I've mentioned this before. Boris Johnson was not born in UK, he was born in New York, so what right does he have to enter UK politics? How do we know he is not a spy working for a foreign power? If he hasn't got a British birth certificate, how do we know for sure he was actually born?
I start off with Boris Johnson just to show this is not about race, this is about a poisonous narrative that has been cultivated for nearly a century to allow a block to be placed on people who live in a particular geographic area, which formally would have been something like a county, having control of how they choose to live their lives in that geographic area.
With that in mind, I watched this report last night.
The front end is about the Nord Stream leaks and the sabotage, and what Biden said, it's not that, about 4:30 minutes in Mark starts talking about UK government sponsoring people trafficking and it leads into the last part, around 7:30, about governments not allowing in Russian asylum seekers as they might cause terrorism. Then he names the following UK terrorists who were asylum seekers...
2021 Liverpool Women's Hospital bombing (Syrian refugee asylum seeker Emad al-Swealmeen/Syrian refugee)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool ... al_bombing
2017 Parsons Green train bombing (Iraqi asylum seeker, Ahmed Hassan)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsons_G ... in_bombing
2020 Reading stabbings (Libyan asylum seeker, Khairi Saadallah)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Reading_stabbings
2017 London Bridge attack (Moroccan/Libyan asylum seeker, Rachid Redouane)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_London_Bridge_attack
2017 Manchester Arena bombing (Libyan-born refugee parents, Salman Ramadan Abedi)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchester_Arena_bombing
But let's add a few more that come from foreign descent. I notice it is harder to find out any real information about the perpetrators families, but it is implied they are second generation immigrants, we see exactly the same case for the MPs with the top jobs in the UK Government currently.
2019 London Bridge stabbing (Pakistani parents, Usman Khan)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Lond ... uardian-34
2020 Streatham stabbing (Sri Lanka parents, Sudesh Mamoor Faraz Amman)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Streatham_stabbing
2013 Woolwich murder, Lee Rigby (Nigerian father, Michael Adebowale; Kenyan decent, Michael Adebolajo/Michael Olemendis Ndemolajo)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Lee_Rigby
2017 Westminster attack (Unnamed immigrant father, Khalid Masood)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Westminster_attack
2007 Glasgow Airport attack (Iraqi decent, Bilal Abdullah; Indian-born Khalid Ahmed)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasgow_Airport_attack
So what do all these people have in common, including Boris Johnson? They either do not have a British birth certificate, else their parents do not have a British birth certificate. This means we cannot trace their lineage. Boris is a special case as his lineage comes from the UK royal family, but it is a different path to the same thing in my estimation on what it actually points to.
And this article is actually what inspired this thread.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... black.html
Rupa Huq apologises to Kwasi Kwarteng after being recorded describing Chancellor as 'superficially' black at conference event - as she is suspended as a Labour MP
- Labour's Rupa Huq recorded describing Kwasi Kwarteng as 'superficially' black
- Ealing Central and Acton MP is suspended by the party over her 'vile' comments
- Tory chairman Jake Berry brands the remarks about the Chancellor as 'racist'
Labour MP Rupa Huq has been suspended by the party after being recorded describing Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng as 'superficially' black.
The Ealing Central and Acton MP, 50, was recorded making the 'vile' remark at a fringe event at Labour's party conference in Liverpool.
In a recording published by the Guido Fawkes website, Ms Huq is heard speaking about Britain's first black Chancellor in the wake of his tax-cutting mini-Budget last week.
'Superficially he is a black man,' she said, adding that people listening to Mr Kwarteng during radio interviews 'wouldn't know he is black'.
The fury over Ms Huq's comments threatened to overshadow Sir Keir's keynote speech to Labour members in Liverpool, which he delivered this afternoon less than an hour after the row broke out.
Labour sources confirmed Ms Huq was told of her suspension from the party this afternoon, which will also see her lose the Labour whip in House of Commons.
A party spokesman said: 'We condemn the remarks she made. They were totally inappropriate and we call on her to apologise and withdraw them.'
Rupa Huq appears to have hit a cross-party nerve... Just out of interest, how many months was the Labour antisemitism row droning on for? Wasn't it most of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership once the Brexit vote was done?... Yet, it appears in less than one day of making that remark, Rupa Huq gets suspended from the Labour party for saying basically, 'this black man could be a white Conservative in the lifestyle he lives'. So was it the word "SUPERFICIALLY" that got Rupa Huq suspended? ... And was the suspension a shot across the bow to other MPs, it doesn't matter what your cultural background is, you cannot bring up the subject of other people being 'superficially black' in the exact same way you cannot bring up men superficially being women or women superficially being men.
Are they worried that somebody might take it to mean he is superficially black in the same way as Martin Bashir is superficially black? Or more likely, she is perfectly aware of how the political parties use race and gender in the UK since the days of Tony Blair, who set the precedent in the Labour party, as a way to pretend democracy exists while blocking what they would consider non-player-characters getting anywhere near power.