Did the elites make a mistake?

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1609 times

Did the elites make a mistake?

Unread post by rachel »

This is a good article in the off-guardian

Ukraine in the time of Covid
Can we trust “horizontal conflict” in the post-pandemic age?
https://off-guardian.org/2022/07/17/ukr ... -of-covid/
The biggest mistake the elites made with the scamdemic was to let us see what good buddies they really are, because this instantly and inadvertently presented the 99.9% with a shocking and previously quite carefully hidden reality about the true nature of power and geopolitics.

Horizontal conflict narratives have for centuries been a major part of how elites control their populations. Catholic v Protestant, Moslem v Christian, black v white, male v female, gay v straight etc etc. It’s a tried and trusted method of channeling frustrations, shaping minds and keeping people’s minds off the real authors of their misfortunes.

Behind the facade of conflict the elites have always shared a common bond of mutual interest. Kings (mostly) knew to honor the divinity of other kings even in defeat. Even when they killed each other they did it reluctantly and in the guise of “natural causes”. They knew their own populations were the real common enemies against which they knew to make common cause.

War was just another method of achieving this as well as gratifying some degree of personal pride.

Nothing much has changed in the modern era. And a great deal of the legacy media’s energy has long been devoted to helping to conceal the reality of the “big (supranational) club” that we ain’t in.

Until, that is, the recent huge error of judgement by the world’s leaders when they chose to abandon the carefully maintained “horizontal divisions” narrative in favor of some New Age, New Normal narrative of “international solidarity and co-operation to beat the virus”.

They were clearly going for some “Independence Day” type hug-fest psychic effect. Humanity falling into each other’s arms and deciding to work together in WHO-created mutual New Normal benevolence to defeat an invisible enemy that will, of course, never be defeated.

It did not go over as planned.

They just tried to sell it too hard too fast. And they blew it.

Cannot disagree with the premise. No matter how utterly nonsensical the legislation laid before the house, no MP opposed, instead "Harder! Harder!" And for the UK after restrictions were lifted, MPs then banging on months about a piece of cake, and not one of them saying, "So you never believe the bullshit you were spouting then?" because all sides of the House were following the same script. The same script that was pumped out in unison across the world. And yet the preparation needed for it, no one talks about that, all the posters and books, particularly child learning about Covid, they all dropped as soon as the pandemic did.

From some of the kids documents I found in March 2020.

22 page covid-19 comic, wayback capture 12 March 2020
22 page covid-19 comic, wayback capture 12 March 2020
12 page pdf, document last modified, 23rd March 2020
12 page pdf, document last modified, 23rd March 2020
Dave the Dog is worried about coronavirus, 28 pages, last modified 18 March 2020
Dave the Dog is worried about coronavirus, 28 pages, last modified 18 March 2020

Was it a misjudged mistake?
Was it always set for 2020?
Were their hand forced to go with it?
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1609 times

Re: Did the elites make a mistake?

Unread post by rachel »

An interesting fact, in software, usually when something comes out with a date, it comes out at the end of the proceeding year.
Microsoft Office 97 (version 8.0) is the fifth major release for Windows of Microsoft Office, released by Microsoft on November 19, 1996. It succeeded Microsoft Office 95 and was replaced by Microsoft Office 2000 in 1999.
Office 2000 was released to manufacturing on March 29, 1999 and was made available to retail consumers on June 7, 1999.

So given the obvious connections with software and upgrades/boosters, might we have not expected the Covid pandemic to show the winter 0f 2018, it only being confirmed and named as a pandemic in 2019?

We know the occult reasoning why they wanted to go with the 19...
rachel wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 1:52 pm So, to paraphrase: Apparently the Bab thought God was inspiring him to change the Basmallah (one of the most important phrases in Islam) from 'Bismi'llahi'r-Rahmani'r-Rahim' to 'Bismi'llahi'l-Amna'i'l-Aqdas', which because he copied the Basmallah, also had 19 letters. Then the Bab used these 19 letters as a symbolism for his followers, which he extended. He figured he stood for the "B", and then said that the next follower was the "S". This is why he chose 18 disciples (18+1), to complete his symbolism for his version of the Basmallah! This is why number 19 was so important. This explains why they chose to rearrange their calendar in 19 months (even though this goes against the Quran... like much of their faith).

So there you have it.. It explains why code 19 and the Baha'i both see 19 as the central number.. Because both are based on the number of letters in the basmallah. It's not coincidence!

BTW, I highly recommend the paper.. It's long, but very well written.. But not highly researched on Code 19.

So what was happening winter 2018 that made it impossible to proceed with the Covid agenda if we suspect this would have been the natural course of events?
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1609 times

Re: Did the elites make a mistake?

Unread post by rachel »

For me, having worked on the IT side of government contracts via a university, it seems inconceivable that given all the literature and signage, they were supposedly turned around in a couple of weeks. My experience, for material going into schools, you are looking at at least an 18 month run in, probably more like 24 months. It's not just about writing the material, the content goes through a number of committee stages with people from the government body who commission the work stating what changes they want implementing. Because all these stages justify jobs, I find it inconceivable that any COVID material we see that comes via government did not also go through these stages and therefore take a significant amount of time to produce.

And with the idea of that investment happening invisibly in the background from say 2016-17, we can see why these people will not let it go.


Britain's leading health journals, the BMJ and HSJ, have called for Covid restrictions to return.

Industrial economics professor David Paton: "They're calling for long-term permanent changes to the way we live our lives."
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1609 times

Re: Did the elites make a mistake?

Unread post by rachel »

document date 2 April 2020
document date 2 April 2020
https://interagencystandingcommittee.or ... VID-19.pdf

Open the link, look at the artwork for the 22 page document. That was all commission, tenders sent out, bids made and returned, contract given, story written and signed off, pictures story-boarded, painted, signed off and published in less than a month? Factor in to the closing down of everything. Not possible... We live in a capitalist society, things are done to maximise the amount of money that can be extracted out of them.

file-20200522-57661-vnzy72.png
kids-guide.png

Couple of other grabs I took again at the beginning of the pandemic, again given my experience, I wanted to see what was already available for kids in publication.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1609 times

Re: Did the elites make a mistake?

Unread post by rachel »

You cannot believe any publish dates the BBC has on their sites, since 2020, they just go back a retroactively change them to fit the narrative better.

https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.u ... ronavirus/
PDF: https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.u ... avirus.pdf

Image

The PDF document creation date is 27 March 2020;- meaning any references in the document existed and were agreed to be "trusted sources" before this date.

grab1.png

Just looked at this randomly, I clicked the video in the PDF above and was taken to a BBC Newsround video (44 seconds).
https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/51698180

Hmm... 5th May 2020 (5/5...55), how can that be?

A13-36.jpg
A13-36.jpg (26.68 KiB) Viewed 418 times

Step in Wayback, first captured 8th March, same 44 second video (kill number).
The only thing changing on that page is that date, the date the BBC claims it was published.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200308191 ... d/51698180

A13-35.jpg
A13-35.jpg (27.03 KiB) Viewed 418 times

4th May capture had the earlier date, 11th May, next capture, it had changed. So we can assume probably they updated to current date on the 5th. This isn't the only BBC example where they just pretend it is from a later date without any reference to it being an updated document. And this one isn't updated because the only thing that changed was the date.
Post Reply