Constitutional Law and common law jurisdiction

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Constitutional Law and common law jurisdiction

Unread post by rachel »

Common Law and Jury Nullification: Growing Awareness - UK Column News - 6th February 2023

UK Column News - 6th February 2023
Sources: https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-colum ... ruary-2023
- UK Column says thanks for your shares
- Emma Lucy Shaw—Mendip Council's homeless decision
- Press from Rheinland-Pfalz: Many Germans refusing to notify the authorities of their home's value
- Western Australia to digitalise land titles
- Statutes cannot overrule Common Law (This is not legal advice)
- Seven Years until Expropriation: EU draft Law Threatens Property Owners (YouTube)
- UK Column Article: Are We Really At War? Nonsensical Sustainable Development—Part I
- UK Column comment piece: Climate, methane and carbon dioxide: Do we have them back to front?
- Neil Oliver on GB News raises the fact that the jury can free those accused of an unjust law
- Alex Thomson at Winchester in 2016—calling for juries to be told of nullification at every trial
- William Keyte tells Richard Vobes about the UK Constitution
- A Dissident’s Guide to the Constitution: Episode 2 — Common Law
- Dr Matthew Sweet calls for Ofcom (thread) on a flippant charge of antisemitism against Will Keyte

This is the video "This is BIG!" between William Keyte tells Richard Vobes discussing the UK Constitution and common law constitutions.

This is BIG! - 2 Feb 2023


And the follow up video posted yesterday:

The power is in our hands - 6 Feb 2023
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Constitutional Law and common law jurisdiction

Unread post by rachel »

https://www.commonlawconstitution.org/memes

800_63d99ddfbefa1.png
Can Charles Fulfil his Constitutional Role? - Under the Constitution, Charles cannot take the required oath to govern according to customs and law (Common Law) at the same time as supporting policies from external influences - especially those that are repugnant to the constitution.

800_63d99d40b5491.png
Right to Trial by Jury - Article 39 of the Great Charter (the 1215 Magna Carta), says that all Freemen were entitled to a Trial before their peers. The meaning of Freemen (at the time of Magna Carta) meant all commoners. This word changed over time to mean property owners but not in 1215. Trials without a Jury in the Magistrates' Court are technically unlawful according to Constitutional Law.

800_63d99db6cedc0.png
Who is Sovereign? - The government likes to claim that parliament is sovereign (as is claimed on the Parliament website). But under the constitution, the legislature (Parliament) can only create legislation which is under the scrutiny of not only the King or Queen through the right to refuse assent but, more importantly, the people on the Jury who can annul it.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Constitutional Law and common law jurisdiction

Unread post by rachel »

https://www.commonlawconstitution.org/memes

800_63dbe8a39e445.png
Your Sovereign is the First among equals - The King is the most senior public servant in a system of Limited Monarchy. He is called 'the Sovereign' but he cedes sovereignty to the people through the mechanism of Jury Independence and Annulment by Jury

800_63d99e249908b.png
Can the Government do Anything it Likes? - No. The constitution places constraints and limitations over the government's powers to prevent it from becoming dangerous to the liberties of the people. It can, in reality, become criminal - but only because it has gone beyond its lawful powers. At this point it becomes illegitimate.

800_63dbe6fb50558.png
Who are the Judges - In a genuine Common Law Trial by Jury, what we think of now as the judge was probably just a Convenor. He was not the judge - all judgement of the entire case was carried out by the Jury: the facts, the law, the punishment and even the admissibility of evidence.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Constitutional Law and common law jurisdiction

Unread post by rachel »

https://www.commonlawconstitution.org/memes

800_63dbe689467f5.png
Influence Law through Jury Independence - The jury (as a representation of the people), has the right to judge independently of the legislation that brought the defendant into court. If the jury pass a not-guilty verdict even though the defendant has broken the law, that legislation is annulled within that case. Annulment is still possible but the people are generally not told of their power to do this. When it occurs, the establishment calls it a 'perverse' verdict.

800_63d99e4d1f7a8.png
Is Everyone Equal under the Law? - Yes. A system that is based on Common Law is a system of Equity. Everyone is equal before the law. All people, including those in government and even the King or Queen (or President in the US) are answerable before the law. King John in 1215 was brought before a Common Law Court held by his own peers: the Barons.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Constitutional Law and common law jurisdiction

Unread post by rachel »

I posted this recent IAIN DAVIS article link originally in the United Nations thread because it is about Global Governance and the UK Government.
rachel wrote: Sun Feb 05, 2023 6:41 pm The UK New Normal Dictatorship
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/the-uk ... ctatorship

From 14th December 2021. I've pulled out a section. Worth reading the whole article about the Global Governance Dictatorship.
-----------

The UK Dictatorship Allows Itself to Torture and Murder with Impunity
However, the Coronavirus Act isn't the only dictatorial law which MPs have enacted and continue to accept without any qualms.

In October 2020, the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill sailed through its third Commons (and Lords) readings, virtually unopposed. In the Commons, most opposition MPs didn’t even bother to vote.

The opposition leader, Sir Keir Starmer, whipped his parliamentary colleagues not to oppose the bill. Just 20 Labour MPs defied the whip to vote against this tyrannical bill. The Act (CHIS) subsequently became law in March 2021.

On behalf of the G3P, the UK Government has given itself and its agencies under this law the authority to commit any crime it likes without fear of prosecution. The Joint Committee on Human Rights spelled out the purpose of the CHIS:
  • The Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill provides a statutory basis for a variety of public authorities to authorise informants, covert agents and undercover officers to engage in criminal conduct […] by explicitly making authorised conduct ‘lawful for all purposes’ […]
    There is no express limit within the Bill on the type of criminal conduct that can be authorised. This raises the abhorrent possibility of serious crimes such as rape, murder or torture being carried out under an authorisation.
The CHIS amends the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 and means that government bodies ranging from the intelligence services, the police and the military to the Department of Health and Social Care, the Food Standards Agency and, ironically, the Ministry of Justice can commit crimes against the people with total abandon...

GLOBAL GOVERNANCE = GG = 77

And didn't we hear about 77 Brigade. Though UK Column have long been on their case.



More from The UK New Normal Dictatorship article:
The Global Governance Dictatorship

A dictionary definition of “dictatorship” is:
  • Government by a dictator […] A country governed by a dictator […] Absolute authority in any sphere.
The British dictatorship is not unique. Its emergence has been mirrored in the US, EU member states and elsewhere. This is a global model of dictatorship run by a coalition of public and private organisations. National governments are the implementing partners.

The nebulous structure of the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P) makes political opposition to it almost impossible. It maintains the offer of so-called democratic elections and even purports to enhance democratic accountability through new forms of claimed democracy.

Image

The “New Abnormal” dictatorship is elusive. It does not have a single, identifiable dictator. There is no despot to depose. The architects of the technocratic dictatorship have learned from history. The modern, worldwide control system is one of governance, not government. Government is the lens which brings it into focus for all of us.

Talk of devolution and sortition (federalisation and citizens' assemblies) and other suggested improvements to “local governance” and political engagement are not remedies for but rather part of this new tyranny. These offers are illusions of representative democracy, confining policy debates to that which has already been decided by the G3P. You can choose net zero by 2030 or net zero by 2050, but whatever you choose it is going to be net zero.
The link above link to other related posts on this forum. I try to make it easier to navigate past ground covered here.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Constitutional Law and common law jurisdiction

Unread post by rachel »

Sajid Javid's interpretation of the law with regards to NHS and care workers.



And what is Konstantin Kisin tweeting about today? Oh 77th Brigade.



See: Muppet Show
masonic-tattoos-masonic-order.jpg
User avatar
Unreal
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2021 8:06 am
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Constitutional Law and common law jurisdiction

Unread post by Unreal »

rachel wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:07 am
Right to Trial by Jury
-
Reading the law - or any other book - by its sole literary meaning is completely forgetting about who rules us and how they rule us.
-
The law and courts more than willingly display religious belief (swearing on holy text) and disguise (capes, wigs) in plain sight. Law and justice departments is housed in openly decorative, classic architecture with statues of gods and godesses of past and future.
-
The word Law in itself is a wordplay. Its what can be called a semordnilap - palindrome spelled backwards, which gives a new meaning.
-
Law - Wall
-
The best for any human being is to stay out of the legal system alltogether - once you opt in, you're hamsterwheeling in a system your enemy has created to their own benefit. The judiciary system is not designed for the good of the people, its a tool for the rich and powerful. And however you analyse the writing, spelling, meaning - you will not win. Its their game, they write the rules. For their own profit, not for justice. And not in respect of any god or religion.
-
Trial by Jury - Trial by Jewry
-

Code: Select all

Etymology : From Middle English Jewery, from Old French juerie. Synchronically analyzable as Jew +‎ -ry.
A group of Jewish people considered collectively; all Jewish people considered collectively. [from 14th c.] 
(obsolete) The land of the Jews; Judea. [14th–17th c.] 
(obsolete) The quarter of a medieval town or village inhabited either partially or exclusively by Jews; its main buildings were the synagogue, the ritual bath or mikve, the kosher-oriented butchery and bakery, etc. [from middle XIth c. to late XIIIth c.]
-
Image
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a jewish man in sheeps cloth, former Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Constitutional Law and common law jurisdiction

Unread post by rachel »

I've got to say, I don't disagree. But I think this is about numbers, not winning. After all, these are just people. I don't post here to "wake up" the masses, just enough people to remind the players their exit strategy might not be as foolproof as they think.

Tony Benn Dead: 'Five Questions on Power'
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/tony-benn-dea ... es-1440277
What power have you got?

Where did you get it from?

In whose interests do you use it?

To whom are you accountable?

How do we get rid of you?

Anyone who cannot answer the last of those questions does not live in a democratic system.

Labour's Ed and David Miliband are currently at the head of the Government under the guise of a Conservative Rishi Sunak and Alex Chalk. Democracy, in fact, is zombie mob rule.

See: Muppet Show
simpsons.gif
simpsons.gif (1.3 MiB) Viewed 2838 times
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Constitutional Law and common law jurisdiction

Unread post by rachel »

Mark Windows of 'Windows on the World' has an interesting take, I first listened to him regarding his work on Common Law, he now advocated for using the control system they have put in place against itself. Some interesting information, and downloadable transcripts.

THE PROTOCOLS OF POWER
https://windowsontheworld.net/the-protocols-of-power/
A series of shows describing how the system of governance is imposed.
This is a follow on from previous shows which have covered many aspects of this subject

Full series Here:
  1. The Protocols of Power
  2. Purpose and Protocols
  3. Protocols of Freedom
  4. The Big Lie
  5. Protocols of Power – World Governance
  6. The Protocols of Distraction
  7. The New Utopia
  8. Control of Evolution
  9. The Force “They” Fear
  10. The Genius of Purpose
  11. The Community Gulag
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1608 times

Re: Constitutional Law and common law jurisdiction

Unread post by rachel »

Tony Blair destroyed the constitution. Interesting video.

The Problem With The Parliament

An unexpected name at the top of the golden triangle.
Post Reply