Far more brutal

All topics related to Australia
Post Reply
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 2094
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 453 times
Been thanked: 778 times

Far more brutal

Post by rachel »

FnPsz0JWYAMQhE2.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -made.html
Tech billionaire Bill Gates has warned Australia to be ready for the next pandemic, which could be man-made and far more brutal.

Mr Gates told the Lowy Institute think tank in Sydney on Monday that political leaders needed to set aside their differences and work together to prepare for the next virus.

He called for greater global cooperation using the Covid-19 pandemic as an example of how countries could improve on their response if they worked together...
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 2094
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 453 times
Been thanked: 778 times

Re: Far more brutal

Post by rachel »

"Die Unfair Arbeitskommission"
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/die-unf ... kommission
Australia's "Fair Work" Commission has become a tool of the state. Its capture mirrors Nazi Germany and has worldwide implications for fundamental human rights that everybody needs to understand.

This is going to be long so grab a beer or a cup of tea and settle in. I need to take you on a journey in time and show you how the capture of the judiciary in Nazi Germany has been directly mirrored in Australia today. And this capture is the primary reason why employee mandates - for investigational gene therapies - have been allowed to be implemented despite a promise to the world in 1947 that this would never happen again.

Let me first introduce these two people who look eerily similar. It’s probably not an accident.

65a357ac-5acd-41b8-95f9-80f1a2bd7e90_1332x703.jpg

On the left is “Dr” Otto Thierack. On the right is “Justice” Iain Ross.

The pictures are taken roughly 70 years apart. They are obviously different people because Iain is happy to have his picture taken with his glasses on, and doesn’t have Otto’s scar. I presume they are unrelated by birth but we are going to get into the similarities...

Very interesting article, from another section...
As a point of circular interest, section 51.23a of the Australian constitution was implemented as a direct result of the Nuremberg doctors’ trial. It was specifically included to prohibit conscription of doctors by the state:
  • “the provision of maternity allowances, widows' pensions, child endowment, unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances;”
This is discussed in an excellent article in the Spectator on August 11th 20219 highlighting the legal ramifications of vaccine mandates and why the constitutional protection existed. But it didn’t matter, did it? Because when the courts are captured, what the government says goes. That is precisely what happened in Kassam vs Hazzard where high level scientific evidence from the likes of Jay Battacharya, Peter McCullough, Sabine Hazan, Brian Tyson and other hugely published medical scholars was waved away in favour of the government’s one “expert” witness - Kristine Macartney - who had never treated a single COVID patient and had received $65m in government grants over just 3 years10. And of course it would be a complete coincidence that the judge presiding over such a hugely important case was just appointed to the Supreme Court on the 11th August 2021 - only a few weeks prior to the trial.

A further unbelievable revelation from the Kassam trial was the replacement of the TGA’s lawyer by Pfizer’s lawyer on day 3 of the trial, in response to a subpoena by the applicants to the original animal studies from the Pfizer trial. The reason for the subpoena was that it was known that the TGA was suppressing the information based on a prior freedom of information request. What was not expected was that the TGA would lie about appearing in court, sending in a patsy called “Mr Glover” who never made it into court and paving the way for the Pfizer lawyer to quash the subpoena. All documented in FOI by that pesky mouse...
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 2094
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 453 times
Been thanked: 778 times

Re: Far more brutal

Post by rachel »

From “Law and Justice in the Third Reich”:
  • All professional associations involved with the administration of justice were merged into the National Socialist League of German Jurists. In April 1933, Hitler passed one of the earliest antisemitic laws, purging Jewish and also Socialist judges, lawyers, and other court officers from their professions. Further, the Academy of German Law and Nazi legal theorists, such as Carl Schmitt, advocated the nazification of German law, cleansing it of "Jewish influence." Judges were enjoined to let "healthy folk sentiment" (gesundes Volksempfinden) guide them in their decisions.
Otto was, of course, a socialist - as all of Germany had to be. It’s important to recognise that the Nazi party (NSDAP - Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or National Socialist Workers Party) was fully based on socialist doctrine. Don’t take my word for it, take theirs1:

German Labour Front (DAF) monument, Dortmund, 1935. The caption translates: “I am a socialist, because it seems incomprehensible to me to care for and treat a machine with care, but to let the noblest representative of work, man himself, degenerate.”
German Labour Front (DAF) monument, Dortmund, 1935. The caption translates: “I am a socialist, because it seems incomprehensible to me to care for and treat a machine with care, but to let the noblest representative of work, man himself, degenerate.”

Why is this relevant? Because what is happening in the “post-pandemic” society is entirely enabled by the “greater good” concept - where your bodily autonomy is irrelevant whilst “the needs of society” are more important. Sounds dystopian? Absolutely. And it is a fundamental tenet of all flavours of socialist society - and enshrined in the 25th point of the national socialist manifesto on which Hitler’s regime was built2:

3befb331-09af-4516-9ffd-d82ed9f396fd_1000x202 copy.png

Following the Nuremberg trials, where doctors, journalists and jurists were convicted of crimes against humanity on precisely this doctrine, the alternative was supposed to be enshrined into human ethics...

This is interesting regarding the photo, a reference at the bottom of the article:
1This is such a controversial picture that it was removed from wikipedia and is extremely difficult to find online. The reason why is clear to those like me who are old enough to remember the history of these people and to see how history is shaped to control the narrative. Not only was it removed from wikipedia but the deletion was removed from the deletion log so it is not possible to find the audit record on wikipedia. That is how propaganda works - by suppression of history. George Orwell of course called it the “memory hole” in the book 1984.

c344c6d2-6cb5-4926-a613-39781bf0d137_587x349.png

2There are plenty of online arguments about whether the National socialists were socialists or not in practice, but that was their name and their declared philosophy. It is beyond the scope of this article however I will point out that most of the articles written by socialists to distance themselves from nazism universally fail to define “socialist”. Socialism as defined here is based on collectivism - the idea that personal property is devolved from the state rather than the individual.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 2094
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 453 times
Been thanked: 778 times

Re: Far more brutal

Post by rachel »

Post Reply