I thought I'd return to this post. Anyone who has looked at the content of Muppet Show will have an idea of my thinking, so faced with 96 alleged deaths in Smolensk, I was clearly going to apply the same logic. But where to start when I'm not Polish and I don't know Polish politics? It seemed clear once I discovered the then Health Secretary, Ewa Kopacz, made a false statement to parliament regarding Polish officials observing the autopsies of the crash victims that allegedly took place in Moscow, and then she subsequently became Polish Prime Minister...well, it was self selecting, she was the person I would look for in the photos of the dead. I put a bet on her being there.
rachel wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 6:45 pm
I'll give you where i think one of the 96 went. But the imagery available for the dead is generally very poor, meaning we will never really know.
On the left is Ewa Kopacz, Polish Health Secretary at the time of the Smolensk crash. You know, the woman who lied to Parliament about Polish officials being present to observe the Smolensk dead in Moscow. The same person who later became Prime Minister of Poland. And on the right is Joanna Agatka-Indecka, Smolensk crash victim. You really have to look at the close-up to see they have a very similar tilted wide smile and wide set eyes. But whether it is her or not, it kind of proves the point. The exact same person could turn up with different shaped eyebrows and a different hairstyle, and if they had a different name, we mostly wouldn't be able to tell for sure if it is the same person or not unless we saw them in real life.
After matching someone, I generally like giving it a couple of months to see if I see the same things. So let's do it. Above, we see Ewa Kopacz with pencil thin eyebrows compared to Joanna Agatka-Indecka. The noses are different, but I always ignore this as it's the easiest part of the face to change. The position of the mouth in relation to the eyes cannot be altered, so that's an anchor. Mouth width can be altered slightly, but it is usually apparent if you look carefully. So let's first look at another picture of Joanna Agatka-Indecka and make some observations about the face.
She's wearing a different set of clothes and eye makeup in the second picture, so it's not the same day. This confirms there is something odd going on with her teeth; we see two darker areas in both pictures. I suggest, looking closer, she is wearing some sort of temporary veneers, and that's likely bonding glue we see. In other pictures, her teeth generally look white.
It might be we are seeing her natural eyebrows, but they seem somewhat odd shaped. There is also an apparent ridge where the inner part of the eyebrow on the left is missing, and we see, more faint, the same on the right. That suggests she might be wearing an appliance which is designed to thicken her eyebrows; and if we look at the tip of her nose, it looks too thick, therefore fake. So likely, the two areas are probably connected with one appliance. The eyeliner she wears is thick on the outside, but is only applied just past half way into the centre of the lid; this is used to give the eyes a somewhat heavy lidded, come-to-bed look.
If we move down to the lips, the left upper lip is fuller than the right side. We actually see that the right side cuts in more and is smaller. Similarly, the lower lip has a more prominent square shape at the left side, the right curving up with the mouth corner higher on the right than it is on the left. We see a ridge at the centre of the lower lip. On the left we see a dimple, and above the dimple, a bit of a shadowy line inside the smile line. I'm not really interested in her beauty spots as I'm convinced these are always added to fool us into thinking it's a different person.
So let's get up another side-by-side, and this one is more convincing than the first. In the close-up, to change the apparent shape of her eyes, Ewa Kopacz does a similar thing as before, she lines her top lids half way, but then continues the line on the inner rims to the tear duct, this is to give her eyes a more cat-like appearance. She then uses white highlighter at the inner corners of the eyes next to the nose, this makes the area look bigger. It's all an optical illusion together with her thinner arched eyebrows; the point, to make the eyes look a different shape.
Look at the mouth, the same tilt, the right side being higher, the same curl at the corner. On the left, the upper lip is bigger than the right. The lower lip has the crease in the centre, and we see the same shadow line inside the left smile crease. Partial evidence of a dimple to the left. Then to the detail below with just her mouth, the lipstick is being used to change the mouth characteristics and shape, but look at the general line shadows proportions and spacing. It's the same face.
We can conclude
Joanna Agatka-Indecka did not die in Smolensk on the 10th April 2010, instead her alter-ego
Ewa Kopacz became Prime Minister of Poland from 22 September 2014 to 16 November 2015. Is it therefore likely any of the other 95 people listed died that day? And yet Poland's (take-the) PIS party propagates the ongoing lie that 96 of Poland's Intelligentsia where murdered by the Russians that day. And how many millions since 2010 have Polish taxpayers been defrauded with the never-ending gravy train of independent reports and analysis of simulated data relating to the fake crash?