The Labour Files: The Purge

All info related to the new biggest hoax of our time.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

The Labour Files: The Purge

Unread post by rachel »

Jeremy Corbyn was leader of the Uk Labour party between 12 SEPTEMBER 2015 - 4 APRIL 2020. I have some very good personal knowledge of the September 2015 time that brought in to power, and looking back on it, it is my view he didn't by chance win the Labour leadership, but instead he was choreographed in for the BREXIT storyline, and as that ended on 31st January 2020, he was removed to make way for Keir Starmer and the COVID-19 storyline.

Look at the dates, they fit, and there was a three month leadership election preceding that 4th April date. The point was to hook a section of LEXITERS and pull them into the REMAIN camp. You don't have to win everyone, just enough to swing the result. This is what I highlighted in this post.
rachel wrote: Mon Aug 22, 2022 4:56 pm I highlight this because it was the beginning of my awakening. All the Leftwing talking heads being pro-EU, vote STAY, then in lockstep, they all unilaterally said, "actually, maybe we should leave the EU in a LEXIT".... LEFT-EXIT ... the point, to hook the leftwing EXITERS and pull them into the fold with their pretend-leave-narrative. They had this view for maybe a month or two, then one-by-one picked apart their own argument for LEXIT and were back where they started, REMAIN. The only hold out was Paul Mason, and right on cue together with Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn a month before the vote...
Anyway, there has been a data-drop of information about the Labour Party, 1998-2020 I understand. So this thread is really a reference pointing to it, to see if there is any logical reason to change the stated opinion above.


The Labour Files: The Purge I Al Jazeera Investigations
https://www.ajiunit.com/article/unprece ... our-party/


The leaked documents, obtained by Al Jazeera, reveal how party officials smear and intimidate rivals.

23 SEP 2022

Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit (I-Unit) has obtained the largest leak in British political history, exposing how unelected officials undermined democracy within the Labour Party.

The leaked data comprises 500 gigabytes of documents, emails, video and audio files from the Labour Party dating from 1998 to 2021. The I-Unit will be releasing a series of reports on the leaked files over the coming week.

The data reveals how the party’s bureaucrats, whose nominal function is to serve the interests of the party, attempted to undermine members supportive of Jeremy Corbyn, Labour’s leader from 2015 to 2020.

Until his election as party leader in September 2015, Corbyn was a little-known figure in British politics, active in grassroots activism, from the anti-war movement to the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

The first unequivocally socialist leader of the party since the 1980s, he rode a wave of popular discontent against the political establishment, standing on a platform of public ownership of key industries, a strengthened welfare state, and an end to the austerity measures imposed by the Conservative government at that time.

The Labour Files show, however, that inside the Labour Party discontent was brewing, leading to internal battles over which side of the party – the left-wing “Corbynites” or the pre-2015 centrists – would have control.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: The Labour Files: The Purge

Unread post by rachel »

Keir Starmer's Labour Party accused of 'lawlessness' in explosive new documentary
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics ... -files-spt
Released by Al Jazeera, it is described by the broadcaster as the "largest leak in British political history". The “leak” includes data obtained like documents, email correspondence and video files from the party spanning 1998 to 2021. In the documents, it is alleged that Labour Party bureaucrats tried to "undermine members supportive of Jeremy Corbyn”.

The investigation says that, as the Left and Right of the party battled for control, Mr Corbyn's supporters were "smeared with false accusations of abusive behaviour" including homophobia and antisemitism.

It also alleges that local branches of the Labour Party were suspended to prevent local members from holding Labour Party meetings.

The report cites the 2021 race to become Mayor of the City of Liverpool. Anna Rothery, councillor from the city and aligned with Mr Corbyn, threw her hat in the ring, and was selected to be on the shortlist before being called for an unexpected second interview in front of a five-person panel, which she claimed was hostile.

After the interview, Ms Rothery was removed from the shortlist, with Labour later claiming it had taken the decision after giving “careful consideration to the additional information presented to it”.


Ms Rothery sought a High Court injunction to keep her on the shortlist but lost her case and was ordered to pay £65,000 in legal costs.

In the documentary, Ms Rothery says: "It's a completely despicable place to find ourselves in after people have made so many sacrifices over so many decades, fighting for a party that represents the working classes.

"To end up at this point, where we are being betrayed by our own party, it's a big no-no in my eyes."

In November, Ms Rothery announced that she had quit the Labour Party, in the process accusing Labour's leadership of being "more interested in carrying out internal party vendettas than standing up for our people, our black community and our LGBTQIA community."

I'm of the opinion that was about something entirely different. Labour use diversity to bar people from getting onto the shortlist. Firstly you had to be a woman, and then I suspect when real women started coming forward that were not part of the correct click, you had to be a black woman.

https://www.lwn.org.uk/all_women_shortlists

Labour have more women MPs than male MPs and have been warned their policy is discriminatory and they risk legal challenge if they continue for selection of MPs. But that is an aside, Anna Rothery fulfilled both of those categories of being a woman and being black, so she had to be removed another way.

rachel wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:14 am I know this is UK centred, but think about the odds of the following if we truly lived in a democracy. Liverpool for some reason still has a City Mayor, the post should have been scrapped because the city also has a Metro Mayor, both held by Labour. City Mayor Joe Anderson, OBE, was raided by police in 2020 which ended with him not being prosecuted, but stepping down as Mayor. Instead of scrapping the post and diverting the money saved to tackle poverty in the city, mayoral elections were run. Who won? Joanne Anderson. What? Is she related? No. But do you see something?

J. ANDERSON was replaced by J. ANDERSON; do we think that is by chance? Or could it be, J. ANDERSON needed to be replaced by J. ANDERSON, and the police should have actually prosecuted the first J. ANDERSON instead of letting Labour install a second J. ANDERSON to legally continue whatever the first J. ANDERSON was doing before the arrest.

I'll continue this thought in my next post.
Cognitive Dissident
Posts: 570
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2022 4:37 am
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 134 times

Re: The Labour Files: The Purge

Unread post by Cognitive Dissident »

Snap election. Starmer in.

Bad to worse.

The Deagel forecast for the UK is looking more and more accurate.
User avatar
rachel
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:04 pm
Location: Liverpool, England
Has thanked: 1312 times
Been thanked: 1611 times

Re: The Labour Files: The Purge

Unread post by rachel »

I agree, Starmer and Labour are worse, worse because they are considered the "Good Guys", so just like in the U.S. with the Liberals, they can get away with ten times the damage.
xileffilex
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:57 pm
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: The Labour Files: The Purge

Unread post by xileffilex »

Watched it. I get the feeling that our political parties are infiltrated by intel / the "security" services. The "anti-semitism" psy-op around Corbyn was a good example. I don't think it's any different in the unions. If the intelligence services weren't involved, they'd be seen to be acting sloppily. Democracy has to be controlled for those higher up the pyramid.
Post Reply