DoctorMindbender
2 days ago
That guy at the end is heartbreaking. Couldn't imagine being in that situation.
WeDoNotConsent
1 day ago (edited)
So the people that expose the shills are correct, but they too are shills?
What was the point of the video at the end?
Reply
Sun Sioux
1 day ago
Yes it would be nice to know why that video was inserted? To show that there was real harm and real victims from the 911 ?
Reply
CalcifiedLies
1 day ago (edited)
lol....it's hard to explain without examples. To break it down in the simplest, easiest way possible: a "shill" might be allowed to expose Alex Jones as a "shill", be correct in doing so, but also simultaneously and intentionally promote unrelated disinformation at the same time. For example this hypothetical "shill" correctly exposes Alex Jones in some way but simultaneously promotes QAnon. Even though by design this hypothetical entity is a "shill" it is allowed to expose another "shill" Alex Jones in an attempt to gain credibility because pretty much every real person doing this talks about the problem of controlled opposition. This simple example has been going on for years and works quite well: "AJ is misleading you but I'm not like him and I have the real truth" etc etc.
Another layer deeper you will find this tactic being employed in each individual conspiracy theory "camp". For example "Those flat earthers are the controlled opposition "shill" flat earthers, I am the one true flat earther". Or "Those other gematria channels are the "shill" channels, I am the only real gematria truther". Or "Those other channels are fake christian truthers, I am the real christian truther". Or "Those other truthers are the fake NDE reincarnation soul trap truthers, I am the only real NDE reincarnation soul trap truther".
And so on. This forces people to choose sides and does a great job of making everyone's collective energy one big toxic mess.
The point about this that I make in the vid was just an observation about how the tactic has been evolving more recently. If you go back and listen to it now it should make more sense, assuming of course that this is a genuine comment left in good faith and not passive-aggressive trolling. Either way, thanks for providing the opportunity to clarify the idea
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Reply
WeDoNotConsent
15 hours ago
Also, what was the point of the video at the end?
How did you determine that was authentic?
Steve has so far ignored the question of why the shock video was inserted at the end. It will be revealing to see if he addresses it.