Vaccine damage reports

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
antipodean
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by antipodean »

rachel wrote: Thu Mar 10, 2022 9:44 am
antipodean wrote: Thu Mar 10, 2022 5:06 am It's possible it could be fake.

I saw a discussion on this, apparently in 2012 they did the same thing relating to this:

FNZJnb_XIAAt9dc.jpg


This is apparently the current delisting. So reports would appear to be correct.

FNakg-MXEAgMr2V 13-30-30-538.jpg
Here's a post from someone with a pro jab view, on a more conservative forum.
the filing lists the class of security "0.250% Notes due 2022", that'll be some bond or preference share issue being withdrawn. not Pfizer.
your twitter link is the same false story. its a bond, not the company delisting.
User avatar
fakeologist
Site Admin
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 12:01 pm
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 133 times
Contact:

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by fakeologist »

Here's the story - it's just a few bonds.
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/pfizers ... g-held?s=r
Companies can have all kinds of capital, ranging from ordinary equity (common stock) to senior secured bonds (debt). They can all be listed on exchanges (not just equity that most people are familiar with - "shares"). But you are probably also familiar with the term "stocks and shares"? "Stock" can refer to other capital classes, like "loan stock", i.e. debt - "corporate bonds". The security that is referenced in the document you shared has a "coupon", an interest rate (0.25%) and a redemption date (2022). This means it is some sort of loan stock. It has matured so there is no need to keep it listed on the exchange! There seems to be nothing out of the ordinary here IMO.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1177
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »

First Look at Newly Released Pfizer Docs Part 1: Case Report Errors and Anomalies
https://trialsitenews.com/a-first-look- ... ort-forms/
A systematic review study was conducted and published in the International Journal of Epidemiology, in its conclusions, it stated: ‘This study provides empirical evidence of pronounced bias due to lack of patient blinding in complementary/alternative randomized clinical trials with patient-reported outcomes.’

However, according to Pfizer’s clinical trial protocol, its trials (which are still in progress) are not double blinded but ‘observer-blinded’ where sponsor staff, study managers, clinical research associates and those who are involved with ‘ensuring protocol requirements’ are unblinded.

By Pfizer essentially unblinding the vaccine trials for what at least some experts refer to as a novel gene therapy product, did they establish a new precedent? In an interview with the British Medical Journal (BMJ), Steven Goodman, associate dean of clinical and translational research at Stanford University said “by allowing unblinding it will set as de facto standard for all vaccine trials to come and that is dangerous.”
All the evidence gleaned over a limited time appears to back up whistle-blower Jackson’s claims of poor trial site data management and raises questions as to how Ventavia conducted the Pfizer clinical trials. The errors and anomalies in the CRFs also allude to her claims that the clinical research associates were not trained adequately, with many having had no prior clinical experience history. If such egregious findings are true at these sites, could they manifest at other trial sites around North America and beyond?
The story of patient 11281009 in the Pfizer trial
https://www.hartgroup.org/the-story-of- ... zer-trial/
The story of patient 11281009 is just one example. Patient 11281009 was a white male who would have turned 66 years of age in 2020. By piecing together the entries in the system and the audit log querying errors in those entries it is possible to recreate a timeline of events (see below).

In summary, after two doses of either vaccine or placebo by 9th August, he presented to the emergency room with cough and shortness of breath. This presentation was recorded as suspected covid. He had a myocardial infarction and developed a pneumonia during his stay. No details of covid testing were recorded but the family reported a single negative test taken during his hospital stay. He was discharged home where he died sometime between the end of October and beginning of February. No explanation was given for why hospital treatment was abandoned; remember you had to be “healthy” to enroll in the trial. The death certificate was said to have recorded the cause of death as “pneumonia”.

His last contact with the trial site was 16th September 2020. The trial protocol included participants having an app on their device to enter any covid-like symptoms but there is no entry of this in trial medical record. His family phoned the site on or around 8th December and relayed the details of his last weeks. These were entered in a “potential covid 19 form” by the site. However, the date of this entry was after death. For this reason all the details of the clinician’s concerns around him having had covid were expunged retrospectively from his records in the trial.

To reiterate, this patient had a cough, shortness of breath and presented to hospital with suspected covid, developed pneumonia, died of it and all records of this presentation except hospitalisation then death from “due to infection” were removed from the trial.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1177
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »



You can't view this on twitter if you are not logged in, and if you are you get a warning notices that you have to get past before you can see it.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1177
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »


J&J too dangerous and cause blood clots, now says FDA and advise use other shots (yeah, right!)
FDA says it’s “not a new signal” just one that hadn’t gone away (though they had crossed their fingers).
Conclusion: FDA authorised unnecessary deaths.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2 ... n-vaccine/


SHOCKER: Following the release of the Pfizer documents, it’s now confirmed that 1,223 people died within the first 28 days after being inoculated with the BioNTech Pfizer vaccine during trials — and it was still approved for use.
https://thecountersignal.com/pfizer-doc ... ne-trials/
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1177
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »


TY @CartlandDr1982 for reviewing Pfizer dump & other medical documents (all evidenced) to discover horrific information regarding pregnant women who were told the Covid jab was completely safe. This conversation is not to be missed, from approx 16.00
https://brandnewtube.com/v/7MMCSf
Pfizer gab pregnant women study, 270 expecting mothers, 238 had no outcome recorded no data on what happened. Of the 32 left, 5 pending data, 23 spontaneous abortion, 2 premature with neonatal death, 2 spontaneous abortion with inter-uterine death, 1 spontaneous abortions with neonatal death, 1 normal outcome.

So out of 270 expecting mothers that Pfizer bothered to study 243 blank data, and our of the 27 left 26 dead babies.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1177
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »

Vaccine induced damage to our vascular system
https://doctors4covidethics.org/vaccine ... ar-system/
Josef Thoma MD/PhD, general practitioner from Berlin, lucidly explains the findings of vaccine-induced vasculitis and thrombosis made by pathologists Burkhardt and Lange. He discusses the clinical consequences and does not shy away from addressing the political context and historical parallels.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1177
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1177
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »

Pfizer and Medicine Regulators hid dangers of Covid-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy due to Study finding increased risk of Birth Defects & Infertility
https://expose-news.com/2022/05/29/pfiz ... pregnancy/
A ‘Freedom of Information’ request alongside an in-depth dive into the only pregnancy/fertility study performed on the Pfizer Covid-19 injection has revealed that Medicine Regulators and Pfizer chose to publicly cover-up alarming abnormalities of the developing foetus and falsely downgraded the actual risk of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy by suppressing documented findings of the clinical data.

These decisions led to medical professionals, who are far too trusting of Medicine Regulators, to wrongly inform pregnant women that the Covid-19 injections are perfectly safe during pregnancy, leading to many pregnant women feeling pressured to get vaccinated.

This fraud and deception has caused at least 4,113 foetal deaths due to Covid-19 vaccination in the USA alone, and a further study shows Covid-19 vaccination actually increases the risk of suffering a miscarriage by at least 1,517%.

image-22.png

According to the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC)) Vaccine Adverse Event Database (VAERS), as of 22nd April 2022, a total of 4,113 foetal deaths have been reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections, 3,209 of which were reported against the Pfizer injection.

INCREASES THE RISK OF MISCARRIAGE BY AT LEAST ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND SEVENTEEN PERCENT

image-14.png
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 1177
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Vaccine damage reports

Post by rachel »

New Government data confirms it can take just 5 months for the Covid-19 Vaccinated to develop Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
https://expose-news.com/2022/05/29/gov- ... ccination/
Governments worldwide have been quietly publishing data for months on end that strongly suggests the Covid-19 injections cause extensive damage to the natural immune system, causing recipients to develop a new form of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Now, new data, recently published by the UK’s Office for National Statistics, indicates that it only takes approximately 4 to 5 months after Covid-19 vaccination, for so much damage to have been done to the immune system that it can, unfortunately, lead to death, as many people have sadly already discovered. ...


...It all started back in October 2021 with the discovery that data from Public Health England showed the vaccinated population were more likely to be infected with Covid-19 than the unvaccinated population, and this was something that was getting considerably worse by the week.

Public Health England (PHE) has since been disbanded and replaced by the UK Health Security Agency, but the only real difference between the two is the new sinister name. But prior to being disbanded, PHE were publishing weekly ‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Reports’, a trend that has been continued by the UKHSA.

The reports contained data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status in England, a trend that was unfortunately ended by the UKHSA on the 1st April 2022. But here’s what those reports revealed back in October 2021.

As you can see in the following table, the week 40 report revealed that Covid-19 case rates per 100,000 individuals were highest among the fully vaccinated population aged 30 and above.

image-222.png

This in effect meant the Covid-19 injections were proving to have a real-world negative effectiveness rather than the 95% efficacy claimed by Pfizer and friends.

The significance of this would probably be brushed aside by many under the assumption that this means the Covid-19 injections simply do not work. But if this was the case then we would be seeing either a slightly positive, slightly negative or zero-percent effectiveness.

In relation to Covid-19, a vaccine effectiveness of +50% would indicate the vaccinated are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.

A vaccine effectiveness of 0% would indicate the Covid-19 injections don’t work and the vaccinated are no more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.

But a vaccine effectiveness of minus-50% would mean the unvaccinated are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the vaccinated, indicating the Covid-19 injections have essentially damaged the immune system.

We know a negative vaccine effectiveness indicates immune system damage because vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of the effectiveness of a vaccine. It is a measure of a vaccine recipient’s immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person. ...

A snapshot of the article's contents.
Post Reply