Excess deaths in different countries 2022 onwards

[xileffilex]

A different, but very clear presentation relating to England

[rachel]

You know my feelings about Katie...the snake in the grass.

'member when the rest of us couldn't travel without a jab, she swanned off the U.S. to stand with Trump. Then Australia, which she apparently got thrown out of. I suggest this as a reason why she went to Australia.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/ ... rveillance

Germany 'may revert to typewriters' to counter hi-tech espionage
Tue 15 Jul 2014

German politicians are considering a return to using manual typewriters for sensitive documents in the wake of the US surveillance scandal.

The head of the Bundestag's parliamentary inquiry into NSA activity in Germany said in an interview with the Morgenmagazin TV programme that he and his colleagues were seriously thinking of ditching email completely.

Asked "Are you considering typewriters" by the interviewer on Monday night, the Christian Democrat politican Patrick Sensburg said: "As a matter of fact, we have – and not electronic models either". "Really?" the surprised interviewer checked. "Yes, no joke," Sensburg responded.

"Unlike other inquiry committees, we are investigating an ongoing situation. Intelligence activities are still going on, they are happening," said Sensburg.

Last week, Merkel's government asked the CIA's station officer in Germany to leave the country after an employee of the German intelligence agency BND confessed to passing confidential documents to the US secret service. The ongoing investigation prompted speculation that the CIA may have actively targeted the Bundestag's NSA inquiry committee.

Last year, the Russian government reportedly took similar measures after the extent of US electronic surveillance was revealed by the whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The federal guard service, a powerful body tasked with protecting Russia's highest-ranking officials, put in an order for 20 Triumph Adler typewriters, which create unique "handwriting", that allows the source of any documents created on them to be traced.

But judging by the reaction to Sensburg's comments, manual typewriters are unlikely to be widely adopted in German political circles.

"Before I start using typewriters and burning notes after reading, I'd rather abolish the secret services," tweeted Martina Renner, an opposition member of the parliamentary committee investigating the activities of US and other intelligence agencies in Germany. Sahra Wagenknecht, Die Linke party's deputy chair, described the suggestion as grotesque.

Christian Flisek, the SPD's representative on the committee, told Spiegel Online: "This call for mechanical typewriters is making our work sound ridiculous. We live in the 21st century, where many people communicate predominantly by digital means. Effective counter-espionage works digitally too. The idea that we can protect people from surveillance by dragging them back to the typewriter is absurd."

Yet while Sensburg may regret his comments, there is little question that revelations about digital surveillance have triggered a fundamental rethink about how the German government conducts its communications.

"Above all, people are trying to stay away from technology whenever they can," wrote Die Welt. "Those concerned talk less on the phone, prefer to meet in person. More coffees are being drunk and lunches eaten together. Even the walk in the park is increasingly enjoying a revival."

Last November, in the immediate aftermath of the revelations of NSA monitoring of Merkel's mobile phone, the German government instructed its MPs to only use encrypted mobile phones for sensitive calls. The use of iPhones for intra-governmental communications is reportedly banned.

Since then, some have even questioned whether the state-of-the-art "Secusmart" encryption mobile currently used by the chancellor is safe from bugging attempts.

The Bundestag's NSA inquiry committee has found its own way of protecting itself from surveillance: before every meeting, members leave their mobiles in a metal box in an adjacent room, in which any remaining snippets of conversation are drowned out by the music of Edvard Grieg played at full blast.

She is an authorised voice, just like Jordan Peterson, just like John Campbell, just like Bret Weinstein.

[xileffilex]

Aaron and Melissa catch up on declining birth rates

We are no longer replacing ourselves

[pasterno]

Aaron and Melissa catch up on declining birth rates

We are no longer replacing ourselves

I think the "birth rate" topic is part of the standard divisive fearmongering propaganda.

1 side is trained to believe we have too many people, that we are killing the earth with breathing, the other side is trained to believe "we" will go extinct, there will be no more kids and we will just all die lonely.

Both groups are fearful as intended. Fear is good, plus plus good.

The fact we see both sides of the fearmongering on YouTube is a signal we are part of a wanted false dialectic that harms us. This one divided on the classic left / right spectre.

Similar to "corona kills" vs "vax kills", "white man kills" vs "black man kills" etc etc.

[xileffilex]

No, not at all. I think Mielissa [and others] are merely pointing out that we are going into unknown territory in which the ponzi population growth system has suddenly been halted and reversed and there will be an excess of old people in developed countries with not enough youngsters working, paying the pensions of the retired and looking after their health issues, not to mention absence of manufacturing workers.
Something will obviously turn up, whether it be mass extermination of the oldies [c.f. the millions of abortions in China] or changed economic circumstances of some/all or mass migration.
There is no either/ or choice, it's already been taken by women in the "west" and we have to deal with the consequences.

[aSHIFT.]

I lean more towards pasterno's views than towards the hypersensationalistic conspie drivel tbh.

I go back to my own Access World. Did I see "en masse" / elevated / sudden deaths in my environment because of whatever they put in those cocktails, no.

Does that mean anything for the rest of the world, also no, but for my world, my perception, it does.

When the carnarratives (carnie narratives) do NOT align with my own world observations, there is a problem.

And yes, I think the fearmongering works from both sides and by that they are trying to label people as "anti-vaxxers". I don't call myself that, and it creates an extra punchbag for the hordes of convinced enormies shilling for BigPharma.

Also, I think the fearmongering itself does much more harm than the actual chemical substances injected into the bodies. Making it possible that an un-vaxxed but constantly busy with this vax human, so affected by it, becomes unhealthier than the vaxxed normie who doesn't care. The irony!

As a rule I think it is foolish to be afraid of things that don't matter to you.

[rachel]

Today ONS announced that those pesky 'excess deaths' will now be calculated by a new improved method.

Basically this fantastic, new 'method' wipes the bodies piled high from 30K+ to just 11K

Hey Presto - Problem solved!

Excess deaths?

What excess deaths??

[xileffilex]

And this is the best that one of the main academic covid-maniacs and jab-pushers can come up with....


You don't need to " better guess" the changing age distribution of the UK population or the age distribution of hundreds of thousands of mainly young migrants recently imported, over just a couple of years [i.e. not really much change at all in the proportion of elderly or vulnerable people in the population]

[xileffilex]

or to put it another way, [better]

[rachel]

https://x.com/TheRustler83/status/1759987294746910901

Estimating excess deaths in the UK, methodology changes: February 2024
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulation ... bruary2024

The new ‘Statistical Model’ method has removed 27,000 excess deaths in&since 2020

7,000 from 2020
20,000 from 2021-2023

Are they hiding the harms of lockdown & the vaccine?

The ONS previously used a rolling 5-year-average to set the baseline

It wasn’t perfect, but it was the standard method used around the world

The ‘new method’ raises the 2023 baseline from 553,835 to 572,239 (+18,400)

Which dilutes excess death figures - and hides harms

“The new and current methods estimate similar numbers of excess deaths during the pandemic…”

Except the new method actually deletes 30,000 excess deaths from the records …

Most of them AFTER the vaccine roll out …

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulation ... bruary2024

The ONS reasoning is that we need to adjust for population growth and ageing

From 2021 to 2023, the population increased by 1%

Median age / Life expectancy stayed static

Yet they increased the baseline by +7.5%

The numbers don’t add up

We see you #ONS