Liberalism

[SaiGirl]

Brendon O’Connell sees them failing and collapsing;

Which suggests that this will only push them even faster into the arms of the "World Economic Forum" in Davos and the UN globalists.



So it makes sense that the BRICS and especially China, would be enthusiastically endorsing the plans of global Big Pharma, global Big Tech and NATO's psyops industrial complex.

[SaiGirl]

Nothing is as destabilizing, demoralizing and damaging to any economy as inflation.

In the Roman world, paper money was never widely in use, except as IOUs.
Money was almost always in the form of coinage: gold, silver, bronze, copper.
Over time, and especially during the "Crisis of the 3rd century", the gold and silver content of coinage was reduced; with the effect of debasing the value of coins and undermining confidence in their worth.
This in turn did long term damage to the economy , triggered revolts by the legions, and contributed to a sense of "decline and fall".

Close examination of coinage (which usually carries chronological and dynastic information)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoninianus

[rachel]

Farmers: Please do your homework and join the dots
https://robwillson.substack.com/p/farme ... irect=true
The anti-Communitarian

...When the government announced the inheritance tax policy in the November budget, they would have already anticipated backlash and protests, factoring these into their plans. They are adept at managing dissent, whether by infiltrating protests to discredit them or steering them into ineffectiveness through false leadership. A brief review of historical protest movements reveals this pattern.

The government also exerts significant influence over the media, including so-called 'controlled opposition' outlets. Take care with sources like GB News, which are unlikely to reveal the deeper origins of this policy and distract people with semantics.

What are the real origins of this policy?

Firstly, farmers need to understand the true purpose behind this policy, alongside the rising costs of red diesel and fertiliser and the tightening grip of oppressive regulations. It’s not about the revenue generated which is an insignificant sum in the overall context of government spending. Instead, this is a very deliberate strategy to drive small, independent farmers out of business.

Secondly, Farmers need to fully understand the system which has brought about this sinister policy and where it has come from; 405E 45th St, New York, NY 10017, USA, better known as the United Nations headquarters. Here’s a sobering reality: we no longer live in a democracy. The rules they operate by are not the rules we once knew, and they’ve conveniently rewritten the laws to enable their agenda.

Just days before the government announced its punitive inheritance theft on family farms, a measure likely to force the breakup of farms that have taken generations to build, the Climate Change Committee piled on further insult. It advised the government that the UK must cut meat and dairy consumption by 50% to meet Net Zero targets. Thanks to the Climate Change Act 2008, these recommendations, made by unelected globalist change agents, are legally binding.

So much for democracy. This is communitarian governance in plain sight. And as for the so-called consensus on Net Zero? We’ve all agreed don’t you know!

Obviously, Starmer is a vacuous shell of a person and a clear wrong-un. However, he and Reeves are merely ‘useful idiots,’ executing the UN’s Agenda 2030. This is the foundation of the communitarian governance system, which I’ve explored in greater detail in my article, Communitarianism for the Distracted.

The UK is fully committed to achieving the 17 Sustainable Development Goals outlined in Agenda 2030. The ones most relevant here are:

• SDG 2 – Zero Hunger
• SDG 15 – Life on Land
• SDG 17 – Partnerships for the Goals

This collectivist agenda views small, independent farmers as obstacles to sustainable development. The preference is for agriculture to be centralised and controlled by a few favoured Big Ag corporations.

As Henry Kissinger famously said: “Control the food, and you control the people.”

Former Labour advisor and globalist agenda pusher, John McTernan, let the cat out of the bag by stating the real goal in a recent TV interview: “If the farmers want to go on the streets - we can do to them what Margaret Thatcher did to the miners.” He added: “It’s an industry we can do without. If people are so upset that they want to go on the streets and spread slurry then we don’t need small farmers.”

Sustainable Development is underpinned by the logical fallacy of the anthropometric global warming theory. Far from being a genuine environmental initiative, it is, at its core, a political agenda, and even its proponents admit as much:

• “It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true.” – Paul Watson, Founding Director of Greenpeace
• “One must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore.” – Ottmar Edenhofer, IPCC panellist and Director of the Mercator Research Institute, in a 2010 interview with NZZ Online.
• “The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.” – Professor Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research
• “The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.” – Dr David Frame, climate modeller, Oxford University
• “We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.” – Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation

And then, perhaps most tellingly:

• “You’ll own nothing and be happy.” – Klaus Schwab, Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum, a key strategic partner of the United Nations

These statements clearly expose the underlying motives behind the agenda: centralised global control and the concentration of wealth and assets for the elites...

[rachel]

HOW THE BRITISH EMPIRE BRAINWASHED THE WORLD

15 May 2015
This speech by Anton Chaitkin recorded in 1994 reveals in greater detail how England was overthrown by banksters and Britain became the centralized hub for crime syndicates, slavery, spiritual manipulation, and world domination.

Chaitkin is an co editor of Executive Intelligence Review and a member of the Lyndon LaRouche political movement.

Some of the high points mentioned are:
How Hollywood was set up by Aleister Crowley and the Golden Dawn.
How many "anti" organizations are actually the perpetrators of what they speak against.
The exact caretakers of slavery in the U.S. and abroad that continues until this very day.
How the so-called Jews brought Palestine.
Black bag jobs of the British Imperialist and how that has effected society.
The of MK-Ultra and mass mind manipulation.
The connection between the Nazis and the Mafia.
What the bootleggers, slave traders, and pirates do today.
The birth of modern science for malevolent means.
The origins of the music industry and the slave master relationship between it performers and originators.
Las Vegas and the raise of an entertainment based culture for hire.
The origins of "accepted" Freemasonry and its charter for the King.
Much Much More

[SaiGirl]

Coinage, architecture and sculpture.

The Romans memorialized their sacrifices and victories permanently for posterity (and to honor the gods).

The golden candelabra sculpted was a literal representation of the trophies and plunder from their sack of the Temple in 70 C.E.

The Romans commemorated great victories and events with imposing arches, temples and sculpture.

And they issued new coinage to make their power even more real.

"Iudaea Capta" reflected the restored confidence and stability of the Empire and new dynasty.

[SaiGirl]

Roman concrete: Indestructible, short of earthquakes.


https://www.neogaf.com/threads/scientis ... te.591531/

[SaiGirl]

The legions kept demanding raises because of the decreasing amount of real silver in the Roman denarius: literal inflation through debasement of the currency.

When emperors or generals couldn't pay off the legions, they opted for rebellion or civil wars and coups.

Catastrophic debasement of silver coinage

Recruitment of Gothic foederati, first as mercenaries and then as citizens and soldiers, was seriously destabilized by less and less silver in the money.
Immigrants felt cheated.

[SaiGirl]

In 406 AD, Roman troops in Britannia revolted, as a direct consequence of unprecedented disastrous inflation (debasement and shortages of coinage).

Numismatic evidence is that the Empire ceased issuing coinage in Britain approximately 403 AD. This seems to have been a decision of Stilicho’s, and it is often suggested that when he withdrew a large part of the army they took much of the coinage in circulation with them. It is often suggested that the shortage of money accelerated a rapid decline of the urban-centred market economy that was already underway. It also very likely meant that the remaining Roman troops could no longer be paid with money, which would have inevitably caused discontent and might have.disrupted the channels through which they were resupplied with food and equipment. Chaos on the continent may have compounded Britain’s economic problems by disrupting trade.

[pasterno]

Always the same handbook.

Inflation is a much easier sell than higher taxes.

In 406 AD, Roman troops in Britannia revolted, as a direct consequence of unprecedented disastrous inflation (debasement and shortages of coinage).

Numismatic evidence is that the Empire ceased issuing coinage in Britain approximately 403 AD. This seems to have been a decision of Stilicho’s, and it is often suggested that when he withdrew a large part of the army they took much of the coinage in circulation with them. It is often suggested that the shortage of money accelerated a rapid decline of the urban-centred market economy that was already underway. It also very likely meant that the remaining Roman troops could no longer be paid with money, which would have inevitably caused discontent and might have.disrupted the channels through which they were resupplied with food and equipment. Chaos on the continent may have compounded Britain’s economic problems by disrupting trade.