I'm going to spend a little time setting the scene. I'm not a forensic scientist, I don't aim to find as many proofs as possible to carpet-bomb other theories. I just set up assumptions and I look for evidence to prove them wrong. If I can prove them wrong, I cross off that particular line of reasoning. What I have found, and why some of my theories seem so outlandish, is I've not been able to cross them off. And the more times I come up with something and think, 'well this will surely prove it wrong', and I find a gap, then the more the coincidences point to it not being "coincidence" at all. Rather I have found the back door used to pull off the trick.
So, a year before the crash...
In 2009, if we suggest the Swine flu pandemic was supposed to look something like the COVID-19 pandemic. Mass vaccination of the whole world, or at least the whole of the European Union. But until they put it into operation in the EU, they didn't know fully the strength of opposition of the people in prominent positions who would tell the WHO to take a running jump when it came to an untested vaccine; - could I be getting back to the
WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty by chance?
This makes sense with regards to the UK and the endless harping on about it by the BBC, at that point in time most people were going, it the bloody flu for crying out loud... I wasn't watching much tv at the time, but I was doing a fair bit of intercity train travel, In coming to a UK train station, they usually have rolling news visuals next to train departures, you can't escape, and you know when you watch with the sound off, it takes on a more keystone cops air about it.
Now on wiki, check out the cases/death numbers, so they were using that metric then it would appear. Apparently Italy had over 3 million cases, and France 2 million; Russia 25,339. So we can deduce the actual trigger point for robbing the world through the purchase of vaccines is likely
Rome.
Wiki: 2009 swine flu pandemic by country
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_swin ... by_country
The whole yarn about keeping countries in lockdowns during COVID-19 was mutating variants, exactly like "
confirmed mutation of H1N1 virus". Again, this map indicates where the complete corruption was in 2009. It clearly surpassed the rest of the world in the intervening decade; commonwealth countries thanks to King Charles III's click, he announced the CORONA VIRUS after all.
- Confirmed mutation of H1N1 virus
We can see why under Jo Biden there is no border between North America and South America, and yet Canadians had to get a vaccine to get in. Look at that map, Rome declaring its territory. Italy, of course... Out of interest, which European country locked down its citizens first for COVID-19?
Italy wasn't it... Fancy that. And France, oh yes, you're
no longer a citizen if you don't get vaccinated. And besides Brazil, we have
China and Ukraine. COVID-19 was like the Swine Flu college reunion, crack out the
TAMIFLU injections all around.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... big-pharma
...The battle over Tamiflu perfectly illustrates the need for full transparency around clinical trials, the importance of access to obscure documentation, and the failure of the regulatory system. Crucially, it is also an illustration of how science, at its best, is built on transparency and openness to criticism, because the saga of the Cochrane Tamiflu review began with a simple online comment.
In 2009, there was widespread concern about a new flu pandemic, and billions were being spent stockpiling Tamiflu around the world. Because of this, the UK and Australian governments specifically asked the Cochrane Collaboration to update its earlier reviews on the drug. Cochrane reviews are the gold-standard in medicine: they summarise all the data on a given treatment, and they are in a constant review cycle, because evidence changes over time as new trials are published. This should have been a pretty everyday piece of work: the previous review, in 2008, had found some evidence that Tamiflu does, indeed, reduce the rate of complications such as pneumonia. But then a Japanese paediatrician called Keiji Hayashi left a comment that would trigger a revolution in our understanding of how evidence-based medicine should work. This wasn't in a publication, or even a letter: it was a simple online comment, posted informally underneath the Tamiflu review on the Cochrane website, almost like a blog comment.
but its positive conclusion was driven by data from just one of the papers it cited: an industry-funded summary of 10 previous trials, led by an author called Kaiser. From these 10 trials, only two had ever been published in the scientific literature. For the remaining eight, the only available information on the methods used came from the brief summary in this secondary source, created by industry. That's not reliable enough.
This is science at its best. The Cochrane review is readily accessible online; it explains transparently the methods by which it looked for trials, and then analysed them, so any informed reader can pull the review apart, and understand where the conclusions came from. Cochrane provides an easy way for readers to raise criticisms. And, crucially, these criticisms did not fall on deaf ears. Dr Tom Jefferson is the head of the Cochrane respiratory group, and the lead author on the 2008 review. He realised immediately that he had made a mistake in blindly trusting the Kaiser data. He said so, without defensiveness, and then set about getting the information needed.
First, the Cochrane researchers wrote to the authors of the Kaiser paper. By reply, they were told that this team no longer had the files: they should contact Roche. Here the problems began. Roche said it would hand over some information, but the Cochrane reviewers would need to sign a confidentiality agreement. This was tricky: Cochrane reviews are built around showing their working, but Roche's proposed contract would require them to keep the information behind their reasoning secret from readers. More than this, the contract said they were not allowed to discuss the terms of their secrecy agreement, or publicly acknowledge that it even existed. Roche was demanding a secret contract, with secret terms, requiring secrecy about the methods and results of trials, in a discussion about the safety and efficacy of a drug that has been taken by hundreds of thousands of people around the world, and on which governments had spent billions. Roche's demand, worryingly, is not unusual. At this point, many in medicine would either acquiesce, or give up. Jefferson asked Roche for clarification about why the contract was necessary. He never received a reply...
What has this got to do with the Polish crash of 96 victims in 2010? Well, I suspect very much this...
Poland's internal swine flu fight
December 6, 2009
https://theworld.org/stories/2009-12-06 ... -flu-fight
WARSAW, Poland — Poland is standing alone against the swine flu, as one of the only European Union member states to refuse to place orders for the H1N1 virus vaccine because of the health minister's concerns about its safety.
But now the country’s human rights ombudsman is threatening the health minister, Ewa Kopacz, with prosecution unless she moves on the vaccine.
Kopacz, who is also a doctor, is worried about the vaccine and is refusing to act until the pharmaceutical companies making the vaccine accept responsibility for any side effects, something they have been excused from by the World Health Organization’s declaration of a pandemic.
“If I had a 100 percent certainty that the vaccine was a panacea for the swine flu, I would certainly buy it,” Kopacz said in an interview with radio station Tok FM, adding that she felt drug companies were “covering up” some information about the vaccines.
“I feel that the research on the vaccines lasted too short a time,” she said.
Kopacz’s stand is very different from most of her European counterparts. Mass vaccination programs have begun in France, Germany and Scandinavia, as well as in central European countries like Hungary.
Her position has put her at odds with Janusz Kochanowski, who heads Poland’s human rights office, and worries that Poland is completely unprepared for dealing with a potential swine flu epidemic. He is toying with the idea of filing charges against Kopacz.
“What is the ombudsman supposed to do when he is powerless and ignored?” Kochanowski asked in a Tok FM interview. “I wake up with this issue and go to sleep with it, because my back is up against the wall and I don’t see any other answer.”
Despite Kopacz' medical background, there are concerns that she is taking a potential risk if the current influenza season gets much worse. Kochanowski has said that he doesn’t know how many people’s deaths Kopacz will have on her conscience. He has called on Poles to inoculate themselves in other European countries where the vaccination is available.
A deputy health minister, in turn, has threatened to refer Kochanowski to the prosecutor’s office for complicating the ministry’s work.
As of Saturday, health authorities have said that 38 people have died in Poland from the swine flu and about 750 have been infected. However, the true level of infections is impossible to determine, both because people with milder cases tend not to report them, and because Poland has very few tests to confirm the presence of the H1N1 virus. Most of the tests have to be performed in neighboring Germany.
As well as lacking tests, the Polish health care system also needs more equipment like artificial lungs, to keep patients with severe influenza cases breathing.
The Polish media has been consumed with the swine flu story, reporting every death and serious case. So far there has been no panic like in neighboring Ukraine, where the country was paralyzed with fear a couple of weeks ago, with schools being shut down and thousands donning generally ineffective face masks to protect themselves against the virus.
Although there is something of the hypochondriac in the Polish character — garlic cures and energy treatments are popular – it is more than balanced by a conspiratorial worldview which would subscribe to the idea of pharmaceutical companies keeping knowledge of the side effects of vaccines to themselves, as well as a suspicion of bureaucracy, including the health ministry.
But if the disease takes a turn for the worse, then Kopacz’s stand could have political ramifications. She is a minister in the center-right government of Donald Tusk, and Kochanowski is a political ally of Lech Kaczynski, Poland’s right-wing president and Tusk’s likely rival in next year’s presidential elections.
On his web page, Kochanowski’s office has a note for every patient killed by the swine flu virus.
So, the health minister, Ewa Kopacz, was part of the centre-right government of Donald Tusk, and the human rights ombudsman, Janusz Kochanowski, was a political ally of the late Lech Kaczynski. Isn't this the wrong way around? I would suggest, Poland, like most other countries has a Uni-party pretending to be left and right. It was suggest, in the upcoming elections in 2010, Lech Kaczynski was likely to loose power. So in creating a distraction with one hand, the actual trick can be performed with the other. And we discover via part three of the Grzegorz Braun documentary, Ewa Kopacz is the same health minister who claimed to have personally supervised the identification of the bodies in Smolensk, when later it was revealed, no Polish specialists saw the bodies.
And what do you know...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ewa_Kopacz
In 2009 Kopacz gained some degree of international fame by requesting pharmaceutical companies to present the advantages of swine flu vaccines, and demanding they take full responsibility for the side effects. She advised the Polish government to wait until proper testing had been done on the vaccine before investing in it, citing the fact that
seasonal flu exceeds the current WHO criteria for pandemic every year but there has been no declaration of a pandemic of this much more dangerous seasonal flu. The Polish government refused to purchase the vaccine in question.
On 22 September 2014
Ewa Kopacz was sworn in as Prime Minister, after Donald Tusk resigned to take office as President of the European Council, and formed a cabinet. On 8 November 2014 she was sworn in as leader of the Civic Platform.
In her first major policy speech as prime minister, Kopacz promised more continuity in Poland's foreign policy.
She said her government would not stand for a break-up of neighboring Ukraine and would push for a greater U.S. military presence in Poland as a deterrent to possible Russian aggression. For domestic political reasons she decided to replace Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski with her party rival Grzegorz Schetyna. Instead, she made Sikorski the speaker of the parliament.
At her first EU summit in October 2014, Kopacz managed to persuade the other Member States that
Poland deserved lucrative concessions as part of a deal to cut European carbon emissions. After the European Commission opened infringement proceedings against Poland for violating particle pollution levels and was investigating reports that it has also exceeded limits on nitrogen oxides, Kopacz's government declared 2015 to be the Year of Improving Air Quality and backed a
proposal to empower regional authorities to clamp down on pollution from vehicles and from the burning of coal and wood in homes.
She has a bit of a man look, but I think it is more likely that's because part of her face is plastic. The hair, forehead and eyebrows, and the troweled on eye makeup to hide it. Only fake persons become Prime Ministers.
