Someone responded to me to say:
Alphonse Faggiolo calls this sort of thing "patriot mythology". In law where is meant "man" it says so, when it's meant for both man and corporations, it says "persons".
What this means, I don't know.
Perhaps it is worth considering that Alphonse and other legal gurus, are
alternative legal gurus. This is to say, they are the response to the MSM law. They do not have fakology hats on. While they may mean well, they are also invested in it. Another alternative guru example from virology, might be those like RFK or DelBigtree - they object to the vaccines but believe in the virus. Their positions depend on an underlying illusion.
I'm saying law is a joke. The definitions in the dictionary are flexible - and can mean whatever "they" want it to mean. But here, we don't need to try very hard to see what might be meant. The dictionaries say feudal relation, with man as the vassal to a lord! By mutual contract!
To me, saying 'I am a man' in a court of law sounds very equivalent to saying 'I wear a mask to improve my respiratory health'. In doing so, you are demanding your right to be a feudal vassal, like mask wearers are demanding more instructions from their health authorities to keep them safe.
For alternative law gurus, laws are NOT just a bunch of words written by people like them, and abided by on account of the years of training we all receive. Alternative law gurus believe the elite are forced to hold to these laws too (for some reason, yet to be revealed). The most common reason given for the elite being subject to these laws is that law is based on God's word - the bible. But then you have to believe that the bible is God's word. If however, you believe that the bible was written by men, you have to wonder if there is any foundation to law at all?
In fact, law does not have any reasonable foundation. It's
all convention and training. There is no objective foundation for law. That there is something more to
law, is like viruses - illusion, backed by convention and experts.
The interpretation can be or become whatever is needed. A man can become (or already is) 'a vassal to a lord'.
In law, in viruses, in all illusions - it remains my position that what is required is "conscious uncoupling", as Gwenyth Paltrow likes to say. Uncouple oneself from illusions. Act upon the things you know and have personally verified.
PS the initial photograph of the definition of man in this thread are
first - from Black Law Dictionary, first edition
second - from Black Law Dictionary, ninth edition
