It's The Muppet Show!

[rachel]

I had to remind myself of the Daniel Morgan case, it's not something I've looked at. Before coming to Fakeologist, I used to like spending Sunday mornings looking up old news stories. I never posted anything anywhere, and a lot of it, I didn't save. Like I know, most likely from an FOI request, all the proper papers were signed for Grenfell Tower to be demolished...and then they apparently cancelled the demolition and were given a shed load of money to refurbish it...did they really refurbish, or was that another scam? Lily Allen being spokesperson for the victims kind of answers that question for me.

Anyway, if one looks at enough of these and you start seeing a formulaic pattern. The pictures of Daniel Morgan look staged, so likely it's a cover for something else. I'd need to spend more time on it to have a clue. But regarding Leveson, I've mentioned this before, so I'll quote myself.

As soon as I put our side, I did think what do I mean by that? ...I guess people who end up being on the receiving end of the bollocks all this stuff apparently justifies. Indeed it is interesting where this is going, I would say it's a continuation of the phone hacking scandal.

The point of that seemed to be to Ofcom the media and create a differentiation between the regulated media and independents. From that, only regulated media gets invites to government press briefings. Do you remember Call me Dave and his crossing the Rubicon speech.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/ ... -press-law

Leveson report: David Cameron refuses to 'cross Rubicon' and write press law
29 November 2012, The Guardian

David Cameron found himself accused of betrayal by the victims of phone hacking and isolated from his coalition partners when he took the gamble of opposing Lord Justice Leveson's proposal to underpin a new independent press regulator with legislation.

Unveiling his 2,000-page report, the judge insisted the move was an essential to end "a culture of reckless and outrageous journalism".

But after agonising for 24 hours since he received the report of the inquiry set up by him 16 months ago, Cameron said he had "serious concerns and misgivings" in principle to any statutory interference in the media. He warned: "It would mean for the first time we have crossed the Rubicon of writing elements of press regulation into law of the land."

Cameron argued: "We should think very very carefully before crossing this line," warning that parliament for centuries had seen its role as a bulwark of democracy. "We should be wary of any legislation that has the potential to infringe free speech and the free press."

I think the phone hacking scandal did exactly what they wanted it to do. It wasn't about creating laws; they wanted to set up a club that isn't enforceable by law. Instead you pay a yearly fee to be a member of the club and abide by its rules...sounds a bit like the Bar Association. The main point of the club is so they can exclude people from the said club. Without paying the fees to get the card that says "I am a journalist", a person cannot be classed as a journalist, and therefore won't get access to areas reserved for journalists. With the deception they run, they can't let anyone real get anywhere near the likes of David Cameron or Rishi Sunak, in case they clock there is something wrong with their face.



See Cameron is on the very end of the stage, that's the 2015 General Election declaration for Witney. Everyone had taken their places, then David Cameron appeared from a side location surrounded by people. Then as soon as he took his place, the guy in front called the result. He won, then went to the front to make his speech...but look at the setup, they designed the stage so the podium is on a ramp set off to one side. That's so Cameron doesn't have to pass any of the other candidates to get to the podium. And next to him it looks to be Labour, that figures, he would have been in on the game. Do we think there was any chance at all, going by that room design, they expected anyone to win other than David Cameron?

---------------

Just to circle back to George Entwistle and his massive payoff.

It kind of confirms these two [Peter Rippon and George Entwistle] were put in post specifically for this claimed "worst crisis” to hit the BBC for at least 50 years. And what was the crisis? To not want to run a hear-say story about Jimmy Savile.

A little bit from wiki about George Entwistle, suggesting it was actually the UK Government that was the source of the story. And in October 2012, that would have been the yellow and blue Coalition under David Cameron and Nick Clegg...

...And just to finish off with a possible real crime...

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/g ... ff-1431456

Everywhere you look with these guys, it's fraud. Taking a second look at that Entwistle photo, the forehead and teeth are a give away he's a plastic face. And then I thought, I do think that face is familiar. So I pulled up a video to take a better look, and bingo.

George Entwistle's resignation statement in full


Brexit: David Cameron resigns as UK votes to leave


I don't know if this is an easy spot for other people, but it's when he's looking down, and I think it's easier to see in movement. ...In fact, I was thinking about that Daily Mirror article. I suspect the people responsible for putting it together deliberately chose a frame from the Liz MacKean interview that was the biggest tell the person we were looking at was Jill Dando. And not only that, in response, the people on Team Cameron then put out a story that Jill Dando was working on the Savile case before her death. The reason, so people like me, who saw the photo and assumed it was Jill Dando looking a bit rough, would think nothing more about it and move on.

Here's a couple of gifs to help you see what I'm seeing.

George Entwistle.gif (5.26 MiB) Viewed 2320 times

David Cameron.gif (6.62 MiB) Viewed 2320 times

And here's a couple of stills. Considering there are three different versions of this video available when one does a search, it's amazing how difficult it was to get a clear screen grab without proportion distortion or fuzzy low resolution. I suggest that's not by chance.

It gets better though. I quoted myself using the Cameron nickname Call-Me-Dave. It's something that Andrew Neil used to use, but I don't know the original reference. I'm beginning to think this might be the actual reference...

[rachel]

Let's have a short interlude from a former Prime Minister to a current one. And this is getting to be like shooting fish in a barrel.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdenx2p32jxo

Sue Gray has quit her role as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's chief of staff, saying she "risked becoming a distraction".

She had been caught up in rows over pay, after the BBC's political editor revealed her salary was higher than Sir Keir's, and donations from Lord Waheed Alli.

A Downing Street spokeswoman confirmed Ms Gray, who became a household name as the Partygate investigator, was taking up a new role as the prime minister's envoy for nations and regions.

Labour said Ms Gray would be replaced by Morgan McSweeney, who was previously chief adviser to the prime minister and masterminded Labour’s election campaign.

Apparently Gray’s salary was leaked last month as £170,000 - more than PM Starmer's £167,000. Oh guess what, she's part of the let's-not-talk-about-the-actual-COVID-criminality PARTYGATE distraction.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59979023

Former senior civil servant Sue Gray, who became a household name as the Partygate investigator, has been cleared to take up a job with Labour from September.

Ms Gray's critical report into lockdown gatherings in Downing Street prompted numerous Conservative MPs to call on Boris Johnson to resign and contributed to his downfall last year.

Some Tory MPs have expressed anger at the job offer to Ms Gray, with allies of the former prime minister saying it undermines her report.

The independent Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) has recommended a six-month break from when she quit as an official in March.

But the government is expected to rule Ms Gray broke civil service rules by failing to declare her contact with Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer while still in her former role.

Having worked in the civil service since 1970s, Ms Gray has vast experience of government and would be useful to Sir Keir, who along with many in his shadow cabinet, has never held a ministerial position.

She's clearly not grey enough...

Sue Gray

Frances O’Grady

And I've flagged Baroness O'Grady of Upper Holloway before, General Secretary of the British Trades Union Congress (TUC) from 2013 to 2022 and currently a Non-executive Director at the Bank of England.

sue-gray.gif (2.97 MiB) Viewed 2226 times

frances-ogrady.gif (4.6 MiB) Viewed 2226 times

And it becomes clear why the UK is swirling down the pan with ever more taxes, because we've had the same bunch of incompetent meddlers in charge since John Major came to power.

Looking back at the following article and pictures from the 2009 protests, it seems clear there was nothing organic about it. Unions are used to bring people for whatever con the globalists want to pull off. They provide free buses and signage for protestors, how else would they get people to turn up? And this is how cosy union leaders are with the establishment.

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/about/p ... /biography

That term at the Bank of England has since been renewed. Small world.




Cabaret | "Money" Musical Number

[Jeremy]

Gray = O'Grady seems a lock. Funny how it's done even with little characters. That actor in Cabaret played Joseph Goebbels of WW2.

[rachel]

Good spot @Jeremy, I didn't even catch it in the name. I'm amazed how blind I am to a lot of this stuff even though I have some good clues what to look for.

I didn't know if I'd given too little, as I just saw a tweet about the resignation and I instantly recognised something about her. I've watched Frances O’Grady give a number of speeches/interviews, she's got a Liverpool accent, maybe Wirral. But, is it real, as Gray is said to be from Wales.

With all these people, you've got to kind of ignore the eyebrows and the hairstyle....And, what can we do other than take the piss out of them?

[rachel]

To not go into more irrelevant detail in the Richard D Hall thread, I'll put this here. Back before Call-Me-Dave was Prime Minister, Richard apparently went to one of his question and answer sessions, to put questions about UFOs to him. Big Society Dave selects him to ask a question. Given I now don't believe David Cameron has appeared anywhere that isn't a closed shop, this throwback from January 2009 is quite interesting. I would suggest its groundwork for the big 2025 alien reveal, see here for the Alice A Bailey quote.


David Cameron answers question about UFO secrecy


UK Government Questioned on UFOs



Richplanet.net Letters : David Cameron MP
https://web.archive.org/web/20100205134 ... bindex=172

Following David Cameron's answer to my question about UFOs, I thought it would make sense to write to him - to ask if he would take part in a TV discussion.

Perhaps he will agree to an interview during the election campaign which could begin any time soon.

The reply ...

Having had a personal reply I thought we should remind David Cameron about his promise. As he is not yet Prime Minister, this is a good chance to give him some knowledge before any government advisors attempt to lie to him, which may well happen when he gets in power.

We received a post card acknowledging this letter.

In fact, to make the 1957 Alice A Bailey quotes searchable, I'll copy them here - it comes from this Walter Veith video where he discussed it.

Thus a great and new movement is proceeding and a tremendously increased interplay and interaction is taking place. This will go on until A.D. 2025. During the years intervening between now and then very great changes will be seen taking place, and at the great General Assembly of the Hierarchy- held as usual every century-in 2025 the date in all probability will be set for the first stage of the externalisation of the Hierarchy. The present cycle (from now until that date) is called technically "The Stage of the Forerunner". It is preparatory in nature, testing in its methods, and intended to be revelatory in its techniques and results. You can see therefore that Chohans, Masters, initiates, world disciples, disciples and aspirants affiliated with the Hierarchy are all at this time passing through a cycle of great activity.

---------

Today, human beings as a whole are so loudly invocative that the entire trend of the life of the Hierarchy and Its plans to date have been subjected to change, to postponement as far as certain interior and purely hierarchical determinations are concerned, and to a hastening of certain plans which were slated (if I may use such a word) to take place several centuries later than this but which—owing to the unexpected preparedness of humanity—can take place, not prematurely really, but securely and in the fullness of time; this fullness of time, as regards the particular planning with which we are dealing, is from now until the year 2025 A.D. -a brief period of time indeed in which to see the consummation of the larger purpose of the planetary Logos, working through the three major centres within His body of manifestation. This purpose was threefold in nature:

I have made this practical application and this immediate illustration of teaching anent glamour, illusion and maya because the whole world problem has reached a crisis today and because its clarification will be the outstanding theme of all progress-educational, religious and economic-until 2025 A.D.

—Alice A Bailey, 1957

[SaiGirl]

The following view also seems consistent, with what has been posted elsewhere in these forums about “The Muppet Show” that makes up the politics, media and psyops industrial complex in the UK.

This is how the cabal ensures its tightly scripted control over all major world events. The people portraying these events to the masses are all actors. That's why they can all seamlessly move between political positions without the slightest flicker of conscience or conviction; they can claim to be libertarian one minute and plunging the country into nationwide house arrest the next (Johnson), or professing to find Donald Trump to be Hitler one day and becoming his running mate the next (Vance).

And this gives them the perfect cover, you see, because if they were ever dragged up into court on charges of crimes against humanity, they could say:

"I was just acting. The whole pandemic thing was just performance art. It's not my fault people can't tell the difference between acting and reality."

And the thing is... this is actually true. It actually might, extrapolating from previous cases, stand up as a legal defence, because the whole pandemic thing was performance art. There was no virus, no emergency, nothing. A lot of people just acted as if there was, replete with theatre props like masks, sanitiser bottles, and Scotch Eggs.

There is, after all, no legal standard that I am aware of that stipulates that actors have to tell you when they're acting, and there are certainly examples in history when they haven't, and mass panic has ensued as a result.

https://miri.substack.com/p/acting-the-part

[SaiGirl]

Comparing the "Battle of Agincourt Victory" narrative (1415) with the "Joan of Arc Martyrdom" (1432) overwhelmingly documented account.

Shakespeare’s hero, Henry V (1386-1422), a Lancaster, became king of England because his father imprisoned and later murdered his predecessor, Richard II, a Plantagenet.

However, Henry’s crown was not secure for some time. A plot to overthrow Henry and restore Richard’s son to the throne was discovered and foiled on the very day of Henry’s planned invasion of France.

It was the “Battle of Agincourt” (1415) that secured the dynasty for at least another generation or two,

Destroying the “flower of French chivalry” with the English “commoners” and their long bows, became a defining moment and a towering legend that spread all over Europe.

And Henry V exploited that as well to forge a domestic patriotic tradition still celebrated in England to this very day.

For another two decades, the English (led by the Lancastrians) raped France.

Until “Joan of Arc” shows up and “restores” French national identity, in the person of “God’s anointed Dauphin” (the House of Valois)

In 1429, Joan of Arc successfully raised the siege of Orléans and had the king crowned at Reims, an important French propaganda victory. Power struggles between Bedford, his brother Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, and their uncle Cardinal Beaufort hampered the English war effort. The Duke of Burgundy, alienated by the blunders of Gloucester, reconciled with the King of France in the Treaty of Arras, 1435. Bedford had died that same year.

The warring parties arranged long truces, during which the French king prepared for the renewal of war, while the English relaxed and took a break from fresh taxes. By 1450, the French had reconquered Normandy, and Guyenne the next year. A final English attempt to recover their losses ended in decisive defeat at the Battle of Castillon, 1453. With this victory, the English had been expelled in all of France except Calais. The Valois succession was upheld and confirmed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Valois

What I have never quite understood is how Shakespeare decided to cast the “Joan of Arc” legend, against the backdrop of her vindication by the Pope and the overflowing cornucopia of documentation from her trial, appeals and very public execution.

Of course, we know from history that Jehanne La Pucelle never referred to herself as Joan of Arc, and indeed that phrase was never applied to her person until well after her death.
But we can tell by Shakespeare’s use of this phrase that Joan of Arc was the popular phraseology used to describe Jehanne La Pucelle by the time he was writing Henry VI Part 1 in England in the late 1590s, but it seems popular opinion was also close enough to her memory to connect the Maid of Orleans with the phrase “La Pucelle” as well (unlike modern audiences that likely had to–like me–look up what that meant.)

==========

Here is the text of “Henry VI”:

You judge it straight a thing impossible
To compass wonders but by help of devils.
No, misconceived! Joan of Arc hath been
A virgin from her tender infancy,
Chaste and immaculate in very thought;
Whose maiden blood, thus rigorously effused,
Will cry for vengeance at the gates of heaven.

_ Act V, Scene 4, making a final stand at her execution.

The "Joan of Arc" narrative defined French national identity right on up to the Great Revolution (1789)

https://www.cassidycash.com/shakespeare ... a-pucelle/

Shakespeare's Henry VI Part 1 is one of the earliest plays attributed to him and was thought to have been written around 1590. There has always been controversy over whether or not Shakespeare actually wrote all or any of the play. Henry VI Part 1 has been harshly criticized over the years for the inaccurate portrayal of Joan of Arc as a witch and a whore. Shakespeare undoubtedly used the prevailing English propaganda of his day however his inability to more accurately depict Saint Joan has been troubling to scholars past and present.

Act V.
Returning to London, Henry VI is pressured to make peace with France and marry Margaret, the daughter of the Earl of Armagnac. In France Richard Plantagenet, the Duke of York, fights with Joan of Arc at Angiers and captures her. At the same time the Earl of Suffolk captures Margaret of Anjou and begins to scheme for her to marry Henry VI while planning to seduce her himself. Joan of Arc, condemned to burn, denies her own father and claims she is pregnant though still a virgin. The Duke of York does not believe her and has her burned to death. York is informed of the peace settlement and is not happy about making peace with France. In London, King Henry VI agrees to marry Margaret of Anjou falling into the Earl of Suffolk's trap to control him through Margaret.

http://www.maidofheaven.com/joanofarc_shakespeare.asp

[rachel]

And this gives them the perfect cover, you see, because if they were ever dragged up into court on charges of crimes against humanity, they could say:

"I was just acting. The whole pandemic thing was just performance art. It's not my fault people can't tell the difference between acting and reality."

Brits told ‘act like you’ve got Covid’ as Chris Whitty fronts TV ad amid surging deaths
https://metro.co.uk/2021/01/09/brits-to ... -13875330/

Yes, we could play, what does it take to get rid of Chris Whitty once and for all?

Now you know what you really have to do to get a Golden Globe, is it worth it?



I think that's Numberwang!

[rachel]

https://www.ancientpages.com/2018/04/21 ... t-suicide/

Why Did Socrates Drink Poison And Commit Suicide?

Ellen Lloyd - AncientPages.com - In 399 B.C., one of the greatest philosophers of all time, Socrates was sentenced to death. Socrates was a courageous man who stood up for what he believed in. He was offered a chance to live, but he chose death instead.

In a previous article published on Ancient Pages, we discussed why Socrates was such a brilliant mind and why his enigmatic personality and thoughts still continue to influence modern philosophers.

Left: Bust of Socrates carved by Victor Wager from a model by Paul Montford, University of Western Australia. Right: The Death of Socrates (399 BC): He drank the contents as though it was wine.

As much as the modern world admires Socrates today, he was not popular among many during his lifetime. Athens was a radical democracy that prided itself on freedom of speech. All that Socrates did was talk, and yet he was sentenced to death.

Socrates was accused of "refusing to recognize the gods recognized by the state" and of "corrupting the youth." In his book, Why Socrates Died: Dispelling the Myths, author Robin Waterfield offers a comprehensive study of what led to Socrates’ trial, death sentence, and interesting account of Athenian history.

At the time of the trial, Socrates was 70 years old. The trial took place in the heart of the city. A crowd of spectators watched how three Athenian citizens, who were Socrates' accusers, spent three hours presenting their arguments against the great philosopher. Socrates was then allowed to defend himself for three hours.

At the end of the trial, the jury convicted him by a narrow majority, and he was given the death penalty.

Interestingly, Socrates was given a choice he ignored. The jury gave him the opportunity to suggest his own punishment for his crimes against the city-state of Athens.

socrates-drinking-poison.jpg (35.02 KiB) Viewed 1171 times

If Socrates had suggested exile, he could have lived. However, Socrates was a stubborn, sarcastic, and proud man who was not afraid of death. Socrates joked that he could be punished with free meals at the Prytaneum, the city’s sacred hearth. Then, he suggested that he could be fined a modest sum of money. The jury discussed the choices proposed by Socrates and decided he was going to receive the death sentence.

Socrates's friends, followers, and students encouraged the great philosopher to flee Athens, but he refused. He felt that he had a legal responsibility to Athens and that escaping was not an option.

So, Socrates was taken to the nearby jail where his sentence would be carried out. Athenian law prescribed death by drinking a cup of poison hemlock. Socrates drank the hemlock, was condemned at trial, and executed his death sentence.

The great philosopher never rejected his beliefs and chose death instead of living a life of shame as an exiled old man.

Updated on February 17, 2024

I thought I'd start this post with an article about the suicide of Socrates, because that's where we're heading with UK law, and as we find out from the article, that was a democracy, so we now know why all democracies collapse, because they are merely an avenue for utter corruption. The legal system that forced Socrates to commit suicide was a CITY-STATE DEMOCRACY no less...exactly where the United Nations is taking us with City Mayors. The future appears to be abandon your property and run, else drink the hemlock.

Democracy: the plebs getting to put a cross on a bit of paper to choose which FAKE IDENTITY an actor plays for the next five years.

Red Tie Ed or Blue Tie Rishi, the choice is yours

This brings me to the video that inspired this post; while copying some links related to the Richard D Hall saga, I watched this episode of the Sonia Poulton Show. Before the guest discussing Richard's court case, Sonia has a discussion with ex-BBC journalist Jemma Cooper regarding the 'Assisted Dying' Debate in Parliament. (starting around 10 mins)

EP. 54: WAKE UP WITH SONIA POULTON & GUESTS - 29 November 2024


And which MP put Assisted Dying forward as a Private Members Bill?...in exactly the same way the UK Parliament put the Abortion Act on the statute...NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN. Well, that would be the fake sister of the fake murdered Labour MP, JOKE-OX. Lesbian Kim (because all fake female MPs are either lesbians or cross-dressers, else both) wasn't selected by the constituent Labour members of Batley and Spen...you know, the people who have to actually suffer her as their fake representative of this fake democracy we find ourselves in. No, Plastic-face Starmer personally decided he wanted to keep it in the fake family, and gifted the seat to laughing face Kim...and now we know why she couldn't keep a straight face while giving that speech within hours of her fake sister's fake death...Kim clearly already knew she would eventually be wearing those size 9s.

dont ever forget laughing leadbeaters aka jo cox family

direct link: https://seed191.bitchute.com/1BdbCQLyWO ... 32M0Ks.mp4

The only qualification and experience Kim needed to be given a £91,346 plus expenses job was a fake dead sister. Nice work if you can get it. But actually, look to Kim's fake dad for the real answer, because when he's not pretending to be Gordon Leadbeater, he's the current Speaker of the House of Commons...though he only got that gig after pretending to be the father of fake dead JOKE-OX.

Gordon Leadbeater, father of Assisted Dying MP Kim

Lindsay Hoyle, Speaker of the House of Commons

So back to the Sonia Poulton Show, ex-BBC Jemma points out the messaging surrounding the Assisted Dying Bill, which has the exact same vibes as 2020 and COVID-19 scam.

...And the messaging surrounding the ads for pro-assisted dying are exactly the same as the messaging we saw around the vaccines; the language that's used in these posters is, 'My dying wish is that I don't want my family to see me suffer...and I won't have to.' - Now the inference there of course is you are doing it for other people, you're killing yourself so you don't upset your family. Other people are more important than you. Exactly the same messaging we saw around the vaccines, which was 'protect other people', 'protect your granny', 'protect others', other people are more important than you, with this kind of programming that we've all got, which we get in schools; which is, 'we're nothing', 'we're worthless', 'the ego says you're nothing, you're a nobody, you are effectively hating yourself', and everything is about other people. It is very coercive messaging, and of course what you said about not being a burden on the NHS. Again, the same messaging, 'Protect the NHS by killing yourself'. Exactly the same as 'don't go into a hospital in 2020, protect the sacred NHS', it's all the exact same messaging surrounding the [Assisted Dying] Bill...

And before leaving Kim Leadbeater, guess what I've just spotted? ...Can you work out why Kim has an idiot face on all three of these pictures and can't stand up straight in any of them?

The idiot face will be to distract us from the fact Kim is purposely crouching with her needs bent to try to look shorter than Plastic Starmer. He's wearing lifts by the way. I'm now leaning towards the idea both of these characters could be cross-dressers. It makes sense, the UK parliament is a pantomime show...except it's filled with dangerous liars that pretend they care when in reality it's just about passing laws so they can syphon off TAX money and cover their own arses from prosecution.

Here's a few pictures, can you tell what sex Kim is?

The bottom picture, the guy in white is most likely a woman wearing lifts, hence why he has a walking stick...here's some stilt walkers as a reference.

Remember this exchange? It becomes clear exactly why this question was put to Keir Starmer. They all know the score, we've moved into 'I'm A Celebrity...Get Me Out Of Here!' culture where the people in the media take the piss 24/7 and call it News.

Keir Starmer - 'Only women have a cervix' 'should not be said'

[rachel]

Lay any bets that former MI5 Agent, cross-dresser and reincarnation of Jesus Christ, David Shayler, is actually Black Mirror's Charlie Brooker.

They look the same. They sound the same. Shayler's bollocks fits exactly Brooker's bollocks...like one of Chubb's locks.

Dave the Messiah - 2017 Interview with Ex-Mi5 operative David Shayler on being Jesus


I was 40 when I found out raisins are grapes | Would I Lie to You? - BBC


Looks like you are going to hell, Charlie...because I think you are TOO PROUD to eat humble pie.

Oh, and guess who is on "Would I Lie to You?"

Only COVID COMEDIAN, Professor Hannah Fry. So you won't be alone at least, Charlie.

Interesting, I just went back to the 'CONTAGION: THE BBC FOUR PANDEMIC' page link I berated here for not having the broadcast dates, and there they are...first shown on Thu 22 Mar 2018, 21:00.



22nd March 2018

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p059y0p1


And two years later, to the date, Boris Johnson implements the first UK lockdown. Do we think they popped some champagne to celebrate?

22nd March 2020

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/ ... march-2020