productivity and profits with planetary goals, as set by the international community.
• Creation of United Nations Parliamentary Assembly that “could be strengthened over time to become a world parliamentary body, much as the Common Assembly of the European Coal and Steel Community evolved into the European Parliament.”
• Funding for the United Nations: If the UN is to become the primary mechanism to manage Earth, then it will need its own funding. With that in mind, the CGC recommends a global value-added tax or a fee on international monetary transactions, with the money collected being allocated to the UN.

Foundation for European Progressive Studies: FEPS is a progressive-left think tank that works with other policy groups and high-level European Union actors. This year, in anticipation of the Summit of the Future, FEPS released its collaborative publication, A New Global Deal: Reforming World Governance. It recommended the following:

• Give the UN General Assembly new powers, allowing it to pass resolutions on conflicts without waiting for Security Council approval.
• Upgrading the UN Economic and Security Council to becoming an Executive Council, thus making it operational to deal with non-military challenges at the international level.
• Create a Global Resilience Council that could bring together all necessary UN agencies and stakeholders, and then coordinate responses to crisis situations.
• Reform the Security Council so that veto power does not remain locked within a few countries. At this time, if the United States or China or England decide to veto a resolution, then the motion is effectively stopped. This has been a sore point for many in the international community, and so the report recommends changing the veto system, raising the voting threshold, and possibly adding new nations with veto powers.
• Establish a UN Environment Agency “with supranational and binding authority.”

Other suggestions include giving the Secretary General greater autonomy and establishing an emergency platform to deal with global shocks, like Covid-19. It also recommended the creation of UN Parliamentary Assembly and the empowerment of the International Court of Justice, which “should play a central role in the architecture of a reformed global governance system.”

However, an interesting point was made about regional organizations and other international groups. Entities like the European Union, African Union and other regional bodies – along with outfits like the G7, G20 and BRICS – encompass a wider community, and these groups should be tied into the UN system.

Other organizations have put forward ideas for the UN Summit to consider. Some of these goals will remain as ideas only, fading away in time. Others will percolate before being reconsidered in the future. In fact, many of these ideas – like the creation of a UN Parliamentary Assembly – have been deliberated and discussed for years. At some point adoption is bound to take place; and that is the point of continual pushing, for it builds momentum towards an achievable goal.

And what is the goal? Enforceable global management: to move past the present world order wherein nations voluntarily align with global agendas and move towards a system of planetary authority. But that’s not a surprise. It’s a vision that has been pushed and pushed and pushed, by Popes and political priests and global pundits, and it is being pushed once again.

[rachel]

Plastic face Liberal John Kerry doesn't like the American First Amendment since people have started seeing past state propaganda.

"Our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to hammer [disinformation] out of existence. What we need is to win...the right to govern by hopefully winning enough votes that you’re free to be able to implement change."

No thanks.

There's a very narrow way to interpret his statement as not a desire to overturn or disregard the First Amendment, but when his party has been routinely trying to censor Americans, I'm unwilling to bend over backwards to interpret his words charitably.

Article:
https://www.shorenewsnetwork.com/2024/0 ... overnment/

Former Secretary of State John Kerry has drawn attention with remarks that some critics interpret as a critique of the First Amendment and its protections of free speech. During a recent discussion, Kerry voiced concerns about the role of social media in shaping public discourse and the challenges it creates for democratic governance.

Kerry lamented the difficulty of building consensus in today’s political climate, attributing much of the problem to the decline of traditional fact-checking institutions and the rise of self-selected media consumption. “The referees we used to have to determine what’s a fact and what isn’t a fact, they’ve been eviscerated,” Kerry said, adding that the First Amendment poses a “major block” to curbing misinformation from certain media outlets.

He said:

I think the dislike of and anguish over social media is just growing and growing and growing. It’s part of our problem, particularly in democracies, in terms of building consensus around any issue. It’s really hard to govern today. The referees we used to have to determine what’s a fact and what isn’t a fact, they’ve been eviscerated to a certain degree. People go and then people self-select where they go for their news or for their information, and then you just get into a vicious cycle. It’s really, really hard, much harder to build consensus today than at any time in the ’45s For 50 years, I’ve been involved in this. There’s a lot of discussion now about how you curb those entities in order to guarantee that you’re going to have some accountability on facts, et cetera. But look, if people go to only one source, and the source they go to is sick and has an agenda, and they’re putting out this information, our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to just hammer it out of existence. So what you need, what we need, is to win the ground, win the right to govern by, hopefully, winning enough votes that you’re free to be able to implement change.

-John Kerry

How about stop lying about things like the climate and viruses and NASA and that hairstyle of yours, John?

[SaiGirl]

This guys's face kind of freaks me out.

[SaiGirl]

Hey!
Remember Michelle Obama talking about what an impediment the 2nd Amendment was to our safety and security?



That was totally prepared and scripted for her.

Likewise, they have now sent out John Kerry to boost their campaign against the 1st Amendment.

But look at the social media "blowback" reaction from this.
Have they been too bold and aggressive ?

Are they simply taking the temperature and measuring the degree of response?
Is this more "urge overkill" from the planners at the WEF?

Was their true target the population of Europe and the Third World, which is now supposed to regard America's "republic" as a data point "outlier", out of step with the "rest" of the world?
Are we really living through a serious effort to render the nation state irrelevant everywhere, as new global rules and institutions take over?

This is why I suspect that the fakeologist movement has scored significant victories over the past year, and may yet grow into a major threat against the fake “power elite” and their flunkies.

They all seem to be frantically scrambling to “catch up” and stay ahead of the “public opinion” media curve.
That’s how they are forced to address things they’d rather not talk about.
But they too must issue marching orders and set priorities for their programmed cult followers.

[SaiGirl]

Are they simply taking the temperature and measuring the degree of response?
Is this more "urge overkill" from the planners at the WEF?

They all seem to be frantically scrambling to “catch up” and stay ahead of the “public opinion” media curve.
That’s how they are forced to address things they’d rather not talk about.
But they too must issue marching orders and set priorities for their programmed cult followers.