Anyway, if one looks at enough of these and you start seeing a formulaic pattern. The pictures of Daniel Morgan look staged, so likely it's a cover for something else. I'd need to spend more time on it to have a clue. But regarding Leveson, I've mentioned this before, so I'll quote myself.
I think the phone hacking scandal did exactly what they wanted it to do. It wasn't about creating laws; they wanted to set up a club that isn't enforceable by law. Instead you pay a yearly fee to be a member of the club and abide by its rules...sounds a bit like the Bar Association. The main point of the club is so they can exclude people from the said club. Without paying the fees to get the card that says "I am a journalist", a person cannot be classed as a journalist, and therefore won't get access to areas reserved for journalists. With the deception they run, they can't let anyone real get anywhere near the likes of David Cameron or Rishi Sunak, in case they clock there is something wrong with their face.rachel wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 3:58 pm As soon as I put our side, I did think what do I mean by that? ...I guess people who end up being on the receiving end of the bollocks all this stuff apparently justifies. Indeed it is interesting where this is going, I would say it's a continuation of the phone hacking scandal.
The point of that seemed to be to Ofcom the media and create a differentiation between the regulated media and independents. From that, only regulated media gets invites to government press briefings. Do you remember Call me Dave and his crossing the Rubicon speech.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/ ... -press-lawLeveson report: David Cameron refuses to 'cross Rubicon' and write press law
29 November 2012, The Guardian
David Cameron found himself accused of betrayal by the victims of phone hacking and isolated from his coalition partners when he took the gamble of opposing Lord Justice Leveson's proposal to underpin a new independent press regulator with legislation.
Unveiling his 2,000-page report, the judge insisted the move was an essential to end "a culture of reckless and outrageous journalism".
But after agonising for 24 hours since he received the report of the inquiry set up by him 16 months ago, Cameron said he had "serious concerns and misgivings" in principle to any statutory interference in the media. He warned: "It would mean for the first time we have crossed the Rubicon of writing elements of press regulation into law of the land."
Cameron argued: "We should think very very carefully before crossing this line," warning that parliament for centuries had seen its role as a bulwark of democracy. "We should be wary of any legislation that has the potential to infringe free speech and the free press."
See Cameron is on the very end of the stage, that's the 2015 General Election declaration for Witney. Everyone had taken their places, then David Cameron appeared from a side location surrounded by people. Then as soon as he took his place, the guy in front called the result. He won, then went to the front to make his speech...but look at the setup, they designed the stage so the podium is on a ramp set off to one side. That's so Cameron doesn't have to pass any of the other candidates to get to the podium. And next to him it looks to be Labour, that figures, he would have been in on the game. Do we think there was any chance at all, going by that room design, they expected anyone to win other than David Cameron?
---------------
Just to circle back to George Entwistle and his massive payoff.
rachel wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2024 5:22 pm It kind of confirms these two [Peter Rippon and George Entwistle] were put in post specifically for this claimed "worst crisis” to hit the BBC for at least 50 years. And what was the crisis? To not want to run a hear-say story about Jimmy Savile.
A little bit from wiki about George Entwistle, suggesting it was actually the UK Government that was the source of the story. And in October 2012, that would have been the yellow and blue Coalition under David Cameron and Nick Clegg...
...And just to finish off with a possible real crime...
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/g ... ff-1431456
Everywhere you look with these guys, it's fraud. Taking a second look at that Entwistle photo, the forehead and teeth are a give away he's a plastic face. And then I thought, I do think that face is familiar. So I pulled up a video to take a better look, and bingo.
George Entwistle's resignation statement in full
Brexit: David Cameron resigns as UK votes to leave
I don't know if this is an easy spot for other people, but it's when he's looking down, and I think it's easier to see in movement. ...In fact, I was thinking about that Daily Mirror article. I suspect the people responsible for putting it together deliberately chose a frame from the Liz MacKean interview that was the biggest tell the person we were looking at was Jill Dando. And not only that, in response, the people on Team Cameron then put out a story that Jill Dando was working on the Savile case before her death. The reason, so people like me, who saw the photo and assumed it was Jill Dando looking a bit rough, would think nothing more about it and move on.
Here's a couple of gifs to help you see what I'm seeing.
- George Entwistle.gif (5.26 MiB) Viewed 822 times
- David Cameron.gif (6.62 MiB) Viewed 822 times
And here's a couple of stills. Considering there are three different versions of this video available when one does a search, it's amazing how difficult it was to get a clear screen grab without proportion distortion or fuzzy low resolution. I suggest that's not by chance.
It gets better though. I quoted myself using the Cameron nickname Call-Me-Dave. It's something that Andrew Neil used to use, but I don't know the original reference. I'm beginning to think this might be the actual reference...