Smolensk plane crash 2010, Polish President "dead"

[rachel]

Didn't I say I bet I could probably get back to the WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty from my diversion into the 2010 Smolensk plane crash. Well, I'm a step closer with this from another 2010 Truther blog post, with an accompanying video. Look out for the swine flu vaccine reference below and in the video...

Polish Plane Crash: NWO Coup D’Etat?
The Truther Girls' Blog, April 21, 2010
https://thetruthergirls.wordpress.com/2 ... oup-detat/

The April 10th plane crash that killed Polish Presiden Lech Kaczynski, his wife, the head of the Polish bank, severl MPs and other politicians, and all the top Polish military brass is highly suspicious, to say the least.

Here is a list of strange things surrounding the crash, just off the top of my head:

• It is odd that all these important members of the Polish government and military were travelling on the same plane. As a matter of strandard procedure, this is not usually done, just in case there is an accident.
• The plane was equipped with a sensor that should have warned the pilot that the plane was to low.
• A special radar machine that was used to guide planes was removed from the Smolensk airport the day before the crash.
• Runway lights at the airport were moved an hour after the crash, causing some to speculate that they had intentionally been placed where they would guide the plane into the woods instead of where it should have gone.
• Footage of the immediate aftermath showed no bodies and gunshots could be heard coming from the nearby woods, causing some to speculate that survivors were shot.
• No footage of bodies or body bags at the scene has been shown anywhere in the media.
• The day before the crash, the Polish government and bank had decided to take steps to intentionally lower the value of the Polish currency, the zloty, against the wishes of the EU who said such a move was not good ‘for the collective’, even though it would have benefited Polands economy.
• Black box recordings show that there were no technical problems with the plane.
• Black box recordings also show that the pilot was not pressured to land by his VIP passengers, against control tower orders. The media had been speculating that the crash was due to ‘VIP syndrome’.
• Media reports claimed that the accident may have been due to communication failure as a result of the control tower operators speaking in Russian, but colleagues of the pilot stated that he spoke Russian fluently.

Personally, I think Poland was just not toeing the line with the NWO and a coup d’etat was staged so that they could be replaced with NWO puppets. It is not insignificant that Poland refused to buy and distribute swine flu vaccines last fall during the H1N1 scam, as any country’s willingness to submit to ‘recommendations’ of the WHO concerning swine flu vaccination campaigns was a good reflection of their submission to NWO and supranational government in general.

Here is my take on the situation a couple of days after it happened.

thetruthergirls Polish Plane Crash update - 13th April 2010


Here is Jane Burgermeister’s coverage of the Polish plane crash situation as well as the refusal of Obama, Angela Merkel, and others to attend the funral at Wawel Castle, citing the Icelandic volcanic ash cloud as an excuse, although as Burgermeister points out, the German chancellor could have travelled by land.

Jane Burgermeister report - Krakow, Poland, 18th April 2010

The last video is very interesting as it references not only the sudden cancellation by Prince Charles to attend Lech Kaczynsk's funeral as well as Obama, Angela Merkel and other European leaders. But near the end it talks about Poland being the only EU country to refuse the WHO's swine flu vaccine, and the head of the Polish Bank, also on the flight, who had refused to take on loans from the IMF during the 2009 global financial crisis.

[rachel]

That last video in the previous post brings me nicely to the amateur video that purports to have been filmed by Andrei Mendierej, minutes after the crash and documents the killing, via gun shots, of survivors by Russian Special Forces. So seventy years to the day of a massacre by Russian military of Polish Intelligentsia in the woods near Smolensk, a massacre of Polish Intelligentsia by Russian military in a woods near Smolensk. Hmm...




I know fakeologists will likely auto-hoax the video, and the fact it exists puts the likelihood of the crash site being a staged set a fair bit higher than if it didn't; but there are some interesting things to take from it. So firstly, let's remind ourselves of the events leading up to its filming. The flight was carrying President Lech Kaczynski and 95 other high ranking dignitaries. It was the second plane that day to fly from Warsaw in Poland to the Smolensk airport in Russia carrying VIPs for the 70th Anniversary Mass. The first one had made its journey some hours before without incident, but like the actual Tupolev Tu-154M flight details, there are conflicting accounts on when this plane took off. From wiki:

Take-off and cruise
Flight PLF101 took off from Warsaw at 9:27 Smolensk time after a delay of 27 minutes.

As the aircraft left Warsaw, weather conditions were rapidly deteriorating at Smolensk. A temperature inversion had developed, trapping moisture low in the atmosphere and causing a dense fog to develop. At 9:15 Smolensk time, about an hour and a half before the crash, a Yakovlev Yak-40 jet (flight PLF 031) also belonging to the Polish government and carrying Polish journalists from the President's press pool landed at the airbase without incident, though conditions were rapidly worsening at the time. Shortly thereafter, between 9:20 and 9:39 MSD, a Russian Ilyushin Il-76 (tail number 78817) made two attempts to land, but because of low visibility, it diverted to Vnukovo Airport near Moscow. Upon PLF101's approach to the base, atmospheric conditions continued to worsen, and the fog continued to thicken, further reducing visibility to 400 metres (1,300 ft). The ground control personnel stated to PLF101 that there were no conditions for landing. The Captain then requested and was given permission to conduct a "trial" approach. The controllers instructed the captain as to the landing minimum of 100 metres (330 ft), to which the captain replied, "Yes, sir!"

You'll notice I've highlighted the section about a third plane, which was Russian, and it apparently made two attempts to land between the first and second Polish planes, but because of worsening weather conditions was instead diverted to an airport near Moscow where it landed. I fancy this plane wasn't part of the original MSM story, and instead we get, "the pilots circle the airport three times" as reported by the Huff Post article I linked to earlier.

Below is an overhead view of the crash site showing its distance in relation to Smolensk Airport runway. We see the start of the runway to the left, and the debris from the Tupolev indicating it landed short and in no way parallel; showing there was no intention from that angle for the pilot to attempt to land on the runway. We begin to see why there was a need for an alternative narrative to be created.

And here we see the official flight path that shows the Tupolev didn't even get close to being able to pull out of its turn and land on the runway even if it hadn't hit trees first. From the flight path we are given, it looks like the plane was specifically aiming for that wooded area.

But the point of the details, the Tupolev apparently hit the ground around 300 meters short of the runway. That is less than a quarter of a mile away. It wasn't a surprise that a plane carrying the President of Poland was arriving for the 70th anniversary. There were plenty of people waiting for it with cars.

Given that distance, if the crash took place, the media waiting at the airport would have heard it, and because pictures are money, we can imagine some of them would be at the scene within minutes. So the actual visual imagery seen in the amateur film is quite possibly real, taken just after 'the crash'; and there are reports that the footage, what it shows visually, is genuine. But the sounds we hear are another thing. And given the proximity to the airport, it is absolutely insane to think a set of Russian special forces got to and found survivors and executed them before anyone from the airport or onlookers in the area wanting a glimpse of the President got to the scene. That wouldn't be a plan signed off by the Russian military.

These grabs come from the first Grzegorz Braun film. Interesting he included a video showing a plane that looks like a Tupolev Tu-154M in white and red livery already landed. I guess it might be the earlier Yakovlev Yak-40 jet that arrived at the airport. But look at its tail number, 44. I'll have to come back to this one.

After all that introduction, here's the Andrei Mendierej video in question. I've posted up the original, there are a few other versions with subtitles and overlays picking out people in the background, but really they are moving pixels. So I'll discuss the things we can actually take from the video in the next post.

Polish president plane crash. 10 April 2010, Smolensk, Russia

[rachel]

So let's start with the scene we saw before, the people waiting at the airport for the plane to arrive.



Do you notice there's a filter that has been applied to the video from the airport to make it appear really dingy. Grzegorz Braun cut from that to maybe local footage, and we see a stark difference in how the colours look. I'm sure he did that on purpose. So removing the colour-cast with the aim to match the other footage, which itself looks to have a slight pink cast.

We can see there is a definite fog in the background of both grabs, and the fire engine has its lights on, as well as a couple of cars in the distance. So ground conditions were not good and there was a ground level mist, but was the fog natural or man-made? If the crash was staged, it was staged using the army, hence a lot of the debris seemingly landed within the boundaries of the military airport.


Types of Russian military smokescreen.

Russian smokescreen device


Russian Military Set Up Smoke Screen In Exercise


Granat dymny RDG-2dcz Mewa Czarna



If we now look at other grabs from the Grzegorz Braun film we see a couple of people talking about hearing the crash, there is no fog, background cars do not have lights on. But as they approach the wood, there is a fog haze in the distance. Granted we cannot be sure of the delay, but it would be expected if they heard the crash they'd go to investigate quite quickly, else not at all.

So what does all this tell us about the Andrei Mendierej video?

[rachel]

While looking up the Andrei Mendierej video, I came across the Mail Online's take. I generally like the Mail, they publish the official story and the subplots, usually with minute-by-minute detail. So if you want to spend the time considering if the story hangs together, the Mail is usually a good research tool. But here we have something interesting, the youtube video they link to no longer works which is fair enough, but they have also taken down the frame grabs they made of the video. That's unusual, and I suspect the reason for doing so must have come from somewhere else.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ivors.html

So going back to the Wayback Machine I was interested to see when the grabs were taken down. As well as 119 comments for the entire capture history of the article, it has 44 Wayback captures. How do they fix that one?

I think it is highly unlikely the first Wayback capture was July 11th, 2011, over a year after the article was published, but it is the first one they give us, and the June 24th, 2013 capture is the last version with the grabs intact, the next capture, December 29, 2013, all images and captions have been cleared. Interestingly enough Wayback is now blocking me from loading the page today, I had to do it via a VPN.

So let's see what interesting nuggets the Mail Online has. I don't think the text has changed, just the removal of the images.

Footage of Polish air crash 'shows Russians executing survivors'... but is it a vile propaganda stunt?
Last updated at 9:41 AM on 15th May 2010

A video of the plane crash which killed the president of Poland apparently shows survivors being shot.

The film, which is being circulated on the internet, has fuelled conspiracy theories about the accident.

It purports to show armed Russian-speaking men killing passengers minutes after the crash which killed Lech Kaczynski and dozens of members of the Polish government and military elite.

The grainy, blurred footage - on which sounds like that of gun shots are heard - has been dismissed as a 'malicious hoax' by a Russian aviation expert.

Murder... or evil hoax? A scene from the footage apparently captures the moment the order was given to kill the survivors of the Polish president's plane crash

Conspiracy? The 'security forces' allegedly give chase to one of the survivors... who appears to survive the crash before running away

Some Russian sources have claimed the video has been circulated in an attempt to smear Moscow by either Ukrainian or Georgian groups by implying that there may have been a planned operation to down the plane.

The video - which has been digitally manipulated, with subtitles added and certain segments slowed down or zoomed in on - is unclear.

No one is actually seen being shot on the footage. Some internet viewers have pointed out inconsistencies, such as trees moving around.

There has been no official comment from the Moscow prosecutor general's office, which is involved in the crash investigation.

Polish investigators have demanded more protection for the crash site from the Russians, and have secured permission for their own examination of the crash site.

The survivors' apparently plead for their lives in the footage

The official investigation has ruled out foul play as a cause of the crash in dense fog which killed all 96 people on board on April 10.

Until now there has been no suggestion that anyone survived.

Claims include fears that vital Nato secrets and other classified military information fell into the hands of the Russian secret service in the aftermath of the flight and that a mystery woman was in the cockpit seconds before the crash.

Passengers on the doomed Tupolev-154 were on their way to commemorate the anniversary of the Katyn massacre, in which some 22,000 officers were murdered by Soviet secret police in 1940.

Firefighters attend the scene of the Polish air crash: Footage has emerged that claims to show Russian-speaking men shooting survivors

Many of the bodies from the crash were badly mutilated and could only be identified by DNA, but no reports have suggested bullet injuries to any of the passengers.

However, there have been unconfirmed reports that Andrej Sheremet, the Polish general prosecutor, believes the footage to have been made at the crash site in the forest near Smolensk.

Another conspiracy theory claimed that the journalist who either made or held the footage - named in some accounts as Andrei Menderei - was stabbed in the back in the Ukrainian capital of Kiev in the days following the crash.

It is then claimed that he died at a clinic in the city soon afterwards when his artificial respiration machine was turned off by unknown intruders.

Another Russian account suggests that the footage was filmed by someone living close to the crash site - and that later an 'incorrect and sensational interpretation' was put on the film.

According to this theory, the gunshots heard were produced by the guns which were carried by the president's security men, which discharged after being caught in fire.

None of this could be verified last night.

The Russian aviation expert, who asked not to be named, said last night: 'The use of this footage is a malicious hoax aimed at damaging Russia, nothing more and nothing less.'

People stand near the wreckage of a Polish government Tupolev Tu-154 aircraft that crashed near Smolensk airport on April 10

The story was seized on yesterday by anti-Russian groups in the former Soviet Union and eastern Europe, and was spreading rapidly across the internet.

Meanwhile, analysis of one of the plane's three black boxes suggests a woman's voice is heard on the flight deck moments before the crash.

Investigators are probing whether a stewardess or a female aide to President Lech Kaczynski was in the cockpit - contrary to regulations - as it went down.

The plane had attempted to land at Smolensk airport in Russia despite receiving clear orders from ground control to fly on to Moscow or Minsk.

As per usual, Andrei Menderei can't comment, because he's mysteriously dead. But at least he knew how to tag the video so it went viral after his death. I do like the fact the Mail spells it out it's "digitally manipulated", but doesn't comment on the voices. I guess they don't know who's feet they'd be trampling on.

'Most of the bodies are so badly mutilated they could only be identified by DNA'. Are we agreed, that's another bullshit science used as a plot device to further a story. But the footage does appear to be real, and does appear to pre-date all the other pictures of the scene. So that's why it is of interest, and there might be a hidden reason why the video was publicly released, the soundtrack, a diversion only.

[rachel]

I'll discuss why I don't take the Andrei Mendierej video seriously in a later post, but what I do find interesting is firstly the fires, which puts this video, on the timeline, ahead of every subsequent photo and piece of video released, and yet Andrei Mendierej is not mentioned in any of the Polish explosion theory reports as I can see doing a search on his name. You'd think this would be a crucial piece of visual evidence even though the soundtrack is questionable. I wonder if the Russians purposely released it with the subtext, 'we dare you to use it'..?

This is the cartoon theory of how the plane crashed. It was low enough to hit a tree and lose a third of a wing, but then high enough to subsequently turn upside-down in the air at landing speed without its wing hitting the ground and stopping the spin, landing on its roof.

We see the direction of travel, the wheels end up at the front, the nearest end to the runway. So if it is hitting trees as it crashes, it should knock them over to the left in the orientation we are observing from. So let's see the trees in the Andrei Mendierej video that conveniently disappear in other photos. It's interesting because the Mail Online did give us a hint to look at the trees.

So as he gets his firs glimpse of the undercarriage section we see a tree that is felled, but it is felled towards the crash, so it's been hit from the other side, and it's orientation is more to the right, not the expected left.

As he moves around there is a second tree felled to the right, and that one is the exact opposite than expected. We can see the first tree at the right of the picture, they are not quite lying in the same direction, but they do complement each other to suggest what hit them came from the airport side.

Here's a better look at that second tree and the direction it is lying, the second grab below shows the fire, that's apparently the start of the crash. and we look at the detail, it's all in a line. Those two trees cannot be explained by the official or alternative explanations.

A third felled tree facing the wrong direction, first grab to get its orientation to the crash, second showing the break at its base, and third confirmation its branches are lying in the opposite direction than expected, with the crash fire in the distance.

And finally as he's leaving, the undercarriage is now behind him out of picture to the left, he passes the first tree a lot closer this time. It's at the side of the crash path, but pointing toward it. So the logic is, it was hit from the opposite side.

[rachel]

I know all the ground I am covering, other fakeologists have covered before, but I suspect the best of the discussion is in Polish or Russian. So you remember me saying the plane officially hit the ground around 300m from reaching the runway, it's interesting skimming the official and alternative reports, the proximity to the airport is mostly left out in the diagrams, it's not something they want us to focus on.

I was trying to work out how far the crash was from the people standing at the airport. You know, these people.






Here's an aerial shot from sometime after the accident.

It's close to impossible to see the orange label lettering without clicking the image to view detail, but top left we have A, B, C. This is the area the grabs above are taken, A, the cars in the first grab, B, the cars in the second grab, C, the likely location of parked plane in second grab. Bottom left we have D, E, these are the roads constructed after the crash in order to get to the crash site. F, is the start of the crash site, the building to the left is a new construction and was not there at the time of the crash, G, is roughly where the wheels/undercarriage of the plane we see in the Andrei Mendierej video is. Finally, bottom right, H is the start of the runway.

Now granted, the wooded area blocks a direct view of anyone waiting at the airport from seeing the crash when it happened. Isn't that fortuitous. And we had fog to make visibility even worse. But we can see everything happened on the 'former' military base, and the roads that were built, they allowed the wreckage to be moved without leaving the confines or jurisdiction of the military airport. Do we think that just maybe, like the consecrated ground of a church, the boundaries of military airports have special rules that enforces a different set of laws that are not civil in nature. Remember this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smolensk_North_Airport

Smolensk North Airport (IATA: LNX, ICAO: UUBS) "Smolensk North Military Aerodrome" is a decommissioned military airbase in Smolensk Oblast, Russia, located 4 km north of the city of Smolensk. It is now used as Smolensk's sole airport for civil and military flights. It has a remote revetment area with 8 pads and a Yakovlev factory at the southeast side of the airfield, the Smolensk Aviation Plant.

The airport was originally built in the 1920s, and it eventually became a class 1 airfield with a runway 2500 m long and 49 m wide, capable of handling planes over 75 tons in weight.

Prior to 1991, it was home to the 401 IAP (401st Interceptor Aviation Regiment, disbanded around 1990), flying MiG-23P aircraft, and the 871 IAP, flying MiG-23 and Su-27.

From 1946 until 2009, the base hosted an airlift unit, the 103 Gv VTAP (103rd Guards Military Air Transport Regiment, flying Ilyushin Il-76 jets. At one point, about 28 Il-76 aircraft were based there.

The regiment was disbanded in late 2009, and since then there have been no active units at the base except for a small airbase command post.

The airfield has been functioning in part as a civilian airport since October 2009.

I was wondering the distance from the crash; another researches already looked at that one.

894 M, just over half a mile walking, but I think the cars, from the Grzegorz Braun video, are little further along the airport just by the entrance, so from my measurement as the crow flies, the waiting cameramen were 1.23 km away from the crash, which converts to three-quarters of a mile, and still under a mile if they took the path around the trees to get to the crash site.

The building block, top left, near the crash, I'm going to guess they were barracks in 2009. Very convenient for the crash site, soldiers therefore could get to or from it with tree cover in a couple of minutes.

[rachel]

When I was looking through some of the English language videos examining the crash site, I came to one particular video from nine years ago that is fascinating. But, interestingly enough, what it suggests doesn't seem to appear again subsequently as far as I can tell doing a search on the academic's name.

Smolensk Crash Investigation: Micro-Detail Comparative Forest Site Analysis, et al.

"Micro-detail comparative forest site analysis using high-resolution satellite imagery" in Smolensk crash investigation by By Chris J Cieszewski, Roger C Lowe, Pete Bettinger, Arun Kumar

This study presents comparative analysis of high-resolution satellite imagery taken on different dates around a detected incident of interest. Under an assumption of a micro-detail land monitoring and disturbance detection interests we compared the patterns of image captured disturbances on the analyzed site and leveraged their interpretation with knowledge base published on relevant subjects.

The incident of interest was the Polish Air Force One TU-154M plane destruction on Apr. 10, 2010. We analyzed the image changes on micro-detail level tracked over time and considered with respect to the patterns of destruction and the plane debris size distribution in space against a broad engineering literature describing destruction patterns of thin walled structures, such as planes and cars. Then, we compared the spatial distribution of the debris between the pictures taken on different dates. Finally, we also considered on ground changes in soil moisture and landscape features between different images.

To learn more about independent Smolensk crash investigation visit Smolensk Crash News Digest: http://bit.ly/1jtya7u

So basically what Chris Cieszewski did was to purchase all the high resolution aerial images available around the date of the crash; this includes an image from 11/4/2010, the day after the crash, and the last one before the crash, 5/4/2010, five days before.

He notices there was apparently snow in early April, but it only stuck in certain areas, these can be seen on the 5/4/2010 image. By coincidence, the patches of snow just happen to correspond directly with where the wreckage of the plane ended up on the 11/4/2010 image. See the red circles on each of the two pictures below for the match.

He dodges answering the question, he's an academic after all. But he does suggest "potentially canvas", it's worth listening to. He knows what he sees, and what it likely means, but he's not prepared to say it out loud.

Do you see that, he mentions there were military manoeuvres at the airport around the timeframe of the crash. Hmm...

[rachel]

I've found a 10 April 2010 post from the blogger who posted the "death pictures" I linked to earlier. Because I'm doing this in real time, I kept an open mind about them, but equally the whole presentation looked staged. Now I'm more familiar with the crash site, the less it makes sense where that picture is supposed to have been taken. There is no recognisable wreckage visible, and having a little look on tineye to see where and when it first appeared, what do you know...

Prison Planet and InfoWars, funnelers of the alternative narrative. It was first seen on May 4, 2010, so nearly a month after the crash. Time enough maybe for an art installation of "dead people in a field" to be commissioned based on the media pictures of the Smolensk plane crash... I wouldn't put it past them. It dawned on me what all the "pile of bricks" artworks in museums are actually about. I'm sure Rena Leinberger could throw in a fake human foot poking out if you commissioned her.

Make believe was all we had left - sculpture of drywall rubble pile by Rena Leinberger

And from part one of the Grzegorz Braun documentary, almost straight away it the Russian media is saying no survivors, and this is parroted by the Polish Ambassador who was waiting at the airport for the plane to arrive. Yet he didn't inspect the crash site and didn't see any bodies, and none of the Polish delegation that arrived in the first plane did either. Yet this was the official line to be pushed from the Polish government...

But to the Lame Cherry April 10 blog where the weather for the day is recorded. The post talks about using maybe salt to induce fog, but as I've shown earlier, the Russian army have heavy-duty smokescreen equipment, and a created fog at the airport would be most likely used to hide what they were up to that morning from potential onlookers.

https://web.archive.org/web/20120314044 ... heory.html

smolensk russia.jpg (21.48 KiB) Viewed 586 times

The condition of "fog" should have no bearing on this, but yet in researching screen grabs for Smolensk, there should not have been fog in the least in that area. Conditions were not 100% humidity, but as the information proves only 60%.

Fog requires in normal circumstances 100% humidity to form. In the extended forecast in Russian no mass fog banks are noted. There was not snow on the ground for thermal inversions, no stagnant air masses, and the most damning evidence of all, the barometric readings were 31 inches which is a high reading.

smolensk.jpg (12.83 KiB) Viewed 586 times

There was no fog and is forecast no fog in Smolensk for the following week after this event of immediate dense fog, but yet the conditions with an east wind showed clear skies, without the heat to burn off fog during the day.

smolensk weather.jpg (29.84 KiB) Viewed 586 times

[rachel]

Since I have touched on deaths in the last post, it's a quandary. The people who give us the two explosions theory are just reading autopsy document supplied by the Russians, and looking at photos and videos from the site. None of them were there or saw any of the dead, the plane parts are still in Russia and the coffins were sealed in Russia before transport to Poland for burial.

In the second part of the Grzegorz Braun documentary, it is stated Donald Tusk hands over the investigation to the Russians and specifically turns down a clause that would have allowed him to choose a team to work with the Russians on the investigation in Russia.

Poles make the crucial decision to pass the investigation into Russian hands, from that moment the presidential flight is given civilian not military status and the entire visit is treated as a private one.

Braun is putting a spin on that. We've got to understand the difference between public and private. Corrupt governments privatise national assets so they can give out contracts protected by confidentiality clauses. Quite obviously if this is a fake event the first thing the Polish Government would want to do is remove the investigation from the public domain where freedom of information requests or court orders might be sort. So first, move it out of the jurisdiction of Poland altogether, and second strip it of any public status. It's now a private agreement between two buddies. This would have been agreed before the actual crash plan was hatched assuming the crash never happened.

Then, from part three of the Grzegorz Braun documentary the Polish chief medical officer is shown stating all the autopsies were observed by Poles. This was later announced to be an untruth, no Polish nationals were involved in the autopsies or saw the content of the 96 caskets before they were sealed in Russia and flown back to Poland for burial.

Then at the end Braun talks about Anna W, the Solidarity Movement founder who was killed in the crash and buried in 2010 without the coffin being opened. Then it was decided to have an exhumation whereupon it was discovered it was the wrong corpse, somehow they managed to track down the correct corpse that clearly was buried somewhere else, dug it up and then reburied her again in 2012...What a load of bollocks, it's one of those devices that is no doubt used to convince us there were bodies in the first place. Instead, given her age, she celebrated her 80th birthday in 2009; maybe she died in 2012 and they just buried her for real then.

------

Next, below is the current state of affairs with regards to corpses and human remains. This doesn't even bend a little to what is observed in photographic and video evidence.

The red dots are alleged dead people, green dot parts of people, so we should be tripping over them in the photos, but then they claim most of the bodies were buried and needed to be dug out. So how did they confirm they were all dead so quickly. And just an aside on the above grab. Look at that logo. If you seriously believed your President and 95 other important Polish people were killed by the Russians, would that be the logo you signed off on. I'm guessing it's meant to be the horizon thing, but we know it's been illustrated purposely to remind us of rifle sights and murder.

I've queued up the video below that pans the crash site, and a grab from it. And under, a picture of an apparent dead body in the same area. A couple of things look to have sightly moved, but we can see the wheel, the orange and green thing to the left, the light green triangular thing, the white square at the back, the two branches, the ball of tumbleweed, but there seems to be something missing in the front in the video. Granted we don't know when the video was taken, but as the crash is reported happening at 10:41 AM, going by that timestamp, the bodies have been there for four hours. You'd think maybe if they hadn't moved them, they might have covered them with something?

Fog (Pol. "Mgla") Smolensk Crash Documentary, Part 1

And fotoforensics gives us an interesting result. See link for detail.
https://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php? ... be.2078237



I can't know for sure, but I would suggest the picture without the bodies was sharpened in the middle fading out to the sides, hence the central white concentration, then the bodies were added, and where they knock out the sharpening, we get black spaces. It's too much of a coincidence that the concentrated black areas just happen to be where the bodies are. It means they are less sharp than the area around them. Why?

Also with this picture, TINEYE only sees it 25 times, so we can guess the only places it appears are conspiracy theory sites that are pushing the Andrei Mendierej video of executions as real, together with this grab.

[rachel]

You know what I've just noticed, the video about the Micro-Detail Comparative Forest Site Analysis that points out there are white shapes in the exact same locations as the crash wreckage five days before the crash; it is nine years old and only has 378 views, and if that's the correct count, two of those views are mine.





The other videos on the channel of a similar age have between 1.5K to 3K. That means likely they are embedded in the website, but that one isn't. They are not interested in what that analysis shows. Why would that be? I suggest because it shows the true state of affairs five days before the apparent crash.

From wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smolensk_air_disaster

The aircraft was a Tupolev Tu-154M of the 36th Special Aviation Regiment of the Polish Air Force (Siły Powietrzne), tail number 101. Built in 1990 at the Kuybyshev Aviation Plant as msn 90A837, it first flew on 29 June 1990. At the time of the accident, the airframe had accumulated more than 5,150 hours in 4,000 cycles. The service life of the Tu-154M is more than 25 years or 30,000 hours or 15,000 cycles (whichever comes first). All three Soloviev D-30KU-154 engines were within the service limits of 24,000 hours or 11,100 cycles.

101 was one of two Tupolev Tu-154s that served as official government jets; the other with a tail number of 102 was a year younger and at the time of the accident it was being overhauled in the Aviakor aviation plant in Samara. The 101 aircraft had undergone a major overhaul in December 2009, and Alexey Gusev, the head of the maintenance plant that carried out the work, told Polish TV that it should not have had technical problems. The crash happened 138 flight-hours after the most recent overhaul.

The aircraft used the callsign Polish Airforce 101, operating flight PLF101. PLF is the ICAO three-letter designator for the Polish Air Force, used to identify the operator of an aircraft by air traffic control.

From that, the Polish Government had two Tupolev Tu-154M planes with tail numbers 101 and 102. As soon as I saw the 102 I couldn't help but think of EVENT 201.

Tupolev Tu-154M 101

Tupolev Tu-154M 102

And at the time of the crash the Tupolev Tu-154M 102 was not in service, instead it was in Samara, Russia. So both planes just happen to be in Russia at the same time on April 10, 2010. I find that fascinating.

According to the Grzegorz Braun documentary, this is Lech Kaczynski and his wife boarding the Tu-154M 101 on April 10, 2010. No one else is seen climbing the stairs of the plane, and the couple seem a little underdressed for standing in a forrest in Russia to observe a Mass. The people filmed there are all in coats, one woman has a scarf on.

Remember he's quoted as saying a couple of years earlier.

Movie director Grzegorz Braun (GB) argued in 2016 (before the exhumations), that one can not be sure, that the delegation of VIP's including the president and the first lady actually left Warsaw, and if they did, one can not be certain their TU-154M crashed in Smolensk. Nor can one be certain they actually died.

If the plane did take off that day, was it the 101 or the 102? - Quite possibly the Tu-154M 101 was already in pieces in Smolensk under camouflage, and instead of the Tu-154M 102 being overhauled in Samara, Russia, it was in Poland pretending to be the Tu-154M 101. Once the event was completed, it returned to Samara to have its call sign turned back into 102.

And I noticed Grzegorz Braun included this little gem.

So it was a New Moon when Lech Kaczynski took his last flight, possibly on Tu-154M 102 pretending to be 101. And 102 are the number of years Semiramis ruled.